tight gas in the
play

Tight Gas in the Netherlands A Study Proposal EBN Exploration Day - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tight Gas in the Netherlands A Study Proposal EBN Exploration Day 23 May 2016 1 1 Why a Tight Gas Study Proposal The Netherlands contains circa 50 discoveries with about 100 200 bcm undevelopped gas in tight reservoirs Several


  1. Tight Gas in the Netherlands A Study Proposal EBN Exploration Day 23 May 2016 1 1

  2. Why a Tight Gas Study Proposal • The Netherlands contains circa 50 discoveries with about 100 – 200 bcm undevelopped gas in tight reservoirs • Several successful and unsuccessful tight gas appraisal/developments have taken place • Infrastructure is aging • Time is running out for tight gas field appraisal / development • EBN study demonstrates good commercial opportunities with tight gas stimulation 2 2 EBN Schulte, Lutgert en Asschert, 2012

  3. Tight Gas Study Proposal • PanTerra proposes to categorize and map offshore tight gas discoveries and fields in Rotliegend and Bunter reservoirs • PanTerra is in a unique position for 2910 plugs < 1mD this study because of its: – database and experience with core studies – geological knowledge of the Netherlands – experienced G&G and reservoir PanTerra database, NLOG data engineering department – access to stimulation and other experts 3 3

  4. Tight Gas Study Proposal • Categorize and describe offshore tight gas discoveries in Rotliegend and Bunter reservoirs • Collect, study and integrate: – Core descriptions (Depositional system, facies, diagenesis) – Core experiments (mineral and clay content, porosity, permeability, capillary pressure, electrical properties a,m,n) • Define burial history (literature, wells and seismic) • Petrophysical consistent log evaluation • Identify tight rock classes • Integrate SCAL data for a hydraulic rock-typing approach – pore throat radius – relative permeability measurements: What is “mobile gas”? • Collect, evaluate and integrate well test, stimulation and production data and correlate them with the rock types defined above. • Describe common tight gas factors and differences – Can sweet-spots be identified – Recommend which stimulation techniques work best – Define best practice to calculate production forecasts and recovery 4 4

  5. None Propriatary Study • Estimated start: Summer 2016 • Duration: About one year • Workscope: to be framed with sponsors • PanTerra seeks sponsors for this project • Cost estimate: Pending study framework 5 5

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend