Three years on, where are we now? Thursday 15 th November 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

three years on where are we now
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Three years on, where are we now? Thursday 15 th November 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Navigating the SEN Maze Three years on, where are we now? Thursday 15 th November 2018 Transition Event East Hayley Mason Senior Solicitor Please note: THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY AND IS NOT TO


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Navigating the SEN Maze – Three years on, where are we now?

Thursday 15th November 2018 Transition Event East Hayley Mason – Senior Solicitor

slide-2
SLIDE 2

THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE RE- PRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR RELIED UPON. PLEASE SEEK SPECIFIC LEGAL ADVICE AS TO YOUR OWN INDIVIDUAL CASE.

2

Please note:

slide-3
SLIDE 3

In the media

“ Children with SEN and disabilities are being failed by a system “on the verge of crisis” as demand for specialist support soars and threatens to bankrupt local authorities.” “Parents of children with SEND are increasingly locked in prolonged and costly disputes with councils across England who are too often failing to deliver on their legal obligations.” More than 1.2 million school pupils – about 15% of all those in England – have some kind of SEND, according to the DFE. Approximately 253,000 (3% of all pupils) still have a Statement or an Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP), a legally binding document detailing the additional support that child needs. “As a result, many of the most vulnerable children in society end up without the support to which they are entitled, and are out of school for months – even years – as parents battle to secure the right provision to meet their child’s needs.”

3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Appeals heard by the special educational needs and disability tribunal have nearly doubled in the past two years. According to the most recent figures, parents are successful in 89% of tribunal hearings, prompting concerns that local authorities are making poor decisions, delaying vulnerable children’s access to education.

Between 2011-12 and 2015- 16, the tribunal heard about 800 cases a year; in 2016-17 the number rose to 1,600 in the fallout after CFA 2014 came into effect. Facts, figures and trends

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A high number of pupils are going without the correct support – Why?

Possible explanations?

  • 1. LA Officers do not read the legislation – unlikely
  • 2. LA Officers seriously think that Local Authority

policy overrides legislation - unlikely

  • 3. Is it a budget issue? – Try it on and see if the

parent will disappear? - perhaps

  • 4. Parents misinformed/misadvised as to their

legal rights - often

5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Entitlement

There are two classes of children those with an EHC Plan and those without.

➢ Any parent, young person or school can request an EHC Needs Assessment under section 36(1) of the Children and Families Act 2014. ➢ It does NOT have to be the school who requests this.

6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

The EHC Needs Assessment

The Application process does NOT have to be laborious. Section 36 does not require any particular form(s) to be filled out. Particularly important for schools who do not have time. One simple A4 page is still a valid application – too much information is sometimes detrimental to your application.

7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Legal Test The Legal Test has not changed. Under S36(8) of the Children & Families Act 2014: the Local Authority must secure an EHC Needs assessment if the Authority is of the opinion that : - (a) The child or young person has or MAY have special educational needs (b) It MAY be necessary for special educational provision to be made for the child or young person.

8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

What is ‘necessary’?

  • Unhelpful for parents but there is no set “list”
  • The word ‘necessary’ falls somewhere between really

useful and essential. Buckinghamshire County Council v HW (SEN) [2013] UKUT 0470 (AAC)

  • What is ‘necessary’ is a matter to be deduced rather

than defined. It’s determination will vary according to circumstances of the particular case and may well involve a considerable degree of judgement. Hertfordshire

County Council v (1) MC & (2) KC SEN [2016] UKUT 385 (AAC)
  • It does mean all requests must be considered.
9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Misinformation – often post 16

“You don’t need an EHC Plan for that, that is Social Care”.

Special Educational Provision has been redefined. “Healthcare provision

  • r

social care provision which educated or trains a child or young person is to be treated as special educational provision (instead of healthcare provision or social care provision)”.

Section 21(5) of The Children and Families Act 2014.

10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Misinformation – high functioning Autism Often high-functioning autistic children who are not visibly failing.

Para 6.23 Code of Practice “It should not be assumed that attainment in line with chronological age means that there is no learning difficulty or disability. Some learning difficulties occur across a range of cognitive ability and left unaddressed may lead to frustration, which may manifest itself as disaffection, emotional or behavioural difficulties”. Hertfordshire County Council v (1) MC & (2) KC SEN 2016 UKUT 385 (AAC) on this issue.

11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Many students with Dyslexia/Dyscalculia do have an EHC Plan
  • Working with the BDA and a number of independent EP’s on this
  • Independent Schools also on board

A true classic…

We don’t provide EHC Plans for specific learning difficulties i.e. Dyslexia

slide-13
SLIDE 13

All parents who want to end up with an EHC Plan, the first step is the request for an EHC Needs Assessment. If you cannot get past this hurdle, you cannot get an EHC Plan.

But the system is reliant on parents applying…

slide-14
SLIDE 14

EHC Needs Assessment Process Timescales – What happens next?

Once parents/school have requested an EHC Needs Assessment

  • The LA have 6 weeks to make a decision (if answer is no – Parental

Appeal to the SEND Tribunal).

  • At 16 weeks the LA must make decision whether to issue EHC Plan
  • r not (if answer is no – Parental Appeal to the SEND Tribunal).
  • The LA must issue a Draft Plan at 18 weeks - Parent has 15 days for

comment.

  • Finalisation of EHC Plan is 20 weeks from the EHC Needs

Assessment request (if unhappy with content – Parental Appeal).

14

These deadlines should not be extended. If the LA miss a deadline this is easily resolved by a simple Pre-Action letter.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

EHC Needs Assessment Process

The list of assessments which should be undertaken for a new EHCP

(Regulation 6 of The Special Educational Needs & Disability Regulations 2014 No1330)

is the same as a transfer from a Statement to an EHCP

(Regulation 18 of the Children & Families Transitional & Savings Provision) (No2 Order) 2014 No 2270).

15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

EHC Needs Assessment Process

The list of assessments which should be undertaken for a new EHCP

(Regulation 6 of The Special Educational Needs & Disability Regulations 2014 No1330)

16

Full EHC Needs Assessment needs to be carried out. Needs and Provision should NOT be simply “cut and pasted” from a child’s

  • ld Statement to their new EHC Plan.

Advices are:

  • Parent
  • Head/SENCO
  • Medical
  • Educational Psychological
  • Social Care
  • Hearing & visual impairment where relevant
slide-17
SLIDE 17

The EHC Plan – When You Get It

The EHC Plan is a complex twelve section document (as section H is in 2 parts). Section A – parent’s/child’s views Section B – Child or young person’s Special Educational Needs Section C - Health needs related to their SEN Section D – Social Care needs related to their SEN Section E – SEN outcomes Section F – Special Educational Provision Section G – Health provision Section H1 – Social Care provisions resulting from Section 2 of the Chronically sick & Disabled Persons Act 1970 Section H2 – Social Care Provision reasonably required Section I – Educational Placement Section J – Personal Budget Section K – Appendices and Advice/Information

  • The Educational sections of an EHC Plan are Sections B, F & I
  • B, F and I are the only sections which are legally enforceable Right of Appeal to the SEND

Tribunal and Section E by consequence S v Worcestershire Council (2017) UKUT 92 (AAC)

  • Request recommendations for Health and Social Care under National Trial from 1st April 2018
17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

The EHC Plan – When You Get It

  • Often an empty document
  • Sections B, F & I have to be separately labelled. If it is not

clear what is educational provision.

  • All sections must be specific, detailed and quantified.
  • Lack of specificity – compromises legal enforceability - how

long or how often is “access to?” “Benefits from?”

  • Remember, the redefinition of Special Educational needs

(Section 21(S)). This means waking day curriculums, behavioural management therapies, life skills e.g. travel training should be included in Section F and DOES NOT require part funding from health or social care (East Sussex

County Council v TW [2016] UKUT 0528).
  • All provision in Section F has to be carried out.
18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Provision – What can parents ask for?

What is ‘specific’ and ‘quantified’? ‘Specific’ should be so clear that there is no room for doubt (Clarke v Somerset County

Council [1998] ELR 129).

Who is to provide the therapy? What is their skill set? How often (in terms of hours, weekly/monthly etc.)? What is the maximum amount of children in social skills groups etc.? Remember, the redefinition of Special Educational needs (Section 21(5)). This means waking day curriculums, behavioural management programmes, therapies, life skills e.g. travel training should be included in Section F and DOES NOT require part funding from health or social care (East Sussex County Council v TW [2016] UKUT 0528). All provision in Section F has to be carried out. Schools, if you cannot meet need on the level of funding you receive/support provided, do not pretend you can. This does not help parental appeals.

19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

SEN Appeals Process

20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

When would a Parent need to Appeal?

On requesting an EHC Needs Assessment, parents are refused.

Appeal to the SEND Tribunal

On Transferring to an EHC Plan from a Statement. “What if the LA change the wording so Provision is not needed or remove provision entirely”.

Appeal to the SEND Tribunal

The LA completes an EHC Needs Assessment but refuse to issue an EHC Plan.

Appeal to the SEND Tribunal

Following an Annual Review where the LA names a school parents do not want for phase transfer e.g. Yr6 to Yr7 Or removes provision that the child/young person is currently getting LA’s unlawfully responding to Post 16/18 EHC Plan Requests e.g. ‘A’s’ needs are substantially care needs’

Appeal to the SEND Tribunal Appeal to the SEND Tribunal

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Why should Parents Appeal to the SEND Tribunal?

Appealing to the SEND Tribunal – levels the playing field and will give parents equality with your Local Authority. How do I Appeal? – Download Appeal forms from the SEND Tribunal website, file together with your ‘Reasons for Appeal,’ mediation certificate and any supporting evidence. Where do parents Appeal? – SENDT Darlington office The SEND Tribunal process is the same for all SEN appeals

  • Refusal to undertake an EHC Needs Assessment
  • Refusal to issue an EHC Plan
  • Failure to correctly transfer a Statement to an EHC Plan
  • EHC Plan content (sections B,F & I)
  • Notification of Cease to Maintain Statement or EHC Plan
slide-23
SLIDE 23

SEN Appeals Process

Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunals are Judicial Proceedings. The standard process is: Mediation Certificate Appeal LA Response Further Information Hearing Decision (The Tribunal aims to get the Decision out within 2 weeks of the Hearing) The procedure is contained in a mix of ever changing unofficial policy, Practice Directions and Case Law.
slide-24
SLIDE 24

SEN Appeals Process

1. If you are going to Appeal, it does not matter what Sections B, F and I currently say or whether provision is in the wrong section. SEND Tribunal can rewrite. 2. The most common mistake is parents only appealing Section I – pointless. 3. Section E: Outcomes – SEND Tribunal can amend them

S v Worcestershire County Council [2017] UKUT 92 (AAC).

4. LA obligation to send with their Written Response an electronic version of the EHC Plan (Working Document). 5. Parties to liaise using key in the Working Document

  • Guidance. Amendments sought should reflect expert’s

advice. 6. Final version to be served on the Tribunal 10 working days before the hearing.

B F

&

I

slide-25
SLIDE 25

SEN Appeals Process Tribunal Appeals The SEND Tribunal looks at the child/young person’s needs as at the date of the hearing, not the past. Whether parents had meetings and corresponded nicely is irrelevant. Don’t waste months of precious time negotiating. Tea party manners are unnecessary

slide-26
SLIDE 26

SEN Appeal Process

  • 1. Process is the same whatever age, however every case is different. One size does not fit all.
  • 2. This is because the legal test is individual need and what is necessary is the individual case – individuals

differ.

  • 3. The key issue is the critical mass of educational provision required, what and what is the cost.
  • 4. An appeal does not suspend the EHC Plan. Continues it and the funding.
  • 5. SEND Tribunal process is often quicker and less frustrating than negotiation with the LA, education and

adult social care.

  • 6. Right of Appeal to SEND Tribunal two months from LA decision or one month from mediation certificate

(which ever is longer).

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Running an Appeal

1. Special Educational Needs & Disability Tribunal are Judicial Proceedings 2. Tribunal decisions are evidence based. Your evidence must be relevant and appropriately targeted. 3. Stale old evidence will not assist because the Practice Direction of the Tribunal requires the Tribunal to consider the child or young person’s needs as at the date of the hearing. 4. Evidence is key and any parent who can afford good independent professional backup evidence is well advised to obtain it. 5. The SEND Tribunal will consider independent evidence even if the Local Authority and NHS refuse to look at it.
slide-28
SLIDE 28 6. Tribunal Orders are legally binding. Local Authorities have to comply with them. If they do not, then they can be made to do so because the orders are legally enforceable. 7. You can make the Local Authority deliver provision. Providing it is clearly labelled. 8. The SEND Tribunal normally, aims to be 12 weeks from start to
  • finish. It’s often quicker and less frustrating than negotiation with
LA Education teams and Adult Social Care. 9. Tribunal will not go over background, who wrote what, to whom, and when. Not advisable – cannot see wood through trees.
  • 10. Parental evidence must be relevant and appropriately targeted.
(Updates – verbal evidence at the hearing).

Running an Appeal

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Expert Witnesses

Parents need good independent expert reports to state:

  • What expert help is needed?
  • How much?
  • How often?

If parents are going to challenge what they have been offered from the LA, they will have to pay for independent expert reports. Expert cannot credibly exceed their area of expertise. Parents are therefore likely to need more than one expert. Parents cannot dictate to an expert witness. Their view is their

  • n professional view even if parents are paying. They are

required to sign a Statement of Truth to this effect.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Evidence: Expert Witnesses

Parents need to make sure their experts are:

  • Willing to quantify
  • Willing to attend the SEND Tribunal
  • Familiar with the Practice Direction of Judge

John Aitken February 2010 If parent’s get quantified provision in their child’s EHC Plan, the LA has to provide it. The LA can’t claim unaffordability or not available, they must provide the provision and if necessary buy it in from private practice.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Expert Witnesses

The Witnesses are not representatives. Parents should not expect their witnesses to be the representatives. The role of the expert witnesses is not to make legal points, ask questions, and give a closing submission (Speech). Need Solicitor/Barrister for that. Many good experts refuse to accept cases without legal representation, due to past inappropriate expectation from parents.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Thank you for listening

www.senlegal.co.uk

Special Needs and Legal Entitlement – 2nd Edition available now! Discounted price on our stall today only £15.00

Visit us on our stand to see how we can help you