The Tennessee River Bridge Experience Presented By: Mike McGregor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the tennessee river bridge experience
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Tennessee River Bridge Experience Presented By: Mike McGregor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Tennessee River Bridge Experience Presented By: Mike McGregor & Jonathan Guess The History of the Tennessee River Bridge Replacement TENNESSEE RIVER BRIDGE September 1994 Scoping Study Authorized September 1997


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Tennessee River Bridge Experience

Presented By: Mike McGregor & Jonathan Guess

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The History of the Tennessee River Bridge Replacement

slide-3
SLIDE 3

TENNESSEE RIVER BRIDGE

 September 1994 – Scoping Study Authorized  September 1997 – Initial Design Funds

Authorized

 February 2004 – Right of Way and Utility Funds

Authorized for the substructure contract

 December 2005 – Contract let to construct truss

substructure (Piers #6-#8)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

TENNESSEE RIVER BRIDGE

 October 2008 – Bulletin for superstructure design

was publicized

 May 2009 – A Notice to Proceed for design

services was issued to URS, Inc.

 July 2010 – Superstructure Contract was let to

the joint venture of Kay & Kay Construction & Haydon Bridge for $66,364,228.26

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PROJECT OVERVIEW

 2-lane bridge  Existing structure 20’ wide curb – curb  ADT: 10,400 (2005)  Built in late 1920’s & early 1930’s  Originally a toll bridge  Designed by Modjeski and Masters

Engineers

EXISTING BRIDGE CHARACTERISTICS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PROJECT OVERVIEW

 Future Design Parameters:

 ADT: 15,000 (2023)  10% Truck Traffic

 New structure approx. 1500 ft. upstream

REPLACEMENT BRIDGE CHARACTERISTICS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PROJECT OVERVIEW

 17 total spans  3 truss spans

 500 FT, 400 FT, AND 900 FT

 Modified Warren Truss  Typical truss span: 4 lane roadway,

barrier wall divided

 1 River Pier

REPLACEMENT BRIDGE CHARACTERISTICS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Phase One: Substructure Phase Two: Superstructure to Completion Phase Three: Existing Bridge Demolition

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PHASE ONE

 Letting: December 16, 2005  Awarded to CJ Mahan Construction  $ 28.5 Million  16,600 C.Y. – Class A Concrete  8,700 C.Y. – Class AA Concrete  3.2 million lbs – Steel Reinforcement  Estimated Completion: Nov. 2008  Actual Completion: June 2010

OVERVIEW

slide-10
SLIDE 10

PHASE ONE

 Weathering Steel modifications  Superstructure evaluation led to

changes on existing design

 Seismic issues with existing

footing design found during evaluation

 Interpretation of data based on

proximity to New Madrid Fault Zone  High Water

 Elev. 306 is C.I. for River pier

construction  Muscle re-location

DELAYS AND ADVERSITY

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Indiana Bats – (clear trees

between Oct 15th & March 31st)

 NTP issued Feb. 28, 2006  Access road to McCracken

County side

 RR Crossing needed to

access McCracken County side of River

 Power to McCracken County

side – Pier # 6

PHASE ONE

DELAYS AND ADVERSITY

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Design/Build option for Pier # 7

 Original Design  Similar to Greenville Bridge

PHASE ONE

CHANGES TO DESIGN

Source: www.greenvillebridge.com

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PHASE ONE

 Design/Build option for Pier # 7

 As-Built Design

CHANGES TO DESIGN

slide-14
SLIDE 14

PHASE ONE

 Pier #7 Construction

CHANGES TO DESIGN

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PHASE ONE

 VE changing steel pile to concrete pile  VE changing size of footer at Pier # 8

CHANGES TO DESIGN

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PHASE ONE

 Dynamic Load Testing

  • vs. Static Load Testing

 Pile Driving Criteria

CHANGES TO DESIGN

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PHASE ONE

 Soil conditions at

Piers 8 & 9

 Erosion Control

Issues

CHANGES TO DESIGN

slide-18
SLIDE 18

PHASE ONE

 Project Completion

 June 2010

PROJECT COMPLETION

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PHASE TWO

 Letting: July 30, 2010  Awarded to Kay & Kay Contracting JV W/ Haydon

Bridge Company

 $66.4 Million  15.3 million lbs of Structural Steel  9,000 C.Y. – Class A Concrete  8,500 C.Y. – Class AA Concrete  2.5 million lbs – Steel Reinforcement  Actual Completion: October 31, 2013

OVERVIEW

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PHASE TWO

 High Water

DELAYS AND ADVERSITY

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PHASE TWO

 High Water

DELAYS AND ADVERSITY

slide-22
SLIDE 22

PHASE TWO

 Weight Limit Reduction

DELAYS AND ADVERSITY

slide-23
SLIDE 23

PHASE TWO

 Material Delivery  Weather  Neither incidents related

to controlling item

 Overall schedule not

effected

DELAYS AND ADVERSITY

slide-24
SLIDE 24

PHASE TWO

 Crane Issues  Related to controlling item: structural steel  Delay Time: 4 to 6 weeks

DELAYS AND ADVERSITY

AFTER BEFORE

slide-25
SLIDE 25

PHASE TWO

OVERALL CONSTRUCTION

slide-26
SLIDE 26

PHASE TWO

OVERALL CONSTRUCTION

slide-27
SLIDE 27

PHASE TWO

STEEL ERECTION OF TRUSS

slide-28
SLIDE 28

PHASE TWO

STEEL ERECTION OF TRUSS

slide-29
SLIDE 29

PHASE TWO

STEEL ERECTION OF TRUSS

slide-30
SLIDE 30

PHASE TWO

STEEL ERECTION OF TRUSS

slide-31
SLIDE 31

PHASE TWO

STEEL ERECTION OF TRUSS

slide-32
SLIDE 32

PHASE TWO

ERECTION

slide-33
SLIDE 33

PHASE TWO

 Condition of Existing Structure  Incentive/Disincentive Option

 Associated Cost keeping existing structure open  Areas of Possible Acceleration

 Accepted Proposal:

 3.8 million dollars for 2 lanes of traffic by May 2013  1.9 K disincentive per day after May 1st, 2013  Project Completion Date: October 31st, 2013

PROJECT ACCELERATION

slide-34
SLIDE 34

PHASE TWO

PROGRESS TO DATE

slide-35
SLIDE 35

PHASE TWO

PROGRESS TO DATE

slide-36
SLIDE 36

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-37
SLIDE 37

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-38
SLIDE 38

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-39
SLIDE 39

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-40
SLIDE 40

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-41
SLIDE 41

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-42
SLIDE 42

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-43
SLIDE 43

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-44
SLIDE 44

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-45
SLIDE 45

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-46
SLIDE 46

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-47
SLIDE 47

PROJECT PHOTOS

slide-48
SLIDE 48