the nuclear emc effect in the deep inelastic and the
play

The nuclear EMC effect in the deep-inelastic and the resonance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The nuclear EMC effect in the deep-inelastic and the resonance region Sergey Kulagin Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow Talk at the XVth International Seminar on Electromagnetic Interactions of Nuclei


  1. The nuclear EMC effect in the deep-inelastic and the resonance region Sergey Kulagin Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow Talk at the XVth International Seminar on Electromagnetic Interactions of Nuclei EMIN-2018 Moscow, Russia October 8, 2018

  2. Outline ◮ Data overview on the nuclear EMC effect in deep-inelastic scattering region. ◮ Understanding and modelling nuclear corrections ◮ Sketch of basic mechanisms of nuclear DIS in different kinematic regions. ◮ Brief review of our efforts to build a quantitative model of nuclear structure functions. ◮ Nucleon and nuclear structure functions and nuclear ratios in the resonance and transition region and comparison with JLab data on D/ ( p + n ) BONuS, 2015 and 3 He /D and 3 He / ( D + p ) Hall C, 2009 ◮ Summary/Conclusions Kulagin (INR) 2 / 37

  3. Data summary on nuclear effects on the parton level ◮ Nuclear ratios ℛ ( A/B ) = σ A ( x, Q 2 ) /σ B ( x, Q 2 ) or F A 2 /F B 2 from DIS experiments ◮ Data for nuclear targets from 2 H to 208 Pb ◮ Fixed-target experiments with e/µ : ◮ Muon beam at CERN (EMC, BCDMS, NMC) and FNAL (E665). ◮ Electron beam at SLAC (E139, E140), HERA (HERMES), JLab (E03-103). ◮ Kinematics and statistics: Data covers the region 10 − 4 < x < 1 . 5 and 0 < Q 2 < 150 GeV 2 . About 800 data points for the nuclear ratios ℛ ( A/B ) with Q 2 > 1 GeV 2 . ◮ Nuclear effects for antiquarks have been probed by Drell-Yan experiments at FNAL (E772, E866). ◮ Nuclear cross sections from high-energy measurements with neutrino BEBC ( 2 H and 20 Ne ), NOMAD ( 12 C and 56 Fe ) CDHS, CCFR and NuTeV ( 56 Fe ) CHORUS ( 207 Pb ). Nuclear cross section ratios Fe / CH and Fe / CH from MINERvA in the region of low Q 2 . Kulagin (INR) 3 / 37

  4. Nuclear ratios from DIS experiments SLAC E139 SLAC E139 (Be) SLAC E139 (C) SLAC E139 1.4 CERN NMC CERN NMC (Li) CERN NMC (C) CERN NMC (Al/C)*(C/D) JLab E03103 JLab E03103 (Be) FNAL E665 (C) 1.3 DESY HERMES (N) JLab E03103 (C) 1.2 F 2 (A)/F 2 (D) 1.1 1 0.9 4 7 12 27 2 He 3 Li 6 C 13 Al 9 14 4 Be 7 N 0.8 0.7 1.4 SLAC E139 SLAC E139 (Fe) SLAC E139 (Ag) SLAC E139 (Au) CERN NMC CERN EMC (Cu) CERN NMC (Sn/C)*(C/D) CERN NMC (Pb/C)*(C/D) FNAL E665 CERN BCDMS (Fe) FNAL E665 (Xe) FNAL E665 (Pb) 1.3 DESY HERMES (Kr) 1.2 1.1 F 2 (A)/F 2 (D) 1 0.9 0.8 40 56 108 197 20 Ca 26 Fe 47 Ag 119 79 Au 208 63 29 Cu 50 Sn 131 82 Pb 0.7 84 36 Kr 54 Xe 0.6 10 -4 10 -3 10 -2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 10 -3 10 -2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 10 -3 10 -2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 10 -3 10 -2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1 Bjorken x Bjorken x Bjorken x Bjorken x Kulagin (INR) 4 / 37

  5. HERMES and JLab measurements on 3 He JLab E03-103 3 He/( 2 H+p) [D.Gaskell, private communication] 1.8 JLab E03-103 3 He is / 2 H [PRL103(2009)202301] DESY HERMES 3 He is / 2 H [PLB475(2000)386;567(2003)339(E)] 1.6 3% HERMES-JLab data offset 1.02 1 Cross section ratio 1.4 0.98 0.96 1.2 0.94 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 W < 1.8 GeV 1 0.8 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Bjorken x Kulagin (INR) 5 / 37

  6. SLAC E139 and JLab BONUS results on 2 H 0.45 JLab BONuS, W > 1.8 GeV 1.12 JLab BONuS, 1.2<W<1.8 GeV SLAC E139 1.1 0.4 1.08 F2D / (F2p + F2n) 1.06 0.35 F2n/F2D 1.04 1.02 0.3 1 0.98 0.25 0.96 BONuS data W > 1.8 GeV BONuS data 1.4 < W < 1.8 GeV 0.94 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Bjorken x Bjorken x 2 / ( F p ◮ SLAC E139 [ PRD49(1994)4348 ] obtains R D = F D 2 + F n 2 ) by extrapolating data on R A = F A 2 /F D with A ≥ 4 assuming R A − 1 scales as nuclear density. 2 ◮ BONuS [ PRC92(2015)015211 ] obtains R D from a direct measurement of F n 2 /F D 2 2 /F p [ PRC89(2014)045206 ] using world data on F D 2 . Kulagin (INR) 6 / 37

  7. Understanding and modelling the nuclear corrections Kulagin (INR) 7 / 37

  8. Why nuclear corrections survive at DIS? Space-time scales in DIS ∫︂ d 4 x exp( iq · x ) ⟨ p | [ J µ ( x ) , J ν (0)] | p ⟩ W µν = 0 + Q 2 z ≃ q 0 ( t − z ) − Q 2 √︂ q · x = q 0 t − | q | z = q 0 t − q 2 2 q 0 z ◮ DIS proceeds near the light cone: | t − z | ∼ 1 /q 0 and t 2 − z 2 ∼ Q − 2 . ◮ In the TARGET REST frame the characteristic time and longitudinal distance are NOT small at all: t ∼ z ∼ 2 q 0 /Q 2 = 1 /Mx Bj . DIS proceeds at the distance ∼ 1 Fm at x Bj ∼ 0 . 2 and at the distance ∼ 20 Fm at x Bj ∼ 0 . 01 . ◮ Two different regions in nuclei from comparison of coherence length (Ioffe time) L = 1 /Mx Bj with average distance between bound nucleons r NN : ◮ L < r NN ( or x > 0 . 2) ⇒ Nuclear DIS ≈ incoherent sum of contributions from bound nucleons. Nuclear corrections ∼ EL and ∼ | p | 2 L 2 where E ( p ) typical energy (momentum) in the nuclear ground state. ◮ L ≫ r NN ( or x ≪ 0 . 2) ⇒ Coherent effects of interactions with a few nucleons are important. Kulagin (INR) 8 / 37

  9. Incoherent nuclear scattering A good starting point is incoherent scattering off bound protons and neutrons ∫︂ F A d 4 p K ( 𝒬 p F p 2 + 𝒬 n F n 2 = 2 ) ◮ The four-momentum of the bound proton (neutron) p = ( M + ε, p ) ◮ 𝒬 p,n ( ε, p ) the proton (neutron) nuclear spectral function, which is normalized to d ε d p 𝒬 p = Z and describes probability to find a bound ∫︁ the nucleon number nucleon with momentum p and energy p 0 = M + ε . ◮ The bound nucleon structure functions depend on 3 independent variables ( x ′ , p 2 , Q 2 ) , x ′ = Q 2 / 2 p · q is the Bjorken variable of a nucleon with F p,n = F p,n 2 2 four-momentum p . Note the nucleon virtuality p 2 is additional variable for off-shell nucleon. ◮ Kinematical factor K = (1 + p z /M ) (︁ 1 + 𝒫 ( p 2 / | q | 2 ) )︁ . Kulagin (INR) 9 / 37

  10. Nuclear spectral function The nuclear spectral function describes probability to find a bound nucleon with momentum p and energy p 0 = M + ε : ∫︂ d t e − iεt ⟨ ψ † ( p , t ) ψ ( p , 0) ⟩ 𝒬 ( ε, p ) = |⟨ ( A − 1) i , − p | ψ (0) | A ⟩| 2 2 πδ ∑︂ ε + E A − 1 ( p ) − E A (︁ )︁ = i 0 i ◮ The sum runs over all possible states of the spectrum of A − 1 residual system. ◮ The nuclear spectral function determines the rate of nucleon removal reactions such as ( e, e ′ p ) . For low separation energies and momenta, | ε | < 50 MeV, p < 250 MeV/c, the observed spectrum is dominated by bound states A − 1 similar predicted by the mean-field model. Kulagin (INR) 10 / 37

  11. Sketch of the mean-field picture In the the mean-field model the bound states of A − 1 nucleus are described by the one-particle wave functions φ λ of the energy levels λ . The spectral function is given by the sum over the occupied levels with the occupied number n λ : ∑︂ n λ | φ λ ( p ) | 2 δ ( ε − ε λ ) 𝒬 MF ( ε, p ) = λ<λ F ◮ Due to interaction effects the δ -peaks corresponding to the single-particle levels acquire a finite width (fragmentation of deep-hole states). ◮ High-energy and high-momentum components of nuclear spectrum can not be described in the mean-field model and driven by short-range nucleon-nucleon correlation effects in the nuclear ground state as witnessed by numerous studies. Kulagin (INR) 11 / 37

  12. High-momentum part ◮ As nuclear excitation energy becomes higher the mean-field model becomes less accurate. High-energy and high-momentum components of nuclear spectrum can not be described in the mean-field model and driven by correlation effects in nuclear ground state as witnessed by numerous studies. ◮ The corresponding contribution to the spectral function is driven by ( A − 1) * excited states with one or more nucleons in the continuum. Assuming the dominance of configurations with a correlated nucleon-nucleon pair and remaining A − 2 nucleons moving with low center-of-mass momentum we have | A − 1 , − p ⟩ ≈ ψ † ( p 1 ) | ( A − 2) * , p 2 ⟩ δ ( p 1 + p 2 + p ) . Kulagin (INR) 12 / 37

  13. The matrix element can thus be given in terms of the wave function of the nucleon-nucleon pair embeded into nuclear environment. We assume factorization into relative and center-of-mass motion of the pair ⟨ ( A − 2) * , p 2 | ψ ( p 1 ) ψ ( p ) | A ⟩ ≈ C 2 ψ rel ( k ) ψ A − 2 CM ( p CM ) δ ( p 1 + p 2 + p ) , where ψ rel is the wave function of the relative motion in the nucleon-nucleon pair with relative momentum k = ( p − p 1 ) / 2 and ψ CM is the wave function of center-of-mass (CM) motion of the pair in the field of A − 2 nucleons, p CM = p 1 + p . The factor C 2 describes the weight of the two-nucleon correlated part in the full spectral function. ε + ( p + p A − 2 ) 2 ⟨ (︃ )︃⟩ 𝒬 cor ( ε, p ) ≈ n cor ( p ) δ + E A − 2 − E A 2 M A − 2 Kulagin (INR) 13 / 37

  14. The two-component model of the spectral function In what follows we combine the mean-field together with SRC contributions and consider a two-component model Ciofi degli Atti & Simula, 1995 S.K. & Sidorov, 2000 S.K. & Petti, 2004 𝒬 = 𝒬 MF + 𝒬 cor We assume that the normalization is shared between the MF and the correlated parts as 0 . 8 to 0 . 2 for the nuclei A ≥ 4 [for 208 Pb 0 . 75 to 0 . 25 ] following the observations on occupation of deeply-bound proton levels NIKHEF 1990s, 2001 . Kulagin (INR) 14 / 37

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend