Approval of Proposed Changes to the Candlestick Point/Hunters Point Shipyard Phase II Project Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure April 17, 2018 1
Agenda 1) Approval Actions Summary 7) DDA Amendments • 3 rd Amendment to the CP/HPS2 DDA 2) Existing Project Requirements - BMR Housing Plan Amendments 3) Rationale for & Summary of Changes - Community Benefits Plan Amendments - Financing Plan Amendments 4) Redevelopment Plan Amendments • 7 th Amendment to the HPS1 DDA 5) HPS Design for Development 8) Community Outreach 6) Environmental Review 9) Current Contracting and Workforce 7) Proposed Project Changes Details Status • Phasing Plan & Schedule of Performance • Parks & Open Space Plan 10) Next Steps • Transportation Plan • Sustainability Plan • Infrastructure Plan • Design Review & Document Approval (DRDAP) 2
Approval Actions Resolution No. Action Adopting Environmental Findings 11-2018 12-2018 Approving Reports to the Board of Supervisors for both HPS and BVHP Redevelopment Plan Amendments 13-2018 Approving Redevelopment Plan Amendments for HPS & BVHP Approving the HPS Design for Development 14-2018 Approving the 7 th Amendment to the HPS Phase 1 DDA 15-2018 16-2018 Approving the 3rd Amendment to the CP/HPS Phase 2 DDA 3
Candlestick Point/Hunters Point Shipyard Phase II Site 4
Project Background 2004 2008 2013 2018 First land transfer Prop G passed HPS Phase 1 Ground- to the City breaking 2015 1997 2017 AG Ground- 2005 Updated HPS2 APPROVED ! breaking & CP HPS master plan APPROVED ! Stadium demo HPS Redevelopment community Phase 1 Plan approved outreach approved commences 2016 Prop O passes; 2010 Northside Park design community outreach APPROVED ! CP/HPS2 approved 5
Existing CP/HPS2 Requirements – Affordable Housing • BMR Housing = 3345 units (32% of the 10,500 total units) • Housing Ladder : AMI ranges from 0-60% AMI to 140-160% • OCII Funded Units = 1,644 Units serving 0-60% AMI o 256 Alice Griffith public housing replacement units* o 248 new affordable units built with Alice Griffith replacement units o 1,140 new affordable units on stand-alone lots o Serves spectrum of needs: families, seniors, homeless, special needs • Developer Inclusionary Units = 1,701 serving 80-160% o 809 moderate income inclusionary units serving 80-120% AMI o 892 “workforce” units serving 140 -160% AMI * Developer funded as well 6
Existing Requirements – Affordable Housing 7
Existing CP/HPS2 Requirements – Community Benefits • Community benefits fund • Community builder program • Community health and wellness contributions • Community real estate program, including: o Artists Complex o Community Facility Lots o Community Facilities Spaces • Construction assistance program • Education Improvement Fund • Housing initiatives • Scholarship fund • Contracting and Workforce initiatives 8
Existing Requirements – Community Benefits Highlights of current or ongoing efforts include: • Provided infrastructure to serve first 4 phases of Alice Griffith • Provided funding for construction of first 4 phases of Alice Griffith • Completed new Commercial Kitchen building • Started construction on new Artists building • Provided $500,000 for Scholarship Fund • Provided $350,000 for Wellness Contribution • Ongoing commitments through the BVHP Employment and Contracting Program 9
Proposed Project Changes: Why • Land Uses – increase diversity of uses: o Increase R&D/office uses o Increase Retail uses o Add Hotel and Maker Space uses o Maximize Housing entitlement • Land Uses – potential shift in commercial sf from HPS2 to Candlestick o Approval path created to allow for changes in market conditions • Street Grid and Block Development Plan : o Re-envisioned to align closer to existing historic layout of Shipyard o Designed by Adjaye Associates • Heritage Buildings: Increase potential to retain certain structures • Parks and Open Spaces : Re-imagine layout and increase acreage • Green Energy and Sustainable Infrastructure: “eco - grid” potential 10
Proposed Project Changes: Summary 2010 2018
Proposed Project Changes: Summary • Housing: o Add 172 unbuilt Phase 1 units ( 10,500 +172 = 10,672 total units ) o Shift allocation of units between CP and HPS2 ( 993+ in CP; 891- in HPS2) o Create category for stand-alone Senior BMR Inclusionary for CP-02 • Parks & Open Space: o Redesign & Increase acreage by 10.7 acres ( 337.7 acres ) o Provide privately owned, publicly accessible “Green Room” • Commercial/Non-Residential in HPS2: 2,071,000 sf increase New HPS2 uses: Increase to existing HPS2 uses: Land Use Type SF Land Use Type SF Hotel 120,000 sf R&D / Office 1,265,000 sf Regional Retail 101,000 sf Neighborhood Retail 100,000 sf Institution 410,000 sf Maker Space 75,000 sf 12
Proposed Project Changes: Summary TOTAL CP & HPS2 2010 Change 2018 10,500 172 10,672 UNITS CP/HPS2 Housing Units 327.0 10.7 337.7 ACRES Parks & Open Space Acreage Artist Studio 255,000 0 255,000 SF Community Use 100,000 0 100,000 SF FAC/Performance Venue 75,000 0 75,000 SF Hotel 150,000 120,000 270,000 SF Institution 0 410000 410,000 SF R&D/Office 3,150,000 1,265,000 4,415,000 SF Regional Retail 635,000 100,000 735,000 SF Neighborhood Retail 250,000 101,000 351,000 SF Maker Space 0 75000 75,000 SF 2,071,000 Non-Residential Square Footage 4,615,000 6,686,000 SF 13
Existing Requirements – Project Structure CP & HPS2 DDA Design for Development & Exhibits Interagency Agreements CEQA State Lands Redevelopment Project Plans Acquisition Entitlements Agreements 14
DDA: Amendments Needed CP/HPS2 Disposition and Development Agreement Development Plan Exhibit A Definitions Exhibit B Phasing Plan Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Exhibit D DRDAP Exhibit E BMR Housing Plan Exhibit F Community Benefits Plan Exhibit G Financing Plan Exhibit H Infrastructure Plan Exhibit I Parks & Open Space Plan Exhibit J Sustainability Plan Exhibit K Project MMRP Exhibit L Stadium Pad Infrastructure Exhibit M Transportation Plan Exhibit N “Form of” Documents Exhibit O-W Employment and Contracting Policies Exhibit X-DD Proforma Values for Commercial Lots Exhibit EE 15
HPS Redevelopment Plan Amendment Highlights • Land Use Districts : names changed to match HPS2 vision • Land Use Definitions : adjustments and additions to match new vision • Land Use Entitlement Sq. Ft. : adjustments within caps to permit a more diverse land use mix • Transfer of Sq. Ft. to CP: 118,500 sq. ft. of R&D/Office uses to be transferable from HPS2 to BVHP Zone 1 (Candlestick Point) 16
BVHP Redevelopment Plan Amendment Highlights • Land Use Entitlement Sq. Ft. : conversion of square footage to be allowed between different land use categories • Transfer of Sq. Ft. to CP: 118,500 sq. ft. of R&D/Office uses to be transferable from HPS2 to BVHP Zone 1 (Candlestick Point) • Jamestown Parcel: shift of a parcel not owned by Developer to Zone 2 of BVHP Project Area (Planning Code jurisdiction) 17
BVHP Redevelopment Plan: Jamestown Parcel 18
Design for Development (D4D) Urban Design Vision : D4D guided by a new vision for the Shipyard designed by architect Sir David Adjaye 19
Design for Development (D4D) The HPS2 Vision calls for 4 Districts and 4 Key Features 20
Design for Development (D4D) • [add several more slides to show District map, height district map, and some nice visuals that best show “ Adjaye vision”] 21
Design for Development (D4D) Development Standards : (examples) • building setbacks, • mid-block breaks, • site coverage and bulk, • private open space requirements, • maximum building heights. 22
Design for Development (D4D) • [add several more slides to show District map, height district map, and some nice visuals that best show “ Adjaye vision”] 23
Design for Development (D4D) 24
Design for Development (D4D) Architectural Controls 25
Design for Development (D4D) 26
Environmental Review • Project EIR : SFRA Commission and Planning Commission certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the CP/HPS2 Project in compliance with CEQA on June 3, 2010 • Previous Addenda: Four Addenda to the EIR since 2010 • Addendum 5: issued April 9, 2018 o Studies environmental effects of the proposed Plan Amendments and amendments to the supporting documents o Recommends modifications to 16 mitigation measures adopted in the EIR’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program o Concludes that the proposed amendments are within the scope of the Project analyzed in the EIR and will not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, altering the conclusions reached in the EIR 27
Phasing Plan & Schedule of Performance • Together these documents form the schedule for Project delivery: • Phasing Plan identifies location • Schedule of Performance establishes time range for commencement and completion of public infrastructure such as: Major Phase and Sub-Phase Applications Associated Public Benefits (e.g. parks, arterial improvements leading to the project) 28
Recommend
More recommend
