Th The F e Fiel eld d Tac actics cs-For Force ce Op Optio - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CITY Y & C & COUNT NTY OF SAN FRA RANCISC SCO

Police Department

March 12, 2019

Th The F e Fiel eld d Tac actics cs-For Force ce Op Optio ions ns Uni nit

michael.nevin@sfgov.org sfpd.ftfo@sfgov.org Safety with Respect

2

Officer-In-Charge FTFO

Lieutenant Michael Nevin

The unit is initially authorized:

• Officer-in Charge (Lt. Nevin)
• Force Options Sergeant (Sgt. John Crudo)
• Field Tactics Sergeant (Sgt. Justin Bugarin)
• 960 (Sgt. Martin Lalor (ret.)-Tactical Sergeant)
• Officer Joel Aylworth
• Officer - TBD

3

FTFO: Composition

Safety with Respect

Unit created in December 2018 to provide training oversight, consistency and guidance related to the application of field tactics and force options. Duties include:

• Review use of force-related instruction and incidents
• Provide training-related feedback and recommendations
• Assess and coordinate force options tools
• Assist in the development of related policy and procedure

4

FTFO: Completing the Lesson Loop

Safety with Respect

FTFO Efforts Presently Include

CMCR Course FTFO Monthly Meeting FTFO Review Process CPT FOS Office and Staffing Recruit FOS FDRB/ICD Review, Training & Coordination LMR Bungalow Alternate Force Options Evals

Current Projects

FTFO: Current Status

5

Safety with Respect

6

Thank you.

Any questions?

Safety with Respect

CITY Y & C & COUNT NTY OF SAN FRA RANCISC SCO

Police Department

March 12, 2019

Th The F e Fiel eld d Tac actics cs-For Force ce Op Optio ions ns Uni nit

Justin-Paul.D.Bugarin@sfgov.org sfpd.ftfo@sfgov.org Safety with Respect

2

Field Tactics-Force Options Unit Training Division

• Sgt. Justin-Paul Bugarin #1728

Training Objectives:

• Critical Decision Making
• Teamwork
• Leadership at scene
• “The Debrief”
• Scenario based training

3

Critical Mindset Coordinated Response

Safety with Respect

A Tactics refresher course on what tasks should be completed and in what order. After identifying the varying degrees of importance using Critical Decision Making skills, the environment for a peaceful resolution is in place. Some Factors include:

• Duty to Protect Life
• To prevent escape
• Gathering of Available Resources
• “Timeline” Principles

4

Priority Task Flow during High Risk Incidents

Safety with Respect

Versions of CMCR has been taught to:

Tactical Unit Specialist Team Advanced Officer School (approximately 170 students) Newly promoted Captains, Lieutenants, & Sergeants

CMCR: Current Status

5

Safety with Respect

6

Thank you.

Any questions?

Safety with Respect

CITY Y & C & COUNT NTY OF SAN FRA RANCISC SCO

Police Department

March 12, 2019

Executive Sponsor Working Group

Us Use o e of For f Force ce

2

CRI Status Changes

Safety with Respect

Proje

• ject Man

anagement t Matrix ix - Statu tus as of f 2. 2.14 14.19

In Progress In Approval Process External Review External Validation RFI Substantial Compliance Total Uploaded Pending Upload Use of Force 28 5 7 3 10 5 58 25 33 Bias 20 18 6 8 2 54 16 38 Community Policing 34 20 3 3 60 6 54 Accountability 37 25 6 68 6 62 Recruitment 14 8 2 8 32 10 22 Total 133 76 18 3 35 7 272 63 209 23% 77%

For

• rm 10

1001 01

Posting Status Amount Rec # Notes Posted Form 1001 95 On Hold 1 23.2 Recvd & hold on posting. Review & report to PC the

• utcome of reviewing all prior OIS and discharge incidents

where firearms were discharged at a moving vehicle. Total 96

Safety with Respect

3

SFPD Collaborative Reform Initiative

Status of UoF Recommendations as of 2/14/2019

In Progress, 28 In Approval Process, 5 External Review, 7 External Validation, 3 RFI, 10 Substantial Compliance, 5

SFPD COLLABORATIVE REFORM INITIATIVE

UOF RECOMMENDATIONS STATUS AS OF 2.14.19 Status Definitions: In Progress: SFPD is actively working on the recommendation In Approval Process: Recommendation packets with PSSPU or the COP for approval External Review: Recommendation packets uploaded to Hillard Heintze for review External Validation: Recommendation packets uploaded to CAL DOJ for review RFI: Uploaded recommendation packets returned to SFPD for more information Substantial Compliance: Implemented recommendations determined to have met compliance measures

4

Safety with Respect

Use of Force Uploaded Recommendations 25 Recommendations Pending Upload 33 Total 58 % Uploaded Recommendations 43% % Pending Recommendations for Upload 57%

33 25

20 40 60 80

Uploaded vs. Pending UoF Recommendations by Objective 2/14/2019

5

Safety with Respect

IN PROG OGRESS SS IN PROG OGRESS SS IN APPROV OVAL PROC OCESS SS Extern rnal Rev eview ew EXT. . VALID IDATIO ION RFI Substa tanti tial Compl mpliance U of F - 28 U of F - 28 U of F - 5 U of F - 7 U of F - 3 U of F - 10 U of F -5 1.1 16.1 3.2 4.4 3.1 4.3 7.1 2.1 16.2 4.7 5.1 4.5 6.2 7.2 4.1 18.2 5.2 8.1 8.2 6.3 7.3 4.2 18.3 12.2 12.1 9.2 9.1 4.6 19.1 12.3 14.1 9.3 9.4 6.1 19.2 14.3 13.1 8.3 20.1 18.1 14.2 10.1 20.2 15.2 10.2 20.3 17.1 11.1 20.4 19.3 11.2 21.1 11.3 22.1 11.4 23.1 15.1 23.2

Recommendation Status

6

Safety with Respect

In Progress Issues

Academic 1.1 The majority of deadly use of force incidents by SFPD involved persons of color. Partner with a research institution to evaluate the circumstances that give rise to deadly force, particularly those involving persons of color. Use of Force resulting in death- evaluation / Research partner (John Jay) 20.4 The SFPD should identify a research partner to further refine its use of force data collection and to explore the data findings

• f this report to identify appropriate data for measurement and to determine causal factors.

Use of Force data collection and analysis / extraction of relevant information / Research partner (Cambridge Univ.) IT and/or Academic 21.1 The SFPD should continue to collect and analyze use of force data to identify patterns and trends over time consistent with recommendations in finding 20. Use of Force data collection and retention / comparison – Infrastructure 22.1 The SFPD needs to improve data collection on use of force so that further analysis can be conducted to better understand this finding. Use of Force data collection infrastructure / protocols

7

Safety with Respect

DGO 11.1 SFPD should update the Department General Order 3.10— Firearm Discharge Review Board to require written evaluation of policy, training, and tactical considerations of discharge incidents, specifically identifying whether the incident was influenced by a failure of policy, training, or tactics and should include recommendations for addressing any issues identified. FDRB - Standardize a template summary include of training tactics 11.3 The SFPD should update the DGO to ensure that the FDRB is staffed with the training and education division representative as an advisory member to ensure an appropriate focus on development of responsive training protocols. FDRB - Standardize a template summary include of training tactics 11.4 Officer-involved shooting events need to be reviewed in a more timely fashion as it relates to policy, training, and procedures. The FDRB should review incidents at the conclusion of the lAD investigation rather than waiting for the District Attorney's letter of declination for charging of an officer-involved shooting incident, which can take up to two years. FDRB - Review – prior to D.A. declination 19.1 The SFPD needs to develop a standard officer-involved shooting protocol within 90 days of the release of this report. OIS - Policy protocol 23.1 DGO 5.02 – Use of Firearms. The SFPD should immediately implement this provision of the draft policy. Policy Implemented 23.2 The FDRB should be tasked with review of all prior officer-involved shooting and discharge incidents in which firearms are discharged at a moving vehicle. Policy and Protocol

8

Safety with Respect

IT 4.1 Use of Force Log captures insufficient information. The SFPD needs to create an electronic use of force reporting system so that data can be captured in real time. Use of Force – Infrastructure / Data Collection – implemented 4.2 In developing an electronic report system, SFPD must review current practice regarding reporting use of force, including reporting on level of resistance by the individual, level and escalation of control tactics used by the officer, and sequencing

• f the individual's resistance and control by the officer.

Use of Force – Data Collection – implemented by collection on Forms and software input (AIM) 4.6 The SFPD should audit use of force data on a quarterly basis and hold supervisors accountable for ongoing deficiencies. Use of Force – Data Collection – implemented by collection on Forms and software input (AIM) 8.3 Supervisors should be required to document their actions regarding the investigation of the use of force incident within the incident report. As recommended in this section (Recommendation 3.2), a stand-alone use of force report should be developed, and when completed, should contain a section for supervisory actions relative to the incident and signature. Use of Force – UoF Forms updated and software input (AIM) 20.1 The SFPD needs to develop reliable electronic in-custody arrest data. It needs to ensure that these arrest data accurately reflect the incident number from the event, and the number should be cross-referenced on both the booking card and the use of force reporting form. Data collection – PD/SD 20.2 The SFPD needs to audit arrest data and use of force data monthly to ensure proper recording of use of force incidents related to arrest incidents. An audit of these data should occur immediately upon publication of this report and monthly thereafter. UoF arrest and UoF data comparison – software implementation UoF form and AIM input 20.3 The SFPD needs to advocate for better coordination with the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department to ensure that the recording

• f SFPD arrest data is accurate and corresponds with SFPD incident report and arrest data.

Collaboration of systems - IT

9

Safety with Respect

Misc. 2.1 SFPD must work with the City and County of San Francisco to develop a process that provides for timely, transparent, and factual

• utcomes for officer-involved shooting incidents.

OIS - Presentation to public via website / Public Portal – IT (AB 1421) 6.1 The Training and Education Division should adopt and implement a formal Learning Needs Assessment model that identifies and prioritizes training needs, and should subsequently design and present them in the most effective and efficient ways possible. Academy infrastructure 11.2 SFPD should update existing programs and develop training to address policy gaps and lessons learned. The Training and Education Division should work with the FDRB and Homicide Detail to create a presentation to inform Department personnel about key issues that contribute for officer discharge incidents and to help mitigate the need for firearm discharge incidents. Academy collaboration with UoF Review 15.1 The SFPD needs to create outreach materials related to educating the public and the media on use of force and officer- involved shooting investigations and protocols. These materials should be disseminated widely through the various community engagement events and district station meetings. OIS - Presentation to public via website / Public Portal – IT - Community Meetings/CPAB 19.2 The SFPD needs to create a template for all officer-involved shooting files. This template should detail report structure and handling of evidence. SFPD should refer to Officer-Involved Shootings: A Guide for Law Enforcement Leaders. OIS - Infrastructure changes for reports

You can reach me at user.name@sfgov.org

10

Thank you.

Any questions?

Safety with Respect