Texture Characterization via Joint Statistics of Wavelet Coef cient - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

texture characterization via joint statistics of wavelet
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Texture Characterization via Joint Statistics of Wavelet Coef cient - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Texture Characterization via Joint Statistics of Wavelet Coef cient Magnitudes Eero Simoncelli Center for Neural Science, and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University Javier Portilla Instituto de Optica Consejo


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Texture Characterization via Joint Statistics

  • f Wavelet CoefÞcient Magnitudes

Eero Simoncelli Center for Neural Science, and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University Javier Portilla Instituto de Optica Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientiÞcas Madrid, SPAIN

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Example Texture Types

structured random periodic 2nd-order Can we derive a statistical model (and sampling technique) to rep- resent all of these?

10/98 1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Synthesis-by-Analysis

Synthesis Analysis

Transform

measure statistics

Example Texture Random Seed

Statistical Sampler Transform

measure statistics

Synthesized Texture

Choice of statistical measurements crucial Proper transform can simplify statistics Most algorithms are iterative

10/98 2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Recent Inspirational Approaches

Portilla et. al. (1996): Adaptive Gabor transform, constrained

subband auto-correlation. Weakness: structures.

Heeger & Bergen (1995): Steerable pyramid, constrained sub-

band marginals (histograms). Weakness: periodicity, extended structures.

Zhu, Wu & Mumford (1996): Small set of Þlters, constrained sub-

band marginals, Gibbs sampling (maximal entropy). Weakness: extended structures, efÞciency.

DeBonet & Viola (1997): Laplacian pyramid, coarse-to-Þne boot-

strap sampling from the scale-conditional empirical neighbor- hood statistics. Weakness: random textures, no parameteriza- tion.

10/98 3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Complex Steerable Pyramid Representation

Fourier spectra of 4-orientation 3-scale complex analytic Steerable pyramid.

10/98 4

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Matched Pixel Marginals

10/98 5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Matched Subband Variances

Captures smoothed distribution of energy in frequency domain.

10/98 6

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Matched Subband Autocorrelation

Captures periodicity.

10/98 7

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Matched Subband Marginals

Captures some local structure.

10/98 8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Subband Magnitudes

Correlated or anti-correlated magnitudes capture important struc- ture.

10/98 9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Texture Model Parameters

CoefÞcient magnitude correlations: E jc i j
  • jc
j j Raw coefÞcient auto-correlation: E c x
  • c
x
  • Pixel statistics: mean, variance, skew, kurtosis, min, max.
  • neighborhoods
  • rientations
scales
  • parameters

10/98 10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Texture Synthesis System

Synthesis Analysis

build complex pyramid

Sample Texture Gaussian Noise

impose statistics mag collapse real part of pyramid build complex pyramid impose statistics impose moments estimate moments mag mag estimate statistics estimate statistics

10/98 11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Projection onto Constraint Surfaces

Joint magnitudes : match correlation of local (spatial position,
  • rientation, scale) magnitudes. Find linear transformation
A

minimizing:

E
  • jj
  • Q
  • A
  • Qjj
  • subject to:
E
  • A
  • Q
  • Q
T A T
  • E
  • Q
  • Q
  • T
  • A.

10/98 12

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Synthesis Results

ArtiÞcial textures.

10/98 13

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Synthesis Results

Natural textures, random.

10/98 14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Synthesis Results

Natural textures, structured.

10/98 15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Synthesis Failures

10/98 16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Spatial Extrapolation

10/98 17

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Scale Extrapolation

10/98 18