Teen een Dr Driver Safety ty Topic Call #3 December 19, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
teen een dr driver safety ty
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Teen een Dr Driver Safety ty Topic Call #3 December 19, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 01, 2023 227 likes •642 views

Teen een Dr Driver Safety ty Topic Call #3 December 19, 2017 Strategy Team Updates Call (866) 835-7973 to join Tips ps Download Call (866) 835-7973 resources from File for audio Share pod Mute yourself when This webinar is youre

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Call (866) 835-7973 to join

Teen een Dr Driver Safety ty

Topic Call #3 December 19, 2017 Strategy Team Updates

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Tips ps

Mute yourself when you’re not talking This webinar is being recorded Call (866) 835-7973 for audio Ask questions in the chat at any time Download resources from File Share pod

This webinar is subject to the CS CoIIN data agreement

*

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

TDS Staff & & Partici cipants ts

Jenny Stern- Carusone, M.S.W. Coordinator Jane Taylor, EdD Improvement Advisor Team Rebecca Willmer Tech Guru Jen Leonardo, Ph.D. Improvement Advisor Team

Teen Driver Safety 8 Strategy Teams

  • Florida
  • Kentucky
  • Nebraska
  • New Hampshire
  • *North Dakota*
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Wisconsin
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

  • Real-time Outcome Data– KY example
  • Strategy Team Updates (approx. 5 min/team for

presentation and TA)

  • Upcoming events

Agen genda

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Ab About t Th This Slide e Dec Deck

Please contact us if you need assistance!

Wh What we disp display Whe here re w we get i it How y w you can an edi dit it it

Drivers & Change Ideas Process Measures Aim Statements Your online Driver Diagram Submit, re-submit, or edit your online Driver Diagram Description of goals, theory

  • r approach

Your Storyboard E-mail us Charts Charts are only generated for the process measures selected in your driver diagram Select the correct Process Measures in your driver diagram Content of your charts comes from your monthly report Submit or edit your monthly reports

This information is shared with HRSA MCHB and CS CoIIN Topic Teams

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Teen D Driv iver Sa Safety ty

Engagem gagemen ent M Metrics FL FL KY KY NE NH ND TN TN TX TX WI WI Topic T Team Driver er Diagram Submi mitted

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes yes 100%Reporting

Num umber o

  • f Mont

nthly Repo ports Subm bmit itted

7 5 4 6 5 5 4 4 100% Reporting at least

  • nce

Numb mber of

  • f PDSAs S

Submi mitted

1 1 8 1 3 2 3 88% Reporting at least

  • nce

Num umber o

  • f Topi

pic Ca Calls State Partici cipa pated I In

7 5 7 6 7 6 7 6 6.375On Average

Asse ssessment Sc Scale

2 3 3 3 1.5 3 1.5 3 3Mode

Updated December 13th, 2017; Run charts updated December 11th

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

TDS: TDS: P Process M Measures

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  • 1. Percent of communities that participate in campaign
  • 2. Percent of teens reporting distracted driving, including cell phone use…
  • 3. Percent of teens reporting driving during restricted hours
  • 4. Percent of teens reporting use of seat belts
  • 5. Percent of teens reporting driving while under the influence of alcohol…
  • 6. Percent of teens reporting speeding
  • 7. Percent of teens reporting driving with teen passengers
  • 8. Percent of teens reporting driving while fatigued
  • 9. Percent of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements
  • 10. Percent of teens reporting safe driving practices
  • 11. Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
  • 12. Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver
  • 13. Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens…
  • 14. Percent of schools that provide GDL education
  • 15. Percent of health care organizations that give anticipatory guidance to…
  • 16. Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver…

Teen Driver Safety Process Measures

Florida Kentucky Nebraska New Hampshire North Dakota Tennessee Texas Wisconsin

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Re Real-time Outc e Outcome Da Data ta

Kent entuc ucky: P Par artner nering w ing wit ith the e Dep epar artment ent o

  • f

Trans ansportat atio ion

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Kentucky T een Motor Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes, 2016

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Kentucky T een Motor Vehicle Injury-related Emergency Department Visit Rate, 2016

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Kentucky T een Motor Vehicle At-Fault Crash Injury Risk Index, 2016

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Kentucky T een Motor Vehicle At-Fault Crash Injury Risk Index: Hot Spots, 2016

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Fl Flor

  • rida

AIM:

  • Deaths: -5%
  • Hospitalizations: -5%
  • ED Visits: -5%

Teen Driver Safety

Change Id Ideas

PD1.SD1.CI2: Campaign PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalition PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and Teach-Back to Parents PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer Programs Process M ss Measu sure res

  • 1. % of communities that

participate in campaign

  • 2. % of teens reporting distracted

driving, including cell phone use and texting

  • 13. % of signed parent-teen driving

agreements among teens participating in an evidence-based teen driver safety program

  • 16. % of active stakeholders in the

state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition The team plans to promote teen driver safety through messaging tied to national health observances, including March – Brain Injury Awareness Month; April – Safe Kids Day, National Minority Health & Health Disparities Month, World Health Day; June – National Safety Month; October – Child Health Day USA. The team will compile and share messaging with partners and will request to be included on monthly county health department directors’ conference calls to facilitate outreach to all 67 county health departments for presentations and discussions that coincide with these national health observances. Stakeholders: Safe Kids coalitions; local health departments; Students Against Destructive Decisions members and sponsors

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Kentu ntucky

AIM:

  • Deaths: -6.67%
  • Hospitalizations: -6.67%
  • ED Visits: -6.67%

The Kentucky team is working to increase parent and teen knowledge of Graduated Drive ver Li Licens nsing ng (GDL) and the risks of inexperience, speed, passengers, no seat belt, rural roads, and all types of distraction and impairment. In Cohort 1, a teen driver safety working group was formed, and the group developed a teen driver safety package, which was adopted and is being utilized by 6 counties. In Cohort 2, the teen driver safety working group will increase implementation of CheckPoi

  • int

nts and Ali live at at 25 25.

Teen Driver Safety

Change Id Ideas

PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policy Makers PD2.SD1.CI3: Anticipatory Guidance PD2.SD1.CI4: Data Collection PD2.SD1.CI5: Evaluation PD3.SD1.CI1: Parent Education PD3.SD1.CI4: Teen Education

Pr Proces ess M Meas easures

1.% of communities that participate in campaign

  • 14. % of schools that offer/provide GDL education
  • 15. % of health care organizations that give anticipatory

guidance to caregivers on teen driver safety

  • 16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction

teen driver safety coalition

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Ne Nebras aska

AIM:

  • Deaths: -9%
  • Hospitalizations: -9%
  • ED Visits: -9%

In Cohort 1, Nebraska developed, tested, implemented, and spread an informational card on GDL requirements, which was distributed at 98 sites by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles. In Cohort 2, Nebraska will:

  • Educate policy makers on TIRF
  • Launch a coalition to support the 28 schools that are implementing Teen

eens i in the e Driv iver Se Seat at

  • Design and implement a Parent

nt-Teen Driv iving A Agreement specific to Nebraska Teen Driver Safety Chang nge I Ideas as PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policy Makers PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalitions PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements Process M ss Measu sure res

  • 3. % of teens reporting driving during

restricted hours

  • 7. % of teens reporting driving with teen

passengers

  • 12. % of parents reporting enforcement of

GDL with their teen driver

  • 13. % of signed parent-teen driving

agreements among teens participating in an evidence-based teen driver safety program

  • 16. % of active stakeholders in the

state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Ne Nebras aska

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 1 12: Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver The first 2 tests of the GDL card showed excellent enforcement of GDL; 100% of the parents in the first small-scale tests confirmed that they enforce GDL requirements with their teens. When distributed to a larger group of 75 parents, 95% reported enforcement of GDL.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Ne Nebras aska

Teen Driver Safety Process M Measure 1 13: Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens participating in an evidence-based teen driver safety program The first 2 tests of the GDL card showed excellent completion of parent-teen driving

  • agreements. 100% of the parents in the first small-scale tests signed the agreement with

their teen. In a larger group of 76 parents, 95% signed the agreement with their teen.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Ne Nebras aska

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 16 16: Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition The team turned it’s attention to launching a statewide teen driver safety coalition in cohort 2 in order to support schools implementing Teens in the Driver Seat. As of Sept 2017, they are looking to move leadership out of DHS and to a school in hopes it will be more flexible and responsive to school needs.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Ne New Ham Hampsh shire

AIM:

  • Deaths: -6.67%
  • Hospitalizations: -6.67%
  • ED Visits: -6.67%

Teen Driver Safety

Change Id Ideas

PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalitions PD2.SD1.CI4: Data Collection, Assessment, Tracking and Reporting PD3.SD1.CI4: Positive Messaging

  • Maximize communication and education for teens

in 40 high schools through the Teen D Driv iver Program to reduce distracted driving and increase seat-belt use

  • Create a toolkit to enable peer leaders to provide

education and support outside of organized educational events.

  • Educate parents and guardians of teens and

encourage them to be actively involved in the driving experiences of their teens.

  • Utilize safety messaging and social media focused
  • n teens.

Process M ss Measu sure res

  • 1. % of communities that participate

in campaign

  • 2. % of teens reporting distracted

driving, including cell phone use and texting

  • 4. % of teens reporting use of seat

belts

  • 14. % of schools that provide GDL

education Alternative measure: # of GDL education events

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Ne New Ham Hampsh shire

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 1: P Percen ent o t of c commu muniti ties es that p t participa pate in c n campaign The NH TDS team has been working on getting their Peer Learning TDS program into all of the 250 high schools across the state. They already achieved their grant required goal of working in 15 high schools. They adjusted their denominator for this measure to 20 schools and hope to achieve 100% engagement in cohort 2.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Ne New Ham Hampsh shire

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 2: P Percent o

  • f t

teens reportin ing d dis istracted d driv ivin ing, in including cell phone u use and t tex exting. The NH TDS team conducts a pre/post observational assessment in the fall/spring and provide GDL education throughout the school year. The survey assesses use of seat belts and technology when leaving the school parking lot. The pre (fall) survey indicated 0% of teens were observed using technology as they left the parking lot.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Ne New Ham Hampsh shire

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 4: P Per ercent o

  • f t

teen eens repo eporting u use e of sea eatbelts The NH TDS team conducts a pre/post observational assessment in the fall/spring and provide GDL education throughout the school year. The survey assesses use of seat belts and technology when leaving the school parking lot. The pre (fall) survey showed 91% students were properly using a seat belt.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Ne New Ham Hampsh shire

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 14: Percent of schools that provide GDL education The NH TDS team has been working on getting their Peer Learning TDS program into all of the 250 high schools across the state. They already achieved their grant required goal of working in 15 high schools. They adjusted their denominator for this measure to 20 schools and hope to achieve 100% engagement in cohort 2.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

No North th D Dakota ta

AIM:

  • Deaths: -0.5%
  • Hospitalizations: -0.5%
  • ED Visits: -%0.5

Teen Driver Safety

Change Id Ideas

PD2.SD1.CI5: Teen Driver Program Evaluations PD3.SD1.CI5: Educate Teen Drivers Using Evidence-based Programs Process M ss Measu sure res

  • 1. % of communities that participate

in campaign

  • 2. % of teens reporting distracted

driving, including cell phone use and texting

  • 9. % of teens reporting understanding
  • f GDL requirements
  • 14. % of schools that provide GDL

education Alternative measure: % of schools implementing GDL education program that are reporting evaluation data

  • Implement and grow the Impa

mpact T t Teen D Driver er program in North Dakota.

  • Increase evaluation of the Impa

mpact T t Teen Driv iver program.

  • Disseminate messaging on the prevention
  • f distracted driving from the North Dakota

Department of Transportation.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

No North th D Dakota ta

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 1: P Percen ent o t of c commu muniti ties es that p t participa pate i e in campaign The North Dakota TDS team is working towards spreading the Impact Teen Driver program across the state through their partnership with the state Extension Service which has an

  • ffice in every county and relationships with most of the Tribes.
slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Tennesse ssee

AIM:

  • Deaths: -6.67%
  • Hospitalizations: -6.67%
  • ED Visits: -6.67%

In Cohort 1, Tennessee successfully tested parking pass incentives at one high school. Another 12 schools made the CheckPo Points program mandatory. In Cohort 2, they are working with 2 new counties that have high crash rates and have spread the CheckPoints program to 10 new high schools in 2017 with another 10 possible for the new year, and improve their data collection process to provide more longitudinal information.

Teen Driver Safety Chang nge I Ideas as PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalition PD3.SD1.CI1: Educating Parents PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent-Teen Driving Agreements Process M ss Measu sure res

  • 9. %

% o

  • f t

teens ns reporting ng understand anding ng

  • f GDL requirements
  • 11. % of pa

paren ents r repo eporting understanding of GDL requirements

  • 12. %

% of pa paren ents repo eporting en enforcement

  • f GDL with their teen driver

13.

  • 3. % of s

% of signed parent-teen d n driving ing agree eements a amo mong t teen eens pa participa pating in a n an e n evidence-bas ased t teen d n driver s safety y program

  • 14. % of schools that provide GDL

education

  • 16. % of active stakeholders in the

state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Tennesse ssee

Teen Driver Safety Outco come Measur ure 1: 1: Rate of Teen Driver-related Fatalities

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Tennesse ssee

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 9 9: Percent of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up, Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they begin to spread the CheckPoints program into schools throughout the state, the total number of teens is increasing and their percent of teens understanding continues to remain above 80%.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Tennesse ssee

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 1 11: Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up, Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they begin to spread the CheckPoints program into schools throughout the state, the total number of teens is increasing and their percent of teens understanding continues to remain above 80%.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Tennesse ssee

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 1 12: Percent of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up, Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL. As they spread the CheckPoints program across the state, the total number of parents is increasing, yet their percent reporting enforcement continues to remain high, at 80% in October 2017.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Tennesse ssee

Teen Driver Safety Process M Measure 1 13: Percent of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens participating in an evidence-based teen driver safety program Using CheckPoints and an incentive program to get teens and parents to sign up, Tennessee is working to educate parents and teens on GDL in the current school

  • year. Over the course of the program, they have now accumulated 1,091 signed

agreements.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Tennesse ssee

Teen Driver Safety Process Measure 14: Percent of schools that provide GDL education The immediate goal is to implement CheckPoints in 20 schools across the state and the TN TDS team has already moved from 1 initial pilot school in cohort 1 to 10 current schools and have 2 more schools lined up for launch in January 2018.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Te Texas

Hidalgo County

AIM:

  • Deaths: -2%
  • Hospitalizations: -2%
  • ED Visits: -2%

Texas is working to improve education to parents and teens in Hidalgo County, focusing on CheckP kPoints ts Teen Driver Safety Chang nge I Ideas as PD3.SD1.CI1: Educating Parents PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and Teach-Back to Parents PD3.SD1.CI3: Parent Teen Driving Agreements PD3.SD1.CI4: Teen Education PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer Programs Process M ss Measu sure res

  • 2. % of teens reporting distracted driving, including cell phone use and texting
  • 3. % of teens reporting driving during restricted hours
  • 4. % of teens reporting use of seat belts
  • 5. % of teens reporting driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs
  • 6. % of teens reporting speeding
  • 7. % of teens reporting driving with teen passengers
  • 8. % of teens reporting driving while fatigued
  • 9. % of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements
  • 10. % of teens reporting safe driving practices
  • 11. % of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
  • 12. % of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen driver
  • 13. % of signed parent-teen driving agreements among teens participating in an EB TDS program
  • 16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition
slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Wiscon

  • nsi

sin: : TeenDrivingP

gPlan

AIM:

  • Deaths: -6.67%
  • Hospitalizations: -6.67%
  • ED Visits: -6.67%

Teen Driver Safety

  • Developed facilitator training and data collection tools for

TeenDrivingPlan lan

  • Trained local health department staff and community members as

facilitators

  • Created an online training for facilitators
  • Created survey tools in Redcap to collect session and fidelity data
  • In Cohort 2, they are implementing statewide GDL campaign
  • Grants proposed for 2018 incorporate components of the change

package (PD1.SD) focusing on policy makers and stakeholders

Change Id Ideas PD1.SD1.CI1: Educate Policymakers PD1.SD1.CI2: Campaign PD1.SD2.CI1: Coalition PD1.SD2.CI2: MOUs PD1.SD2.CI3: Strategic Plan PD2.SD1.CI1: GDL Enforcement PD2.SD1.CI3: Anticipatory Guidance PD2.SD1.CI4: Improve Data Collection PD2.SD1.CI5: Evaluation Plans PD3.SD1.CI1: Parent Education PD3.SD1.CI2: Positive Messaging and Teach-Back to Parents PD3.SD1.CI3: Driving Agreements PD3.SD1.CI4: Educate Teens PD3.SD1.CI5: Peer-to-Peer Programs Pr Proces ess M Meas easures

  • 1. % of communities that participate in campaign
  • 9. % of teens reporting understanding of GDL requirements
  • 10. % of teens reporting safe driving practices
  • 11. % of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements
  • 12. % of parents reporting enforcement of GDL with their teen

driver

  • 14. % of schools that provide GDL education
  • 15. % of health care organizations that give anticipatory

guidance to caregivers on teen driver safety

  • 16. % of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen

driver safety coalition

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 1 11: Percent of parents reporting understanding of GDL requirements Wisconsin has maintained 100% of parents reporting understanding of GDL throughout their CS CoIIN participation.

Wisco sconsin

TeenDrivingP gPlan

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Teen Driver Safety Process M ss Measu sure re 1 16: Percent of active stakeholders in the state/jurisdiction teen driver safety coalition Wisconsin increased the number of stakeholders in their teen driver safety coalition from 12 to 18 over the course of the CS CoIIN. This measure changed to an aggregate in Cohort 2.

Wisco sconsin

TeenDrivingP gPlan

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

SUG UGGESTI STIONS OR R QUES UESTI TIONS?

We’re listening.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Websit ite U Updates

New Required Field Indicate if you are reporting on your alternate measures (N/A, Yes, No) and upload related materials. Upload additional materials not related to alternate measures if desired as well. Click view/ed /edit t to update if you are tracking alternative measures. If ‘YES’, then please enter the text for each measure you are

  • tracking. Use ‘Add another item’ for

additional measures. On your State/Jurisdi dict ction Pa Page Driv iver Diag iagram **************************** On your Monthly ly R Report S Subm bmissi ssions

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Upcom coming T Topi

  • pic C

c Calls & Deliver erables es

November data was due December 12th! Please submit your data if you haven’t already done so. December data is due on January 9th, 2017. Upco coming C Calls ( (NO NOTE: E: C Cond nden ensed S Sch ched edule) e) Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention Topic Call: December 20th, 1pm ET Falls Prevention Topic Call: December 21st, 10am ET Interpersonal Violence Prevention Topic Call: December 21st, 3pm ET January C Calls lls QI Corner: January 16th, 1pm ET Populations & Settings: January 23rd, 1pm ET

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Than ank you for par articipating!

Please complete this brief evaluation: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/N3WV6PC

Questi tions or Commen ments ts? C Conta tact: t: Jstern-Carusone@edc.org 541-414-4240 For more in informatio ion, v vis isit:

https://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/cscoiin