Survey, Investigation and Repairing on Concrete Wall of Waste Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

survey investigation and repairing on concrete wall of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Survey, Investigation and Repairing on Concrete Wall of Waste Water - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Survey, Investigation and Repairing on Concrete Wall of Waste Water Treatment Building Partogi H. Simatupang 1 and Jonbi 2 1 Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nusa Cendana 2 Civil Engineering


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Survey, Investigation and Repairing on Concrete Wall of Waste Water Treatment Building

Partogi H. Simatupang1 and Jonbi2

1Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nusa Cendana 2Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Pancasila University

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline Presentation

 Introduction  Methods

  • Survey and Investigation
  • Repairing
  • Pond Testing

 Result and Discussion

  • Concrete Quality and Crack Depth
  • Repairing
  • Pond Testing

 Conclusions

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 3

Waste Water Treatment Building (WWTB) of Multi National Company located in Cikande of Banten Province in Indonesia has experienced a poor function due to seepage and leakage on its reinforced concrete walls

This building used the construction of reinforced concrete walls as high as 12 meters. After construction, there was seepage and leakage on its wall.

The wall was encountered deterioration such as the presence of honeycomb/segregation of concrete and cracks.

Based on the construction report, this deterioration was

  • bserved as a result of uncontrolled slumps so that the slump

value was not complied and the level of compaction was not sufficient at the time of casting.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 4

Waste Water Treatment Building (WWTB) of Multinational Company located in Cikande, Banten 12 m

slide-5
SLIDE 5

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 5

surface area seepage

  • n the wall W1

spot seepage on the wall W2

Lay out of WWTB

slide-6
SLIDE 6

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 6

THE INDICATION OF THE SEGREGATION IN CONCRETE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 7

ALKALINE REACTION HAPPENED Cement based waterproofing was not working

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 8

VERTICAL CRACK SOME CRACKS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 9

DETAIL – A VERTICAL CRACKS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 10

HORIZONTAL CRACK AND POROUS AREA

slide-11
SLIDE 11

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 12

Methods

slide-13
SLIDE 13

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 13

Methods…(cont’d)

  • Investigation

The investigation tests were: (1) Homogeneity test and (2) concrete crack depth measurement using UPV (Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity) method with Ultrasonic Testing Apparatus Proceq model Pundit Plus

slide-14
SLIDE 14

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 14

Methods…(cont’d)

  • Repairing

Methods of repairing conducted were: (1) injection of cracks with Epoxy, (2) injection of leaks with cement modified polymer material, and (3) waterproofing coating with a cement based material

slide-15
SLIDE 15

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 15

Methods…(cont’d)

  • Testing on the repairing

structure by pond testing The WWTB construction was tested by pond testing for 14 days. During the ponding process, a thorough observation

  • f the concrete wall was conducted to see

whether the seepage or leakage still

  • ccur or not
slide-16
SLIDE 16

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 16

Result and Discussion

  • Survey and Investigation

No Location/Wall V uniformity of concrete quality (km/sec) 1 Vertical/wall W12 3,24 pretty good 2 Horizontal/wall W12 2,34 enough 3 Horizontal/wall W1 3,05 pretty good 4 Vertical/wall W1 3,32 pretty good 5 Vertical/wall W3 2,99 enough

From the results of crack depth testing of wall W1, the average crack depth of 102.5 mm was obtained

slide-17
SLIDE 17

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 17

Result and Discussion…

  • Crack Injection

The steps of Crack injection were (1) cleaning the crack surface from dust and other dirt, (2) cutting the crack, (3) setting an injection nipple, (4) injecting the epoxy, and (5) cleaning the surface with a grinder

  • Repairing
slide-18
SLIDE 18

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 18

Result and Discussion…

  • Leakage Injection
  • Repairing

The steps of leakage injection were (1) cleaning the crack surface from dust and other dirt, (2) cutting the crack, (3) setting injection nipple, (4) injecting the cement modified polymer material , and (5) cleaning the surface with a grinder

slide-19
SLIDE 19

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 19

Result and Discussion…

  • Waterproof Coating
  • Repairing

The steps of waterproof coating were (1) cleaning the crack surface from dust and other dirt, (2) applying waterproof coating for 1 layer, and (3) applying waterproof coating for 2 layers perpendicularly

slide-20
SLIDE 20

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 20

Result and Discussion…

  • Pond Testing

The pond testing was conducted for 14 days. Based on the test results, there was no leakage and seepage during the pond

  • testing. WWTB was ready to use
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusion

 The leakage and seepage of WWTB were caused by

the inadequate quality of concrete work

 Investigation conducted using UPV Testing showed

that the quality of concrete was enough and pretty good quality and the crack depth of 102.5 mm

 The repairing methods using crack injection, leak

injection and waterproof coatings were performed successfully

 This was proved by no leakage and seepage during

the pond testing for 14 days

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

7/17/2018 ICRMCE 2018 22