Student Success Measures Yuba Community College District Woodland - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Student Success Measures Yuba Community College District Woodland Community College Yuba College Yuba Community College District Overview Building Teams Development of Common Metrics and Definitions Woodland Community College
Yuba Community College District Woodland Community College Yuba College
Overview
Building Teams Development of Common Metrics and Definitions Woodland Community College Student Success Measures Yuba College Student Success Measures Distance Education Report Baselines for CCCCO Vision for Success
Siria S. Martinez, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success & Institutional Effectiveness Woodland Community College Emma Blackthorne, PhD Dean of Institutional Effectiveness Yuba Community College District Jeremy Brown, ABD Dean of Student Success and Institutional Effectiveness Yuba College
Creating a culture of data informed decision making Effectively and efficiently respond to change Effective in identification of new opportunities to support
Facilitates the continued development of a culture of
collaboration throughout the district at all levels
Data Definitions for Student Success Measures Significant outcome – using common measures across the district Developed Student Achievement Metrics and Definitions aligned
to the Board of Trustee’s 8 Measures of Success
Using common reports and queries Developed a Crosswalk between Answers Reports, Student
Achievement Metrics and the Board’s Adopted Measures of Student Success
Presented by:
Presented by: Jeremy Brown
35% 40% 43% 38% 55 99 132 116 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of First Time College Students who First Enrolled at or Above College-Level in English Each Academic Year
Percent Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
College Readiness - English
18.1% 19.5% 18.4% 22.7%
121 131 106 128
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of First-Time College Students who First Enrolled at or Above College-Level in English Each Academic Year
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
College Readiness - Mathematics
34% 36% 39% 35% 75 103 123 93 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of First-Time College Students who First Enrolled at or Above College-Level in Math Each Academic Year
Percent Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
College Readiness - Mathematics
16.0% 15.5% 15.5% 17.4%
107 104 89 98
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of First-Time College Students who First Enrolled at or Above College-Level in Math Each Academic Year
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Progression through Developmental Courses English
15% 18% 14% 51 83 81 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Percentage and Number of Unprepared Students Who Successfully Complete the Degree Requirement in English within 2 Primary Terms
Percent Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Progression through Developmental Courses
English
15.1% 18.0% 23.6%
153 179 208
50 100 150 200 250 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Percentage and Number of Unprepared Students Who Successfully Complete the Degree Requirement in English within 2 Primary Terms
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Source: Custom SQL Query
5% 5% 6% 18 25 37 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Percentage and Number of Unprepared Students Who Successfully Complete the Degree Requirement in Math within 2 primary terms
Percent Number
Progression through Developmental Courses Mathematics
Progression through Developmental Courses
Mathematics
5.7% 7.4% 10.2%
59 78 82
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Percentage and Number of Unprepared Students Who Successfully Complete the Degree Requirement in Math within 2 Primary Terms
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Disaggregated by Race/Ethnicity
Semester Course Completion
* 2017/18 Data is incomplete at this time. Source: Answers – Enrollment Term to Term Comparison
* 2017/18 Data is incomplete at this time. Source: Answers – Enrollment Term to Term Comparison
Semester Course Completion
70.6% 71.2% 72.7% 74.0%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18*
Annual Course Success Rate by Race/Ethnicity with Overall Comparison
American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic/Latinx Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White Two or more races Other/Unknown Overall
Successful Completion of Gateway Courses English
78% 77% 78% 78% 133 217 251 258 50 100 150 200 250 300 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of Students Who Successfully Complete their First Attempt in the Degree Requirement for English
Percentage Number
Source: Custom SQL Query
Successful Completion of Gateway Courses
English
Source: Custom SQL Query 70.7% 70.3% 69.3% 71.7%
787 865 745 761
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of Students Who Successfully Complete their First Attempt in the Degree Requirement for English
Percentage Number
Successful Completion of Gateway Courses Mathematics
Source: Custom SQL Query
69% 61% 67% 69% 196 191 268 285 50 100 150 200 250 300 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of Students Who Successfully Complete their First Attempt in the Degree Requirement for Math
Percentage Number
Successful Completion of Gateway Courses
Mathematics
Source: Custom SQL Query 52.7% 51.5% 56.0% 50.4%
497 524 541 412
100 200 300 400 500 600 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of Students Who Successfully Complete their First Attempt in the Degree Requirement for Math
Percentage Number
Fall to Spring
Semester to Semester Persistence
Source: Answers-Persistence Cohort Report by Term
71.6% 71.7% 71.1% 72.8% 270 327 392 420 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Fall to Spring within an Academic Year
Percent Number
Source: Answers – Persistence Cohort Report by Term 70.4% 70.9% 71.1% 75.0%
743 680 621 569
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Fall to Spring within an Academic Year
Percentage Number
Semester to Semester Persistence
Year to Year Persistence – Fall Entry
Source: Answers-Persistence Cohort Report
58.6% 53.3% 52.7% 221 243 290 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Fall 2014 to 15 Fall 2015 to 16 Fall 2016 to 17
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Fall in One Academic Year to Fall in the Next Academic Year
Percentage Number
Source: Answers – Persistence Cohort Report by Term 51.5% 51.2% 49.5%
544 491 433
100 200 300 400 500 600 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Fall 14 to 15 Fall 15 to 16 Fall 16 to 17
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Fall in One Academic Year to Fall in the Next Academic Year
Percentage Number
Year to Year Persistence – Fall Entry
Year to Year Persistence – Spring Entry
33.7% 27.8% 39.6% 35.2% 65 49 80 101 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Spring 2014 to 15 Spring 2015 to 16 Spring 2016 to 17 Spring 2017 to 18
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Spring in One Academic Year to Spring in the Next Academic Year
Percentage Number
Source: Answers-Persistence Cohort Report
Source: Answers – Persistence Cohort Report by Term 32.7% 36.7% 35.3% 39.3%
166 182 158 140
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Spring 14 to 15 Spring 15 to 16 Spring 16 to 17 Spring 17 to 18
Percentage and Number of Entering Students Persisting from Spring in One Academic Year to Spring in the Next Academic Year
Percentage Number
Year to Year Persistence – Spring Entry
Degree/Certificate Completion
Source: Answers – Academic Program - Graduates in a Date Range
324 401 419 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Number of Students Earning a Degree or Certificate Each Year
757 710 813
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Number of Students Earning a Degree or Certificate Each Year
Source: Answers – Academic Program - Graduates in a Date Range Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #1 (Direct)
Degree/Certificate Completion
Transfer Readiness
Source: Answers - Momentum Report Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #2 (Indirect)
178 205 236 50 100 150 200 250 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Number of Students who Achieve Transfer Ready Status Each Year
315 379 404
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Number of Students who Achieve Transfer Ready Status Each Year
Source: Answers - Momentum Report Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #2 (Indirect)
Transfer Readiness
Employment
5% 53% 17% 22% 54% 9% 60% 11% 18% 69% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Self-Employed Employed at one job Employed at more than one job Unemployed Employed in a Job Closely Related to the Field of Study*
Percentage of CTEOS Respondents Who Ended their Study at Woodland Community College in 2014-15 within each Employment Category
Woodland Community College Statewide
Source: Cal-PASS Plus – Career & Technical Education Outcomes Survey (CTEOS) * Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #4 (Direct)
Source: Cal-PASS Plus – Career & Technical Education Outcomes Survey (CTEOS) * Aligns with CCCCO Vision for Success Goal #4 (Direct)
7% 62% 15% 16% 63%
9% 60% 11% 18% 69%
Self-Employed Employed (one job) Employed (multiple jobs) Unemployed Employed in a Job Closely Related to the Field of Study*
Percentage of CTEOS Respondents Who Ended their Study at Yuba College in 2014/15 within each Employment Category
Yuba College Statewide
Employment
Employment
Source: Cal-PASS Plus – Strong Workforce Program (SWP)
34% 41% 47% 44% 50% 50% 52% 54% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Percentage of Skills-Builders and Completers who Earned a Living Wage within One Year of Exiting the College with a Statewide Comparison
Woodland Community College Statewide
Source: Cal-PASS Plus – Strong Workforce Program (SWP)
42% 43% 46% 51%
44% 46% 50% 52%
2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16
Percentage of Skills-Builders and Completers who Earned a Living Wage within One Year of Exiting the College with a Statewide Comparison
Yuba College State Median
Employment
Board of Trustees Retreat July 11, 2018 Presented by: Emma Blackthorne
YCCD Distance Education 3-Year FTES Trend
Source: Custom SQL Query
979 955 1,008 350 347 380
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
FTES And Sections
DE FTES DE Sections
Source: Custom SQL Query
68.8% 72.3% 71.6% 71.20% 72.70% 74% 72% 70% 70%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 2015_16 2016_17 2017_18
Course Success Rates
Success Rate Yuba Average Success Rate Woodland Average Success Rate
Looking forward
groups
regions with educational attainment of adults
MIS Data Mart District Completion Goal: Increase by at least 20% annually students acquiring Associate degrees, certificates, or specific skills sets that prepare them for an in- demand job
District Completers
Increase by at least 20% annually
students acquiring Associate degrees, certificates, or specific skills sets that prepare them for an in-demand job
Source: CCCCO CalPassPlus
Data Source: University of California InfoCenter & The California State University Institutional Research Dashboard Goal: Increase by 35% the number of students transferring annually to a UC or CSU
Source: UC InfoCenter
APPROXIMATE DISTRICT UC TRANFER RATE: 11%
Increase by 35% the number of students transferring annually to a UC or CSU
District: New Enrollments at CSU 2016
Source: CSU Institutional Research Dashboard
APPROXIMATE DISTRICT CSU TRANFER RATE: 39%
Increase by 35% the number of students transferring annually to a UC or CSU
Goal: Decrease the average number of units to complete
Completion by Design & Guided Pathways, Enrollment management, and Degree audit projects will be paramount to achieve
the overall goal.
Data Source: CalPassPlus Launch Board Goal: Increase the percent of exiting CTE students who report being employed in their field of study statewide to 69%
Increase the percent of exiting CTE students who report being employed in their field of study statewide to 69%
Forecasts 2014-2024 Middle-Skills and Entry-Level Goal: Increase the percent of exiting CTE students who report being employed in their field of study.
This is the job market for prospective employees who are nonskilled workers. Living Wage for Sutter/Yuba Counties: 1 Adult: $11.40/hr $23,712 +Child: $24.91/hr $51,813
Regional Entry-Level Employment Yolo
This is the job market for prospective employees who are nonskilled workers. Living Wage for Yolo County: 1 Adult: $12.77/hr $26,561 +Child: $26.81/hr $55,765
Regional Entry-Level Employment Lake
This is the job market for prospective employees who are nonskilled workers. Living Wage for Lake County: 1 Adult: $11.04/hr $22,963 +Child: $25.10/hr $52,208
This is the job market for prospective employees after participating in YCCD programs.
Living Wage for Yolo County:
1 Adult: $12.77/hr $26,561 +Child: $26.81/hr $55,765
Living Wage for Sutter/Yuba Counties:
1 Adult: $11.40/hr $23,712 +Child: $24.91/hr $51,813
Regional Middle- Skill Employment Lake
This is the job market for prospective employees after participating in YCCD programs. Living Wage for Lake County: 1 Adult: $11.04/hr $22,963 +Child: $25.10/hr $52,208
MIS Data Mart Equity Gaps Goal: Reduce achievement equity gaps across all measures among traditionally underrepresented student groups
Source: CCCCO CalPassPlus
Goal: Reduce regional achievement gaps across all measures among colleges located in regions with educational attainment of adults
Any Questions?