STRESS-IN-MOTION (SIM) RESULTS IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stress in motion sim
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

STRESS-IN-MOTION (SIM) RESULTS IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TOWARDS THE APPLICATION OF STRESS-IN-MOTION (SIM) RESULTS IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION Morris De Beer, Colin Fisher (CSIR, Transportek) and Louw Kannemeyer (SANRAL ) Layout of Presentation Introduction;


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TOWARDS THE APPLICATION OF STRESS-IN-MOTION (SIM) RESULTS IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

Morris De Beer, Colin Fisher (CSIR, Transportek) and Louw Kannemeyer (SANRAL)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Layout of Presentation

  • Introduction;
  • Stress-In-Motion (SIM) system;
  • Pavement Modeling using 3 loading

cases;

  • Concept of Normalised Contact Stress

(NCP);

  • Conclusions and recommendations.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

  • Protection of road infrastructure – major

challenge to RA’s;

  • Africa: Inter - regional traffic – as much as 70 %
  • ver loading;
  • World wide: Road user charges - complex;
  • Current tensions: Road Authorities vs private

sector interests.

  • CHALLENGE TO US “TECHNOCRATS”

FOR SOLUTIONS !

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Stress-In-Motion (SIM) system

  • Description;
  • Calibration and data acquisition;
  • Typical Data and outputs;

–Normalised Contact Pressure (NCP); –Effect of tyre speed; –Pavement response-top down cracking;

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Figure 1: Single SIM pad configuration (used under Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS) with single test tyre)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Figure 4: SAE sign convention used during SIM measurements. X-Longitudinal, Y-Lateral and Z -Vertical loads/stresses

  • Tyre Rotation

+Z +X +Y

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Direction

  • f

Traffic

Instrumented Pins

356 mm 755 mm

pattern1.wmf

TOP VIEW OF THE VRSPTA MK II TYRE PATCH TYRE PATCH TYRE PATCH

slide-9
SLIDE 9

425 /65 R22.5 HVS TYRE ON SIM SYSTEM: EXAMPLE OF FOOTPRINT TO FOLLOW…..

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5-Axial Load Cell: [+/- X; +/- Y; Z]

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SIM Measuring Pins- 3-Axial

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Laboratory Calibration Issues “Pin by Pin ” calibration- Jig A

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Laboratory Calibration Issues “In-Situ” calibration - Jig B

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Typical Pin Calibration data

  • 800
  • 700
  • 600
  • 500
  • 400
  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 ENTRAN LOADCELL (NEWTONS) LOADCELL (VOLTS) X Y Z

3D LOADCELL PIN 10

LOADING IN "X" DIRECTION

3D-CELLX/Y/Z.WK3 11/01/1999
  • 800
  • 700
  • 600
  • 500
  • 400
  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 ENTRAN LOADCELL (NEWTONS) LOADCELL (VOLTS) X Y Z

3D LOADCELL PIN 10

LOADING IN "Y" DIRECTION

3D-CELLX/Y/Z.WK3 11/01/1999

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

  • 0.5

0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 ENTRAN LOADCELL (NEWTONS) LOADCELL (VOLTS) X Y Z

3D LOADCELL PIN 10

LOADING IN "Z" DIRECTION

3D-CELLX/Y/Z.WK3 11/01/1999

+/- X - LOAD (kN) +/- Y - LOAD (kN) Z - LOAD (kN) VOLTS VOLTS VOLTS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

315/80 R22.5 HVS TYRE ON SIM MK II

slide-16
SLIDE 16

HVS 04 SIM MEASUREMENTS OF 11R22.5 TYRE

INFLATION PRESSURE Z - LOAD

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Figure 2: Twin (or dual) SIM pad configuration (used under Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS) with dual test tyres)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Figure 2: Quad (full) SIM pad configuration at a typical weighbridge site on National Road 3 (N3), near Heidelberg in Gauteng.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

In operation: Quad (full) SIM pad configuration at a typical weighbridge site on National Road 3 (N3), near Heidelberg in Gauteng.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

In operation – SIM N3-TCC

slide-21
SLIDE 21

In operation: SIM N3-TCC

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Table 1 Example of loading cases

Case Cold Inflation Pressure (kPa) Single tyre Loading (kN) % of rated loading @ 720 kPa[1] Comments

1 720 20

  • 20

Under- loaded

2 720 35 + 45

Overloaded

3 720 50 + 107

Extremely

  • verloaded

[1] For this test tyre the rated load at 720 kPa = 24 kN

slide-23
SLIDE 23

(a) Case 1: 20 kN, 720 kPa (b) Case 2: 35 kN, 720 kPa, (c) Case 1: 50 kN, 720 kPa

Figure 6: Static Tyre Foot Prints

  • 20 %

+ 45 % + 107 %

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

SIM DATA USED FOR ANALYSIS

slide-26
SLIDE 26

SIM DATA : VERTICAL STRESSD (Z)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

SIM DATA : LATERAL STRESS (Y)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

SIM DATA: LONGITUDINAL STRESS (X)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Loading Case Max Vert Stress: Z (kPa) Max Lat Stress: Y (kPa) Max Long Stress: X(kPa) 1 (n- shape) 953 191 102 2 (m- shape) 1189 209 185 3 (m- shape) 1486 261 210

Table 2: Maximum Stresses

slide-30
SLIDE 30

NORMALISED CONTACT PRESSURE (NCP) Maximum Contact Stress @ load P Inflation Pressure (rated tyre load) NCP = NCPz - Vertical Stress; NCPx - Long. Stress; NCPy - Lateral Stress; Performance Based Standard ?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Load Case NCPZ NCPY NCPX 1 (n- shape) 1.32 0.27 0.14 2 (m- shape) 1.65 0.29 0.26 3 (m- shape) 2.06 0.36 0.29 Table 3: NCPs

slide-32
SLIDE 32

NCPs cont.

NORMALISED CONTACT PRESSURE (NCP)- FREE ROLLING TYRE NCPi 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 TYRE LOADING (kN)

NCPz-VERTICAL NCPy-LATERAL NCPx-LONGITUDINAL

LIMITING NCPz = 1.5

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Interface shear stresses (x,y) Lateral (X)shear stresses

  • Long. (Y) shear stresses
slide-34
SLIDE 34

425 /65 R22.5 HVS TIRE ON SIM SYSTEM: EXAMPLE OF FOOTPRINT TO FOLLOW…..

slide-35
SLIDE 35

SHEAR STRESS (X-Y) EXCURSION - Single Tyre: 20 kN, 720 kPa (Test T472A)

  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300

  • 200
  • 150
  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150 200

X-Longitudinal Stress (kPa) Y-Lateral Stress (kPa)

Pin 3 Pin 5 Pin 9 Pin 12 Pins: 3 5 9 12

Tyre Tread

LATERAL (X-Y) STRESS EXCURSIONS

slide-36
SLIDE 36

SHEAR STRESS (X-Y) EXCURSION - Single Tyre: 35 kN, 720 kPa (Test T772A)

  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300

  • 200
  • 150
  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150 200 X-Longitudinal Stress (kPa) Y-Lateral Stress (kPa) Pin 3 Pin 5 Pin 9 Pin 12 Pins: 3 5 9 12

Tyre Tread

LATERAL (X-Y) STRESS EXCURSIONS

slide-37
SLIDE 37

SHEAR STRESS (X-Y) EXCURSION - Single Tyre: 50 kN, 720 kPa (Test T1072A)

  • 300
  • 200
  • 100

100 200 300

  • 200
  • 150
  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150 200 X-Longitudinal Stress (kPa) Y-Lateral Stress (kPa) Pin 3 Pin 5 Pin 9 Pin 12 Pins: 3 5 9 12

Tyre Tread

LATERAL (X-Y) STRESS EXCURSIONS

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Effects of Tyre Speed on contact stress

  • Not studied in detail with SIM;
  • Preliminary work done in 1996 on car tyres;
  • Changes in shape of stress regime expected;
  • Axle lift may result in smaller contact patch

(6 % @ 100 km/h);

  • Some pavement response parameters

decrease with increased speed.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Effect of Tyre Speed: 27.6 km/h

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Effect of Tyre Speed: 58.1 km/h

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Top Down Cracking in (“thick”) AC layers

  • MAJOR REASON:Non-

Traffic associated- shrinkage, temperature, construction, etc.;

  • Traffic associated- tyres

and stresses – but not solely responsible for this type of cracking;

  • Working conjointly - most

probable scenario;

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Circular load - Tyre Model (Blab, 2001)

AC G3 Subgrade

slide-43
SLIDE 43

VERTICAL STRESS: TYRE CENTRE AND EDGE

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Case 1-std Case 1 Case 2-std Case 2 Case 3-std Case 3 Vertical Stress (kPa)

Vertical Stress - Centre Vertical Stress - Edge

Case 1: 20 kN; 720 kPa Case 2: 35 kN; 720 kPa Case 3: 50 kN; 720 kPa

slide-44
SLIDE 44

VERTICAL ELASTIC DEFLECTION ON SURFACE: TYRE CENTRE AND EDGE

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Case 1-std Case 1 Case 2-std Case 2 Case 3-std Case 3 Vertical Deflection (um)

Deflection - Centre Deflection - Edge Case 1: 20 kN; 720 kPa Case 2: 35 kN; 720 kPa Case 3: 50 kN; 720 kPa

slide-45
SLIDE 45

HORISONTAL STRAIN BOTTOM OF 20 mm ASPHALT SURFACING: TYRE CENTRE AND EDGE

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Case 1-std Case 1 Case 2-std Case 2 Case 3-std Case 3

Horisontal Strain (um)

Tensile Strain - Centre Tensile Strain - Edge Case 1: 20 kN; 720 kPa Case 2: 35 kN; 720 kPa Case 3: 50 kN; 720 kPa

slide-46
SLIDE 46

FACTOR OF SAFETY (FoS) - GRANULAR BASE TYRE CENTRE AND EDGE

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Case 1-std Case 1 Case 2-std Case 2 Case 3-std Case 3

Case

Factor of Safety (FoS) FoS-Centre FoS-Edge

Case 1: 20 kN; 720 kPa Case 2: 35 kN; 720 kPa Case 3: 50 kN; 720 kPa

slide-47
SLIDE 47

VERTICAL STRAIN ON TOP OF SUBGRADE: TYRE CENTRE AND EDGE

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Case 1-std Case 1 Case 2-std Case 2 Case 3-std Case 3

Vertical Strain (um) Vertical Strain - Centre Vertical Strain - Edge

Case 1: 20 kN; 720 kPa Case 2: 35 kN; 720 kPa Case 3: 50 kN; 720 kPa

slide-48
SLIDE 48

PAVEMENT LIFE : MECHANISTIC – EMPIRICAL: CRITICAL LAYER APPROACH (me-PADS)

0.00E+00 2.00E+04 4.00E+04 6.00E+04 8.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.20E+05 Case 1-std Case 1 Case 2-std Case 2 Case 3-std Case 3

“Layer Life”

Surfacing-Centre G3-Base-Centre Subgrade-Centre Layer Life > 1.00+06 1<NCPc<1.5 NCPe > 1.5 NCPc = NCPe ~ 1.0

slide-49
SLIDE 49

PERFORMANCE BASED STANDARD (PBS)

NCPz (for Vertical Stress) < 1.5 ….for rated tyre loading on thinly surfaced pavements.. ?

slide-50
SLIDE 50

IN SUMMARY…….

  • Use of SIM technology demonstrated;
  • Tyre contact stress shapes: Vertical: typically

“n-shapes and “m”-shapes;

  • X-Y Shear excursion plots- useful concept ?;
  • Three-circle modeling in MLLE analyses;
  • NCP useful concept recommended for PBS;
slide-51
SLIDE 51

RECOMMENDATIONS…..

  • Continued R & D with SIM:

– Higher speeds; – Braking and acceleration (down hill);

  • Analysis of a wider range of pavement

types;

  • Improved modeling (tyre contact patch non-

uniform & non-circular);

  • NCPz, NCPx, NCPy to be further

investigated for PBS applications.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Thank you