Status of the Mechanics of Tracking Detector Szymon Sroka, Wolfgang - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Status of the Mechanics of Tracking Detector

Szymon Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt CLICdp Tracker Technology Meeting

Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt

1/13/2016

Presentation Layout

I. Tracking Detector System

• Tracker Layout ‐ Two different scenarios

(Reminder)

• Tracker Layout ‐ Current status. Arrangement of

modules ‐> Barrel

• Tracker Layout ‐ Current status. Arrangement of

modules – > End‐Caps

• End‐Caps ‐> Upgrade of dimensions
• End‐Caps ‐> Conceptions, ideas, remarks.

Brainstorming. Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 2

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 3

Tracker Layout

Two different scenarios

Outer Sub‐system: ‐ 4 End‐Caps ‐ 3 Tracker’s Layers Inner Sub‐system: ‐ 7 End‐Caps ‐ 3 Tracker’s Layers Outer Sub‐system: ‐ 5 End‐Caps ‐ 3 Tracker’s Layers Inner Sub‐system: ‐ 7 End‐Caps ‐ 3 Tracker’s Layers

“Layer 5 & layer 4” Towards Lightweight Tracker Support Structure proposed by Fernando Duarte Ramos

Layer 6 Layer 5

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 4

Tracker Layout

Current status Arrangement of modules ‐> Barrel

Arrangement of Electronics Cards and Power Suppliers

Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer 3 Layer 2 Layer 1 Layer 0

“Layer 4, 3, 2, 1” Conception of 3D Space Frame

One of possible design proposal ‐ Single Modules Package (Zoom in)

Support Plate

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 5

Tracker Layout

Current status Arrangement of modules ‐> Barrel

Layer 2 Layer 1 Layer 0

Outer & Inner Sub‐System

Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer 3

Tracker Barrel

Number

• f Barrel

Radii of Modules [mm] Length

• f

Barrel [mm] Number of Modules along the "beam axis“ [‐] Number

• f

Modules around perimet er [‐] Angular spacing [deg] Inner Sub‐System 131.55 963.2 32 15 12.714 1 345 963.2 32 38 9.4740 2 558.55 1384.6 46 32 11.250 Outer Sub‐System 3 815 2523.4 84 46 7.826 4 1151.45 2523.4 84 64 5.625 5 1456.45 2523.4 84 82 4.390

Module package ‐ plate support for layers 2,3,4,5 Module package ‐ plate support for layer 1 Module package ‐ plate support for layer 0 e.g. Layer 5 e.g. Layer 1 e.g. Layer 0

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 6

Tracker Layout

Current status Arrangement of Modules – > End‐Caps

Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer 3

Outer Sub‐System

Modules size = 30 mm x 30 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 3.45 m2 = 3450000 mm2 A2 = 2.85m2 = 2850000 mm2 Numbers of Modules_1 = 128 x30 Numbers of Modules_2 = 106 x 30

A1 A2

Modules size = 30 mm x 30 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 3.45m2 = 3450000 mm2 A2 = 4.355m2 = 4350000 mm2 Numbers of Modules_1 = 128 x30 Numbers of Modules_2 = 160 x30

A1 A2

Modules size = 30 mm x 30 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 8.7m2 = 8700000 mm2 Numbers of Modules_1 = 160 x30 Numbers of Modules_2 = 160 x30

A A

6 different sensors Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A = 9.78m2 = 9780000 mm2 Inactive area of sensors near to edges

A A

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 7

Tracker Layout

Current status Arrangement of modules –> End‐Caps

Layer 2 Layer 1 Layer 0

Inner Sub‐System

Modules size = 15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 0.324m2 = 324000 mm2 A2,3 = 0.162 m2 = 162000 mm2 Petals are located in 3 planes ! Modules size = 15 mm x 15 mm Petals are located in 4 planes ! ( similar to the CMS concept Modules size = 15 mm x 15 mm Petals are located in 3 planes ! 3 different sensors Gaps between sensors = 0.1 mm A = 0.75m2 = 75000 mm2 Inactive area of sensors near to edges Modules size = 15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm A1 = 0.648m2 = 648000 mm2 Petals are located in 2 planes !

On the example of "Disc 0"

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 8

Tracker End‐Caps

Number of EndCaps

Inner Radii of End‐Caps [mm] Outer Radii

• f End‐Caps

[mm] Z Coordinate of End‐ Caps [mm] Number of Petals around perimeter [‐] Number

• f planes
• n which

Petals are placed [‐] Angular spacing in

• ne plane

[deg] Angle between Petals in two planes [deg]

Inner Sub‐System

112.0 414.0 530.6 12 (x2) 2 30 15 1 107.1 545.0 815.1 12 (x2) 2 30 15 2 137.3 545.0 1099.6 12 (x2) 2 30 15 3 167.5 545.0 1384.1 12 (x2) 2 30 15 4 197.7 545.0 1668.6 12 (x2) 2 30 15 5 227.9 545.0 1960.1 12 (x2) 2 30 15 6 258.1 545.0 2237.6 12 (x2) 2 30 15

Outer Sub‐System

1 617.2 1429.9 1317.2 24 (x2) 2 15 7.5 2 617.2 1429.9 1623.8 24 (x2) 2 15 7.5 3 617.2 1429.9 1930.4 24 (x2) 2 15 7.5 4 617.2 1429.9 2237.6 24 (x2) 2 15 7.5

Tracker Layout

End‐Caps ‐> Upgrade of Dimensions

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 9

End‐Caps

Conceptions, ideas, remarks Brainstorming

Questions:

How to make support structure for the modules? How to make support structure for both End‐Caps system? How to cool down the systems? How to perform an overlap in ϕ and keep the system hermetic ?

1/13/2016

Backup slides

Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 11

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 12

New Tracker Layout

Arrangement of Modules ‐ ‐ Barrel

Layer 2 Layer 1 Layer 0

Layer 2 Layer 1 Layer 0

Inner Tracking Sub‐System ‐ Barrel

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 13

New Tracker Layout

Arrangement of Modules ‐ Barrel

Layer 5 Layer 4 Layer 3

Layer 4 Layer 5 Layer 3

Outer Tracking Sub‐System ‐ Barrel

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 14

Petal ver.1 – Outer Sub‐System

New Tracker Layout

Arrangement of Modules ‐ EndCaps

Commnets:

Modules size = 30 mm x 30 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.145 m2 = 145000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 160

Commnets:

6 different sensors Gaps between sensors = 0.1 mm Area = 0.183 m2 = 183000 mm2 Inactive area of sensors near to edges Petal ver.2 – Outer Sub‐System

Outer Tracker Sub‐System ‐ EndCaps Inner Tracker Sub‐System ‐ EndCaps

Commnets:

Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.026 m2 = 26000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 116

Commnets:

Modules size = 15mm x 15mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.046 m2 = 46000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 201

Petal ‘’Disc0’’ – Inner Sub‐System Petal ‘’Disc1’’ – Inner Sub‐System

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 15

New Tracker Layout

Arrangement of Modules ‐ EndCaps

Commnets:

Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.044m2 = 44000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 195

Petal ‘’Disc2’’ – Inner Sub‐System

Commnets:

Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.043m2 = 43000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 189

Petal ‘’Disc3’’ – Inner Sub‐System

Commnets:

Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.041m2 = 41000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 179

Petal ‘’Disc4’ – Inner Sub‐System

Commnets:

Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.039m2 = 39000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 169

Petal ‘’Disc5’ – Inner Sub‐System

Commnets:

Modules size =15 mm x 15 mm Gaps between modules = 0.1 mm Area = 0.036m2 = 36000 mm2 Numbers of Modules = 159

Petal ‘’Disc6’ – Inner Sub‐System

1/13/2016

Alice’s Modules Conception

Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 16

Estimated contributions of the Outer Layer Stave to the material budget

Component Material Thickness [µm]

Module

FPC Metal Layer Aluminium

50

FPC Insulating Layers Polyimide

100

Module Plate Carbon Fibre

120

Pixel Chip Silicon

300

Glue Eccobond 54

100

Cold Plate

Carbon fleece

40

Graphite foil

30

Cooling pipe Polyimide

64

Cooling fluid Water

• Carbon Plate

Carbon Fibre

120

Glue Eccobond 54

100

Power Bus

Metal Layer Aluminium

200

Insulating layers Polyimide

200

Glue Eccobond 54

100

1/13/2016 Szymon Krzysztof Sroka, Wolfgang Klempt 17