Graphic: Anze Slozar
Your Name and Collaborators
1
Statistical challenges in the Lyman-α forest
Andreu Font-Ribera STFC Ernest Rutherford Fellow at University College London
In collaboration with Pat McDonald (LBL) and Anže Slosar (BNL)
Statistical challenges in the Lyman- forest Andreu Font-Ribera - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Your Name and Collaborators Statistical challenges in the Lyman- forest Andreu Font-Ribera Graphic: Anze Slozar STFC Ernest Rutherford Fellow at University College London In collaboration with Pat McDonald (LBL) and An e Slosar (BNL) 1
Graphic: Anze Slozar
Your Name and Collaborators
1
Andreu Font-Ribera STFC Ernest Rutherford Fellow at University College London
In collaboration with Pat McDonald (LBL) and Anže Slosar (BNL)
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 2
Look back time (billion years)
BOSS Lyα forest 160k spectra 2.0 < z < 3.5 BOSS galaxies 1.3M spectra 0.2 < z < 0.7
Overdensity Underdensity
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 3
Look back time (billion years)
BOSS Lyα forest 160k spectra 2.0 < z < 3.5 BOSS galaxies 1.3M spectra 0.2 < z < 0.7
Overdensity Underdensity
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest
4
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 5
Credits: Andrew Pontzen
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 6
fq(λ) = Cq(λ)Fq(λ)
λ = λα(1 + z)
Observed flux Transmitted fraction Quasar continuum Absorption redshift Observed wavelength LyaF wavelength (121.6 nm)
δF (x) = F(x) − ¯ F ¯ F
Flux fluctuations in pixels trace the density along the line of sight to the quasar
440 460 480 500 520 540 ! (nm) !5 5 10 15 20 flux [10!17 erg s!1 cm!2 A!1]
Method 1 Method 2
Quasar Continuum x Mean Flux
1st step: from observed flux to cosmological fluctuations
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest
7
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 8
Gas Quasar Quasar
Gas Gas Quasar Quasar
Two independent ways of measuring the BAO scale
Bautista et al. (2017) du Mas des Bourboux (2017) —— DR12 ——
1˚ A ∼ 70 km s−1 ∼ 0.7 h−1 Mpc
1 deg ∼ 70 h−1 Mpc
Lyα auto-correlation Lyα-quasar cross-correlation
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 9
Two independent ways of measuring the BAO scale
Bautista et al. (2017) du Mas des Bourboux (2017) —— DR12 ——
Lyα auto-correlation Lyα-quasar cross-correlation
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 10
In a flat ΛCDM model BAO Planck
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest
11
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 12
Mayall 4m Telescope Kitt Peak (Tucson, AZ)
Readout & Control
Scheduled to start in 2019 Increase BOSS dataset by an
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 13
Mayall 4m Telescope Kitt Peak (Tucson, AZ)
Readout & Control
Scheduled to start in 2019 Increase BOSS dataset by an
Lens in cell, UCL, March 2018
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 14
Planck prediction
Acceleration Deceleration
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 15
DESI projections (Font-Ribera++ 2014b)
Planck prediction
Acceleration Deceleration
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest
16
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 17
Lyman-α forest offers a unique window to study small scale clustering Combined with CMB, it allows us to study:
Late time Early time Small scales Large scales
CMB Lyman-α Forest Weak Lensing Spectroscopic Galaxies Photometric Galaxies CMB Lensing
0 1 2 Redshift 5 1100 1000 100 Mpc 10 1
Future 21cm
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 18
Flux correlations (P1D or P3D) Quasar spectra Estimator Density power spectrum Hydrodynamical simulations Likelihood Cosmo params (neutrino mass) Planck (+ others)
MCMC
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 19
Flux correlations (P1D or P3D) Quasar spectra Estimator Density power spectrum Hydrodynamical simulations Likelihood Cosmo params (neutrino mass) Planck (+ others)
MCMC
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest
20
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 21
1D correlations, one skewer at a time (Palanque-Delabrouille et al. 2013)
Line of sight (1D) wavenumber ~ 2 h/Mpc ~ 0.1 h/Mpc
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest
22
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 23
(DESI Lyα forecasts dominated by P3D, not P1D) Motivation However, current 3D studies in BOSS/eBOSS only try to measure BAO 1D analyses have used both FFT / Pseudo-Cl and Maximum Likelihood
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 24
Likelihood-based
L(p) ' L(p0) + dL dpi pi + 1 2 d2L dpidpj pipj + ... ⌘ L(p0) + L,ipi + 1 2L,ijpipj + ...
L(|p) / det (C)−1/2 exp 1 2tC−1
pmax
i
= p0
i L−1 ,ij L,j ,
L,i = 1 2tC−1S,iC−1 1 2Tr ⇥ C−1S,i ⇤
L Fij ⌘ hL,iji = 1 2Tr ⇥ C−1S,iC−1S,j ⇤
Optimal Quadratic Estimator
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 25
(continuum errors) spread over all scales
in transverse direction
(z-evolution) Configuration or Fourier space? Cross-spectrum (hybrid) 1D power is just one of the bins of the cross-spectrum with
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 26
Measurement from 40 mock realizations of BOSS
JCAP (2018) 1710.11036v2
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 27
BAO in the Lyα forest
Small scale clustering of the Lyα forest
28
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 29
Riess et al. (2016)
Addison et al. (2017)
Planck + LCDM predicts value of H0 lower than that from local expansion (Riess et al. 2016) BAO + LCDM constraint Ωm and H0 rs (sound horizon, size of ruler) With BBN prior on Ωb we can break degeneracy and measure H0 from BAO
Oxford, April 19th 2018 Andreu Font-Ribera - Statistical challenges with the Lyman-⍺ forest 30
Snowmass report (2014)
Massive neutrinos are hot dark matter, do not cluster on small scales Comparing the power
we can constraint neutrino masses Best constraints from Planck + BOSS Lyα Σmν < 0.12 eV (95%)
(Palanque-Delabrouille++ 2015)