the mean ultraviolet spectrum of a representative sample
play

The Mean Ultraviolet Spectrum of a Representative Sample of Faint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop: The Mean Ultraviolet Spectrum of a Representative Sample of Faint z~3 Lyman Alpha Emitters Kimihiko Nakajima (ESO/UCL) In collaboration with R. Ellis (ESO/UCL) , T .


  1. � � Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop:� The Mean Ultraviolet Spectrum of � a Representative Sample of � Faint z~3 Lyman Alpha Emitters � Kimihiko Nakajima (ESO/UCL)� In collaboration with� R. Ellis (ESO/UCL) , T . Fletcher (UCL) , B. Robertson (UCSC) , � I. Iwata (Subaru) , A. Inoue (Osaka Sangyo U.) �

  2. � � � � � � � � � � � � � Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima � � Background � � � � � � � Galaxies governed Reionization process?� � � � � Electron scattering � History of cosmic star-formation� Neutral fraction of IGM� � Optical depth� � � � ρ SFR←UV� � 1-Q HII � � � � τ � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2 � � � ) Robertson et al. 2015� � � � � � See also Faisst 2016, Talks on Wednesday� � � � � � � � � � � � � Fraction of ionizing photons that � Efficiency of ionizing photon production� � � escape into IGM� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2 � � � � � � ) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

  3. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Background � Lyα emitters (LAEs) as Probes of Early galaxies� in all star-forming galaxies� Fraction of LAEs � EoR� 3 4 5 6 7 8� Redshift� Stark et al. 2011, ApJL, 728, L2� Low-mass, metal-poor, young star-forming galaxies� • Typical in early universe� •

  4. � Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Background � Lyα emitters (LAEs) as Probes of Early galaxies� z=3.1 LAEʼs MOSFIRE K spectrum� in all star-forming galaxies� Fraction of LAEs � EoR� 3 4 5 6 7 8� Redshift� Nakajima et al. 2016� Stark et al. 2011, ApJL, 728, L2� See also Nakajima&Ouchi 2014, Erb+2016, Kojima+2017, Talk by D. Erb� Low-mass, metal-poor, young star-forming galaxies� • Typical in early universe� • Intense nebular lines, e.g. [OIII] 5007,4959� •

  5. � Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Background � Lyα emitters (LAEs) as Probes of Early galaxies� Roberts-Borsani et al. 2016� z=3.1 LAEʼs MOSFIRE K spectrum� in all star-forming galaxies� Fraction of LAEs � EoR� 3 4 5 6 7 8� Redshift� Nakajima et al. 2016� Stark et al. 2011, ApJL, 728, L2� See also Smit+2014,2015� See also Nakajima&Ouchi 2014, Erb+2016, Kojima+2017, Talk by D. Erb� Low-mass, metal-poor, young star-forming galaxies� • Typical in early universe� • Intense nebular lines, e.g. [OIII] 5007,4959� •

  6. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Background � LAEs present Hard Ionizing Spectrum� ξ ion Based on Hydrogen recombination lines� LBGs� LAEs� (Bouwens et al. 2016)� Nakajima et al. 2016� More efficient production� of ionizing photons� Typical Characteristics of LAEs ? �

  7. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Our Work � Nature of Ionizing Spectrum � Examined by UV spectrum � emitted above energy E� Number of photons � Harder� Softer� Refer also to Talk by K. Schmidt�

  8. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Our Work � UV line diagnostics of ξ ion� Flux(CIII])� N ion (>24.4eV)� EW(CIII]) = --------------- ∝ ------------------ = f ( Z , U ,ξ ion (age))� f λ,1909� L UV� 1Myr 10Myr 100Myr� Age� Smaller ξ ion� Nakajima et al. 2017 in collaboration with VUDS� (A&A in press, arXiv:1709.03990)� See also Stark+2014, Gutkin+2016�

  9. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Our Work � VLT/VIMOS (11hrs) Observation� Identifying Lyα from ~70 Faint z=3 LAEs � 400 z=3 LBGs (Shapley+03) 40 z ∼ 2 LAEs (Stark+14) 350 z=2-3 LAEs (Erb+14) 35 z=3.1 LAEs (This Work) N o (Shapley + 03 only) 300 30 LBGs� Our target � 250 (Shapely et al. 2003)� LAEs� 25 N o 200 20 150 15 100 10 50 5 0 0 − 26 − 24 − 22 − 20 − 18 − 16 − 14 -26 -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 � M UV M UV� Nakajima et al. 2018, MNRAS in press� (arXiv:1801.03085)�

  10. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Our Work � VLT/VIMOS (11hrs) Observation� Identifying Lyα from ~70 Faint z=3 LAEs � 400 z=3 LBGs (Shapley+03) 40 z ∼ 2 LAEs (Stark+14) 350 z=2-3 LAEs (Erb+14) 35 z=3.1 LAEs (This Work) N o (Shapley + 03 only) 300 30 LBGs� Our target � 250 (Shapely et al. 2003)� LAEs� 25 N o 200 20 150 15 100 10 50 5 0 0 − 26 − 24 − 22 − 20 − 18 − 16 − 14 -26 -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 � M UV M UV� Nakajima et al. 2018, MNRAS in press� (arXiv:1801.03085)�

  11. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Our Work � VLT/VIMOS (11hrs) Observation� Identifying rest UV lines in Stacks of 70 z=3 LAEs � Flux density (cgs per A)� Rest Wavelength (A)� Nakajima et al. 2018, MNRAS in press� (arXiv:1801.03085)�

  12. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Results � Strong CIII] Associated with Strong Lyα � EW(Lyα) large� UV faint� Bluer β� EW(Lyα) small� UV bright� Redder β� Nakajima et al. 2018, MNRAS in press� (arXiv:1801.03085)�

  13. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Results � Stronger LAEs are less chemically enriched galaxies � Nakajima et al. 2018�

  14. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Results � Stronger LAEs are less chemically enriched galaxies � ionization state � Gas metallicity � Nakajima et al. 2018� Nakajima et al. 2017� Stronger LAEs: Z = 0.05 – 0.2 Z sun� Weaker LAEs: Z = 0.1 – 0.5 Z sun�

  15. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Results � LAEsʼ Hard ξ ion is confirmed with UV line analysis� @ 1Myr� Nakajima et al. 2018� Stronger LAEs: log ξ ion = 25.68±0.13 � Weaker LAEs: log ξ ion = 25.54±0.09 �

  16. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Results � LAEsʼ Hard ξ ion is confirmed with UV line analysis� with UV lines� with Hβ� Nakajima et al. 2018� Stronger LAEs: log ξ ion = 25.68±0.13 � Weaker LAEs: log ξ ion = 25.54±0.09 �

  17. � Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Discussion � ξ ion as functions of UV luminosity, redshift and Lyα� (Nakajima+16)� Nakajima et al. 2018� Refer also to Talks on Wednesday� LBGs: Uniform ξ ion (~25.2--25.4), independent of M UV , z � LAEs: Larger ξ ion (~25.5--25.7), particularly for faintest LAEs� → Analogous to Galaxies in EoR�

  18. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Work on-going� LymAn Continuum Escape Survey (LACES):� UV Imaging of z=3 LAEs� Deep (20orbits x3) HST/F336W imaging of 51 z=3 LAEs � High success rate in securing significant F336W detections (~30%)� HST localization suggests minimal (<2%) foreground contamination � F336W� NB497� F160W� Lyα� Stars� LyC� f esc ~7±2%� y � r a n i m i l e r P For detections: � Individual f esc ranges from 4-60% � r detections: individual f

  19. Tokyo Spring Cosmic Lyman-Alpha Workshop, Tokyo on Mar 27, 2018 – Kimihiko Nakajima Summary� LAEs are ideal analogs of sources � in Reionization era � Low-mass, Low-metallicity, Young� Intense [OIII] 5007,4959 � Hard Ionizing Spectrum� Galaxies like LAEs could dominate F336W� NB497� F160W� Reionization process� LyC� Lyα� Stars� Hard Ionizing Spectrum� High Escape Fraction? � → To be examined with LACES� r detections: individual f

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend