State of Ohio 2016-2017 Local Report Card PRELIMINARY RESULTS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

State of Ohio 2016-2017 Local Report Card PRELIMINARY RESULTS

• Ohio’s Local Report Cards
• Our PRELIMINARY Results
• Our Commitment to Excellence
• Our Purpose
• Our Response
• Our Focus - Continuous Improvement

Tonight’s Presentation

2

• Report on the progress of districts and schools in raising

achievement and preparing students for the future

• Provide one measure of district and school progress; an

important source of data for districts to use in conjunction with

• ther data
• Report on the results on state tests given to students in grades

3-8 and in select high school courses annually in the spring

• Provide a snapshot of student, school and district performance

at one point in time

Purpose of Ohio’s Local Report Cards

3

• Although significant legislation surrounds the requirements for

achievement testing, it remains only one source of data that is used by our staff in identifying and analyzing the strengths and areas for improvement for each and every student.

• Benchmarks to measure student performance levels have and

will continue to change annually

• 2016-17 report card measures not finalized yet by ODE -

COMING IN SEPTEMBER!

Cautions for Ohio’s Local Report Cards

4

Owning Our Results

5

Achievement B

Solid performance on this component, increase in PI scores across the district. All schools PI increased. Will continue to strive for greater passage rates.

Gap Closing B

Increased performance in all subgroups in Math and ELA; the district must continue its efforts in helping all subgroups succeed.

Progress NR

Coming in September

Graduation Rate A

Continues to be a strong success area for the district.

Prepared for Success B

College Credit Plus participation, AP participation and scores, SAT/ACT scores and honors diploma data are strong; we expect continued growth in future years.

Achievement

What is the Achievement component? District Results

6

• Performance Index - based on the

test results of every student, with points awarded based on the achievement level of each student.

• Performance Index - 102.7 of 120

possible points (85.6%); A 4.9 point PI increase from 2015-2016.

• Indicators Met - the number of

indicators the district met out of 24 indicators representing each test and each grade level.

• Indicators Met - 14 out of 24

indicators met; ODE now requires 80% for passage; we must continue to increase student achievement levels

Achievement

Comparison Data

Achievement Level Earned

16-17 15-16 Untested 0.1% 0.1% Limited 5.9% 8.6% Basic 10.6% 12.9% Proficient 19.6% 22.5% Accelerated 26.5% 25.7% Advanced 26.0% 26.1% Advanced Plus 11.2% 4.3%

Achievement

Exam 2015 State Indicators 2016 State Indicators NAPLS 2015-2016 2017 Indicators State & Beyond NAPLS 2016-2017 Results Grade 3 Math 65% 73% 83.8% 80% 88.4% Grade 3 ELA 80% 68% 77.8% 80% 85.5% Grade 4 Math 64% 72% 80.4% 80% 90.8% Grade 4 ELA 69% 75% 71.6% 80% 82.8% Grade 4 SS 70% 75% 88.3% 80% 93.0% Grade 5 Math 68% 74% 78.3% 80% 82.1% Grade 5 ELA 66% 73% 79.6% 80% 87.8% Grade 5 Science 62% 71% 85.7% 80% 85.8%

Achievement

Exam 2015 State Indicators 2016 State Indicators NAPLS 2015-2016 2017 Indicators State & Beyond NAPLS 2016-2017 Results Grade 6 Math 67% 74% 76.7% 80% 75.1% Grade 6 ELA 68% 74% 74.9% 80% 79.1% Grade 6 SS 56% 68% 84.5% 80% 77.1% Grade 7 Math 67% 74% 39.2% 80% 71.7% Grade 7 ELA 68% 74% 74.3% 80% 81.5% Grade 8 Math 51% 66% 78.2% 80% 91.5% Grade 8 ELA 68% 74% 62.5% 80% 78.3% Grade 8 Science 60% 70% 82.3% 80% 79.6%

Achievement

Exam 2015 State Indicators 2016 State Indicators NAPLS 2015-2016 2017 Indicators State & Beyond NAPLS 2016-2017 Results Algebra 1 64% 72% 80.0% 80% 79.7% Geometry 80% 80% 74.2% 80% 68.4% ELA 1 73% 77% 80.3% 80% 86.3% ELA 2 76% 78% 80.5% 80% 75.6% Biology N/A 72% 86.8% 80% 86.0% US History 71% 76% 93.7% 80% 83.8% US Government 67% 74% 91.7% 80% 92.6%

The gifted Indicator highlights the opportunities and performance of gifted students.

Gifted Students

District Results

Value Added Grade: Enrollment: Value Added Met? Not Rated

Coming in September

Gifted Value Added Performance Index: Performance Index Met? 120.540 Met

4.2 increase

Gifted Performance Index Total Points: Gifted Inputs Met? 89.0 Met Gifted Inputs

11

Achievement

Indicators Met Overall Achievement Performance Index

The Gap Closing component shows how well we are meeting the performance expectations for our most vulnerable populations of students in English language arts, math and graduation.

Gap Closing

District Results

13

The Graduation Rate component shows the percent of students who successfully finish high school with a diploma in four or five years.

Graduation Rate

District Results

14

The K-3 Literacy component shows how successful NAPLS is at getting struggling readers

• n track to proficiency in

third grade and beyond.

K-3 Literacy

District Results

New Albany-Plain Local Schools has not been graded because fewer than 5% of kindergarten students were struggling readers.

15

Prepared for Success shows how well prepared

• ur students are

for all future

• pportunities.

District Results

Prepared For Success

16

Forward Progress into 2017-2018

Highlights

• Increased passage rates in

15/23 testing areas

• Increased passage rates for all

sub-groups

• Gifted PI increased in all

buildings

• 100% of 3rd graders promoted!

Focus Areas

• Continue to focus on aligning

daily instruction with standards

• Targeted interventions to help

ALL students succeed

• Provide opportunities to extend

each student’s learning

• Data warehouse integration and

usage

2016-17 Local Report Card Results: Elementary Schools

Scott to do K-5

18

Highlights

Grades 3 - 5

Grades 2-8 / 2-5 Highlights Achievement: A/B All passage rates increased for 3-5, ALL Indicators Met Gifted: Met/Met Final Indicator Rating: Coming in September! Gap Closing: B/B Exceeded goal that each building set for closing the gap with specific subgroups K-3 Literacy: A/A Progress monitoring helps identify and provide support for all readers Third Grade Reading Guarantee: 100%/100% 100% of 3rd grade students were promoted even with an increased promotion score requirement

Areas of Focus

Grades Preschool - 6th

• Implementation of New Math Programs
• Review of Writing Curriculum
• Analyzing last year’s results for areas of improvement
• Action plans specific to grade level, building and subgroup needs

Local Report Card Results: Middle and High Schools

21

Grades 6 - 8

Grades MS/HS Highlights Achievement: C Middle School passage for 7th Grade Math increased 32.5 pts PI increased for MS 4.8 pts Gifted: Met MS met Gifted PI & Inputs Final Indicator Rating: Coming in September! Gap Closing: B MS increased passage for all subgroups in ELA & Math

Highlights

Grades 9 - 12

Grades MS/HS Highlights Achievement: C HS increased performance index 4.6 pts Gifted: Not Met HS met Gifted Inputs increased Gifted PI 4.6 pts Final Indicator Rating: Coming in September! Gap Closing: D HS ELA stayed the same or increased Graduation Rate: A Continues to be a strong indicator Prepared for Success: B Increased number of students with Scores of 3 or higher on AP and number of students with 3 or more college credits

Highlights

Areas of Focus

Grades 7 - 12

• Math Curricular Study grades 6 - 12
• Targeted Math Intervention during an additional lab time added to student

schedules.

• Utilization of Eagle period to provide additional support for individual

students

• Action plans specific to grade level, building and subgroup needs,

including gifted

Questions & Comments

Official Results will be released in September

Curriculum Audit and Resource Study Math 6 -12

• Use the results of the quantitative analysis of Ohio State

Math Test.

• Use the item analysis for each individual test - Math 6,

Math 7, Math 8, Algebra 1, Geometry

Hanover Research Project Participation

• In depth Math teacher interviews
• Best practice research
• Like district implementation of math resources
• Alignment with Bridges in Mathematics
• Vendor review of math resources

Next Steps

• Middle School/High School vertical alignment meetings twice monthly
• High School Intervention Learning Centers and Eagle period support

for struggling math students

• Progress Monitor in MS/HS
• Targeted intervention for middle school students
• Common planning time for middle school math teachers
• Resource adoption by December
• Professional development
• Potential pilot of materials second semester