STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION: THE CASE STUDY OF LEUVEN Dr. Imre Keseru - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

May 04, 2023 234 likes •453 views

THE USE OF AHP AND PROMETHEE TO EVALUATE SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY SCENARIOS BY ACTIVE STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION: THE CASE STUDY OF LEUVEN Dr. Imre Keseru Jeroen Bulckaen Prof. Cathy Macharis Department BUTO MOBI Mobility, Logistics

SLIDE 1

Dr. Imre Keseru – Jeroen Bulckaen – Prof. Cathy Macharis

Department BUTO MOBI Mobility, Logistics and Automotive Technology Research Centre

THE USE OF AHP AND PROMETHEE TO EVALUATE SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY SCENARIOS BY ACTIVE STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION: THE CASE STUDY OF LEUVEN

SLIDE 2

Who is in charge of planning?

www.globalnerdy.com/2009/08/10/old-ibm-ad-150-extra-engineers/

SLIDE 3

The new “players”

SLIDE 4

Diverse objectives of stakeholders

SLIDE 5

NISTO project

 New integrated smart transport options  Development of an evaluation framework and toolkit  More information: www.nisto-project.eu

SLIDE 6

Research questions

Is the multi-actor multi-criteria analysis

(MAMCA) a suitable tool for decision making for sustainable urban mobility?

How can electronic GDSS make

MAMCA more resource efficient while involving a high number of stakeholders?

SLIDE 7

Methodology: multi-actor multi-criteria analysis

(Macharis et al., 2004)

SLIDE 8

Methodology: Computer support for MAMCA

(Macharis et al., 2004)

SLIDE 9

Methodology: AHP and PROMETHEE

PROMET METHEE HEE AHP

SLIDE 10

Methodology: AHP and PROMETHEE

Weight elicitation – AHP

 Easy to use  It can decompose a

complex problem into its constituents

 Widely used for weight

elicitation Evaluation - PROMETHEE

 Avoids trade-offs

between scores

 Simplifies the

evaluation procedure

Based on Macharis et. al 2003

SLIDE 11

Case study: MAMCA GDSS workshop

 Leuven, 30th January 2014  40 participants  7 stakeholder groups  14 subgroups  Software: D-Sight Web

SLIDE 12

Problem

SLIDE 13

Alternatives

Business as usual Car-free city centre Park and Walk Smart road user charging

SLIDE 14

Stakeholder criteria and weights

SLIDE 15

Weight elicitation: AHP

Source: D-Sight Web

SLIDE 16

Evaluation of alternatives: PROMETHEE

Source: D-Sight Web

SLIDE 17

Results: multi-actor view

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flemish Government City council Leuven Citizens PT users Car users PT operators Retail and employers Performance score Business as usual Car free city centre Park & Walk Smart road user charging

SLIDE 18

Results: Criteria contribution (Flemish government)

8.1 20.0 11.8 16.8 6.8 3.2 6.8 18.9 8.7 10.3 3.4 13.2 13.2 26.3 9.4 5.5 16.3 1.3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Smart road user charging Park & Walk Car free city centre Business as usual Performance score Environment Traffic safety Accessibility Efficient public spending Equity

(Source: adapted from D-Sight Web)

SLIDE 19

Conclusions 1

 MAMCA provides a structured way to appraise

the preferences of stakeholders for urban mobility

 The interactive evaluation with the combination

f AHP and PROMETHEE was well received by the

participants

 The combination of a workshop setting and the

nline software can help to improve

understanding and conflict resolution

 The EGDSS assisted MAMCA is more resource

efficient

SLIDE 20

Conclusions 2

 The real-time analysis of multiple decision trees

requires computer support

 The software was not ideally suited for the

MAMCA workshop (only single value trees are supported)

 Further research: software based on the specific

requirements of MAMCA

SLIDE 21

Pag. Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Author

Thank you for your attention!

dr. Imre Keseru

Vrije Universiteit Brussel Imre.Keseru@vub.ac.be Jeroen Bulckaen Vrije Universiteit Brussel Jeroen.Bulckaen@vub.ac.be

Prof. dr. Cathy Macharis

Vrije Universiteit Brussel Cathy.Macharis@vub.ac.be