Solar magneto-seismology with asymmetric waveguides
Matthew Allcock
and Robertus Erd´ elyi
Solar magneto-seismology with asymmetric waveguides Matthew Allcock - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Solar magneto-seismology with asymmetric waveguides Matthew Allcock and Robertus Erd elyi Outline Introduction 1 Waves on the Sun Solar magneto-seismology (SMS) A brief history SMS with asymmetric wave-guides 2 Motivation Derivation
and Robertus Erd´ elyi
1
2
3
1
2
3
An overview
Observations
An overview
Observations Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters
An overview
Observations Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters Temporal parameters Spatial parameters
An overview
Observations Physical understanding Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters Temporal parameters Spatial parameters
An overview
Observations Physical understanding Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters Temporal parameters Spatial parameters Equilibrium models
An overview
Observations Physical understanding Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters Temporal parameters Spatial parameters Equilibrium models Eigenmodes
An overview
Observations Physical understanding Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters Temporal parameters Spatial parameters Equilibrium models Eigenmodes Temporal magneto-seismology Spatial magneto-seismology
An overview
Observations Physical understanding Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters Temporal parameters Spatial parameters Equilibrium models Eigenmodes Temporal magneto-seismology Spatial magneto-seismology
An overview
Observations Physical understanding Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters Temporal parameters Spatial parameters Equilibrium models Eigenmodes Temporal magneto-seismology Spatial magneto-seismology
An overview
Observations Physical understanding Equilibrium parameters Wave parameters Temporal parameters Spatial parameters Equilibrium models Eigenmodes Temporal magneto-seismology Spatial magneto-seismology
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 1970 1980 1990 2000
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 1970 1980 1990 2000 Uchida, 1970 - Moreton wavefronts;
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 1970 1980 1990 2000 Uchida, 1970 - Moreton wavefronts; Rosenburg 1970 - MHD waves cause pulsations in synchrotron radiation with measuable period
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 1970 1980 1990 2000 Uchida, 1970 - Moreton wavefronts; Rosenburg 1970 - MHD waves cause pulsations in synchrotron radiation with measuable period Zeitsev and Stepanov, 1975 - pulsations of type IV solar radio emission due to plasma cylinder oscillations
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 1970 1980 1990 2000 Uchida, 1970 - Moreton wavefronts; Rosenburg 1970 - MHD waves cause pulsations in synchrotron radiation with measuable period Zeitsev and Stepanov, 1975 - pulsations of type IV solar radio emission due to plasma cylinder oscillations Roberts et al. 1984 - coronal context
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 1970 1980 1990 2000 Uchida, 1970 - Moreton wavefronts; Rosenburg 1970 - MHD waves cause pulsations in synchrotron radiation with measuable period Zeitsev and Stepanov, 1975 - pulsations of type IV solar radio emission due to plasma cylinder oscillations Roberts et al. 1984 - coronal context Tandberg Hanssen et al. 1995 - prominence context
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 1970 1980 1990 2000 Uchida, 1970 - Moreton wavefronts; Rosenburg 1970 - MHD waves cause pulsations in synchrotron radiation with measuable period Zeitsev and Stepanov, 1975 - pulsations of type IV solar radio emission due to plasma cylinder oscillations Roberts et al. 1984 - coronal context Tandberg Hanssen et al. 1995 - prominence context Coronal loop oscillations imaged! Aschwanden et al. 1999
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017 Nakariakov and Ofman 2001 - magnetic field strength estimate using period of kink standing modes
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017 Nakariakov and Ofman 2001 - magnetic field strength estimate using period of kink standing modes Goossens et al. 2002 - damping time scales used to estimate cross-field density variation length scales
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017 Nakariakov and Ofman 2001 - magnetic field strength estimate using period of kink standing modes Goossens et al. 2002 - damping time scales used to estimate cross-field density variation length scales Andries et al. 2005 - density stratification deduced from period ratio
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017 Nakariakov and Ofman 2001 - magnetic field strength estimate using period of kink standing modes Goossens et al. 2002 - damping time scales used to estimate cross-field density variation length scales Andries et al. 2005 - density stratification deduced from period ratio
Verth et al. 2007 - anti-node shift due to density stratification
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017 Nakariakov and Ofman 2001 - magnetic field strength estimate using period of kink standing modes Goossens et al. 2002 - damping time scales used to estimate cross-field density variation length scales Andries et al. 2005 - density stratification deduced from period ratio
Verth et al. 2007 - anti-node shift due to density stratification Erd´ elyi and Taroyan 2008 - slow sausage and kink standing modes
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017 Nakariakov and Ofman 2001 - magnetic field strength estimate using period of kink standing modes Goossens et al. 2002 - damping time scales used to estimate cross-field density variation length scales Andries et al. 2005 - density stratification deduced from period ratio
Verth et al. 2007 - anti-node shift due to density stratification Erd´ elyi and Taroyan 2008 - slow sausage and kink standing modes Arregui and Asensio Ramos 2011 - Bayesian inversion
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017 Nakariakov and Ofman 2001 - magnetic field strength estimate using period of kink standing modes Goossens et al. 2002 - damping time scales used to estimate cross-field density variation length scales Andries et al. 2005 - density stratification deduced from period ratio
Verth et al. 2007 - anti-node shift due to density stratification Erd´ elyi and Taroyan 2008 - slow sausage and kink standing modes Arregui and Asensio Ramos 2011 - Bayesian inversion Pascoe et al. 2013 - using gaussian and exponential damping
A brief history - temporal and spatial seismology 2000 2005 2010 2017 Nakariakov and Ofman 2001 - magnetic field strength estimate using period of kink standing modes Goossens et al. 2002 - damping time scales used to estimate cross-field density variation length scales Andries et al. 2005 - density stratification deduced from period ratio
Verth et al. 2007 - anti-node shift due to density stratification Erd´ elyi and Taroyan 2008 - slow sausage and kink standing modes Arregui and Asensio Ramos 2011 - Bayesian inversion Pascoe et al. 2013 - using gaussian and exponential damping
Magyar et al. - global dynamic coronal seismology
1
2
3
Motivation
Equilibrium conditions
−x0 x0 x z y
Governing equations
✈ = plasma velocity, ❇ = magnetic field strength, ρ = density, p = pressure, µ = magnetic permeability, γ = adiabatic index.
Fourier decomposition
x −x0 x0 d2ˆ vx dx2 − m2 0ˆ
d2ˆ vx dx2 − m12ˆ
d2ˆ vx dx2 − m22ˆ
Boundary conditions: pressure and velocity continuous across boundaries. m02 = (k2vA2 − ω2)(k2c2
0 − ω2)
(c2
0 + vA2)(k2cT 2 − ω2) ,
m1,22 = k2 − ω2 c1,22 , cT 2 = c2
0vA2
c2
0 + vA2 ,
vA = B0 √µρ0 ,
Eigenmodes
See Allcock and Erd´ elyi, 2017. m02 = (k2vA2 − ω2)(k2c2
0 − ω2)
(c2
0 + vA2)(k2cT 2 − ω2) ,
m1,22 = k2 − ω2 c1,22 , cT 2 = c2
0vA2
c2
0 + vA2 ,
vA = B0 √µρ0 ,
Symmetric kink surface mode
Quasi-kink surface mode
Symmetric sausage surface mode
Quasi-sausage surface mode
Body modes
Mode identification
Morton et al. 2012
Mode identification
Morton et al. 2012
−x0 x0 x
Top = quasi-kink Bottom = quasi-sausage)
−
ρ0 ρ1 − ω2m0
coth
ρ0 ρ2 − ω2m0
coth
Parameter inversion
Parameter inversion
Parameter inversion
Mode Approximation of k2vA2/ω2 using amplitude ratio, RA Thin slab Incompressible Low-beta Sausage 1 +
1 x0
ρ2 ρ0m2 + ρ1 ρ0m1 RA+1
ρ2 ρ0 + ρ1 ρ0 RA+1
1 + k
ρ2 ρ0m2 + ρ1 ρ0m1 RA+1
Kink 1 + k2x0
ρ2 ρ0m2 − ρ1 ρ0m1 RA−1
ρ2 ρ0 − ρ1 ρ0 RA−1
1 + k
ρ2 ρ0m2 − ρ1 ρ0m1 RA−1
Parameter inversion
Parameter inversion
−x0 x0 x −x0 x0 x −x0 x0
x ∆min −x0 x0
x ∆min
−x0 x0 x −x0 x0 x
ρ0 ρ2 tanh(m0x0) − ω2m0
ρ0 ρ2 − ω2m0 tanh(m0x0)
Parameter inversion
Parameter inversion
Parameter inversion
Mode Approximation of k2vA2/ω2 using minimum perturbation shift, ∆min Thin slab Incompressible Low-beta Quasi-sausage
ρ1 ρ0m1 (x0 + ∆min) + 1 1+(ω/kc0)2 + k2x0∆min
1 + ρ1
ρ0 tanh k(x0 + ∆min)
1 +
kρ1 m1ρ0 tanh k(x0 + ∆min)
Quasi-kink
−b±
2a
, defined in text 1 + ρ1
ρ0 coth k(x0 + ∆min)
1 +
kρ1 m1ρ0 coth k(x0 + ∆min)
Parameter inversion
Parameter inversion
1
2
3
−x0 x0 x z y
ρ1, p1, T1 ρ0, p0, T0 ρ2, p2, T2
Initial value problem
−x0 x0 x z y
ρ1, p1, T1 ρ0, p0, T0 ρ2, p2, T2 Initial impulse Initial impulse
Application
Adaptation of Liu et al., 2017, by Zs´ amberger et al.
Application
NASA
Application
Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research