SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology P and S Waves are - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sio15 ss1 2020 topic 7 earthquake seismology p and s
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology P and S Waves are - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology P and S Waves are body waves Image: S. Marshak Earth, Portrait of a Planet SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology R 1. P first,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

P and S Waves are body waves

Image: S. Marshak “Earth, Portrait of a Planet”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

  • 1. P first, typically smallest signal
  • 2. S, typically larger (felt by humans)
  • 3. Love
  • 4. Rayleigh, longest/largest wavetrain, most damaging

R

short video 7 on:

seismic waves how to locate an earthquake

p wave used in early warning systems warning time: up to 1 minute

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

there is already a fault why don’t blocks move all the time?

fault breccia/fault gouge: broken-off, ground up asperities asperities: protrusions that increase friction along a fault EQ: when stresses high enough to overcome friction

Friction Stress Friction Stress no EQ EQ!

  • Fig. 5.18
slide-6
SLIDE 6

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

  • 1. stress builds up; asperities; no motion
  • 2. stress overcomes friction -> EQ + aftershocks
  • 3. slip along fault; stress drop
  • start from 1)

fault locked very little creep fault locked very little creep

  • Fig. 5.19
slide-7
SLIDE 7

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

  • some history of local seismicity in

Seattle/Tacoma area

  • no recorded history of megathrust EQ
  • 1700 orphan tsunami in Japan has no

corresponding local EQ -> MW=9.0 in Cascadia

  • recurrence time ~ 300 years
  • complex aseismic slip and episodic tremors

(GPS and seismometers)

  • Fig. 5.21
slide-8
SLIDE 8

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

  • > 3.5 Mio per year
  • small events often
  • large events rare
slide-9
SLIDE 9

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

Get recurrence time from # of EQ per year

E.g. 3 Mio EQ/year -> 1 EQ every 10.5s 0.3 EQ/year -> 1 EQ every 3.3 years

  • Fig. 5.13
slide-10
SLIDE 10

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

EQs not regular recurrence time has a certain probability < 100%

source: Abbott “Natural Disasters”

  • Fig. 5.15
slide-11
SLIDE 11

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

Probability of EQ before 2032

  • 30% chance for a mag 7 quake before 2032,

for most places along SAF

  • 90% chance for a mag 6 at Parkfield

recurrence time varies along same fault

prognosis for before 2004 seismic gap/recurrence

source: Abbott “Natural Disasters”

  • Fig. 5.16
slide-12
SLIDE 12

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

use seismic gap method

EQ recurrence time Parkfield EQs remarkably regular in > 100 years next predicted: 1993

28 September 2004, 10:15 PSDT * #7 late or #8 early???

  • Fig. 5.17
slide-13
SLIDE 13

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

  • Mw= 6.5 December 22, 2003 San

Simeon EQ increased stress at Parkfield

  • made #8 more likely???
  • but why did #7 not happen?
  • EQs can trigger/influence other EQs on nearby faults

(1992 Landers/Big Bear)

  • very large EQs may trigger volcanism far away (Rayleigh waves!)

(2002 Denali EQ/Yellowstone; 2004 Sumatra/Alaska volcanoes)

  • Fig. 5.17
slide-14
SLIDE 14

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

InSAR: Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar

  • overlay satellite altimetry map before and after EQ
  • interferogram -> fringes show amount of slip along fault

Sep 17, 1999 Izmit, Turkey Earthquake

Image: NASA/JPL; wikipedia

  • Fig. 6.43
slide-15
SLIDE 15

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

  • use stack of INSAR images to

get strain rate

  • extrapolate to 250yrs

relaxed loaded

  • example: southern SAF
  • last major EQ: 250 years ago,

while north and middle SAF ruptured 1906, 1989 and 1857

  • typical co-seismic slip for

big EQs: 7-10m

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

probability of strong shaking site amplification

  • Fig. 6.44
  • Fig. 6.45

takes into account local geology takes into account local geology, tectonics, seismicity

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

SCEC: Southern California Earthquake Center http:movie

  • Fig. 6.46
slide-18
SLIDE 18

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

* understand shaking characteristics of EQs * improve local forecasts for strength of shaking

Mw=7.2 El Mayor Easter (4 Apr) 2010

USGS Did-you-feel-it map

slide-19
SLIDE 19

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

slide-20
SLIDE 20

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

  • don’t build, build to code, retrofit

(e.g. use wood, not bricks)

  • construct lifelines to EQ building codes
  • problematic in less developed countries
  • grading according to code (landslides!)
  • secure life lines/make disaster plans

What Government and People can do Got water? ...flashlight canned food batteries battery-op radio

  • Fig. 6.42
slide-21
SLIDE 21

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

We just don’t know! ……yet….. forecasting weather is much easier!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology

So, when is it coming?