SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology P and S Waves are - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology P and S Waves are - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology P and S Waves are body waves Image: S. Marshak Earth, Portrait of a Planet SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology R 1. P first,
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
P and S Waves are body waves
Image: S. Marshak “Earth, Portrait of a Planet”
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
- 1. P first, typically smallest signal
- 2. S, typically larger (felt by humans)
- 3. Love
- 4. Rayleigh, longest/largest wavetrain, most damaging
R
short video 7 on:
seismic waves how to locate an earthquake
p wave used in early warning systems warning time: up to 1 minute
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
there is already a fault why don’t blocks move all the time?
fault breccia/fault gouge: broken-off, ground up asperities asperities: protrusions that increase friction along a fault EQ: when stresses high enough to overcome friction
Friction Stress Friction Stress no EQ EQ!
- Fig. 5.18
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
- 1. stress builds up; asperities; no motion
- 2. stress overcomes friction -> EQ + aftershocks
- 3. slip along fault; stress drop
- start from 1)
fault locked very little creep fault locked very little creep
- Fig. 5.19
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
- some history of local seismicity in
Seattle/Tacoma area
- no recorded history of megathrust EQ
- 1700 orphan tsunami in Japan has no
corresponding local EQ -> MW=9.0 in Cascadia
- recurrence time ~ 300 years
- complex aseismic slip and episodic tremors
(GPS and seismometers)
- Fig. 5.21
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
- > 3.5 Mio per year
- small events often
- large events rare
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
Get recurrence time from # of EQ per year
E.g. 3 Mio EQ/year -> 1 EQ every 10.5s 0.3 EQ/year -> 1 EQ every 3.3 years
- Fig. 5.13
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
EQs not regular recurrence time has a certain probability < 100%
source: Abbott “Natural Disasters”
- Fig. 5.15
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
Probability of EQ before 2032
- 30% chance for a mag 7 quake before 2032,
for most places along SAF
- 90% chance for a mag 6 at Parkfield
recurrence time varies along same fault
prognosis for before 2004 seismic gap/recurrence
source: Abbott “Natural Disasters”
- Fig. 5.16
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
use seismic gap method
EQ recurrence time Parkfield EQs remarkably regular in > 100 years next predicted: 1993
28 September 2004, 10:15 PSDT * #7 late or #8 early???
- Fig. 5.17
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
- Mw= 6.5 December 22, 2003 San
Simeon EQ increased stress at Parkfield
- made #8 more likely???
- but why did #7 not happen?
- EQs can trigger/influence other EQs on nearby faults
(1992 Landers/Big Bear)
- very large EQs may trigger volcanism far away (Rayleigh waves!)
(2002 Denali EQ/Yellowstone; 2004 Sumatra/Alaska volcanoes)
- Fig. 5.17
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
InSAR: Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar
- overlay satellite altimetry map before and after EQ
- interferogram -> fringes show amount of slip along fault
Sep 17, 1999 Izmit, Turkey Earthquake
Image: NASA/JPL; wikipedia
- Fig. 6.43
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
- use stack of INSAR images to
get strain rate
- extrapolate to 250yrs
relaxed loaded
- example: southern SAF
- last major EQ: 250 years ago,
while north and middle SAF ruptured 1906, 1989 and 1857
- typical co-seismic slip for
big EQs: 7-10m
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
probability of strong shaking site amplification
- Fig. 6.44
- Fig. 6.45
takes into account local geology takes into account local geology, tectonics, seismicity
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
SCEC: Southern California Earthquake Center http:movie
- Fig. 6.46
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
* understand shaking characteristics of EQs * improve local forecasts for strength of shaking
Mw=7.2 El Mayor Easter (4 Apr) 2010
USGS Did-you-feel-it map
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
- don’t build, build to code, retrofit
(e.g. use wood, not bricks)
- construct lifelines to EQ building codes
- problematic in less developed countries
- grading according to code (landslides!)
- secure life lines/make disaster plans
What Government and People can do Got water? ...flashlight canned food batteries battery-op radio
- Fig. 6.42
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
We just don’t know! ……yet….. forecasting weather is much easier!
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology
SIO15-SS1 2020: Topic 7 Earthquake Seismology