smartscale virginia s statewide prioritization process
play

SmartScale - Virginias Statewide Prioritization Process Nick - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SmartScale - Virginias Statewide Prioritization Process Nick Donohue Deputy Secretary of Transportation Commonwealth of Virginia June 15, 2016 Why Accessibility? 3 Congestion versus Accessibility 4 What is Accessibility? No-Build


  1. SmartScale - Virginia’s Statewide Prioritization Process Nick Donohue Deputy Secretary of Transportation Commonwealth of Virginia June 15, 2016

  2. Why Accessibility? 3

  3. Congestion versus Accessibility 4

  4. What is Accessibility? • No-Build Scenario

  5. What is Accessibility? If NB path is not congested, delay saving would not be • Build Scenario counted New Roadway

  6. Challenges with Accessibility • No methodology or definition within VDOT or DRPT • 12 month timeframe to develop and test solution • Staff concerns over how to measure • Stakeholder concerns over accuracy and privacy 7

  7. Assessing T Tra ransport rtation C Conditions i in t the Nort rthern rn V Virg rginia R Region: Automobile Au Auto A Accessibility M Map (Access t to j jobs i in 4 45 m minutes from e each C Census B Block G Group) Walk A Accessibility M Map Transit Tr (Access t to j jobs i in 4 45 m minutes f from each C Census B Block G Group) Walk Wa Transit A Accessibility M Map (Access t to j jobs i in 4 45 m minutes f from each C Census B Block G Group) 8

  8. The R Role o of D Distance D Decay Accessibility t to J Jobs Accessibility t to J Jobs Without D Distance With D Distance De Decay Decay De 9 Hampton R Roads R Region

  9. Virginia’s Statewide Prioritization Process • Legislation championed by Democratic Governor and the Republican Speaker of the House • Requires Commonwealth Transportation Board to use objective and quantifiable process for the allocation of construction funds • Policy developed over a 14 month process and adopted by Commonwealth Transportation Board in June 2015 10

  10. Broad-Based Evaluation Factors All projects are evaluated using the following: • Congestion mitigation • Economic development • Accessibility • Safety • Environmental Quality • Land Use (only in areas over 200,000) 11

  11. Accessibility s scori ring m methodology i in t the HB2 P Pro rocess 12

  12. I-95 Auxiliary Lanes – Route 288 to Route 10 Delay Score – 11.0 Accessibility Score – 55.8 13

  13. Bailey Bridge Connector Phase I Delay Score – 55.6 Accessibility Score – 2.1 14

  14. I-64/I-264 Interchange Delay Score – 53.9 Accessibility Score - 100 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend