PROGRAM OVERVIEW 03/26/2019 Page 1 of 16 FINAL PRESENTATION - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

program overview
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PROGRAM OVERVIEW 03/26/2019 Page 1 of 16 FINAL PRESENTATION - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FINAL PRESENTATION PIMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE FY19-20 Pavement Program Roadway Prioritization MARCH 26, 2019 PROGRAM OVERVIEW 03/26/2019 Page 1 of 16 FINAL PRESENTATION Prioritization Methodology Worst First (Repair


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PIMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE

FY19-20 Pavement Program Roadway Prioritization

MARCH 26, 2019

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 1 of 16

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Prioritization Methodology

  • Worst First

(Repair Only)

  • Maximize Miles

(Preservation Only)

  • Combination

(Keep Good Roads Good)

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 2 of 16

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Two Programs – Two Different Methodologies

  • RLRRP (Property Tax) – Maximize Miles (local roads only)
  • HURF Bond (DOT-59) – Worst First (Arterials & Collectors)

System/Network Based Approach

Need a tool that is:

  • Robust (Roughly 1900 miles, mixed classification)
  • Reacts to funding changes
  • Objective – looks at road condition, maintains overall

system condition index

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 3 of 16

slide-4
SLIDE 4

StreetSaver

  • Robust:
  • Developed by MTC (Metropolitan Transportation

Commission), the PAG of the San Francisco Bay Area to help maintain city and county roadways and street

  • Reacts to funding changes:
  • Flexible to encompass available funding per jursidiction
  • Objective:
  • Uses road condition index, effective treatments, network

level assignment

  • Compares different scenarios to show impact of

decisions

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 4 of 16

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Example Graph: Impact of Funding Levels on Condition Illustration: Effectiveness Based on PCI-Time Curve

StreetSaver

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 5 of 16

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Example Graph: Impact of Funding Levels on Deferred Need Example Graph: Effect of Funding Levels on Backlog

StreetSaver

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 6 of 16

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current Network Dashboard

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 7 of 16

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Current PCI Breakpoints

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 8 of 16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Current Decision Tree

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 9 of 16

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Scenarios

  • Ran 5 different scenarios of the projected 5-year pavement

preservation contracts allocations

  • Scenario 1 – Arterials & Collectors
  • Scenario 2 – Arterials & Collectors, Split by BOS District
  • Scenario 3 – All Roads, Split by Classification
  • Scenario 4 – All Roads, Split by BOS District & Classification
  • Scenario 5 – All Roads StreetSaver Best Practice

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 10 of 16

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Scenario 1

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 11 of 16

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Scenario 2

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 12 of 16

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Scenario 3

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 13 of 16

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Scenario 4

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 14 of 16

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Scenario 5

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 15 of 16

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Questions?

Contact Information: robert.lane2@pima.gov

FINAL PRESENTATION 03/26/2019 Page 16 of 16