October 26, 2016 Programs Math Program ELA Program Leadership - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

October 26, 2016

Programs

 Math Program  ELA Program  Leadership Program  Boys and Girls Club Program  Science Program  Wolf Pack Program  Counseling Program  Sports and Extra Curricular Programs

 Program- a plan or system under which action may be

taken toward a goal (Merriam-Webster)

 Educational Program- is a program written by the

institution of education which determines the learning progress of each subject in all stages of formal education.

Academic Programs

 Scope and Sequence  Teaching Strategies  Assessments

Five Elements of Language Star

 The Language Star- Definition of language  Key Learning Acceleration Principles  Language Acceleration Methodologies  Periodic Student Assessment  Language Scope and Sequence

Snapshot of the Research

 Language is a social process and a meaning-making system, and

grammatical structures and vocabulary interact to form registers that vary depending upon context and situation (Halliday and Matthiessen, 2004)

 Teaching about the grammatical patterns found in specific disciplines

has been shown to help students with their reading comprehension and writing proficiency.

 Instruction should focus on the language features of the academic

texts students read and are expected to write in school.

 Instruction should support students’ developing awareness of and

proficiency in using the language features of academic registers so that they can better comprehend and create academic texts (Brisk 2012;Gebhard, Willet, Jimenez and Piedra 2011; Fang and Schleppegrell 2010; Gibbons 2008; Hammond 2006; Rose and Acevedo 2006; Schleppegrell and Oliveira 2006; Spycher 2007).

Snapshot of the Research

 “Students acquire foundational skills through

excellent, carefully designed systematic instruction and ample opportunities to practice” (English Language Arts/ELD Framework, Chapter 2, p.89)

 “ELD should be planned and delivered with a specific

language objective in mind” (Saunders &Goldenberg 2008)

 “An effective approach to English language instruction

begins with an analysis of the linguistic demands of instruction and assignments” (Dutro, 2002)

Language Star Today

 Assumptions and Values  Beliefs and Principles  Goals and Objectives  Knowledge  Methods  Teacher Skills  Materials  Time

DataQuest 2009-2015 CELDT Criterion

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2009 - 10 2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 2015 - 16 HUSD Orland Joint Unified Willows Unified State

DataQuest 2009 – 2015 CELDT Performance Level

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2009- 10 2010- 11 2011- 12 2012- 13 2013- 14 2014- 15 2015- 16 Average

CELDT Performance

HUSD Orland Joint Unified Willows Unified State

CAASPP Language Subgroup Multi- Year Comparisons

Language Classification CAASPP ELA Average Scores 2015 CAASPP ELA Average Scores 2016 Effective Size English Only EO 2387 2421 0.3 Initially Fluent English Proficient IFEP 2489 2517 0.4 Re-designated Fluent English Proficient RFEP 2430 2487 0.6 English Learner EL 2331 2350 0.3

English Learner Progress and Proficiency Report Comparison

% of EL Making Annual Progress % Of EL Attaining English Proficiency <5 years % Of EL Attaining English Proficiency >5 years Hamilton Unified 56.0 22.1 38.1 Orland Unified 51.6 14.8 42 Willows Unified 57.4 13.9 49.5 GCOE Consortium 35 24.1 44.8

CAASPP Language Subgroup Comparison 2016

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade All 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade All 2387.5 2421.7 2474.5 2516.9 2506.3 2547.3 2601.3

EL

2364.2 2391.4 2418.8 2434.4 2442.9 2456.8 2470.9 N/A 2514.3 2536.8 2528 2579.3 2560.7 N/A

EO

2428.5 2469.1 2509.3 2532.5 2556.3 2572.7 2612 N/A 2368.9 2393.6 2437.8 2481.5 * * 2627.8 N/A

% diff. 2.6% 3.1% 3.6% 3.9% 4.4% 4.5% 5.4% HUSD CAASPP Comparison EO vs EL 2016

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade All

EL

2327.2 2362.3 2407.7 2415.2 2416.7 * * N/A

EO

2368.9 2393.6 2437.8 2481.5 * * 2627.8 N/A

% diff. 1.8% 1.3% 1.2% 2.7% http://caaspp.cde.ca.gov/SB2016/ViewReport?ps=true&lstTestYear=2016&lstTestType =B&lstGroup=4&lstCounty=11&lstDistrict=76562&lstSchool=0000000 State of California CAASPP Comparison EO vs EL 2016 FEP_EO RFEP EO

HUSD CAASPP Mean Scaled Score ELA 2016

2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 2550 2600 2650 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade

HUSD Language_Grade Level Comparison 2016

FEP_EO RFEP EO