october 26 2016 programs
play

October 26, 2016 Programs Math Program ELA Program Leadership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

October 26, 2016 Programs Math Program ELA Program Leadership Program Boys and Girls Club Program Science Program Wolf Pack Program Counseling Program Sports and Extra Curricular Programs Program - a plan or


  1. October 26, 2016

  2. Programs  Math Program  ELA Program  Leadership Program  Boys and Girls Club Program  Science Program  Wolf Pack Program  Counseling Program  Sports and Extra Curricular Programs

  3.  Program - a plan or system under which action may be taken toward a goal (Merriam-Webster)  Educational Program- is a program written by the institution of education which determines the learning progress of each subject in all stages of formal education.

  4. Academic Programs  Scope and Sequence  Teaching Strategies  Assessments

  5. Five Elements of Language Star  The Language Star- Definition of language  Key Learning Acceleration Principles  Language Acceleration Methodologies  Periodic Student Assessment  Language Scope and Sequence

  6. Snapshot of the Research  Language is a social process and a meaning-making system, and grammatical structures and vocabulary interact to form registers that vary depending upon context and situation (Halliday and Matthiessen, 2004)  Teaching about the grammatical patterns found in specific disciplines has been shown to help students with their reading comprehension and writing proficiency.  Instruction should focus on the language features of the academic texts students read and are expected to write in school.  Instruction should support students’ developing awareness of and proficiency in using the language features of academic registers so that they can better comprehend and create academic texts (Brisk 2012;Gebhard, Willet, Jimenez and Piedra 2011; Fang and Schleppegrell 2010; Gibbons 2008; Hammond 2006; Rose and Acevedo 2006; Schleppegrell and Oliveira 2006; Spycher 2007).

  7. Snapshot of the Research  “Students acquire foundational skills through excellent, carefully designed systematic instruction and ample opportunities to practice” (English Language Arts/ELD Framework, Chapter 2, p.89)  “ELD should be planned and delivered with a specific language objective in mind” (Saunders &Goldenberg 2008)  “An effective approach to English language instruction begins with an analysis of the linguistic demands of instruction and assignments” ( Dutro, 2002)

  8. Language Star Today  Assumptions and Values  Beliefs and Principles  Goals and Objectives  Knowledge  Methods  Teacher Skills  Materials  Time

  9. DataQuest 2009-2015 CELDT Criterion 60% 50% 40% HUSD Orland Joint Unified 30% Willows Unified State 20% 10% 0% 2009 - 10 2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13 2013 - 14 2014 - 15 2015 - 16

  10. DataQuest 2009 – 2015 CELDT Performance Level CELDT Performance 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2009- 10 2010- 11 2011- 12 2012- 13 2013- 14 2014- 15 2015- 16 Average HUSD Orland Joint Unified Willows Unified State

  11. CAASPP Language Subgroup Multi- Year Comparisons Language CAASPP ELA CAASPP ELA Effective Size Classification Average Average Scores Scores 2015 2016 English Only EO 2387 2421 0.3 Initially Fluent IFEP 2489 2517 0.4 English Proficient Re-designated RFEP 2430 2487 0.6 Fluent English Proficient English Learner EL 2331 2350 0.3

  12. English Learner Progress and Proficiency Report Comparison % of EL Making % Of EL % Of EL Annual Progress Attaining Attaining English English Proficiency Proficiency <5 years >5 years Hamilton Unified 56.0 22.1 38.1 Orland Unified 51.6 14.8 42 Willows Unified 57.4 13.9 49.5 GCOE Consortium 35 24.1 44.8

  13. CAASPP Language Subgroup Comparison 2016 HUSD CAASPP Mean Scaled Score ELA 2016 State of California CAASPP Comparison EO vs EL 2016 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade All 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade All FEP_EO EL 2387.5 2421.7 2474.5 2516.9 2506.3 2547.3 2601.3 2364.2 2391.4 2418.8 2434.4 2442.9 2456.8 2470.9 N/A RFEP 2514.3 2536.8 2528 2579.3 2560.7 N/A EO 2428.5 2469.1 2509.3 2532.5 2556.3 2572.7 2612 N/A EO % diff. 2.6% 3.1% 3.6% 3.9% 4.4% 4.5% 5.4% 2368.9 2393.6 2437.8 2481.5 * * 2627.8 N/A HUSD CAASPP Comparison EO vs EL 2016 HUSD Language_Grade Level Comparison 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade All EL 2016 2327.2 2362.3 2407.7 2415.2 2416.7 * * N/A EO 2368.9 2393.6 2437.8 2481.5 * * 2627.8 N/A 2650 % diff. 1.8% 1.3% 1.2% 2.7% 2600 2550 2500 FEP_EO 2450 RFEP 2400 EO 2350 2300 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade http://caaspp.cde.ca.gov/SB2016/ViewReport?ps=true&lstTestYear=2016&lstTestType =B&lstGroup=4&lstCounty=11&lstDistrict=76562&lstSchool=0000000

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend