Siting Plan and Concept Designs for Living Shoreline Projects on the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
siting plan and concept designs for living shoreline
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Siting Plan and Concept Designs for Living Shoreline Projects on the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 22, 2023 115 likes •425 views

Siting Plan and Concept Designs for Living Shoreline Projects on the Inland Bays Delaware Estuary Science & Environmental Summit 2017 January 22 25, 2017 Cape May, New Jersey Douglas Janiec Natural Resources Program Manager Sovereign

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Delaware Estuary Science & Environmental Summit 2017 January 22 – 25, 2017 Cape May, New Jersey

Siting Plan and Concept Designs for Living Shoreline Projects on the Inland Bays

Douglas Janiec Natural Resources Program Manager Sovereign Consulting, Inc. Marianne Walch, Ph.D. Science & Restoration Coordinator Delaware Center for the Inland Bays that’s Marianne’s hand

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Page 2

CIB Living Shorelines Strategy In a Nutshell

Be Proactive:

  • Stop being passively
  • pportunistic and catch-can
  • Make our own
  • pportunities that serves

both the Inland Bays’ natural resources and the community

PRESENT THE VISION Chris Bason CIB - Executive Director

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Page 3

CIB Living Shorelines Strategy In a Nutshell

How?:

  • Screen the entire Delaware

Inland Bay System for demonstration living shoreline projects

  • Score and rank each

identified site

  • Generate permit level designs

for up to 6 sites

IMPLEMENT THE VISION Marianne Walch, Ph.D. CIB - Science & Restoration Coordinator

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Page 4

CIB Living Shorelines Strategy In a Nutshell

How?:

  • Develop 2 Tier Screenig

Process

  • ID/Prioritize Top Sites
  • Develop New or Modified

Techniques/Tactics

TECHNICAL SUPPORT Douglas Janiec Sovereign Consulting Inc.

  • Sr. Restoration Ecologist
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Page 5

The Screening Process

Two Tier Screening Process

  • Tier 1 based on:
  • Access (a necessity for demonstration projects)
  • Proximity to Active State Dredging Projects

(DNREC Special interest)

  • Special Interest Sites
  • Tier 2 based on:
  • TH

THE SC E SCREE REENI NING NG MA MATR TRIX

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tier 1 Process

The Tier 1 Screening Effort Resulted in the identification of 84 Sites, located throughout the 3-Bay System.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Page 7

Tier 2 Process THE

THE SC SCREE REENIN NING MATR G MATRIX IX

The Tier 2 screening process consisted of two elements First, a complicated criteria selection exercise known as the “worksheet” Second, a specific scoring matrix for each selected criteria

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Page 8

The Worksheet involved a non- parametric Mixed-Paired Comparison (MPC) performed on 61 potential criteria

Tier 2 Process THE

THE SC SCREE REENIN NING MATR G MATRIX IX

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Page 9

Aestetics  Green (Natural Look)  Blending (integration)  Short-term  Long-term Ownership  Private (individual)  Private (HOA Managed)  Federal  State  Local/Municipal  Commercial/Industrial Energy System  Low  Moderate  High Living Shoreline Type  Conventional  Armored Hybrid  Energy Dissipating Hybrid Feasibility  Permitability  Project Cost  Established Technology  Technical Innovation  Adjacent Property Benefits/Burdens  Operation & Maintenance Outreach  Contractors & Other Professionals  General Public  Decision Makers Climate Change  SLR  Acute Severe Weather  Flood Mitigation  Resilience Socioeconomics  Ecosystem Services  Commercial Interests  Protection of Investment Ecological Functions  Marsh (resource uplift)  Shellfish (resource uplift)  Nekton (resource uplift)  Habitat Structure (resource uplift)  SAV (resource uplift)  Shorelines (resource uplift)  Horseshoe Crab (resource uplift)  Shorebirds (resource uplift) Water Quality  Nutrient Reductions/Processing (utilization)  Carbon Sequestration  Sediment Management Demonstration  Innovation  Research and Development  Funding Potential  Monetary Match Available  In-Kind Match Available  Grant Program Targeted  Political Support

Tier 2 Process THE

THE SC SCREE REENIN NING MATR G MATRIX IX

11 Primary Criteria + 50 Secondary Criteria = 61 Criteria

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Page 10

Aestetics Green (Natural Look) Blending (integration) Short-term Long-term Ownership Private (individual) Private (HOA Managed) Federal State Local/Municipal Commercial/Industrial Energy System Low Moderate High Living Shoreline Type Conventional Armored Hybrid Energy Dissapating Hybrid Feasibility Permitability Project Cost Established Technology Technical Innovation Adjacent Property Benefits/Burdens Operation & Maintenance Outreach Contractors & Other Professionals General Public Decision Makers Climate Change SLR Acute Severe Weather Flood Mitigation Resilience Socioeconomics Ecosystem Services Commercial Interests Protection of Investment Ecological Functions Marsh (resource uplift) Shellfish (resource uplift) Nekton (resource uplift) Habitat Structure (resource uplift) SAV (resource uplift) Shorelines (resource uplift) Horshore Crab (resource uplift) Shorebirds (resource uplift) Water Quality Nutrient Reductions/Processing (utilization) Carbon Sequestration Sediment Management Demonstration Innovation Research and Development Funding Potential Monetary Match Available In-Kind Match Available Grant Program Targetted Political Support Aestetics 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Green (Natural Look) 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Blending (integration) 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Short-term 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 Long-term 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ownership 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Private (individual) 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 Private (HOA Managed) 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 Federal 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 State 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Local/Municipal 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Commercial/Industrial 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 Energy System 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Low 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Moderate 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 High 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Living Shoreline Type 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 Conventional 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 Armored Hybrid 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Energy Dissapating Hybrid 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Feasibility 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Permitability 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Project Cost 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Established Technology 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Technical Innovation 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Adjacent Property Benefits/Burdens 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 Operation & Maintenance 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Outreach 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 Contractors & Other Professionals 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 General Public 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 Decision Makers 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 Climate Change 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 SLR 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Acute Severe Weather 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Flood Mitigation 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Resilience 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Socioeconomics 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 Ecosystem Services 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 Commercial Interests 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 Protection of Investment 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 Ecological Functions 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Marsh (resource uplift) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Shellfish (resource uplift) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Nekton (resource uplift) 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Habitat Structure (resource uplift) 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 SAV (resource uplift) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Shorelines (resource uplift) 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Horshore Crab (resource uplift) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Shorebirds (resource uplift) 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 Water Quality 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Nutrient Reductions/Processing (utilization) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Carbon Sequestration 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Sediment Management 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Demonstration 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Innovation 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 Research and Development 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Funding Potential 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Monetary Match Available 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 In-Kind Match Available 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 Grant Program Targetted 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 Political Support 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 TOTAL SCORE 17.5 6.5 11.5 8 6.5 15.5 6.5 9.5 22.5 23.5 21.5 24 43 14 29 45 29 15 16 46 46.5 52 43.5 18.5 35 17.5 42 25.5 15 16 30 49.5 49.5 49.5 45 51 25 24.5 18.5 35 40 43 38 27.5 34 33 41.5 31.5 27 43.5 38.5 28 42 22 31 17.5 45 36.5 32.5 33.5 45.5 Category to Category Scores 3 3 8 3.5 9 4 7.5 3.5 7 7.5 3 8
  • The Worksheet

provided for 3,660 separate comparisons

  • Not everyone

attempting the worksheet was successful

Tier 2 Process THE

THE SC SCREE REENIN NING MATR G MATRIX IX

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Page 11

Based upon the cumulative results from all those who completed the Worksheet, the following criteria were selected for matrix scoring development:

  • AESTHETIC VALUE
  • FEASIBILITY
  • CLIMATE CHANGE (need

based)

  • ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS

(potentials)

  • WATER QUALITY (potentials)
  • DEMONSTRATION

(potential)

  • SPECIAL INTERESTS

Tier 2 Process THE

THE SC SCREE REENIN NING MATR G MATRIX IX

slide-12
SLIDE 12

4 3 2 4 3 2 4 2 1

Surroundings are: Predominately green: 4 Mixed developed/green: 3 Developed & maintained: 2 Land use is/has: Stable: 4 Undetermined: 2 Abandoned/unmaintained: 1

Scoring Context:

  • Green (nature-based)
  • Blending (integration

with surroundings) Total x 1:

AESTHETIC VALUE

  • Long-Term Aesthetics

Primarily delapidated: 0 Developmental presure: 0 Green opportunity: Full opportunity for green design: 4 Structure (<30%) present, green retrofit design: 3 Structure (30-60%) present, limiting green options: 2 Structured (> 60%), severely limiting options: 0

An example of a criteria scoring matrix is below

Tier 2 Process THE

THE SC SCREE REENIN NING MATR G MATRIX IX

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Page 13

The results were segregated by standard deviations, and demonstrated good scoring distribution

Tier 2 Process THE

THE SC SCREE REENIN NING MATR G MATRIX IX

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Tier 2 Process THE

THE SC SCREE REENIN NING MATR G MATRIX IX

+1 SD +2 SD

  • 2 SD
  • 1 SD

0 SD

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Page 16

Selected Sites

  • Top 10 Site Selected
  • Field Visit:
  • Truth GIS Data
  • Discuss Possible

Alternatives

  • Site-Specific

Considerations

  • ID Top 6 (of the 10) for

Design Work

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Page 17

High to Moderate Energy, Urban Retrofits and Restoration

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Page 18

Low to Moderate Energy, Tidal River Systems

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Page 19

Higher Energy Shorelines

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Page 20

Higher Energy, Mixed Use & Mixed Shoreline Types

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Page 21

Low Energy Dead-End Lagoons

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Page 22

Moderate Energy, Oyster Reef Establishment

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Some Tactics Being Developed

Mixed Urban Reef/LS Hybrid/Marsh – Moderate to High Energy

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Some Tactics Being Developed

Conventional LS with Hardwood Toe & Biochar Treatments – Lower Energy

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Some Tactics Being Developed

Reefs to Attenuate Wave Energy – Moderate to High Energy

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Some Tactics Being Developed

Reefs to Attenuate Wave Energy – Moderate to High Energy

N

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Some Tactics Being Developed

Reefs to Attenuate Wave Energy – Moderate to High Energy

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Some Tactics Being Developed

Marsh Bands in Deadend Canals – Low Energy

Illustrated Rendition

  • f New Marsh Bands

Existing Proposed

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Some Tactics Being Developed

Braided Shallow Oyster Reef – Low to Moderate Energy

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Thank You

For More Information Contact

To just say “hello”, catch up, and have a quick drink contact: Douglas Janiec Natural Resource Program Manager Sovereign Consulting, Inc. 973-433-6480 djaniec@sovcon.com For specific questions related to the content of this presentation, contact: Marianne Walch, Ph.D. Science & Restoration Coordinator Delaware Center for the Inland Bays 302-226-8105 science@inlandbays.org