Outline Outline Introduction Shoreline Management Act - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

outline outline
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Outline Outline Introduction Shoreline Management Act - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Outline Outline Introduction Shoreline Management Act Background/Context Shoreline Inventory, Analysis, & Characterization Report Restoration Plan Shoreline Master Program Cumulative Impacts Analysis Cons


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline Outline

  • Introduction
  • Shoreline Management Act

Background/Context

  • Shoreline Inventory, Analysis, &

Characterization Report

  • Restoration Plan
  • Shoreline Master Program
  • Cumulative Impacts Analysis
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cons Consultan ultant T t Team eam

 The Watershed Company  BERK (Land Use)  Coast and Harbor Engineering (Physical Marine/Estuarine Science)

Experience

 Shoreline Master Program Updates throughout WA State (50+)  Critical Areas Updates (20+)  Pacific County experience

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Role

  • le of
  • f Consulta

Consultant T nt Team eam

 Prepare supporting technical documents  Draft SMP language and format based on substantial input from the Shoreline Planning Committee  Draw from SMP and CAO experience to guide Pacific County in

  • ptions and areas of flexibility to meet SMA standards

 Assist Pacific County in public adoption process

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Inventory & Analysis

SMP

  • Environment

Designations

  • Goals
  • Policies
  • Regulations

Cumulative Impacts Analysis Local Adoption Restoration Plan

Ecology Review and Adoption

Determine Jurisdiction

Public Participation

Required Steps

WE ARE HERE

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Waters

  • Marine and estuarine waters
  • Streams & rivers with mean annual flow of 20 cfs or greater
  • Lakes 20 acres or larger

 Shorelands

  • Upland areas 200 feet from OHWM
  • Associated wetlands
  • Floodway + 200 feet landward when in the 100 year floodplain

 Optional expansion

  • Entire floodplain and buffers on associated wetlands (not

included in draft SMP)

  • Does not apply directly to federal actions or on federal

lands/waters, but Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) requires consistency with SMP

Shoreline Jurisdiction

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Shoreline Inventory and Characterization (SIAC)

 Identifies broad-scale shoreline ecological functions and impairments  Summarizes current land use and likely future changes  Lays foundation for environment designations and key issues to address in SMP  Not a regulatory document

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Shoreline Restoration Plan

 Draws from existing plans and input from the SPC subcommittee  Identifies projects, programs, funding sources, and general priorities  Intent is to demonstrate a net improvement in functions  Not a regulatory document (all opportunities identified are voluntary)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Shoreline Master Program (SMP)

Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) and Shoreline Master Program Guidelines (WAC 173-26)  Balance of required components/language and flexibility

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Key SMP Components

 Definitions  Environment Designations  General Policies and Regulations

 Environmental Protection, Public Access, Flood Hazard Reduction, Water Quality

 Shoreline Uses and Modifications

 Matrix of permitted uses  General Development Standards

 Coastal Ocean Uses and Modifications  Administration

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Prioritize preferred uses

  • Water dependent
  • Water enjoyment
  • Water related
  • Single Family Development

 Promote public access  Ensure No Net Loss of Ecological Function  Mitigation sequencing (Avoid, Minimize, Mitigate)  OHWM defines extent of jurisdiction  Specific definitions and standards from guidelines

Required

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The SMP does not:

 Apply retroactively to existing development  Require modifications to existing land uses or development  Alter ongoing agricultural, aquacultural, or forestry activities  Apply to activities that do not require a land use permit (fishing, shipping, etc)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 Specificity of regulations

 General regulations put burden on applicant/permitting staff to evaluate no net loss  Specific regulations reduce flexibility for applicant, but reduce/eliminate permitting burden

 Permitted Uses and Modifications by Environment Designation  More restrictive standards

 However, mitigation must be proportional to impacts

 Regulatory incentives

 Ex: options to reduce buffers in exchange for shoreline restoration

Examples of Flexibility

slide-14
SLIDE 14

 Will SMP maintain no net loss of ecological functions?  Existing conditions  Anticipated land use changes  Anticipated changes to ecological conditions  Effects of SMP provisions  Effects of other programs and regulations

Cumulative Impacts Analysis

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Questions/Discussion