site plan review committee
play

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 13, 2013 PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 13, 2013 PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1. SPRC Recap 2. Guiding Principles Overview 3. Circulation Network 4. Architecture / Buildings Network 5. Open Space / Public Space Network SPRC RECAP ( FOCUS ON DESIGN GUIDELINES


  1. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 13, 2013

  2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1. SPRC Recap 2. Guiding Principles Overview 3. Circulation Network 4. Architecture / Buildings Network 5. Open Space / Public Space Network

  3. SPRC RECAP ( FOCUS ON DESIGN GUIDELINES ELEMENTS ) SPRC #3 (May 14, 2012) Site Design & Characteristics SPRC #4 (June 11, 2012) Applicant presented revised site design SPRC #5 (July 16, 2012) Draft design guidelines presented SPRC #7 (Oct 18, 2012) Height, density, massing SPRC #8 (Nov 19, 2012) Design guidelines presentation SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013) Site design analysis by staff (framework) SPRC #13 (April 4, 2013) Open space network

  4. GUIDING PRINCIPLES A. Compatibility B. Mixed-use Development C. Distribution of Densities & Heights D. Open Space E. Circulation & Pedestrian Routes F. Other Elements of Good Urban Design G. Sustainable Design H. Accessibility Categories A through F were created by the Pentagon City Planning Task Force and published in the November 1997 Report of the Pentagon City Task Force but are not part of the original planning goals established in the February 1976 Pentagon City Master Development Plan .

  5. GUIDING PRINCIPLES A. Compatibility B. Mixed-use Development C. Distribution of Densities & Heights D. Open Space E. Circulation & Pedestrian Routes F. Other Elements of Good Urban Design G. Sustainable Design H. Accessibility Categories A through F were created by the Pentagon City Planning Task Force and published in the November 1997 Report of the Pentagon City Task Force but are not part of the original planning goals established in the February 1976 Pentagon City Master Development Plan .

  6. GUIDING PRINCIPLES A.1. Development should create a sense of place both internal and external to the site. It should contribute to the sense of place and community vitality envisioned for the entire Pentagon City neighborhood. A.2. High quality urban design and architectural design should define the site.

  7. CIRCULATION NETWORK

  8. A RLIN GT ON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGISIA Planning D1 vis1on TRANSPORTATION > > > Analysis PenPlace PDSP ( future ) Streetcar Station ( future ) Metropolitan Park PDSP (in de vel opment ) Pentagon Centre PDSP ( distant future ) (- • • •-) N orth / South Elm St Connect i on East/ W est 12th St Connection

  9. J\RL1 NGroN ~ ,· '°J•Gl\1~ ,.,~ ~ • PHma'Y/ ""lt i- mo dai co ,,id o, Seco nd a ry A ccess S tr ee ts • Prim a ry P edes tri an • • <'-. .. "' lr ee tcar S ta tion Vehicular/ Peclestra;,, Access Oiagrarn

  10. P~OPOSEO ARL I NG T ON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNI NG . HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGISIA Planning D1 vis1on STREET SECTION: 12TH STREET PROPOSED M t;T PARK PEN PLACE 9UIL OJNG BUILDING eYO T Ht; RS 34' 12' 12' STREET CAR LA NES 77-0• l'.O.C • l' .0 C 116'·4• MIN l',0 e • I' 0 S I l •NOTE: CAFE S EA TI NG ALONG 12TH ST REET TO BE APPROVED BY A USE PERMIT

  11. ARCHITECTURE / BUILDINGS NETWORK

  12. BUILDING MASSING

  13. BUILDING STEPBACKS

  14. ~ ARLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGIS I A Planning D1 vis1on BUILDINGS/ ARCHITECTURE POD I UM STEPBACK ZONES -- Principal en tr ances for all n ew reta il should be located on street frontaoes. Arcades on street frontages are not recommended. Paved surfaces should extend to the bu il di ng face, wi th landscapi ng elements limi ted to movable planters. With in the cafe/ display zo ne, some fenci ng and pa rt itioning between es ta blishments may be perm i tted by speci al use permit fro m Arlington County. Ot herwise, these areas should remain accessible for pedestrian movement. All handicap ramps should be internal to buildings. On st reets where resi dent ial bu ildings wi thou t a retail base occur, street frontage should ex pr ess t he more passive and a residential ne ighborhood. To that end : quiet character of All residential l obby entrances should front onto streets. L obby entrances should be at grade, with a mi ni mum clear he i ght of 1 2 feet in the lobby. ONE SE CURE BU I LD I NG SCHE ME NO SECUR E B UILD I NG SCH EME VORNADO PENPL ACE DESIGN GUIDELINES Cl>'l • R L.• 5 l'..$ M l 1""1'1

  15. ~ ARLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGIS I A Planning D1 vis1on BUILDINGS/ ARCHITECTURE POD I UM STEPBACK ZONES -- Principal en tr ances for all n ew reta il should be located on POD IU M S TEPB AC K ZO N ES street frontaoes. Arcades on street frontages are not recommended. Paved surfaces should extend to the bu il di ng face, wi th landscapi ng elements limi ted to movable planters. With in the cafe/ display zo ne, some fenci ng and pa rt itioning between es ta blishments may be perm i tted by speci al use permit fro m Arlington County. Ot herwise, these areas should remain accessible for pedestrian movement. All handicap ramps should be internal to buildings. On st reets where resi dent ial bu ildings wi thou t a retail base occur, street frontage should ex pr ess t he more passive and a residential ne ighborhood. To that end : quiet character of All residential l obby entrances should front onto streets. L obby entrances should be at grade, with a mi ni mum clear he i ght of 1 2 feet in the lobby. ONE SE CURE BU I LD I NG SCHE ME NO SECUR E B UILD I NG SCH EME VORNADO PENPL A CE DES I GN GU I DELINES Cl>'l • R L.• 5 l'..$ M l 1""1'1

  16. OPEN SPACE / PUBLIC SPACE NETWORK

  17. ~ ~IG.-. ~ntaon ~ · ARL I NG T ON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGISIA Planning D1 vis1on OPEN SPACE > > > Context 1 Lo ng Bridg .. Pa rle 5 Virg in ia Highlands Parle 4 Metropo l itan Parle 6 Hooper Memorial Parle Penbigon C entre 2 PO S P PLAZAS / SQUARES 7 Penbigon Row Pl~ 3 C ry sta l C ity Wate r Parle 8 Pen Pla ce -t.agon I • . • • • • Tral'ttft:ftaza Row ........ • t2tnSt .:•••••••• •••••• . . . • •

  18. ARL I NG T ON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGISIA Planning D1 vis1on ANALYSIS > > > Urban Design Framework BLOCKS / STREETS OPEN SPACE / COMPOSITE PUBLIC REALM DIAGRAM PEN PLACE SPRC#10 ARLINGTON February 25 , 2013 Vl l. O INI A

  19. ARL I NG T ON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGIS I A Planning D1 vis1on OPEN SPACE > > > Analysis K ey Plan Concept Plan

  20. POTOMAC YARD PDSP

  21. ~ thc20shSt1tfront.ogeR~asOM f!IOJlths.A.prOtT1"-'t~rtial~ctl.nl ftowure(:l)tlfdbeb:xedlil:the~ ~althepMl: to *c>bea>nM:k~ withagrandstlid~ cnabat~along CICdSibk.-~mneoti~the:Qr.ade ~l«dUSC$bl\'en.visionedonthe d~nces. olf1~«'Ukfbe~edintothe lndsupc-lMl~oflhe~il<>d duringthe~Cistemswithind!e f1dM1d~ent~scotAd~ .JndlorJObr~muldbeuxdinMtistic suply~ benclci~ sign:japoStolart.ry tcmponiykioskm.ti,.-S~o!Jldor wrietyaf~suc:has~s#e~tio. ~erP.1\.~l.theintenectionol O.rk-lelOd20thS1:1~1,. il ~-:~u En'lisi:lfleduanopenspace~acivic: Gtywith.a~sizeof74,20sqlJIR~ Ihes:=ofthe~would.,.,_.forawOe intmdedtobe ethi:IMru,~!Ni-._a~some ARL I NG T ON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNI NG . HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGISIA Planning D1 vis1on 2 - CEllTER PAJll part north11ndeast s idrsoltiloepM1'.withlM M.d! of the shUd be possibility of a re;sil aratde ;:it the .-.ooh peniclus and ptedominMitly gram. Spec:AI end l'llhidlmukl ft thewWdff .vtH!:ic:lghtingshouldhigt6ghtth.epd c:hand:etitwilbe lhebrges.1 pari:in(iysbl .and gathering Wien arrMng from )efierson 0.,-9ou4e-nird.Ast11>nglinkbetwee:nl8th n1inwmerforparkinig.mon.Windhlrbnes .and X'thStreetslhould ...... .,,,... '-rs 1oeduc.- ...-Cou .ndt11

  22. VO~NADO ARL I NG T ON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT VJRGIS I A Planning D1 vis1on OPEN SPACE/ PUBLIC SPACE DESIGN FRAMEWORK : CONCEPT PLANS The design of the buildings that line the streets will be critically important in giving an immediate impression to the public of the sort of place PenPlace will be. It is the design of the open spaces between the buildings, however, that wil l define the nature of the everyday experience of PenPlace to those who enter into it , whether by car, bicycle, on foot , or by streetcar. SEE ENLARGEMENT ON PAGE 57 In the section of the design guidelines that follows, the typology of these open spaces wil be discussed and defined. They range in size and complexity from the sidevvalks that promote easy and gracious movement of pedestrians around Pen Place to plazas and parks that serve as gathering places , soci al spaces and venues for events , fairs and performances . PenPlace will include the full range of urban open space: • streetscapes • plazas • parks SEE ENLA R GEMENT private green spaces ON PAGE 54 - 56 Each has an i mportant role to play, both in enlivening the publ ic realm and in making it urbane and elegant. These qualit ies, in concert wi th carefully designed buildings, will be hallmarks of PenPlace, making it a desirable place to work, shop and enjoy life. This section of the design guidelines will describe each of these open space types. SEE ENLARGEMENT ON PAGE 52 ,. PENPLACE DESIGN GUIDELINES CH A " l.E S L 8M I T H

  23. ARLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING . HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT YIRLl,IA Planning D1v1ston Master Plan Presanta:l to PDC for Conceptual Review on Januuy 10 , 2011 Revised percomrrentsreceived from PDC, DPR, CornmunityBoard, and results of light study

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend