signal electron is single mono energetic delayed The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
signal electron is single mono energetic delayed The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Proton - Production high-P low-P BG e - e - Signal - Spectrometer Magnet -e Conversion Muonic Atom Formation in-flight Production Secondary Beamline Target signal electron is
Proton Production Target Secondary Beamline
① π- Production ② in-flight π-→ μ- ③ Muonic Atom Formation ④ μ-e Conversion
Magnet Spectrometer π- μ- e- e- low-P BG high-P Signal
① ② ③ ④
Start with Carbon target
- Lifetime of muonic atom ~ 2 μs
- Energy of electron from -e conversion = 105 MeV
- Single event sensitivity (1 year = 2×10% sec)
- 1×10&'(
- 2.5×10&'+ (4 years)
signal electron is…
- single
- mono energetic
- delayed
The signal electron is identified by their momentum and time information In case of SiC…
- 2×10&'+
- 5×10&', (4years)
Proton Beam
μ-e conversion searching experiment at J-PARC MLF H-Line
Experimental groups are working to complete H-Line with the facility group.
MLF Muon facility H1: DeeMe experimental hall
- Decay In Orbit
0.015 (event/year)
- Distinguished by momentum
- prompt background <2.9×10'( (event/year)
(zero in principle)
- Distinguished by time distribution
- Delayed protons from main pulse are
monitored by a beam loss monitor in RCS
- Cosmic-ray induced
e: <0.018, ): <0.001 (event/year)
- suppressed by duty factor(= 1/20000)
and horizontal tracking direction
- Anti-Proton
Zero in principle
- beam energy(=3 GeV)
< * p production threshold
Primary Proton from RCS
e- signals at detector
//
Measurement time window
//
Delayed proton Prompt electrons from delayed proton No proton
Momentum (MeV/c) 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 Counts (/0.2MeV/c)
- 4
10
- 3
10
- 2
10
- 1
10 1 10
2
10
Delayed proton DIO )-e conversion signal region
Publication: PTEP, Volume 2017, Issue 2, 023C01
ON Anode wire: 1450V Potential wire: 0V Gas gain: O(104) OFF Anode wire: 1450V Potential wire: 1450V Gas gain: O(1)
efficiency ~98% in switching-ON period
Watanabe spectrum
Beamtime had been held in MLF D-line
- Performance test of spectrometer system
- DAQ test with 4 MWPCs
- Development of tracking analysis codes with real data
- DIO spectrum analysis
- Confirmation of Czarnecki C spectrum
AMJ
- -A=
- 4AA=RH
- 9=CAM
- CDMHAQMMMDAA=PHP
- ()T=HT=C=HLMMA==QL=H
=CHAM=QL
- JAMAMA
- 0FF45LAM=HLAMAHHC=CHAM
- 9CCA=H/,
- 9CCAB/,LRHDHSAPMDMD=MB=AFA=MMCCAAAAR(L
- =ABAAR D41S0F=LD,/
Beam axis
Magnet axis
- 25,430/FHA
- 1FHAP=LHM==F=FA
- 4A=LAAHMAHACR))4A
- 9DAAJAHAHAH=HALAAH=M))4A
1. test pulse 2. HV-switching OFF->ON 3.
- ver shoot by PZC circuit
4. signal 5. HV-switching ON->OFF
#ch@X #ch@Y time (10ns) time (10ns)
A template waveform is a set of most frequent value in each sample points
Momentum spectra of data are consistent to that
- f MC
Calibrated with MC spectrum
Michel spectrum (calculation)
GeV
0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05 0.055 0.06 0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08
20 40 60 80 100 120
compared the shape of measured momentum spectrum with MC simulation
GeV
0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05 0.055 0.06 0.065 0.07 0.075 0.08
5 10 15 20 25 30 MeV
MWPC laser
1 2
!" !"
When !" = 0.1 '' the errors of each MWPC are WC0: 0.35 mm WC1: 0.22 mm WC2: 0.19 mm WC3: 0.31 mm
Magnet axis
(Momentum spectrum with moved MWPC) (Momentum spectrum with original position)
GeV/c cm
fitting with liner function in 40~50MeV/c region 9 : = < : − 0.045 + C
a(dx)
cm cm
b(dx)
a(dx) and b(dx) fitting with liner function Iteration for MWPC 1-4
Calculate pdf of a in possible dx region
a
Calculate momentum distribution of
- > the systematic error is smaller than statistical error
@mu+ 45 MeV/c)
- GeV/c
at 50MeV/c relative statistical error=14% relative systematic error=1.4%
DIO Momentum spectrum
DIO momentum spectrum can be calculated as (Measured DIO momentum spectrum) / (acceptance curve) Acceptance curve is generated by MC simulation with flat momentum gun file
acceptance curve @ 55MeV/c
Measured momentum spectrum @55 MeV/c
MeV/c 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
MLF 201706 run6355-6419 MC Watanabe-O MC Watanabe-C (Uesaka-C) MC Czarnecki-C
DIO spectrum
normalizing region
- Each spectrum normalized in the
normalizing region
- The measured spectrum and each MC
spectrum are compared in the comparison region
MeV/c 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
MLF 201706 run6355-6419 MC Watanabe-O MC Watanabe-C (Uesaka-C) MC Czarnecki-C
DIO spectrum
fit measured spectrum with each MC spectrum Watanabe-O : prob. = 21.5% Czarnecki-C : prob. = 92.9% Watanabe-C : prob. = 43.7%
normalizing region comparison region
- Each spectrum normalized in the
normalizing region
- The measured spectrum and each MC