sidc xbid update 18 th mesc meeting entso e brussels 17
play

SIDC (XBID) Update 18 th MESC Meeting ENTSO-E, Brussels 17.09.2019 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIDC (XBID) Update 18 th MESC Meeting ENTSO-E, Brussels 17.09.2019 SIDC Headlines on Progress 2 nd Wave Go-Live on target for November but risk Deployment of Release 2.0 on target for end October remains User The Acceptance


  1. SIDC (XBID) Update 18 th MESC Meeting ENTSO-E, Brussels 17.09.2019

  2. SIDC – Headlines on Progress 2 nd Wave Go-Live on target for November but risk Deployment of Release 2.0 on target for end October remains • User • The Acceptance Testing, UAT, has been final phase of Local Implementation successful and delivered to plan. Final phase Project testing is underway • Pre-launch Event is scheduled for 1 st October. is now underway (Performance Testing) • Release 2.0 delivers increased Order Book Invitations issued/participants are registered • Risks on 2 nd Wave include Transit Shipping Depth of 100 (up from 31) • Also delivers Enhanced Shipper for 2 nd Wave (see separate slides), MPLS connections and XBID Go-Live technical readiness successfully transitioned to Future Development progresses Roadmap SIDC • The Proof of Concept for Losses on DC Cables • Roadmap developed with circa 130 items is underway (expected to complete in covering geographic extension, usability and November) functional development • Pilot of Agile Development agreed with DBAG • Research & Development workshop with NRAs scheduled for 26 th September and approach is being discussed • Scope of Release 3.0 ongoing – list to be • Early discussions on Intraday Auctions and aligned with 2020 Budget - discussions ongoing. governance 2

  3. SIDC key figures – performance monitoring – example Order Transactions / Trades 1,000,000 100,000 900,000 90,000 800,000 80,000 Orders Transactions 700,000 70,000 Realistic Test Scenario 600,000 <=50k 60,000 Trades 500,000 50,000 400,000 40,000 Realistic Test Scenario 300,000 30,000 3A<=400k 200,000 20,000 100,000 10,000 0 0 2018-06-12 2018-06-18 2018-06-24 2018-07-01 2018-07-07 2018-07-13 2018-07-19 2018-07-25 2018-07-31 2018-08-06 2018-08-12 2018-08-18 2018-08-24 2018-08-30 2018-09-05 2018-09-11 2018-09-17 2018-09-23 2018-09-29 2018-10-05 2018-10-11 2018-10-17 2018-10-23 2018-10-29 2018-11-04 2018-11-10 2018-11-16 2018-11-22 2018-11-28 2018-12-04 2018-12-10 2018-12-16 2018-12-22 2018-12-28 2019-01-03 2019-01-09 2019-01-15 2019-01-21 2019-01-27 2019-02-02 2019-02-08 2019-02-14 2019-02-20 2019-02-26 2019-03-04 2019-03-10 2019-03-16 2019-03-22 2019-03-28 2019-04-03 2019-04-09 2019-04-15 2019-04-21 2019-04-27 2019-05-03 2019-05-09 2019-05-15 2019-05-21 2019-05-27 2019-06-02 2019-06-08 2019-06-14 2019-06-20 2019-06-26 The figure shows daily Orders Transactions (Order events) and Trades since the first complete day of trading (13 June 2018). The maximum order transactions peak (~862k) was produced on 26 June 2019 . The trades also reached a peak in that month (~85k on 7 June). Over 20 million trades have been completed since the 1 st go-live Note: Realistic Test Scenarios have been run and SLAs agreed to ensure effective contractual frameworks as the Intraday Market grows 3

  4. 2 nd Wave Go-Live – “Transit” Shipping (1/2) • The 2 nd Wave Go-Live is scheduled for November 2019 with 7 countries – Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania & Slovenia (subject to successful testing) in two Local Implementation Projects (LIPs). See Appendix for parties involved. • In comparison to the 1st Wave, the 2nd Wave shipping arrangements introduce a more complex topology for SIDC which could not be fully considered when the Shipping Module was initially developed for the 1 st Wave Go-Live. • In order to deal with this 2nd wave complexity - a role of the preferred shipper has been established. This means that in the MNAs (Multi NEMO Arrangements) areas, “preferred” shipping agent from amongst the two NEMO/CCP/Shipping agents currently active* in these MNA areas needs to be appointed by each NEMO/CCP. • The preferred shipper role deals with “transit shipping activities“ (shipping of the energy through delivery areas where the trade has neither source nor sink). Transit in non-MNA areas does not need any selection as the non-MNA NEMO/CCP active in each area assures this activity (or nominates another entity to provide it, e.g. shipping agents) to all other NEMOs/CCPs. • The arrangements and agreement regarding “Transit” Shipping through MNA areas is key for the success of the 2 nd Wave *At the current time EPEX SPOT/ECC and EMCO/NordPool could be active NEMOs in all MNA areas and TGE is only active in the Polish MNA area. EXAA is not operational in XBID. 4

  5. 2 nd Wave Go-Live – “Transit” Shipping (2/2 ) • A selection process for the provision of “Transit” Shipping in MNA areas has been jointly prepared (to ensure consistency) by the non-MNA NEMOs • The corresponding Request for Offer (RfO) was sent to EMCO and EPEX/ECC on 14th August, together with the defined Terms. • Responses were received by 11th September and the final selection decision is due to be made on 18th September. This will be followed by final negotiations, a Lock-In if needed, NRA approvals (where needed) and incorporation in bilateral agreements. • The timeline is challenging in order to secure the 2nd wave go-live scheduled for 19th November 2019. • If timely agreement is not reached through this process, then a Transit Shipper will be appointed for an interim period of up to 6 months. The above RfO included the request for the potential providers to detail the costs for 3 and 6 months under direct assignment of the Transit Shipper role. This is designed to mitigate the risk on the 2nd wave go-live if the above selection process does not deliver in time. • TGE, the Polish NEMO, is separately running a selection process for the selection of their Preferred Shipper and also requested a response from EMCO and ECC by 11th September. • Transit Shipping is being monitored very closely by the Transit Shipping Group and the SIDC Intraday Steering Committee. • Other risks to the 2 nd wave go-live include the Nomination system in Poland, some NEMOs’ connection to the MPLS (communication channel) for back office activities, and completion of testing. 5

  6. Appendix: 2 nd wave Local Implementation Projects and parties involved LIP Participants Foreseen allocation • AT-CZ, AT-SI, NEMOs : BSP, Cropex, Implicit • AT-HU, BG- EPEX, HUPX, IBEX, Nord Implicit & RO, CZ-DE, Pool, OPCOM, OTE Explicit for 15 16 CZ-PL, DE-PL, TSOs : 50Hertz, APG, HR-SI border HR-SI, HR-HU, CEPS, ELES, ESO, HOPS, HU-RO MAVIR, PSE, Transelectrica, TTG LT-PL, PL-SE NEMOs : Nord Pool, TGE Implicit 16 TSOs : Litgrid, PSE, Svk 15 Operational Operational, part of 2nd wave 2nd wave 6

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend