SH-123 over the Caney River PUBLIC MEETING MAY 10, 2016 AT 6 PM

Meeting Agenda 2 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Meeting Purpose Present the alternatives considered and obtain input on the proposed options for further consideration. Protected Resources – Section 4(f) ◦ NRHP Eligible Bridge ◦ NRHP Eligible Dam ◦ Johnstone Park ◦ Pathfinder Parkway ◦ NRHP Eligible Carr-Bartles Mill NRHP – National Register of Historic Places 3 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Project Location 4 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Project Purpose The purpose of the project is to provide a structurally sound crossing and preserve transportation continuity over the Caney River. The need of the project is to address the current structural and functional deficiencies of the existing bridge structure and approach roadway. ◦ The Bridge is classified as structurally deficient ◦ The Bridge is rated in poor condition ◦ Currently has a posted 10 ton load limit 5 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act ◦ Federally Funded Projects ◦ Complete environmental studies and documentation for ODOT/Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) approval ◦ Determine Environmental Impacts ◦ Avoid ◦ Minimize ◦ By design ◦ Mitigate 6 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Process includes the following: ◦ Public and Agency Involvement ◦ Public Meeting ◦ We need your input on these resources and alignment options ◦ Solicitations ◦ Environmental Studies ◦ Consultation with Agencies and Tribes ◦ DOT Regulations – If Protected Resources 7 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act Studies and Consultation For: ◦ Relocations ◦ Threatened & Endangered Species ◦ Scenic Rivers ◦ Prime Farmland ◦ Wetlands & Streams ◦ Noise Impacts ◦ Section 106 ◦ Floodplains ◦ Historic Properties ◦ Permitting ◦ Archeological Sites ◦ Hazardous Waste Sites ◦ Tribal Concerns ◦ Parks & Recreational Areas (Section 4(f) & 6(f)) 8 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Section 4(f) & 6(f) Resources 9 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Section 4(f) & 6(f) Resources Officials with Jurisdiction and Concurrence Requirement ◦ SHPO – Section 4(f) NRHP Eligible Bridge over the Caney River ◦ SHPO – Section 4(f) NRHP Eligible Dam – Under Bridge ◦ City – Section 4(f) Johnstone Park Surrounding Project ◦ NPS & City – Section 4(f) & 6(f) Pathfinder Parkway ◦ SHPO – Section 4(f) NRHP Eligible Carr-Bartles Mill ◦ SHPO – NRHP Nellie Johnstone #1 Section 6(f) Resource – Land and Water Conservation Funds regulated by the Department of the Interior and the Oklahoma Tourism Department protects recreational properties that have used these funds and would require replacement in kind, if impacted. SHPO – State Historic Preservation Officer NPS – National Park Service 10 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

USDOT Section 4(f) Regulations FHWA may not approve an action that uses public park and recreation land, or historic properties, when there is a feasible and prudent alternative. To reject an avoidance alternative, one must demonstrate that it cannot be constructed as a matter of sound engineering practice (not feasible) and that it does not cause other severe problems of a magnitude that substantially outweighs the importance of protecting the Section 4(f) property (not prudent). DOT – Department of Transportation 11 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

USDOT Section 4(f) Regulations If the analysis of avoidance alternatives concludes that there is no feasible and prudent avoidance alternative, then the FHWA may only approve the alternative that causes the least overall harm to the Section 4(f) property. 12 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

NHPA Section 106 Section 106 Definition Section 106 of the NHPA requires federal agencies to consider the effects of their projects on historic properties and avoid or minimize those effects. If effects cannot be avoided or minimized, they must be mitigated. NHPA – National Historic Preservation Act 13 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Cultural Resources Section 106 Consultation to Date ◦ Consulting Party Comments ◦ Delaware Tribe ◦ Oklahoma Historic Bridge and Highway Group ◦ City of Bartlesville Key Features ◦ Stone Masonry for Carr-Bartles Mill ◦ Nellie Johnstone #1 (NRHP Listed/Section 4(f)) ◦ Johnstone Park (Section 4(f)) ◦ Pathfinder Parkway (Section 4(f) & 6(f)) ◦ Bartlesville Water Company Dam (NRHP Eligible) 14 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

15 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Environmental Summary Impacts Addressed ◦ NEPA ◦ Section 4(f), 6(f), and 106 Next Step ◦ Public Comments and Input ◦ Importance of the Environmental Impacts in the project area ◦ Rank Impacts on the Comment Card ◦ 1 “Not Important” to 5 “Most Important” 20 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Bridge Background 418 Foot Long Truss Bridge Structurally Deficient ◦ 3-Span Bridge ◦ Deck in poor condition ◦ 210 Foot Truss Main Span ◦ Superstructure in poor condition ◦ 2-100 Foot Long Pony Truss Spans ◦ 10 Ton Limit ◦ Substructure in poor condition Functionally Obsolete ◦ 24 Foot Bridge Deck Width ◦ 15 Foot 6 Inch Vertical Clearance ◦ Sidewalks Do Not Meet Current ADA Standards 21 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Bridge Conditions 22 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

Bridge Rehabilitation ◦ Alternative 1: Do nothing (Maintenance Only) ◦ Alternative 2: Rehabilitation without affecting historic integrity of the bridge ◦ Alternative 3: Build on new location ◦ Alternative 3(a): Rehab and retain existing bridge in vehicular service as part of a one-way pair ◦ Alternative 3(b): Retain existing bridge in place, either as a non-functional monument or as a non-motorized pedestrian and/or bicycle facility 23 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions Options Summary

SH-123 over the Caney River PUBLIC MEETING MAY 10, 2016 AT 6 PM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SH-123 over the Caney River PUBLIC MEETING MAY 10, 2016 AT 6 PM Meeting Agenda 2 Meeting Project Project Section Bridge Bridge Roadway Alignment Meeting NEPA Purpose Area Purpose 4(f), 6(f), 106 Conditions Rehab Conditions

SH-123 over the Caney River PUBLIC MEETING DECEMBER 20, 2018 AT 6 PM Meeting Agenda 2 Meeting

CANEY CREEK WATERSHED BRAZOS COLORADO COASTAL BASIN December 7, 2017 Steven Johnston &

Long-Term Prof. Simon Caney University of Oxford How can today's Europe better safeguard

River Towns: A River Runs Through It Patrick Starr, Executive VP, PA Environmental Council

Salmon management and Sport fishing a Swedish perspective - 2012 Torne river Kalix river Rne

St Lucie River Estuary and Indian River Lagoon St Lucie River Estuary Water Quality Report October

Mountain River Mountain River Processors RAKAIA Mountain River Venison MARKETING

Community Outreach 536 River Street Mattapan 536 River Street Mattapan Ma 536 River Street

Egypt (The Nile River Valley) India (The Indus River) China (The Yellow River) 1 River Valley

Cross-sectoral cooperation as a basis for contemporary river corridor management: the Drava river

Santa Fe River Greenway 1 Santa Fe River Greenway Project Santa Fe River Headwaters US 84-

Colorado River Basin Characterizing the Colorado River Basin 3 rd largest river basin in Texas

Inland River and Export Coal Inland River and Export Coal Michael Gipson AEP River Operations

2019 MRG Presentation Angling The Manuherikia River is the 5th most fished river in Otago

Conservation of the Colorado River Delta Colorado River Delta impact of a 100 years of

Park River W atershed Revitalization I nitiative in collaboration with the Farmington River

IDGE CT BR OJE R PR A MONICA PIE NT ME ACE PL SANT E R OBJE CTIVE Staff r e c

Meeting Objectives Update project status Update Purpose and Need Review Community

SAN MARTIN BOULEVARD OVER RIVIERA BAY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDY

FY 2019-2020 Proposed Budget Report June 4, 2019 1 Dramatically Improve Student LCAP Goal 1

Project Development Workshop: Missouri March 2018 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM

Emergency Shelters, ADA, and FNSS Compliance By: Stephen E. DeMarsh, Esq., County Attorney

August 14, 2019 Federal Program Monitoring & Support Division Susan Brigman Section Chief

2019-20 2 nd Interim Budget Report PRESENTED TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON MARCH 10, 2020 Agenda