SANITATION ARE CRUCIAL FOR POVERTY REDUCTION, CRUCIAL FOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sanitation are crucial for poverty
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SANITATION ARE CRUCIAL FOR POVERTY REDUCTION, CRUCIAL FOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SAFE DRINKING WATER AND ADEQUATE SANITATION ARE CRUCIAL FOR POVERTY REDUCTION, CRUCIAL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND CRUCIAL FOR ACHIEVING ANY AND EVERY ONE OF THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS. 01 OBJECTIVE TO EVALUATE NEW


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

SAFE DRINKING WATER AND ADEQUATE SANITATION ARE CRUCIAL FOR POVERTY REDUCTION, CRUCIAL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND CRUCIAL FOR ACHIEVING ANY AND EVERY ONE OF THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OBJECTIVE 01

TO EVALUATE NEW SOLUTIONS FOR THE BIOSAND FILTER GEOMETRY AND THE OUTLET INSIDE THE FILTERS, USING THE CFD TO SIMULATE THE FLOW IN THE MODELS: HYDRAID, CAWST AND PEU/UEM.

PEU/UEM CAWST HYDRAID

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

METODOLOGY 02 02 03 04

BUILDING AND OPERATING THE EXPERIMENTAL MODEL

  • SUPPLY CRITERIA
  • REMOVAL OF TOTAL COLIFORME AND E. COLI
  • REMOVAL OF TURBIDITY AND PH

SIMULATION IN PERM. AND ITERM. REGIME

  • COMPARATION BETWEEN USUAL FILTER AND

ADOPTED OUTLET.

DETERMINATION OF RTD CURVE

  • RTD CURVE EXPERIMENTAL FILTER
  • RTD CURVE NUMERICAL MODELS

CHOICE OF OUTLET

  • 4 DIFFERENT MODELS OF OUTLET FOR PEU/UEM
  • MODELS SIMULATION.
  • RESULT ANALYSIS

01

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CHOICE OF OUTLET 03

FOR THIS STUDY WE USED THE PEU/UEM DESIGN. SIMULATION OF FILTER CONSIDERING AND NOT CONSIDERING THE POROUS LAYERS FOR THE FOUR OUTLET MODELS

PEU/UEM

slide-7
SLIDE 7

03.1 CHOICE OF OUTLET

NOT CONSIDERING POROUS LAYERS - FLOWLINE

CENTRAL LATERAL BOTTOM WITH RING

slide-8
SLIDE 8

03.2 CHOICE OF OUTLET

CONSIDERING POROUS LAYERS - FLOWLINE

CENTRAL LATERAL BOTTOM WITH RING

slide-9
SLIDE 9

03.2 CHOICE OF OUTLET

CONSIDERING POROUS LAYERS – VELOCITY PROFILE

CENTRAL LATERAL BOTTOM WITH RING CENTRAL LATERAL BOTTOM WITH RING

AXIS XZ

[Y=0]

AXIS YZ

[X=0]

slide-10
SLIDE 10

03 .2

CENTRAL LATERAL BOTTOM WITH RING CENTRAL LATERAL BOTTOM WITH RING

AXIS XZ AXIS YZ

CHOICE OF OUTLET

CONSIDERING POROUS LAYERS – VELOCITY PROFILE

slide-11
SLIDE 11

04

slide-12
SLIDE 12

04.1

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0,0100 0,1000 1,0000 10,0000

D10%=0.23 D60%=0.40 PASSING PERCENTAGE (%)

GRAIN DIMMENSIONS (mm)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

04.1

GRAIN SPECIFIC MASS (NBR 6508/84) MAXIMUM VOID RATIO (NBR 12004/90) D10% D60%

ρ=2,75 (g/cm³) emáx=44,22% D10%=0,23 (mm) D60%=0,40 (mm)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

04.2

SUPPLY CRITERIA

CONTINOUS OPERATION INTERMITTENT OPERATION

SUPPLY 10L/DAY SUPPLY 10L/DAY

slide-15
SLIDE 15

04.3

BACTERIOLOGICAL REMOVAL

INDEX REMOVAL IN CONTINUOUS OPERATION [log10] REMOVAL IN INTERMMITENT OPERATION [log10] Filter A Filter B Filter C Filter D Filter E avg max avg max avg max avg max avg max Total Coliformes 1,12 2,58 0,88 2,00 0,83 1,67 0,79 1,84 1,01 2,26

  • E. coli

0,79 1,66 0,83 1,67 0,58 1,14 0,89 1,42 0,77 1,44

slide-16
SLIDE 16

04.4

TURBIDITY REMOVAL

0,00 5,00 10,00 15,00 20,00 25,00 30,00 35,00 40,00 45,00 50,00 10 20 30 40 50 Turbidity (UT) Days

Filtro A Filtro B Filtro C Filtro D Filtro E Antes

slide-17
SLIDE 17

04.5

HEAD LOSS IN THE POROUS LAYERS

  • 1,00

2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 7,00 10 20 30 40 50 i [m/m] Days i1 i2 i3 i4

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SIMULATION IN PERMANENT REGIME 05

WE SIMULATED THE CAWST AND HYDRAID FILTERS IN PERMANENT REGIME. FOR EACH ONE WE USED:

  • CONVENCIONAL MODEL
  • MODEL WITH RING

CAWST HYDRAID

slide-19
SLIDE 19

SIMULATION IN PERMANENT REGIME 05.1

CAWST FILTER– FLOW LINES

CONVENTIONAL WITH RING

slide-20
SLIDE 20

05.1 SIMULATION IN PERMANENT REGIME

CAWST FILTER – CUT YZ

CONVENTIONAL

[Y=0cm]

WITH RING

[Y=6cm]

slide-21
SLIDE 21

05.1 SIMULATION IN PERMANENT REGIME

CAWST FILTER – CUT XY [Z=1cm]

CONVENTIONAL WITH RING

slide-22
SLIDE 22

05.2 SIMULATION IN PERMANENT REGIME

HYDRAID FILTER – FLOW LINES

CONVENTIONAL WITH RING

slide-23
SLIDE 23

05.2 SIMULATION IN PERMANENT REGIME

HYDRAID FILTER – CUT YZ

CONVENTIONAL

[Y=0cm]

WITH RING

[Y=6cm]

slide-24
SLIDE 24

05.2 SIMULATION IN PERMANENT REGIME

HYDRAID FILTER – CUT XY [Z=1cm]

CONVENTIONAL WITH RING

slide-25
SLIDE 25

06

slide-26
SLIDE 26

06.1

THREE SUPPLIES IN THE 1st ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATION OF 2g/L OF NaCl.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

06.1

(0,50)

  • 0,50

1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 5,00 0,00 5,00 10,00 15,00 20,00 25,00 30,00 35,00

NaCl CONCENTRATION (g/L) FILTERED VOLUME (L)

FILLED FILTERS

A (Preenchido e Contínuo) B (Preenchido e Interm.) 1ST SUPPLY. 2ND SUPPLY 3RD SUPPLY

slide-28
SLIDE 28

06.2

0,000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 0,000 0,500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 E(θ) θ CHARACTERISTIC VOLUME Dead Volume 1,52% Slug Volume 61,53% Mixture Volume 36,95%

slide-29
SLIDE 29

06.3

0,000 0,020 0,040 0,060 0,080 0,100 0,120 0,140 0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00 120,00 140,00 160,00 PEU/UEM com anel - Empírico PEU/UEM com anel - COmputacional

slide-30
SLIDE 30

06.4

0,000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 0,000 0,500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 E(θ) Dimensionless time θ PEU UEM convencional HydrAid Conv PEU UEM anel CAWST conv CAWST conv HydrAid anel

slide-31
SLIDE 31

06.4

PEU/UEM convenc. PEU/UEM ring CAWST convenc. CAWST ring HydrAid convenc. HydrAid ring τ [min] 64,32 64,23 61,7 64,23 54,95 55,14 θmin 0,72 0,73 0,74 0,72 0,52 0,59 θmax 0,84 0,8 0,85 0,82 0,89 0,86 Dead volume 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% Slug volume 78,13% 76,42% 79,42% 77,22% 70,37% 72,69% Mixture volume 21,87% 23,58% 20,58% 22,78% 29,63% 27,31%

slide-32
SLIDE 32

CONCLUSIONS 07

  • IN THE EVALUATION OF THE FOUR MODELS OF PEU/UEM

FILTER THE CENTRAL AND RING OUTLETS PRESENTED BETTER RESULTS

  • FOR THE CAWST AND HYDRAID FILTERS THE RING

OUTLET PRESENTED BETTER RESULTS REGARDING THE FLOW LINES AND VELOCITY PROFILES.

  • THE

EXPERIMENTAL FILTER ASSISTED IN THE COMPREHENSION AND DETERMINATION OF MATHEMATIC

  • PARAMETERS. THE TURBIDITY AND PH

PARAMETERS WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BRAZILIAN POTABILIZATION NORMS.

  • IN THIS STUDY ALL THE MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS

PRESENTED EQUIVALENCE FOR THE RTD CURVES.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS 08

  • EMPIRICALLY

EVALUATE THE POTABILIZATION PARAMETERS IN THE VARIATIONS OF BIOSAND FILTERS DESIGNS .

  • ADD POTABILIZATION PARAMETERS IN THE VARIATIONS

OF MATHEMATIC MODELS.