sae baja concept
play

SAE Baja: Concept Generation & Selection Suspension and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SAE Baja: Concept Generation & Selection Suspension and Steering Benjamin Bastidos, Victor Cabilan, Jeramie Goodwin, William Mitchell, Eli Wexler Wednesday, October 30, 2013 Overview Introduction Suspension Concept Designs o


  1. SAE Baja: Concept Generation & Selection Suspension and Steering Benjamin Bastidos, Victor Cabilan, Jeramie Goodwin, William Mitchell, Eli Wexler Wednesday, October 30, 2013

  2. Overview • Introduction • Suspension Concept Designs o Decision Matrix o Final Design • Steering Concept Designs o Decision Matrix o Final Design • Conclusion • References Jeramie Goodwin 1

  3. Introduction Client: Dr. John Tester • Problem Statement: Design and build a safe, maneuverable, and versatile vehicle for competition use. • Goal: Design a suspension and steering system that will meet the demands of off road racing. Jeramie Goodwin 2

  4. Suspension Concepts ● 4 Designs truly considered ○ Dual A-arms (front and rear) ○ Twin I-beam (front) ○ Semi-trailing arms (rear) ○ Solid Axle (rear) ● Design that did not make it past preliminary choosing process ○ Twin Trailing Arm (front) Jeramie Goodwin 3

  5. Suspension Design 1 (Front & Rear) • Independent Suspension • Advantages o Lightest weight o Alignment control throughout travel • Disadvantages o Easier to break (mostly due to CV axles) Source: CarBibles William Mitchell 4

  6. Suspension Design 2 (Front) • Equal I Beams • Advantages Allows for maximum travel o Best articulation o • Disadvantage Susceptible to bumpsteer o Radical camber change o Uneven tire wear due to o camber wear Source: HM Racing Design William Mitchell 5

  7. Suspension Design 3 (Rear) • Trailing Arm • Advantages o Lots of travel o Truly independent o Strong o Simple • Disadvantages o Camber is static Source: SAEBaja.net o Handling suffers at limit William Mitchell 6

  8. Suspension Design 4 (Rear) • Live Axle/Solid Rear Axle • Advantages o Tough o Simple design o Good articulation o Reliable • Disadvantage o Large unsprung weight Source: Motor Trend o Wheels are not independent Eli Wexler 7

  9. Decision Matrix (Suspension Front) Table 1: Suspension Decision Matrix (Front) Requirements A Arm Equal I Beam Solid Axle Simplicity (0.20) 4 4 5 Reliability (0.30) 4 4 5 Weight (0.30) 3 2 1 Cost (0.20) 4 3 2 Totals 3.7 3.2 3.2 Eli Wexler 8

  10. Decision Matrix (Suspension Rear) Table 2: Suspension Decision Matrix (Rear) Requirements A Arm Solid Axle Trailing Arms Simplicity (0.20) 3 4 4 Reliability (0.30) 3 5 3 Weight (0.30) 4 1 4 Cost (0.20) 4 2 4 Totals 3.5 3.3 3.7 Eli Wexler 9

  11. Final Design (Suspension) Eli Wexler 10

  12. Steering Concepts • 3 Designs considered o Pitman arms o Rack & pinion o Steer-by-Wire Benjamin Bastidos 11

  13. Steering Design 1 • Pitman Arm Steering Assembly • Advantages o Easily repaired o Robust o Strictly Mechanical Components • Disadvantage “Dead Spot” o  Response time Benjamin Bastidos 12

  14. Steering Design 1 • Pitman Arm Steering Source: CarBibles Benjamin Bastidos 13

  15. Steering Design 2 • Rack and Pinion • Types o Helical o Spur • Advantages o Smooth gear Meshing(Helical) o Simple mechanical design • Disadvantage o Steering Column Thrust Load(Helical) Victor Cabilan 14

  16. Steering Design 2 Source: CarBibles Victor Cabilan 15

  17. Steering Design 3 • Steer by wire • Advantages o Lightweight o Advanced Electronic Traction and Stability control • Disadvantage o Precise programing o Needs watertight connections o Needs to be well grounded Victor Cabilan 16

  18. Steering Design 3 Source: Cvel Clemson Victor Cabilan 17

  19. Decision Matrix (Steering) Requirements Rack & Pinion Pitman Arm Steer by Wire Simplicity (0.20) 5 4 2 Reliability (0.30) 4 5 2 Weight (0.30) 4 3 3 Cost (0.20) 4 3 1 Totals 4.2 3.8 2.1 Victor Cabilan 18

  20. Final Design (Steering) Source: Car Bibles Victor Cabilan 19

  21. Conclusion • Front and Rear Suspension Concepts o Double A-arm (independent) o Solid Axle o I-Beam o Trailing Arm • Steering Design Concepts o Rack & Pinion o Pitman Arm o Steer-by-wire • Final Suspension and Steering Concepts o Trailing Arm/A-arm Jeramie Goodwin 20 o Rack & Pinion

  22. References 1. http://www.carbibles.com/steering_bible.html 2. http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/report-s197-ford-mustang-could-have- had-independent-rear-suspen/ 3. http://www.cvel.clemson.edu/auto/AuE835_Projects_2009/pillai_project.html 4. http://www.hmracingdesign.com/html/suspension_kit_ranger_ibeam_hnm.html 5. http://www.altairhyperworks.com/(S(3fu2zyrlbyi03xcofiue25jd))/hwhelp/Altair/hw 11.0/help/engsol/engsol.htm?rear_trailing_arm_suspension_system_svdd.htm 6. http://forums.bajasae.net/forum/trailing-arm-suspension_topic753.html

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend