Roundabouts By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University February 19, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

roundabouts
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Roundabouts By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University February 19, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Roundabouts By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University February 19, 2015 Outline 1. Background on Roundabouts 2. Silhavy Rd. Corridor Improvement Project in Valparaiso, IN 3. 5-points Roundabout in Valparaiso, IN Circular Junctions modern


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Roundabouts

By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University February 19, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • 1. Background on Roundabouts
  • 2. Silhavy Rd. Corridor Improvement Project in

Valparaiso, IN

  • 3. 5-points Roundabout in Valparaiso, IN
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Circular Junctions

(Sources: Bing maps, FHWA)

Traffic Circle Neighborhood Circle Rotary modern Roundabout

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Columbus Circle, NY (Built in 1905)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Early 20th Century Circular Junctions

  • Designed for high-speed entry
  • Entering vehicles had priority over circulating

vehicles

  • Result: high crash rate and choked traffic circles
  • Unpopular in the US.
  • United Kingdom (1960s): mandatory “yield-at-entry”

rule at circular junctions => modern roundabouts

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Modern Roundabout – Key Features

(Source: Bing maps)

Yield control

slide-7
SLIDE 7

(Source: Bing maps)

Yield control Deflection

Modern Roundabout – Key Features

slide-8
SLIDE 8

(Source: Bing maps)

Yield control Deflection Offset

Modern Roundabout – Key Features

slide-9
SLIDE 9

(Source: Bing maps)

Yield control Deflection Offset Splitter island

Modern Roundabout – Key Features

slide-10
SLIDE 10

(Source: Bing maps)

Yield control Deflection Offset Splitter island Peds crossing

Modern Roundabout – Key Features

slide-11
SLIDE 11

(Source: Bing maps)

Yield control Deflection Offset Splitter island Peds crossing Truck apron

Modern Roundabout – Key Features

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Modern Roundabout – Key Features

(Source: Bing maps)

Compact junction vs. Rotary

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Modern Roundabout – Key Features

(Source: Bing maps)

No traffic control for circulating vehicles vs. Traffic Circle

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Modern Roundabout

  • Designed to slow the speed of vehicles
  • Entering traffic yields to the circulating traffic
  • Approach legs are deflected to reduce entry speed

and channelize entry into correct lane

  • Compact one-way circular junction
  • No traffic control for circulating traffic
slide-15
SLIDE 15

(Source: NCHRP 672)

Roundabout – Safety Benefits

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Reduced number of conflict points => lower crash

frequency

  • Elimination of crossing conflicts => reduced

fatal/injury crashes

  • Reduced speed => less severe crashes
  • Reduced angle of conflict => less severe crashes
  • Correct geometric design is key – a challenge for

multilane roundabout

Roundabout – Safety Benefits

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Signal to Roundabout Conversion

48%

All crashes

78%

Injury + fatal crashes

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Two-way Stop to Roundabout Conversion

44%

All crashes

82%

Injury + fatal crashes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

All-way Stop to Roundabout Conversion

0%

All crashes

0%

Injury + fatal crashes

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Roundabout – Other Benefits

  • Lower overall delay compared to signalized and all-

way stop-controlled intersections

  • Delay reduction most significant for off-peak periods
  • Environmental benefits: reduced number/duration of

stops, acceleration-deceleration cycles, idling

  • Lower operating and maintenance cost
  • Narrower approach roadways
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Roundabout – Other Benefits

  • Access management: U-turns
  • Traffic calming effect: speed reduction
  • Aesthetics: central island
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Roundabout Trade-offs

  • Large footprint at the intersection
  • Higher initial cost
  • Low-speed (20 – 30 mph) operation
  • Gives equal priority to all approach legs
  • Can’t give priority to transit, emergency vehicles, fire

trucks, etc.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Number of Roundabouts in U.S.

Year 2014 Year 2010 Year 1997 Year 1990

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Silhavy Rd. Corridor Improvement Project in Valparaiso, IN

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Valparaiso, IN

(Source: Google maps)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Silhavy Corridor Improvement Project

(Source: Google maps)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Silhavy Corridor Improvement Project

(Source: Google maps)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Silhavy Corridor Improvement Project

Silhavy Rd. - Evans Ave. intersection

(Source: Google maps)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Silhavy Corridor Improvement Project

LaPorte Ave. - Silhavy Rd. intersection

(Source: Google maps)

High crash frequency

slide-30
SLIDE 30

LaPorte - Silhavy Roundabout

  • 180 ft. inscribed circle diameter (ICD)
  • 35 mph design approach speed
  • 25 mph travel speed in circle
  • 15 foot travel lanes in circle
  • Geometry determined using AASHTO Green book,

FHWA guides, INDOT guides, the MUTCD

slide-31
SLIDE 31

LaPorte - Silhavy Roundabout

LaPorte Ave. - Silhavy Rd. roundabout

Speed reduction curve

slide-32
SLIDE 32

LaPorte - Silhavy Roundabout

LaPorte Ave. - Silhavy Rd. roundabout

Righ-turn bypass lane

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Pedestrian Crossing Tunnels

slide-34
SLIDE 34

19 February 2015 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

19 February 2015 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Silhavy - LaPorte Intersection

PRESENT CONFIGURATION DESIGNED ROUNDABOUT

Intersection Type Signalized intersection Two-lane Roundabout Level of Service LOS D LOS B Average Delay 40 seconds 18 seconds Turning Vehicles Protected left turn lanes

  • n all approaches

Right turn bypass lane for traffic leaving shopping area toward IN49 Space / Footprint Large intersection due to turning lanes on each approach Design will fit over current intersection, with expansion on SE corner Pedestrians Pedestrian crosswalks with no islands Design includes pedestrian tunnel, so pedestrian traffic in the roundabout is not an issue

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Five-points Roundabout in Valparaiso, IN

slide-38
SLIDE 38

5-points Intersection

(Source: Google maps)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

5-points Intersection

(Source: Bing maps)

Past 3 years 61 crashes 11 injury crashes Types: head on, right angle, left turn, signal violations

slide-40
SLIDE 40

5-points Roundabout

(Source: City of Valparaiso)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

5-points Roundabout

(Source: Associated Press)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

5-points Roundabout

(Source: City of Valparaiso)

Year 2014 98 crashes Majority are minor fender benders, side swipes 5 injury crashes 52 crashes: northbound Calumet entering too soon.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

5-points Roundabout

5 injury crashes:

  • Rear-end on approach legs (3 crashes)
  • Northbound Calumet Ave. failed to yield (1 crash)
  • Motorcycle lost traction (1 crash)
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Conflicts at Multilane Roundabouts

(Source: NCHRP 672)

  • 1. Fail to maintain

lane

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Conflicts at Multilane Roundabouts

(Source: NCHRP 672)

  • 2. Turn from wrong

lane

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Conflicts at Multilane Roundabouts

(Source: NCHRP 672)

  • 3. Entering next to

an exiting vehicle

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Intersection-level Safety Model

Roundabout with 5 legs & 2 circulating lanes (AADT = 34,000 vehicles/day): Total crash prediction = 0.0073(𝐵𝐵𝐸𝑈)0.7490= 18.1 𝑑𝑠𝑏𝑡ℎ𝑓𝑡/𝑧𝑓𝑏𝑠 Injury crash prediction = 0.0029(𝐵𝐵𝐸𝑈)0.5923= 1.4 𝑑𝑠𝑏𝑡ℎ𝑓𝑡/𝑧𝑓𝑏𝑠 Bayesian revised estimates: Total crash prediction = 93.4 𝑑𝑠𝑏𝑡ℎ𝑓𝑡/𝑧𝑓𝑏𝑠 Injury crash prediction = 3.45 𝑑𝑠𝑏𝑡ℎ𝑓𝑡/𝑧𝑓𝑏𝑠

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Future Work

  • Explore intersection-level and approach-level

safety models further

  • Highway Safety Manual (HSM)
  • Develop a microscopic simulation model of 5-

point roundabouts

  • Simulation-based crash potential modeling –

Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Thank you!