TYLER STREET AND POLK STREET (CANTY STREET TO PEMBROKE AVENUE) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tyler street and polk street
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TYLER STREET AND POLK STREET (CANTY STREET TO PEMBROKE AVENUE) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TYLER STREET AND POLK STREET (CANTY STREET TO PEMBROKE AVENUE) PROPOSED TWO-WAY CONVERSION PROJECT Prepared by City of Dallas Public Works Department City of Dallas Planning & Urban Design Department City of Dallas Department of Street


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TYLER STREET AND POLK STREET

(CANTY STREET TO PEMBROKE AVENUE)

PROPOSED TWO-WAY CONVERSION PROJECT

Prepared by

City of Dallas Public Works Department City of Dallas Planning & Urban Design Department City of Dallas Department of Street Services

Hayden Consultants, Inc. April 21, 2016

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Overview

 Project Scope  Project Goals  Project Overview  Roundabout at northern Tyler/Polk junction  Southern Tyler/Polk junction reconfiguration  Two-way conversion study of Tyler Street and Polk Street

between Canty Street and Pembroke Avenue

 Thoroughfare Plan Amendment Process

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Scope

 Convert the existing Tyler/Polk couplet into dual two-way

traffic streets

Replace existing traffic signals with new state-of-the-art traffic

signals to improve efficiency and traffic flow

Striping/signage improvements

 Provide roundabout on the north end of the existing couplet  Provide new traffic signal on the south end of the existing

couplet

 Estimated cost: $3.1 million

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Goals

 Improved quality of life:

Traffic calming Provide healthier/more walkable neighborhood

 Promote economic development:

Improved access and circulation

 Create gateways into the neighborhood:

Provide landscaped roundabout at north end of existing couplet Provide landscaping at south end of existing couplet

 Improved emergency response times

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project Overview

 Project location  Existing traffic conditions  Proposed two-way conversion traffic conditions  Tyler-Polk proposed roadway cross-sections  Proposed markings/striping layout  Tyler/Polk northern junction – roundabout  Tyler/Polk southern junction – new traffic signal

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Project Location

Tyler Street Polk Street 12th Street Jefferson Blvd Davis Street 10th Street

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Existing Traffic Conditions

Tyler Street Polk Street 12th Street Jefferson Blvd Davis Street 10th Street Tyler Street One-way Northbound Polk Street One-way Southbound

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proposed Two-Way Conversion

Tyler Street Polk Street 12th Street Jefferson Blvd Davis Street 10th Street

New Traffic Signal at Southern Tyler/Polk Junction New Roundabout at Northern Tyler/Polk Junction Modify/Replace existing traffic signals

Tyler Street Two-way traffic Polk Street Two-way traffic

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tyler and Polk Proposed Cross-Sections

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proposed Two-Way Conversion Markings/Striping Layout

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Proposed Two-Way Conversion Markings/Striping Layout Continued

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Tyler/Polk Northern Junction - Roundabout

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

BENEFITS

Roundabouts are becoming more common in the United States and the state of Texas due to their many benefits.

 How to get around

Safer

Efficient

  • Observe all standard road rules, including

yielding for pedestrians in crosswalks Roundabouts reduce delay by allowing motorists to yield rather than stop at a red light. They can also handle higher traffic volumes, which helps vehicles get through quicker.

  • To safely and efficiently drive a roundabout:

Roundabouts are safer than other intersections because severe head-on and left-turn crashes do not occur. Other safety benefits include slower speeds and the one-way circulating traffic.

Slow down

Read advance signing and choose correct lane

Yield to traffic in all lanes on your left before entering

Stay in your lane to your exit

Economical

Accident reduction at roundabouts Reducing driver delay saves time and fuel. Eliminating signals also saves approximately $3,000 to $5,000 per year in maintenance and energy costs.

52%

Green

9 %

Roundabouts are proven to reduce overall accident rates in Wisconsin by approximately 9%, and reduce severe crashes by 52%. The 2011 Study by the UW Traffic Operations & Safety Laboratory reported zero fatal crashes. Roundabouts reduce fuel consumption and vehicle pollution

ALL

because vehicles are not idling at a red light.

INJURY

and bicyclists at roundabouts as compared to signalized intersections. The center island of a roundabout provides an opportunity to beautify the location with landscaping. Flowers, trees, or even simple green space can be placed in the center

  • f

a roundabout, making the intersection aesthetically pleasing.

Roundabout Myths vs. Facts

Yield ►

Myth: Roundabouts are not

The “Golden Rule”

pedestrian and bicyclist friendly.

  • f driving roundabouts.

Fact: Traffic circles have high-speed entries, variable yield rules, low capacity, and many high-speed

  • crashes. They are dangerous and

confusing to drive. When you enter the roundabout, you Fact: There are statistically fewer pedestrian and bicycle crashes at roundabouts than at signalized

  • intersections. Drivers are required to

yield to pedestrians in the crosswalks, while refuge islands provide a space for pedestrians in the middle of each crossing so pedestrians only cross one direction

  • f traffic at a time.

must yield to circulating traffic. Roundabouts require motorists to yield

  • n entry, speeds are low, capacity is

high, and crashes are few and minor. They are designed to be easy to use and provide a higher level of driver safety. Yield means the other drivers in the circle have the right of way. A motorist approaching a roundabout should wait for a safe gap in traffic before entering.

In addition, studies show fewer accidents involving pedestrians

roundabouts are the same thing.

Myth: Traffic circles/rotaries and

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Tyler/Polk Southern Junction - Signal

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Two-Way Traffic Study

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Tyler-Polk Two-Way Traffic Study

Traffic Volumes Existing AM Peak

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Tyler-Polk Two-Way Traffic Study

Traffic Volumes Existing PM Peak

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conversion Study Results

 60/40 traffic split between Tyler/Polk respectively

18

40% Polk Street Tyler Street 60%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Tyler-Polk Two-Way Traffic Study

19

60% 40% Polk Kings Davis Tenth Jefferson Twelfth Tyler Signalized intersections PM Southbound Split 60% 40% AM Northbound Split Roundabout

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Motor Vehicle Level of Service at Signalized Intersections

 Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions

within a traffic stream, based on service measures such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, and convenience.

20

(LOS) Average Control Delay per Vehicle (seconds per vehicle) General Description A Less than or equal to 10 seconds Free Flow B 10-20 seconds Stable flow (slight delays) C 20-35 seconds Stable flow (acceptable delays) D 35-55 seconds Approaching unstable flow (tolerable delay, occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding) E 55-80 seconds Unstable flow (intolerable delay) F Greater than 80 seconds Forced flow (jammed)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

AM Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) for Tyler-Polk Two-Way Conversion

21

North Section

slide-22
SLIDE 22

AM Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) for Tyler-Polk Two-Way Conversion

22

South Section

slide-23
SLIDE 23

PM Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) for Tyler-Polk Two-Way Conversion

23

North Section

slide-24
SLIDE 24

PM Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) for Tyler-Polk Two-Way Conversion

24

South Section

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Tyler-Polk Two-Way Traffic Study

  • Two-way conversion of Tyler/Polk is feasible from a traffic
  • peration standpoint
  • Traffic delays will increase but remain within acceptable level
  • f service
  • Parking on Tyler Street will be allowed during peak traffic

hours while still maintaining an acceptable level of service

Conclusions

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Thoroughfare Plan (TP) Amendment Process

 ~ Three month process  Interdepartmental staff review to gather information from various City

departments and other agencies

 Community meeting with the property owners to discuss amendment and

address concerns when necessary

 Item considered and voted on by three bodies: 1) City Plan Commission

Transportation Committee (CPCTC); 2) City Plan Commission (CPC); and 3) City Council has final authority to approve or deny

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

TP Amendment Process (Continued)

 City Plan Commission will hold a public hearing to solicit citizen

input before the CPC forwards a recommendation to City Council

 City Council will hold a public hearing and take into consideration

the recommendations of the CPC and make the final determination whether the thoroughfare plan is amended

 If City Council approves the amendment to the Thoroughfare Plan,

the map and text will be changed to reflect the amendment

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

TP Amendment Proposed Timeline

 1st Public Meeting – April 7, 2015  2nd Public Meeting – April 21, 2016  CPC Transportation Committee – May 5, 2016  City Plan Commission – May 19, 2016  City Council – June 22, 2016

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Tyler/Polk Project Schedule

 Thoroughfare Amendment Plan Process: April 21 - June 22, 2016  Tyler/Polk Engineering Design: Summer 2016 - Winter 2016  Tyler/Polk Construction: Spring 2017 - Spring 2018

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Questions or Comments?

 Staff and consulting teams will be available at the

various subject matter stations to address questions

 Staff Contacts: Tanya Brooks, Assistant Director Planning and Urban Design City of Dallas 214-670-4038 Tanya.Brooks@dallascityhall.com

30

Tim Starr, P.E., Assistant Director Public Works Department City of Dallas 214-948-4250 Timothy.Starr@dallascityhall.com