Rockville| Maryland Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Justin A. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Rockville| Maryland Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Justin A. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Justin A. Woishnis | Construction Option Advisor: James Faust PROJECT OUTLINE Project Introduction Project Background NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Site
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Rockville| Maryland
Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Justin A. Woishnis | Construction Option Advisor: James Faust
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Rockville| Maryland
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis | Construction Management |
Project Size| 600,000 S.F. Base Building 575,800 S.F. Parking Garage Building Function| Office/ Research Contract Value | $96 Million Contract Type| Design-Build Total # of Floors | 8 Owner| The JBG Companies General Contractor| DAVIS Construction PROJECT OUTLINE
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
Site Plan
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Existing Site
Base Building Parking Garage New Parking Lot
During Construction
Construction Parking Tenant Parking
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
Features Twin 7-story Towers w/ 3-story Connector Lower-Level including:
- Data Center
- Fitness Center
- Auditorium
Green Roof Curtain Wall
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
Co Core & Shell Cast-In-Place Concrete Structure Post-Tension Beams Precast Panel Facade Batch Plant
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Tower Cranes
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
Problem Background
- LEED Gold Certification
- No Renewable Energy Sources
- Large Energy Consumption
Problem Solution
- Roof-Mounted Solar Photovoltaic Array
- Large Available Roof Areas w/ Minimal Sun
Obstructions Site/Roof Investigation Blue- Available Roof Area: 28,441 S.F. Red- Penthouse Area: 4,359 S.F.
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
ANALYSIS TOPIC #1 SOLAR R (P (PV) AR ) ARRAY
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
Fall Equinox
September 22nd
Spring Equinox
March 20th
Winter Solstice
December 21st
Summer Solstice
June 20th
10:00 AM 1:00 PM 4:00 PM 10:00 AM 1:00 PM 4:00 PM
Optimum Roof Area = 20,617 7 S.F.20,617 S.
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Shading Analysis
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
Initial Investigation:
- Full electricity Load = NOT FeasiblE
- 50% Electricity Load = NOT Feasible
- 10% Electricity Load = Still NOT Feasible
Revised Approach:
- Limit Energy Target
- All 24 Hour Lighting
- Main Lobby Entrance, Corridors, Elevator
Lobbies, Stairways and Exit Signs
Type Description Lamps West East West East Total RC1 9" Aperture Semi-Recessed Downlight 1-F32WTRT 17 25 544 800 1344 RF1 6" Recessed Linear Light Fixture 2-F28T5 3 3 168 168 336 RC2 5 1/2" Aperture Downlight 1-F32WTRT 9 12 288 384 672 RM3 Adjustable Semi-Recessed Wall Washer 1-32W PMH 7 7 224 224 448 JL1C Decorative Lit Panel w/ Remote LED Driver/Transformer LED 4.5W/LF 4 4 360 360 720 PM1 Decorative Pendant 1-70W 1 3 70 210 280 JM2 Linear Light Fixture 3-CMH70 4 4 840 840 1680 JM1 Surface Mounted Lobby Fixture 14-CMH20 1 280 280 RM2 6" Lensed Wall Washer 1-70W, PAR30 3 4 210 280 490 RM1 6" Aperture Downlight 1-70W, PAR30 1 1 210 210 420 JL1A Decorative Lit Panel w/ Remote LED Driver/Transformer LED 4.5W/LF 4 4 360 360 720 RF3 10" Recessed Linear Light Fixture 4-F21T5 4 336 336 3554 4172 7726 Watts Total Exit Signs ( 2-way) 3.4 408 Exit Signs (1-way) 1.8 281 Elevator 2-F28 2352 Stairway 2-F28 4256 7297 15023 kW 15.023 Overall Total (Watts) Count Watts Main Lobby & Corridor Lighting TOTAL
15023 kW 15.023 Overall Total (Watts)
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Energy Use Study
U.S. DOE, Annual Energy Review 2009 Average Site Energy Intensity per Square Foot calculated to be 19,344,000 kwh
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE Total Energy Assumed 24 Hours/Day Lighting
Energy per Day
- 16 kW * 24 hours = 384 kwh/day
Energy per Month
- 384 kW * 30 days = 1
1,520 kwh Energy per Year
- 384 kW * 365 days = 140,160
60 kwh kwh
Solar Array designed to produce annual wattage of at least 140,160 0 kwh Determining # of Panels to reach output: SAM (System Advisor Model)
- 372 Total Panels
- Produce 141,293 kwh
- 3 inverter units
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
Typical Panel: 5’ spacing & 39° tilt New SunPower Panel
Panel Section SPR-305-WHT-U 305 (96 Cell Panels) Rack System SunPower T10 Solar Roof Tile
- 10° Tilt
- 1
1.35 inch Spacing
Sketch of Panel Layout
Shading Considerations:
- Penthouse, Davits, Parapets
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Panel Selection and Layout
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
Total Initial System Cost (Prior to Rebates/Incentives)
Rebates and Incentives
- Federal Tax Credit: 30% of gross installation
- Montgomery County-High Performance Building Property
Tax Credit:
- LEED-NC Gold = 25% Exemptions Amount (5 year
term)
- Clean Energy Production Tax Credit
- $0.0085/kwh claimed against the state income
tax (5 year term)
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland Overall Total Incentive Amounts (5 Year Term) Total MC- High Performance Property Tax Credit $1,562,500 Clean Energy Production Tax Credit $6,000 Total $1,568,500
Payback Period Based on Rebates & Incentives:
- Approxim
imat ately y 3 Years
Incentive Name Description Cost Reduction Adjusted Cost Initial Cost $1,186,033 Federal Tax Credit 30% of Gross Installation $355,809 $830,224 MC-High Performance Property Tax Credit 25% Exemption Amount $312,500 $517,724 Clean Energy Production Tax Credit $0.0085/kWh $1,200 $516,524 Final Cost $516,524 PV System Cost After Rebates & Incentives (1st Year of Installation)
Initial System cost for Installation Including First Year Rebates & Incentives Total Applicable Rebate & Incentive Costs over 5 Years
Item # of Units Cost Module 372 $338,344.19 Inverter 3 $52,920.00 Installation 7 $/Wdc Total $1,186,032.41 Initial PV System Costs
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
System Costs
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Structural Breadth Roof Structure Impact
Sources:
- Building Code Requirements for
Structural Concrete (ACI I 318-08) 8) and Commentary
- 8.3
8.3- Metho hods ds of Anal alysi sis
- Pos. & Neg. Moments (int. & Ext. Face)
- 13.6- Di
Direct ct De Design gn Method hod
- Design Procedure for One-Way Flat
Slab Reinforcement
Exterior & Interior Bay “Worst-Case Scenario”
Panel Weight = 52 lbs.
- Dead Load = 100 psf
- Live Load = 30 psf
- Panel Load = 3 psf
Wu = 0.172 ksf One-way y sla lab rei einf nfor
- rce
ceme ment Anal alysi sis Rebar Spacing:
- Bottom Bars: 12” to 1
1”
- Top Bars: 8” to 7”
PT Beam Analysis: (Negligible)
- Panels Less than 3% Total Roof Load
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Summary & Recommendation
- Large Available Roof Spaces to Implement System
- 372 Panels
- High Efficiency
- Minimal Structural Impact
- Short Payback Period, Optimal to Install System
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Analysis Topic #2: Tec Technol nology
- gy Into
to the Field ld Problem Background
- Large Quantity of Similar Materials
- Managing Deliveries/Materials
- Site Congestion
Problem Solution
- Research Technology Applications
- Tablet PC’s for Coordination &
Material Tracking Possible Applications Overview
- Smart Box
- Tablet PC
- iPad
- Motion F5v
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Material Tracking
Tablet PC Ideas for Material Tracking
- Precast Panel delivery/Placement
- Punch-List Management
- Steel Erection/Placement
iPad used for construction practices On-Site Tracking Software Vela Systems mobile iPad App
- Record Site Conditions and Material Arrivals
- Model Viewing Capabilities
- 1. Proposed Delivery Date
- 2. Has Material Been Delivered?
- 3. Date and Time of Delivery?
- 4. Quantity?
- 5. Location on Site
- 6. Has Material Been Installed?
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Case Study MetL tLife ife Stadium adium, ,
East Rutherford, N.J.
- $998 Million
- 2.2 Million s.f. Football Arena
- Skanska USA Building
- More than 3200 Precast
Concrete Pieces
- Utilized RFID tags for tracking
Benefits its
- Aware of Status of all Precast members including:
- Production
- Delivery
- Site Preparation
- Installation Status
- Vela Systems and Tekla Corp. provide a Field BIM/Tablet
solution
- Each Piece Designed and Tracked for One Specific
Location
Results/F lts/Feedb edbac ack
- Efficient Coordination of Fabricated Pieces
- Easily Identify jobsite Laydown area and Site
Accessibility upon Material Arrival
Estim timat ated ed Savin ings gs
- Accelerated Schedule by 10 Days
- Generated $1 Million in Savings
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Feasibility Impleme menting nting with An Analysis sis Topic pic #4 #4
- Short Interval Production Schedule (SIPS) for
Façade Re-sequence
- Increased need for Coordination
- Each Day will Require Specific Panels At
Designated Locations
- Tablet PC allows efficient communication
between Field Personnel and Manufacturer
Co Concern rns
- RFID Tag Prices Outweigh Overall Benefit to Project
- Who will absorb the additional costs to pay for the
system?
Recomm
- mmendat
endation ion
- Application of RFID Tracking Systems Not Feasible
- Tagging more beneficial for larger-scale projects,
industrial construction or stadiums
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
CMU Overview Fully Grouted and Reinforced CMU
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Analysis Topic #3: Replac acin ing Interior rior CM CMU Wall w/ Pr Precas ast Problem Background
- Time-Consuming Installation Process
- Extensive Field Cutting Required
- Scaffolding Increases Safety Concerns
Problem Solution
- Improved Constructability
- Minimize Installation Cost
- Schedule Acceleration Dependent on Building
Enclosure (Analysis Topic #4)
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
Advantages:
- Durability
- High Strength
- Fire Ratings
- Low Maintenance
Requirements
PROJECT OUTLINE
Disadvantages:
- Very Labor Intensive
- Extensive Field-Cutting
- Corners/Angles
- Scaffolding Required
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Extensive Field-Cutting & Customized Corner Blocks Non-Linear Wall increases quantity of corner connections
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
Infor
- rmation
mation Summar mary Size: 8” x 8” x 16” Quantity: 6,544 Crew Size: 6 Daily Output: 80 Cost: $14/S.F.
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
CMU Estimate
Total Square Footage = 5,817 S.F.
Material Cost Unit Quantity $/S.F. Total CMU Block S.F. 5,817 14 $81,438 Duration Unit Quantity Daily Output Total (Days) CMU Block Ea. 4,602 80 58
Material Cost Duration of Installation
Quantity/Duration Estimate Takes into Account Space for 3/8” Mortar Joints
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Precast Overview Advantages:
- Substantial Decrease in Installation Time/Cost
- f on-site Labor
- Manufactured in Controlled Location
- Decrease in Potential Delays due to
Uncontrollable Site Factors
- Design-Build Delivery Method
Disadvantages:
- Long Lead Time for Engineering/Design
- Increased Coordination with MEP Engineers for
Penetrations
- Early Design of Steel Embed Connection Locations
- Designing to Withstand Blast Loading
Connection Detail of Precast to Concrete to Floor Slab
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Pre recas cast Prope ropertie ties
- Minimum 7” Thick Solid Precast
Panel
- Maximum Width = 12’-0”
- 5-6 Month Lead Time
Infor
- rmation
mation Summar mary Size: 12’ x 12’ x 7” Daily Output: 15-20 Panels Cost: $15/S.F. Quantity: 41 Panels (Based on S.F.) Duration: 2.73 Days Non-Linear Orientation of Wall requires Numerous Customized “L ”-Shaped Panels New Total Quantity: 49 Panels New Duration : 3.5 Days
Duration Unit Quantity Daily Output Total Precast Panel Ea. 49 15 3.5 Days
Duration of Installation
Material Cost Unit Quantity $/S.F. Total Precast Panel S.F. 5,817 15 $87,255
Material Cost
Precast Estimate
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Options ions to to Minimize imize Effects fects
- High Early Strength Concrete Utilized for
Ground & 2nd Level Slab
- Precast Walls As Additional Shoring
- Minimal Overtime Work To Remain on Schedule
Results/Feasibility
Project Effects
- Delay in 2nd Level Slab
Construction
- Require Proper Curing of
Ground Level to Support Wall loads
Material Duration (Days) Cost CMU 58 $81,438 Precast 3.5 $87,255 SAVINGS 54.5 ($5,817) Results
Material Cost and Duration Comparisons
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Site e Logis istics tics/Ph /Phas asing ing Pla lan
- Visualize Relationship Between
Trades
- Precast Erection Begins At
North End of Lobby
- Concrete Crew Will Follow
Precast Installation
- Minimal Overall Conflicts
Precast Installation Screenshots
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Consideration
- Analysis topic #4 involves New Façade Erection
Sequence
- Enclose Lobby Early in Sequence to allow early
start of Interior Work
- Precast Costs outweighed by New Interior
Finishes Start Date Summary/Questioning
- Precast Requires Increase in
Design and Coordination
- Lack of Incentive to utilize
Precast
- What makes the Delay for Precast
Worthwhile?
- Decision of Utilizing Precast
Dependent on Building Enclosure
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Problem Background
- Issues with Crane Limitations
- Overtime Costs Endured
- Excessive Crane Movement/Relocating
Problem Solution
- Increase Crane Capacities
- Create more stringent Productivity/Schedule Goals
- Develop New Crane /Façade Sequences for Maximum
Erection Efficiency
Analysis Topic #4: Alternativ ative e Façad ade Sequen ence ce
Cranes unable to perform Numerous Picks
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Initial Sequence 200 Ton Crane 100 Ton Crane
- 1. Moves to SE Corner of West Building
- Formwork and Shoring not fully stripped on the east
building.
- 2. Moves to East Elevation of East Building
- PEPCO permanent power utility ductbank taking place
- n the north end of site.
- 3. Moves to SE Corner of South Elevation
- Elevation coordinated and fabricated last
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Cr Crane Moves es Short: 30 min. Long: 1 Day
- Each Position based on
Specific Panel Weights
Overtime 10 Days
- Shockey’s 300 ton Crane
required to make Picks
Capacity $/day Duration Total 100 Ton 1300 1.38 $1,793 200 Ton 2300 3.94 $9,060 Overall Total $10,852 Cost of Crane
Type Time + 1/2 Hours Total Crane Operator 38.50 1.5 80 $4,620 Foreman 30.55 1.5 80 $3,666 Layout (3) 32.45 1.5 80 $11,682 Welder (3) 42.31 1.5 80 $15,232 Rigger 33.63 1.5 80 $4,036 Truck Driver 20.62 1.5 80 $2,475 Overall Total $41,711 Overtime Costs
Costs Endured During Crane Movements
Item Total Overtime $41,711 Labor $3,670 Crane $10,852 Total Cost $56,234 Overall Costs
Type Duration Hours Total Crane Operator 38.50 1.32 10.56 $407 Foreman 30.55 1.32 10.56 $323 Layout (3) 32.45 1.32 10.56 $1,028 Welder (3) 42.31 1.32 10.56 $1,340 Rigger 33.63 1.32 10.56 $355 Truck Driver 20.62 1.32 10.56 $218 Overall Total $3,670 Cost of "Down Time"- Crane Moves Costs endured due to Overtime and Productivity Loss Crane and Labor Costs Display Money That Could be Utilized for Erection
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
New Façade Scheduling & Sequencing
Consider siderat ations ions
- Many Typical Panels
- Repetitive Nature of Façade and
Installation Practices New w Appr proa
- ach
- Develop SIPS for Façade to
Increase Productivity
- Push Precast Crew to work
Vertically Shor
- rt
t Inter erval al Produ roduct ction ion Sched hedul ule e (SIPS PS)
- Day-to-Day Labor Productivity Requirements
Precast Installation
Trad ade Sequ quence nce
- Precast Erection
- Backwelding
- Punch Windows
- Caulking/Waterproof
Lower Level (LL) Precast Floor 1-7 Precast (Typical Panels) Backwelding/Final Welds Punch Windows Caulking/Waterproofing
Preview of SIPS
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Phas asing ing Sche hedul dule
- First Complete Lower Level of
Building (Non-Typical)
- Apply SIPS to Levels 1-7 (Typical)
Basis is of SIPS
- Elevations
- Crane Positions
- Bay Numbers
New Sequence of Panel Erection New Crane Positioning
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Crane Operator Works Overtime to Move Crane
Cost/Schedule Results
Crane ne Posit ition ioning ing
Capacity Distance No. of Moves Duration (Days) Total Days 200 Ton Short 23 0.0625 1.438 Long 1 300 Ton Short 2 0.0625 0.125 Long 1 Overall Total 1.563 Total Hours 12.5 Crane Moves/Relocation
Crane Operator Time + 1/2 Duration (Ho Total 38.50 1.5 12.5 $722 Overtime Costs for Crane Moves
Overtime $41,711 Labor $3,670 Crane $10,852 Total Cost $56,234 Overtime $722 Labor $0.00 Crane $0.00 Remaining Total $55,512 Cost Difference
Substantial Savings with Crane Utilization Plan
Building Original Duration Actual Duration New Duration Total West 66 54 34 20 East 60 51 34 17 Connector 12 11 11 37 Precast Duration Summary Total Savings (Days)
SIPS PS Results lts
- Saves 37 Days for Precast Erection
Type Duration Work Hours Total Crane Operator 38.50 37 296 $11,396 Foreman 30.55 37 296 $9,043 Layout (3) 32.45 37 296 $28,816 Welder (3) 42.31 37 296 $37,571 Rigger 33.63 37 296 $9,954 Truck Driver 20.62 37 296 $6,104 $102,884 Labor Savings (Precast Crew) Overall Total
WO GRUBB Crane Rental Costs Duration (37 Days) Total 200-Ton Crawler $20,000 1 Month $20,000 $6,700 3 Weeks $20,100 $2,300 2 Days $4,600 $44,700 Crane Savings Overall Total
SIPS PS Results lts
- Labor and Crane Cost
Savings of $147,584
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Summary/Questioning
- Crane movements during overtime
- SIPS Schedule for East/West
Building
- Precast Erection Saves 37 days
- Schedule Reduction Saves
$147,584 ,584 Consideration
- Combined Use of Analysis topic #3 would prove beneficial
to overall project
- Due to Extensive level of coordination and material
procurement, Lobby South Elevation not Feasible for early completion
- Confirmed as NOT FEASIBLE by DAVIS Project Engineer
- 1. Designing and Developing Drawings
- 2. Cutting Stone (Canada)
- 3. Shipping Stone (Canada to U.S.)
- 4. Formwork
- 5. Casting
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
Summar ary y of Co Conclusion/ usion/Recom ecomme mendation ndations
Analysis #1: Solar PV Array
- Rebates and Incentives allow System to be Desirable by
Owner
- 3-Year Payback Period
- Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Cost of Systems Does not Outweigh Project Benefits
Analysis #3: Replace Interior CMU Wall w/ Precast
- Substantial Decrease in On-Site Labor
- Deemed Beneficial Solely based on Building Enclosure,
- therwise no incentive to Implement
- Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- SIPS Saves Substantial Time and Money
- Larger Crane Sizes increases Erection Efficiency
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
PROJECT OUTLINE
Academic Acknowledgements Penn State AE Faculty
- Craig Dubler
- James Faust
- Kevin Parfitt
PACE Roundtable Industry Members Special Thanks National Cancer Institute Family & Friends Industry Acknowledgements James G. Davis Construction
- Will Cox
- John Rappoport
- Todd Povell
Nick Carosi, IV- Arban & Carosi Mark T. Taylor- The Nitterhouse Companies Jerry D. Davis Jr.- W.O. Grubb Kurt D. Maldovan- Balfour Beatty
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Project Introduction Project Background
- Site Overview
- Building properties
Analysis #1: Solar PV Analysis
- Site/Roof Investigation
- Shading Analysis
- Energy Use Study
- Panel Selection and Layout
- System Costs
Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Technology to the Field
- Material Tracking
- Case Study
- Feasibility
Analysis #3: Interior CMU Wall To Precast
- CMU Overview
- CMU Estimate
- Precast Overview
- Precast Estimate
- Results/Feasibility
Analysis #4: Alternative Façade Sequence
- Initial Sequence
- New Façade Scheduling/Sequence
- Cost/Schedule Results
Summary of Conclusions/Recommendations Acknowledgements
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
THANK YOU QUESTIONS?
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
APPENDIX
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
PV Rack Specifications
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
APPENDIX
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
PV Array: Constructability
Sunpower T10 Solar Roof Tiles
- Easy to Install without any need for mechanical roof
Attachments (non-penetrating)
- Large-scale roof tile Arrays can be installed efficiently and
commissioned quickly
- Low-profile design blends into flat roof construction,
- perating within the electrical grid network
- Solar Roof Tiles will not interfere with roof drainage
(extremely flexible layout capabilities)
- All Panels Placed on One roof Area, minimizing Wire Runs
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
APPENDIX
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Structural Load Calculations
Live Loads Roof Live Load = 30 psf Roof Snow Load = 30 psf Dead Loads Roof Slab = 6” thick [(6”)/(12)] x 150 pcf = 75 psf Assumed Superimposed Dead Load = 20 psf Total Dead Load = 95 psf (Used 100 psf) Panel Loads Panel Weight = 52 lbs per panel
- Trib. Area = 20’ x 20’
[(52 lb/panel) * (20 panels)] / (20’ x 20’) ]= 2.6 (Used 3 psf) Total Loads DL = 103 psf LL = 30 psf Wu = 1.2(0.103) + 1.6(0.030) = 0.172 72 ksf
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
APPENDIX
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Property Tax Reduction
Cost of Project = $100,000,000 Property Tax Assumption = 1.25% 100,000,000 * .0125 = $1,250,000 Taxes/Year LEED-NC Gold = 25% Exemption Amount (5 year term) Cost Savings of Property Tax per Year = $312,500
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
APPENDIX
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland
Crane and Erection Details
Capacity Distance No. of Moves Duration (Days) Total Days 100 Ton Short 6 0.0625 0.375 Long 1 1 1 200 Ton Short 15 0.0625 0.938 Long 3 1 3 Overall Total 5.313 Crane Moves/Relocation WO GRUBB Crane Rental Per Month Per Week Per Day Mobilization 100-Ton Crawler $11,000 $3,700 $1,300 $10,000 200-Ton Crawler $20,000 $6,700 $2,300 $21,000 300-Ton Crawler $34,000 $11,300 $3,800 $31,000 Crane Pricing WO GRUBB Crane Rental Per Month Per Week Per Day Mobilization 300-Ton Crawler $34,000 $11,300 $3,800 $31,000 100-Ton Crawler $11,000 $3,700 $1,300 $10,000 Difference of values $23,000 $7,600 $2,500 $21,000 Additional Costs Endured With Larger Crane
Average Daily Erection Trade Original Quantity New Contract Quantity/Agreement Precast Panels 8-10 panels/day Per New Schedule/SIPS Punch Windows 10-12 units/day Per New Schedule/SIPS Curtain Wall 8 units/day Per New Schedule/SIPS Niche/Recessed Bays 8 units/day Per New Schedule/SIPS
AE Senior Thesis | Justin A. Woishnis
APPENDIX
NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE Rockville| Maryland