UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Baltimore, MD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
umbc p erforming a rts h umanities f acility
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Baltimore, MD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 10, 2024 308 likes •626 views

UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Baltimore, MD Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Courtney Glaub Construction Management Dr. Chimay Anumba CM Advisor UMBC P erforming A rts & H umanities F acility Baltimore, MD

slide-1
SLIDE 1

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

  • Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor
slide-2
SLIDE 2

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

  • Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

slide-3
SLIDE 3

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PROJEC JECT BACKGR GROUN OUND UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

LO LOCATI TION ON:

  • 1000 Hilltop circle, baltimore, md 21250
  • umbc performing arts & Humanities facility

ING NG PARAM AMATER TERS: S: Buil ildi ding ng parameters: s:

  • 90,000 SF gross building area
  • 4 stories + basement
  • Upgrade to existing central utility plant & tunnel

PROJECT ECT PARAMET ETER ERS: S: Project ct parameter ers: s:

  • projected cost:

$67,000,000

  • Dates of Construction:

7/1/2010 – 6/30/2012

  • Delivery Method:

CM at Risk

  • LEED Certification:

Silver

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGES COURTESY OF GOOGLE MAPS IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PROJEC JECT BACKGR GROUN OUND UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER

4

STRUCTURAL AL SYSTEM TEM:

  • Foundation Concrete Footings
  • Steel Beams and Girders
  • Cast-in-place Concrete
  • Concrete Masonry Units

BUILDING NG ENC NCLO LOSU SURE: E:

  • Brick Veneer with CMU back-up or Steel Stud back-up
  • Glazed Aluminum Curtain Wall
  • Stainless Steel Wall Panels with Concrete/Steel Stud back-up

CONSTRUC TRUCTIO TION LO LOGISTI TICS: S:

  • Phase One:

275 Seat Proscenium Theater 100 Seat Black Box Theater Scene Shop, Rehearsal/Acting Studio, Offices, Classrooms, Conference Rooms

slide-5
SLIDE 5

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER

5

PROBLEM EM IDENTI ENTIFI FICATI TION: ON:

  • Complete project on time and efficiently
  • Building is made up of three different structural elements
  • delays encountered due to adjacent work being completed

RESEA EARCH GOAL:

  • Perform preliminary design of precast façade
  • Reduce masonry schedule and eliminate any delays

Site Logistics Image

slide-6
SLIDE 6

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER

6

ORIGIN INAL AL FACAD ADE: E:

  • 70% Driftwood Grey and 30% Light Autumn by Cloud Ceramics,

Roman Modular type

  • $900,000 masonry package
  • 4 month construction duration

PRECAS AST T FACAD ADE: E:

  • Span from column to column
  • Different Sizes of Panels up to 12ft and 35-40ft span
  • 341 total pieces
  • 20,835 sf of panels
slide-7
SLIDE 7

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

7

STRU RUCT CTURAL RAL WEIGHT HTS: S:

  • Precast heavier than masonry wall
  • Assume 6” thick panel with normal weight concrete

EXTERIO ERIOR BEAM LO LOADS: S:

  • W16x26 = 129FT-K < 241FT-K
  • W14X22 = 129FT-K < 183FT-K
  • W21X44 = 252FT-K < 510FT-K

EXTERI ERIOR OR BEAM DEFLECT LECTIO ION: N:

  • Governing factor of design
  • Allowable deflection = L/240
  • Beams can withstand heavier precast load
slide-8
SLIDE 8

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGES COURTESY OF MID-ATLANTIC PRECAST ASSOCIATION IMAGE COURTESY OF MID-ATLANTIC PRECAST ASSOCIATION

8

STRUCTURAL AL PRECAS AST T CONNECTIO ION: N:

  • Panel spans from column to column
  • Precast Tie-Back Connection to the exterior beams
  • Bearing/Adjustable Tie-Back Connection
  • Fixed Tie-Back Connection
slide-9
SLIDE 9

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER

9

SCHED EDULE E REDUCTI TION ON:

  • Original masonry façade duration = 1

15 days

  • Precast erection = 12 pieces/day
  • Precast façade duration = 29 days

IMPACT CT ON PROJECT: ECT:

  • No overlap of steel and façade trades
  • Façade is not on critical path
  • Save 87 days of façade work
slide-10
SLIDE 10

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

10 10

MATER ERIAL IAL PRICING NG:

  • $41.50/sf deduct for masonry wall assembly with back-up
  • $37.00/sf cost for precast panel
  • $50.50/sf cost for precast panel with back-up

COST T IMPACT CT:

  • Precast façade costs approximately 17% more than masonry
  • $50,703.64 overall increase from façade re-design

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER

slide-11
SLIDE 11

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

1 1 1 1

SITE TE CONG NGESTIO TION: N:

  • Reduced façade schedule allows for no trade overlap
  • Concrete/steel occupy site solely
  • No masonry staging areas or scaffolding
  • Increased efficiency
  • Only metal decking will occur during precast erection

PRECAS AST T ERECTIO ION N SEQUENCE: ENCE:

  • additional phase to construction
  • erection begins on East façade, works counter clockwise
  • Three delivery truck locations
  • Four precast crane locations
slide-12
SLIDE 12

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Prec ecas ast Faça çade e Des esign ign UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

12 12

FINAL CONC NCLUS LUSIO IONS: NS:

  • Precast façade reduces schedule
  • Minor increased cost
  • Eliminates confusion between trades
  • Minor architectural implications

RECOMMEND ENDATIO TION: N:

  • Pursue precast façade
  • Met goal of analysis to reduce inefficiencies
  • Ultimately owner/arch. must make decision

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER

slide-13
SLIDE 13

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Crane ne Compari mpariso son UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER, Multivista

13 13

PROBLEM EM IDENTI ENTIFI FICATI TION: ON:

  • Time efficiency/completion on time
  • Time to mobilize tower crane
  • Cost to use tower crane

RESEA EARCH GOAL:

  • Reduce cost & schedule by utilizing mobile cranes
  • Accelerate schedule & complete project on time

Mobile crane image

slide-14
SLIDE 14

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Crane ne Compari mpariso son UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

14 14

Mobile Crane: e:

  • TMS700E – 60 ton lift
  • HT8660 – 60 ton lift
  • TMS800E – 80 ton lift

Tower r Crane: e:

  • BK 412-10
  • Maximum Capacity – 22,000 lbs
  • Requires foundation to be installed
slide-15
SLIDE 15

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Crane ne Compari mpariso son UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER, MULTIVISTA

15 15

SCHED EDULE E IMPACT: T:

  • Original lift duration = 318 days
  • Gain 1

1 days of work w/o tower crane installation IMPACT ON PROJECT ECT:

  • Require another mobile crane in place of tower crane
  • Require a pump truck
  • less time to erect mobile cranes
  • Mobile cranes cost more on this project
  • Concrete contract contains tower crane
slide-16
SLIDE 16

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Crane ne Compari mpariso son UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER, MULTIVISTA

16 16

CRANE E PRICIN ING: G:

  • Initial crane costs = $1,317,069
  • Crane costs w/o tower crane = $6,649,107
  • Tower crane = $350,000

COST T IMPACT CT:

  • Increased cost w/ additional cranes & trucks
  • $5,332,038 overall increase from eliminating tower crane
  • Tower crane was cheaper with concrete contractor
slide-17
SLIDE 17

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Crane ne Compari mpariso son UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGES COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER, MULTIVISTA

17 17

SITE TE CONG NGESTIO TION: N:

  • Added more laydown areas
  • Required more crane travel space
  • More space by the southwest corner w/o tower crane
  • Increased efficiency

CRANE E ERECT CTION SEQUEN ENCE: CE:

  • additional mobile crane replacing tower crane
  • additional pump truck
  • Two delivery truck entrances
  • Five crane location paths
slide-18
SLIDE 18

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Crane ne Compari mpariso son UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGES COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER, MULTIVISTA IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER, MULTIVISTA

18 18

FINAL CONC NCLUS LUSIO IONS: NS:

  • Tower crane is more efficient
  • Crane total is more w/o tower crane
  • Tower crane cheaper because it’s w/ the concrete contractor
  • Different cranes depend on different scenarios

RECOMMEND ENDATIO TION: N:

  • Utilize the contractors tower crane
  • Tower crane needs less path locations
  • Longer foundation to install = better in this case
  • Cost efficient
slide-19
SLIDE 19

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

19 19

PROBLEM EM IDENTIFI ENTIFICATI TION ON:

  • Project is pursuing LEED Silver certification
  • Few sustainable techniques pursued in project
  • PV system eliminated from scope

RESEA EARCH GOAL:

  • Perform preliminary design of a building integrated PV system
  • Determine financial feasibility of system
  • reduce energy costs for UMBC

IMAGES COURTESY OF SHARP CATALOG

slide-20
SLIDE 20

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

IMAGE COURTESY OF WHITING-TURNER

20 20

ORIENT NTATI TION: N:

  • Humanities Roof faces Southwest
  • 9000 sf of roof space
  • flat roof

SOLAR SHADIN ING: G:

  • shading at 9Am and 3PM for each case
  • Maintain 6’ perimeter to avoid shading from parapet wall

SUMMER 9AM 3PM FALL/SPRING 9AM 3PM WINTER 9AM 3PM

slide-21
SLIDE 21

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

21 21

PRODUC UCT SELECT CTIO ION: N:

  • Sharp Solar Electricity Catalog
  • NU-U235F1 Panel (39”x 65”)
  • Ballasted Roof Mounts (35 degree tilt)

TO TOTAL AL HUMANIT ITIES IES LIGHTI TING NG ENERGY:

  • Estimate 27000 W for all four floors
  • Requires 1

16 Panels for humanities

  • Requires < 9000 sf of roof space

ACTUAL AL SYSTEM TEM SIZE: ZE:

  • 32.9 kW
  • 140 PV panels
  • Fixed at 30 degree tilt
slide-22
SLIDE 22

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

22 22

UNIT T WEIGHT HTS: S:

  • PV Panels = 44 lbs. each
  • Mounts

= 406 lbs. each (each cap is 14.5lbs * 28 per mount) TRIBUT BUTAR ARY Y AREA:

  • 15’ beam spacing
  • Trib. Area = 7.5’ in each direction = 15’ total

RESULTING TING LO LOAD:

  • Total Load = 6 psf
  • existing beams and girders are able to support additional load
slide-23
SLIDE 23

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

23 23

SYSTEM TEM PRODUCTIO ION: N:

  • 40,121 kWh per year
  • 3300 kWh average per month
  • 1

10 kWh average per day

  • PV Watts factor = 1219.5

ENERGY GY PRODUCTIO ION:

  • Humanities section of the building
  • 100 % of all four levels of lights
slide-24
SLIDE 24

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

24 24

GRID CONNECTIO ION: N:

  • Additional load on main panel for load-side connection
  • Use Supply-side interconnection

ELECTR TRIC ICAL AL COMPONENT NENTS S REQUIR IRED ED:

  • DC Wire Run
  • DC Disconnects
  • Inverter
  • AC Disconnects
  • AC Wire Run
  • Service-Tap Meter Box

IMAGESCOURTESY OF SMA CATALOG

slide-25
SLIDE 25

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

25 25

SYSTEM TEM SET-UP: P:

  • Locate inverter on roof level at Northwest corner
  • Minimize DC run
  • Cover inverter to minimize sun/moisture exposure
  • 200’ DC wire run per row of panels
  • 91’ AC wire run
  • 31% less wire due to locating inverters on roof

IMAGES COURTESY OF SHARP CATALOG

slide-26
SLIDE 26

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

26 26

SYSTEM TEM COST: T:

  • Solar Gaines Proposed System Cost Summary
  • System Cost = $121,654 after incentives

REBATES TES/I /INCEN ENTIVES TIVES:

  • Maryland State Energy Program - $500/kW system
  • Federal Tax Credit – 30% of gross installation cost
  • Maryland Alternative Energy Credit – 0.40$/kWh produced

IMAGES COURTESY OF SHARP CATALOG

slide-27
SLIDE 27

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

27 27

FINANC NCING NG OPTIO ION: N:

  • 0% Borrowed

FINANCI NCING NG PARAMA MATERS TERS:

  • $0.156 current cost of electricity (Maryland)
  • 3% market rate increase each year
  • Average Yearly ROI = 14%
  • Payback Period = 6.09 years

IMAGES COURTESY OF SHARP CATALOG

slide-28
SLIDE 28

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Photo

  • tovol
  • ltaic

aic Panel nel System em UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

28 28

RECOMMEND ENDATIO TION: N:

  • Humanities roof optimal for solar array
  • 32.9kW, 140 panel system
  • Fully fund up-front costs, i.e. no loan ($121,654)
  • Payback Period of 6.09 years
  • Operational building for at least 50 years

IMAGES COURTESY OF SHARP CATALOG

slide-29
SLIDE 29

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Conc nclusion lusion UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

29 29

ANALYSI SIS S #1:

  • Precast panels can be cost and time effective
  • Must analyze schedule benefits beyond critical path

ANALYSI SIS S #2:

  • Mobile cranes & Tower cranes are both beneficial
  • Analyze cost and schedule early in project

ANALYSI SIS S #3:

  • Critical to perform feasibility study early in project development
  • Rebates/incentives available that make PV systems affordable
slide-30
SLIDE 30

UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

Ackno nowledg edgem ements ents UMBC Performing Arts & Humanities Facility

Baltimore, MD

Courtney Glaub – Construction Management

PRESEN ESENTATIO ION N OUTLI LINE: NE:

I. I. PROJECT JECT BACKGROU OUND

  • I. Locatio

ion/I /Info

  • II. Building

ing Stats II. II. ANALYSI YSIS S 1 – PRECAST ST FACADE I. I. desig ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact IV. Site Logist istics ics III. III. ANALYSI YSIS S 2 – CRANE COMP MPARISON ISON I. I. Crane Logist stics ics II II. Schedule/C /Cost st Impact II III. Site Logist stic ics s IV. ANALYSI SIS S 3 – PV ARRAY STUDY I. I. System Design ign II II. Structural Impact ct II III. Energy/E /Elect ctric rical Impact IV. Feasib ibil ilit ity Analysis sis V. V. CONCLU LUDIN ING THOUGH GHTS S VI. ACKNOW OWLED LEDGEME MENTS S

EHS CAMPUS SITE

30 30

ACADEM EMIC IC ACKNO NOWLEDGE LEDGEMENT ENTS: S:

Penn State AE Faculty

  • Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor

INDUSTR TRY Y ACKNO NOWLEDGEM LEDGEMENT ENTS: SPECI ECIAL AL THANKS S TO TO:

The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company Project Team – Patty Carper, Andrew Light, Tim Unrath, Steve Chesko The UMBC Project Team – Mickey Miller Grimm & Parker Architects – Sue Hains Nitterhouse Concrete Products – Mark Taylor Solar Gaines – John Hencken My Family and Friends

slide-31
SLIDE 31