Square 1400 Apartments Fairfax, VA PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
square 1400 apartments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Square 1400 Apartments Fairfax, VA PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 26, 2023 124 likes •393 views

Square 1400 Apartments Fairfax, VA PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECT Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Raymond Sowers - CM ADVISOR PRESENTATION OUTLINE: Square 1400 Apartments I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Square 1400 Apartments

Fairfax, VA

PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECT

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Raymond Sowers - CM ADVISOR

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project Background ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN ANALYSIS 3: SIPS ANALYSIS 4: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

Square 1400 Apartments

Fairfax, VA

PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECT

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Raymond Sowers- CM ADVISOR

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PR PROJECT B OJECT BACKGR GROUND ND

LO LOCA CATION:

  • 2700 Dorr Ave, Fairfax, VA
  • Home of the previous HITT Headquarters

BUILDIN BUILDING P PARAMA RAMATERS RS:

  • 327,431 SF gross building area
  • 1

1 Story Apartment Building/4 Story Parking Garage PROJECT P ECT PARAMETERS: METERS:

  • Total Project Cost:

$40 Million

  • Dates of Construction:

January 2012 – October 2013

  • Delivery Method:

Design-Bid-Build

  • LEED Certification:

Silver

IMAGES COURTESY OF GOOGLE MAPS IMAGE COURTESY OF HITT Contracting

3

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. I. PROJ OJECT ECT B BACKGRO CKGROUND ND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PR PROJECT B OJECT BACKGR GROUND ND

IMAGE Developed by Anthony Grab

ST STRUCTURAL SY SYST STEM:

  • Cast-in-place Concrete with Post Tension Cables
  • 30,000 SF per floor
  • 5 Pours per floor

BUILDING ENCL BUILDING ENCLOSURE: OSURE:

  • Multi Color style brick with Light Gage Studs
  • Roof – Parapet wall with 6” insulation

CONSTRUCTI TRUCTION LO LOGISTICS: ICS:

  • Phase One:

Demo Existing Structures, Utility relocation Phase Two: Excavation, Building Structure

  • Phase Three:

Building Exterior Façade

4

IMAGE Developed by Anthony Grab

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. I. PROJ OJECT ECT B BACKGRO CKGROUND ND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Anal Analysis 1: Chang is 1: Change in Cas in Cast-In-Place

  • In-Place

PR PROBLEM IDENTIFIC OBLEM IDENTIFICATION: TION:

  • High Level of Detail Cast-In-Place Structure
  • Impacts on critical path schedule
  • Require a large amount of man power

RES RESEARCH GO GOAL: AL:

  • Investigate alternative structure system
  • Assess changes in strategies for constructing the new system

INDUS INDUSTRY MEMBER INTER MEMBER INTERVIEW IEWS:

  • Raymond Sowers ……………………..Penn State OPP
  • Brian Abel ……………………………….Able Consulting Engineers
  • Bill Holley……………………………….Infinity Structures

5

IMAGE Taken by Anthony Grab

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANAL NALYSIS 1: S 1: Chang Change in in Cast- Cast-In- n-Plac Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Model Produced by Anthony Grab

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ISSUES D ISSUES DISCUSSED IN SCUSSED IN IN INTER TERVIEW IEWS:

  • Factors influencing shifts in strategy
  • Constructability and Limitations
  • Design Layout
  • Cost and duration
  • Benefits of the infinity system
  • Downfalls of Cast-In-Place Concrete
  • Manufacturing of Infinity System Panels

6

Model Produced by Anthony Grab Image COURTESY OF www.infinitystructures.com

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. I. Inte Interv rview Outc w Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Anal Analysis 1: Chang is 1: Change in Cas in Cast-In-Place

  • In-Place

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ho How t w the e Inf Infinity Sy ty System em W Work rks s

  • EPICORE MSR Composite Floor with WWF
  • Panelized Load-bearing Metal Studs
  • Spans up to 27 feet
  • 4” to 8” Slab Thickness
  • 4,000 psi Regular Weight Concrete

7

Video COURTESY OF www.infinitystructures.com Image COURTESY OF www.infinitystructures.com

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How

  • w the

the Infi Infini nity ty Syst System Wo Work rks s III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Anal Analysis 1: Chang is 1: Change in Cas in Cast-In-Place

  • In-Place

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Infinity Sy Infinity System : em :

  • About 1 week per floor to construct
  • Economical traditionally low cost than Cast-In-Place
  • Quality control in Factory environment
  • Uniform Load

Cas Cast-In-Place Conc

  • In-Place Concret

rete e

  • Can build many stories
  • More freedom with floor plan design

8

AD ADVANT NTAGES ES DIS DISADVANT ANTAGE GES Infinity Sy Infinity System : em :

  • Difficult To Come Back a Redesign Floors
  • Limited to 5 Stories

Cas Cast-I

  • In-Place Co

n-Place Conc ncrete rete

  • About 2 weeks per floor to construct
  • Cost

Model Produced by Anthony Grab

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How

  • w the

the Infi Infini nity ty Syst System Wo Work rks s III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Anal Analysis 1: Chang is 1: Change in Cas in Cast-In-Place

  • In-Place

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Br Breadt eadth 1 h 1 Design of sign of t the In e Infinity finity Sy System em

  • Epicore MSR 22 Gage Composite Deck
  • Simple Span Condition
  • Concrete Strength 4,000 psi
  • Live Load 40 psf
  • Dead Load 20 psf of Epicore MSR Deck
  • Concrete slab 8” thick
  • Deflection is accounted for within table values
  • No reinforcing is required for simple span other than Epicore MSR
  • 4T10 Metal Studs to be used

9

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. III. Breadth 1 eadth 1 System em D Desig sign III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Anal Analysis 1: Chang is 1: Change in Cas in Cast-In-Place

  • In-Place

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Conclusion an nclusion and R d Recommendations : commendations :

  • 42 Day Savings
  • Light Weight
  • Less Weather Sensitive during construction
  • Prefabricated Panels
  • I would highly recommend the implantation on an Infinity

Structure System

10 10

Image COURTESY OF www.infinitystructures.com Image COURTESY OF www.infinitystructures.com

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. III. Breadth 1 eadth 1 System em D Desig sign III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Anal Analysis 1: Chang is 1: Change in Cas in Cast-In-Place

  • In-Place

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-11
SLIDE 11

AN ANAL ALYSIS 2: BRIC IS 2: BRICK F K FAÇADE RE-DESIGN DE RE-DESIGN

PR PROBLEM IDENTIFIC OBLEM IDENTIFICATION: TION:

  • Site congestion due to concrete and masonry overlap
  • Potential Delays in Drying Dead Line
  • Complexity of Brick Façade

RES RESEARCH GO GOAL: AL:

  • Determine new type of Exterior Facade
  • Reduce site congestion and trade coordination on-site
  • Reduce Schedule

IMAGE COURTESY OF HITT Contracting

1 1 1 1

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. II. ANALYSIS 2: ALYSIS 2: FA FAÇA ÇADE RE-DESIGN DE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ORIGIN ORIGINAL F AL FACADE:

  • 4” brick on Metal Metal Stud
  • $7.4 million masonry package
  • 4.2 month construction duration

PR PROPOSED OPOSED GFR GFRC F FACADE:

  • Prefabricated Panels
  • Varity of Sizes and Colors
  • Sustainable
  • Improved Site Logistics
  • No Structure Redesign

IMAGE COURTESY OF Meyer Consulting Engineers

12 12

IMAGE COURTESY OF Stromberg Architectural Products

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. I. Abo About the t the Façade Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS 2: BRIC IS 2: BRICK F K FAÇADE RE-DESIGN DE RE-DESIGN

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SCHEDU HEDULE R LE REDUCTIO DUCTION:

  • Original masonry façade duration = 126 days
  • GFRC erection = 6 days/floor
  • GFRC façade duration = 67 days

IMP IMPACT ON ON PR PROJE OJECT:

  • No overlap of concrete and façade trades
  • Façade is on critical path – Potential 59 days savings

13 13

IMAGE COURTESY OF Stromberg Architectural Products Schedule Produced by Anthony Grab

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural I uctural Impact pact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS 2: BRIC IS 2: BRICK F K FAÇADE RE-DESIGN DE RE-DESIGN

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-14
SLIDE 14

MA MATERIAL PRICING: TERIAL PRICING:

  • $45.00/sf Glass Fiber Reinforced Cladding
  • $00.45/sf cost Fiberglass 3-1/2”, R15 Insulation

COST REDUCTION: REDUCTION:

  • GFRC façade costs approximately 27% less than masonry
  • $2,018,000.00 overall savings from façade re-design

14 14

IMAGE COURTESY OF Stromberg Architectural Products

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. II. Cost I Cost Impact pact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS 2: BRIC IS 2: BRICK F K FAÇADE RE-DESIGN DE RE-DESIGN

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Breadt Breadth 2: Mec h 2: Mechanical – anical – Therm hermal Quality al Quality

15 15

IMAGE COURTESY OF Stromberg Architectural Products

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. IV. Breadth 2: adth 2: Therma ermal l Qualit ality y V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS 2: BRIC IS 2: BRICK F K FAÇADE RE-DESIGN DE RE-DESIGN

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FIN FINAL C L CONCLUSIONS SIONS

  • GFRC façade reduces schedule and cost
  • Eliminates site congestion and inefficiencies
  • Minor architectural implications
  • Met goal of analysis to reduce site congestion issues

REC RECOMMEND MMENDATION: ION:

  • Pursue GFRC façade based on constructability concerns , cost

and schedule

16 16

IMAGE COURTESY OF Stromberg Architectural Products

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. V. Concl Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS 2: BRIC IS 2: BRICK F K FAÇADE RE-DESIGN DE RE-DESIGN

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-17
SLIDE 17

AN ANAL ALYSIS IS 3: IMPLEMENT 3: IMPLEMENTATIO TION OF SIPS OF SIPS

PR PROBLEM IDENTIFIC OBLEM IDENTIFICATION: TION:

  • Complexity of Cast-In-Place PT Concrete
  • 5 pours per floor
  • Crew Management

RES RESEARCH GO GOAL: AL:

  • Streamline Cast-In-Place Erection
  • reduce Schedule
  • Potential Cost Savings

IMAGE taken by Antony Grab

17 17

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

IMAGE COURTESY OF HITT Contracting

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. IV. ANAL NALYSIS 3: S 3: SIPS SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Implement Implementation: tion:

  • Traditional SIPS
  • Schedule Between Pours with a Floor
  • Distant Work Tasks
  • One Fixed Crane Location
  • Establish Critical Durations
  • (8) 5-day work week

18 18

1 2 3 4 5

Model Produced by Anthony Grab

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. I. Imp Implementa tati tion II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS IS 3: IMPLEMENT 3: IMPLEMENTATIO TION OF SIPS OF SIPS

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Re Results:

  • Resequenced Work
  • Saved 1

1 Days

  • Savings from Crane and Other General Conditions Costs

Re Reco commendations:

  • It is In the best interest of Square 1400 to utilize SIPS for the

erection of the Cast-In-Place Structure

19 19

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. II. Results/Recom ts/Recommenda mendatio ions ns V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS IS 3: IMPLEMENT 3: IMPLEMENTATIO TION OF SIPS OF SIPS

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pr Problem Identification:

  • blem Identification:
  • Complex/Difficult to Operate Building Systems
  • High Demand for Information Rich Models
  • Challenging to monitor energy within a building

RESEAR SEARCH GO GOAL ALS: S:

  • The implantation of a Energy Saving Dashboard will result in

apartment residents using less energy

20 20

AN ANAL ALYSIS 4: OPERA IS 4: OPERATIONS AND MAINTEN IONS AND MAINTENANCE

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

IMAGE COURTESY OF http://greentechadvocates.com/ IMAGE COURTESY OF Penn State University

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERAT OPERATIONS AN NS AND D MAINT MAINTENAN NANCE I. Building Compatibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Building Compatibilit Building Compatibility y

  • ACS320 HVAC Control

Cost and P Cost and Payba yback:

  • 25 % percent Total Building Energy Savings

21 21

IMAGE COURTESY OF Wyble and Associates

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. I. Buildin ding C Compa mpatibility ibility II. Conclusion and Recommendations VI. LESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS 4: OPERA IS 4: OPERATIONS AND MAINTEN IONS AND MAINTENANCE

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Table COURTESY OF Lucid

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Dashboard In shboard Information rmation

  • Competitions
  • Comparisons
  • Green Features
  • Renewables
  • Unit Equivalents

Conclusion an nclusion and R d Recommendations commendations

  • New Technology - Few Studies
  • Hard to Justify its implementation
  • Potential Long term savings

22 22

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. I. Buildin ding C Compa mpatibility ibility II II. Conclus usion ion a and Recom commenda dations tions VI. VI. LESSONES LEARNED ESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AN ANAL ALYSIS 4: OPERA IS 4: OPERATIONS AND MAINTEN IONS AND MAINTENANCE

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

IMAGE COURTESY OF Lucid IMAGE COURTESY OF Lucid IMAGE COURTESY OF Lucid

slide-23
SLIDE 23

LESSO LESSONS LEARNED S LEARNED

AN ANAL ALYSIS 1: IS 1:

  • An Infinity System is a great solution to reduce cost, decrease schedule

duration, while maintaining a high level of quality

AN ANAL ALYSIS 2: IS 2:

  • GFRC panels can be cost and time effective
  • Pursue GFRC façade based on constructability concerns
  • Met goal of analysis to reduce site congestion issues

AN ANAL ALYSIS 3: IS 3:

  • It is In the best interest of Square 1400 to utilize SIPS for schedule impacts

AN ANAL ALYSIS 4: IS 4:

  • Hard to Justify its implementation
  • Potential Long term savings

23 23

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. I. Buildin ding C Compa mpatibility ibility II II. Conclus usion ion a and Recom commenda dations tions VI. VI. LESSONES LEARNED ESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

INDUSTRY A ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LEDGEMENTS:

ACKN KNOWLEDGEMENT LEDGEMENTS

24 24

SPECIAL THAN SPECIAL THANKS TO: KS TO:

Randy Barrett at HITT Contracting HITT Project Team Brian Abel PACE Industry Members My Family and Friends

ACADEM ADEMIC A IC ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LEDGEMENTS:

Penn State AE Faculty Raymond Sowers– CM Advisor

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. ANALYSIS 2: FAÇADE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. I. Buildin ding C Compa mpatibility ibility II II. Conclus usion ion a and Recom commenda dations tions VI. VI. LESSONES LEARNED ESSONES LEARNED VII. VII. ACKNO KNOWLEDGEM LEDGEMENTS ENTS

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

ADDITION ADDITIONAL INF AL INFORMA RMATION ION

26 26

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony Grab | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Square 1400

Apartments

Fairfax, VA

Anthony grab| CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

PRESENTATION OUTLINE:

I. PROJECT BACKGROUND II. ANALYSIS 1: Change in Cast-In-Place I. Interview Outcomes II. How the Infinity System Works III. Breadth 1 System Design III. II. ANALYSIS 2: ALYSIS 2: FA FAÇA ÇADE RE-DESIGN DE RE-DESIGN I. About the Façades II. Structural Impact III. Cost Impact IV. Breadth 2: Thermal Quality V. Conclusion IV. ANALYSIS 3: SIPS I. Implementation II. Results/Recommendations V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE I. I. Buildin ding C Compa mpatibility ibility II II. Conclus usion ion a and Recom commenda dations tions VI. VI. LESSONES LEARNED ESSONES LEARNED VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS