Roadmap to Success! Follow the route to defensible IEPs Todays - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

roadmap to success
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Roadmap to Success! Follow the route to defensible IEPs Todays - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Success Next Exit Roadmap to Success! Follow the route to defensible IEPs Todays Objective: Aligning PLAAFP to IEP goals using data-driven decision making: Topics: What comprises a legally compliant PLAAFP? Legal implications


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Follow the route to defensible IEPs

Success

Next Exit

Roadmap to Success!

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Aligning PLAAFP to IEP goals using data-driven decision making:

Today’s Objective:

Topics: ❑ What comprises a legally compliant PLAAFP? ❑ Legal implications correlated to PLAAFP ❑ Examples vs. Non-examples Parts of an IEP goal: ❑ What data (Pre-K-12th grade) is used to determine the PLAAFP? ❑ Goals/objectives aligned to PLAAFP

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is a PLAAFP?

Present Level of Academic Achievement & Functional Performance: ❑ Driving force of the IEP ❑ Direct correlation to IEP goals, objectives, benchmarks ❑ Data-Driven-include baseline measures ❑ Describes deficit areas, strengths, and how the disability affects student’s ability to perform in the general education

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PLAAFP:

❑ The driving force of the IEP goals and data collection ❑ Identifies student need(s) while establishing baseline data ❑ What is the student able to do? ❑ What is the student need? ❑ Describes all areas of academic and functional performance (routine activities) ❑ Grade level standards and comparison to same age peers ❑ Data must be current and relevant

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PLAAFP continued

  • Data from various assessments
  • Brief, specific, accurate, objective, and measurable
  • What strategies, accommodations, or assistive tech have been successful?
  • Objective information: bridge between evaluation and goals
  • What strategies, accommodations and/or assistive technology have already been

successful for this student’s learning?

  • Identify grade-level academic standards for student’s grade, and compare

student’s skills from same age peers

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Legal Requirements:

  • Statements regarding health,

vision/hearing, medical needs, social- emotional, educational performance compared to peers, communication & motor abilities, and developmental status

  • Specific, measurable, objective

information

  • Include functional performance deficits

○ Social skills, pragmatics, executive functioning, on/off task, organization

  • What does the behavior look or sound

like? ○ When does the behavior occur? ○ What type of behavior does he/she exhibit? ○ Antecedent or function of behavior

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Legal continued

  • Prioritize and identify needs that will be written as goals
  • Identify strengths as they relate to interventions
  • Provide baseline data for each target deficit/need
  • Establish data method for each goal/need
  • Do the “unfamiliar test”

– If you dropped it off at the next district would they know how to service the student?

  • Avoid information about content areas or specials

– A student can’t have a disability in science/social studies

  • Avoid qualitative data

– “made progress in, did well in, struggled with”

  • Avoid personal information as it does not correlate to instruction
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Why?

What’s the Law?

Legal Implications

Illinois, 2009 52 IDELR 177: The PLAAFP was inadequate because it did not include objective, measurable

  • data. It only contained general

statements about a 13-year-old. Statements such as being shy in social situations, and difficulty expressing ideas in front of peers in the school setting were noted.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Illinois, 2002 36 IDELR 283: The district’s reliance on report card grades in its statement of present performance levels with respect to the progress of a high school student in the general curriculum was found to be

  • inadequate. The hearing officer

said the district should have used assessment techniques such as criterion-referenced tests, standard achievement tests and diagnostic tests.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Does your PLAAFP include?...

  • Statement of the student’s strength
  • Statement of the student’s need(s)
  • Specific, observable, measurable
  • Statement of need(s) affects his/her

ability to participate in the general education

  • Accommodations, interventions,

supports, assistive technology warranted

  • Preschool only:

– How does the disability affect his/her ability to participate in appropriate activities?

Quick PLAAFP Checklist

  • Have you had a maintenance check?
slide-11
SLIDE 11

student need(s)

http://goanimate.com/player/embed/0l rg8VjkG5t4?utm_source=social&utm_m edium=tumblr&utm_campaign=usercon tent

Collaborate with team members to appropriately represent student’s needs

Be Prepared

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Examples vs. Non-Examples

You decide….. Tommy is a 3rd grade student who was re-evaluated on 3/23/13. Tommy’s results of the Woodcock-Johnson Full Scale IQ represented a 78 and a performance IQ of 84. Tommy’s MAP scores fell within the 25th percentile with a RIT score of 217 for Reading and 225 for Math. Tommy’s guided reading level is currently a level H. Most recent academic testing on 5/15/14 showed the following information: WPM-100, Reading comprehension, spelling, and math are all at the 2nd grade level.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Examples vs. Non-Examples

Reflect on the criteria for PLAAFP:

Note: Refer to checklist

  • Does it state the student need(s)?
  • State comparison to same age peers
  • State functional performance?
  • Strategies used? Interventions? Accommodations?
  • Parent/guardian concern?
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Examples vs. Non-Examples

You decide… Jim is a 9th grade student at Prairie United High School. He is a very shy and quiet student and does not participate in class. His current Lexile score is a 750. His current grades are all C’s and one B in social

  • studies. His most current Woodcock Johnson IQ was an 83 which is

slightly below the average range. Jim is comprehending at a 7th grade level.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Examples vs. Non-Examples

Susie has an emotional disability that makes it difficult for her to use calming strategies when she is frustrated. She uses aggression 70% of the time which impacts her ability to participate in the general education classroom. Megan’s perceptions and feelings are inconsistent with actual situations or interactions with peers. She frequently over reacts.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Example vs. Non-Examples

Example: Jane has a phonological processing disorder that make it difficult for her to blend and segment cvc words to decode unknown words when presented a grade level text. Non-example: Jane has a learning disability in reading which takes her longer to process new information.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PLAAFP

Don’t forget to….(slow down!)

➔ Strengths and needs should not contradict each other ◆ Math computation is a strength but the deficit is the student can’t solve single digit addition/subtraction facts ◆ Strength is reading but the student struggles with reading comprehension ➔ Document parent concerns ◆ Note any communication ◆ Seek information at the IEP meeting ◆ Section on the IEP should never be blank ➔ Always state the characteristics of the disability that impact classroom instruction ➔ State student’s needs versus disability

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • When
  • Who
  • Will ‘do’
  • Under what condition
  • At what level of proficiency
  • Measured by
  • Aligned to NILS/CCSS or EE

Goals should include:

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Progress markers
  • Measurable
  • Ladder or pie approach
  • Intermediate steps
  • Benchmarks: Major milestones
  • Data-Driven
  • Observable vs. Not Observable?

(visible/countable behavior)

  • Non-measurable=Ambiguous verbs
  • An IEP must provide access to the general

education curriculum-grade level content ○ Bloom’s and Webb’s levels of generated

  • bjectives

Bateman, D. B., Herr, C., 2006

Objectives & Benchmarks

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Examples

Goals aligned to Objectives/Benchmarks Examples:

Part of the PLAAFP information: When provided 3 verbal cues, Emily follows a simple, one-step direction such as, “Touch the block,” or “Sit down,” fewer than 1

  • ut of 5 times.

Goal: Given a three-step direction, Emily will follow all three steps, in the correct

  • rder, 9 out of 10 times with 1 prompt.

Objectives:

  • 1. Given a one-step direction, Emily will follow the direction 9 out of 10 times with 3 or less prompts by

the end of the first trimester.

  • 2. Given a two-step direction, Emily will follow the first of the two steps 9 out of 10 times with 2 or less

prompts by the end of the second trimester.

  • 3. Given a three-step direction, Emily will follow both directions 9 out of 10 times with 1 prompt by the

end of the third trimester. **Turn & Talk: Create part of the PLAAFP, the goal, and objective to align the same student need(s)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Example

How can progress be measured using this goal and objectives:

Numerical Analysis

Frequency: simple count of the number of items correct/incorrect Percent: number correct or incorrect or incomplete/total number of items x 100=percent Rate: total number of correct or incorrect or incomplete/total number of minutes=RPM Correct Incorrect Incomplete Frequency 6 3 Percent 67% 33% Rate 3 per minute 1.5 per minute 0 per minute

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Think Legal! Must have the data to backup

your goal: Is it legally defensible?

  • Assess student’s academic and/or

behavioral progress

  • Quantify a student’s rate of improvement
  • r responsiveness to instruction
  • Scientifically-based practice
  • Examples: CBM/CBA: AIMSweb, MAP data,

SRI, Guided Reading Level ○ Turn and Talk: What other progress monitoring tools does your district implement?

  • Progress monitoring tool should always

align to IEP goals

Progress Monitoring

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Progress Monitoring continued

  • Data can be collected by different staff members (ie. sw, speech, psych)
  • On-going process and collecting and analyzing data
  • Decide Frequency & Duration
  • Easy and quick method for gathering student performance data
  • Data Collection Methods:

– Error Analysis for Permanent Product Data (academic) – Numerical Analysis (academic/behavioral) – Task Analysis (academic/behavioral) – Momentary Time Sample – Event Data Recording (behavioral) DESTINATION….COMPLETE!!!

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Remember: Follow the “MAP” to get to SUCCESS!

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Thank you!

Questions?...

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Resources

  • 1. There is a webinar on the ISBE website. http://www.isbe.net/spec-ed/Default.htm Click on Developing Meaningful IEPs and

Utilizing the New Illinois Learning Standards (45:02) - December 8, 2014 –Gives a good refresher and overview on writing IEPs with a special emphasis on writing goals aligned to NILS.

  • 2. IEP Q- https://iepq.education.illinois.edu A wonderful resource site with examples of goals and links to other resources. Also

you can find the standards here: from the home page click on common core standards link on the left side. Check out for printable lists of the standards aligned to academic and functional needs areas, see our Printable Standards Charts Page. The standards charts are linked to New Illinois learning Standards and the Functional needs are linked to the Social and Emotional Learning Standards (SEL). *Special Note- you have to register for above site but it is free to all Illinois educators.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

References

Bateman, D.B., Herr, C., (2006).Writing Measurable IEP Goals and Objectives, Verona, WI. Attainment Publication. Bateman, D.B., Linden, M.A. (2012) Better IEPS How to Develop Legally Correct and Educationally Useful Programs., Verona, WI. Attainment Publication. Norlin, J.W., Slater, A.E., Lake, S.E., (2010). IEPs That Succeed: Developing Legally Compliant Programs Horsham, PA. LRP Publications. LRP Publications

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Contact Information

Jennifer Thomas: Director of Student Services D26 jennifer.thomas@cary26.org Kim Dahlem: Director of Student Services D155 kdahlem@d155.org Monica Furlong: Director of Student Services D46 mfurlong@dist46.org