resi esident dent cl clas assifica sification tion syst
play

Resi esident dent Cl Clas assifica sification tion Syst ystem - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Me Medi dicare care Par art t A SN SNF Paym yment ent Syst ystem em Refo eform: m: Intr In troductio oduction n to to Resi esident dent Cl Clas assifica sification tion Syst ystem em - I Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018 Intr In


  1. Me Medi dicare care Par art t A SN SNF Paym yment ent Syst ystem em Refo eform: m: Intr In troductio oduction n to to Resi esident dent Cl Clas assifica sification tion Syst ystem em - I Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  2. Intr In troduction oduction to to th the e Resi esident dent Cl Classification assification Syste ystem m - I Concepts Structure Implications Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  3. RCS S is is NOT OT th the e Unif ifie ied d Post st-Acute Acute Payment yment System stem • IMPACT Act mandated MedPAC to outline a unified payment system that would replace the four current post-acute care Medicare payment systems (SNF, HHA, IRF, LTCH) • Objective is to base payment on patient characteristics rather than setting or amount of therapy furnished (significant redistribution of PAC dollars) • IMPACT Timeline: Propose system by 2023, then implement • MedPAC demonstrated that the system is highly feasible & accurate; recommends implementation in 2021 with 3-year optional phase-in • See June 2017 MedPAC Report to Congress, chapter 1 for details Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  4. Abo bout t RCS CS-I • Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (5/4/17; CMS-1686) • Public comment period extended from 6/26 to 8/25/17 and left open ended • Based on extensive research and TEPs (possible refinements) • Target date is October 1, 2018 • Likelihood of implementation? • Budget Neutrality assumed (Parity adjustments) • No mention of “phase -in / blend- in” but possibility • Improvement over RUGs? • Shift from Volume to Patient Characteristics as $ driver Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  5. Abo bout t RCS CS-I • N O CHANGE IN M EDICARE “ CLINICAL ” / “ TECHNICAL ” ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS • “Focus on reducing administrative burden for providers” • MDS remains basis for rate setting, but 5-day sets the “ Composite score ” for the entire benefit period (assuming no discharges or sig. changes) • Remaining PPS MDS schedule is eliminated, including COTOs • Sets up benchmarking mechanism from admission – discharge • Recognizes disproportionate costs during first days of stay • Frequency / Amount of therapy does not impact reimbursement • Therapy is “just another component of the care plan” – Nursing acuities, Diagnosis coding & certain Ancillaries drive revenue Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  6. RCS CS Str tructur cture T N • RUG-IV contains 3 rate components: O • Therapy, Nursing (including NTAs) and Overhead • Blended into one of 66 distinct per diem rates Per Diem RUG • RCS includes 5 distinct, (4 variable) rate components: • PT/OT (30 categories) 1 of 30 • SLP (18 categories) 1 1 of 18 • Nursing (43 RUGs) Composite • Non-Therapy Ancillaries (6 levels) • Overhead / Non-Case Mix Adjusted (1 rate) 1 of 43 1 of 6 How many possible combinations??? Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  7. Pos ossi sible ble RCS CS Ra Rate te Co Comb mbin inations ations PT/OT: 30 • While there are technically SLP: 18 139,320 possible composite Nursing: 43 combinations, many are NTA: 6 “ mutually exclusive ” Overhead: 1 139,320 Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  8. PT/OT • 30 categories RCS: : Wher here e Do W o We e Sta tart? t? • 18 categories SLP One step at a time… Nrsng • 43 RUGs • 6 groups Each h co compo mponent nent ha has s its ts own wn NTA grouping ping process cess usi sing ng different fferent • 1 CBSA variables iables and nd sc scor oring ing OH meth me thodol odologies ogies RCS Composite Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  9. Why y is is th the P e Pat atient ient He Here re? • 10 “Clinical Categories” capture the “range of general resident types” found in SNFs • MDS Section I: ICD-10 code • “Primary reason for SNF stay” • DRG “Mapping” Non- Orthopedic Major Joint Non-Surgical Acute Orthopedic Rep. or Spinal Surgery (Except Orthopedic/ Neurologic Surgery Major Joint) Surgery Musculoskeletal Acute Medical Cardiovascular Cancer Pulmonary Infections Management & Coagulations Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  10. The 10 categories are collapsed into 5 for PT/OT Major Joint Non- Other Medical Acute Rep. or Spinal Orthopedic Orthopedic Management Neurologic Surgery Surgery Non- Major Joint Non-Surgical Acute Cancer Rep. or Spinal Orthopedic Orthopedic/ Neurologic Surgery Surgery Musculoskeletal Orthopedic Acute Surgery (Except Infections Major Joint) Acute Pulmonary Neurologic 2 for SLP Non- Medical Cardiovascular & Coagulations Neurologic Management Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  11. Physical ysical / Oc Occupa cupational tional Compo mponent nent Calcu culation lation Cognitive Clinical Functional Impairment (2) Category (5) Score (3) Major Joint Rep. MDS Section or Spinal Surgery Clinical: I8000 / I0020 Other 14 – 18 Primary reason for SNF stay (ICD-10) Orthopedic Intact or Mildly Functional: G Impaired Non-Orthopedic Trans, Eating, Toileting: Self Perf only 8 – 13 Surgery Moderately or Cognitive: C Severely Cognitive Function Scale Impaired Acute 0 – 7 Neurologic All patients score in one PT/OT group no Medical matter if they receive therapy (or how much) Management Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  12. PT PT/OT /OT Fu Func nction tional al Sco core re • RCS PT/OT scoring differs from RUG-IV ADL system • Transfers, Eating and Toileting Self-Performance scores only • Each ADL scored on a 0 – 6 scale; (v. 4 in RUG-IV) • 0 – 18 point range • Unlike RUGs, higher point totals represent lower dependence; • Fully functional residents are reimbursed at the highest rates • Greater need reduces PT/OT rate but increases RCS Nursing RUG • The difference in net impact varies for each component score • Nursing increase may or may not exceed PT/OT increase • Any inflexible capture strategy may be counter-productive Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  13. Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  14. RCS: S: P PT/OT OT Fu Functional ctional Score ore v. RUG-IV IV: : Self lf-Per erfor formance mance Scale cale RCS-I I Scoring oring Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  15. PT PT/OT /OT Ca Case se-Mi Mix x Cl Clas assif sification ication Gr Grou oups ps See handout for complete listing of case-mix groups Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  16. Speec eech h Languag guage e Patholog thology y Component mponent Calculation lculation Swallowing SLP Related Clinical Disorder or Comorbidity or Category (2) Mechanically- Mod. to Severe Altered Diet (3) Cog Imp (3) MDS Section Both Both Acute Clinical: I8000 Neurologic Sw Dis: K0100Z Either Either MA Diet: K0510C2 Non- Comorb: Misc. Neurologic Neither Neither Cognitive: C (CFS) All patients score in one SLP group no matter if they receive therapy (or how much) Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  17. SLP LP Rel elated ated Co Como morb rbidit idities ies Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  18. SLP LP Ca Case se-Mix Mix Cl Clas assifi sification cation Gr Grou oups ps See handout for complete listing of case-mix groups Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  19. PT PT/OT /OT & SLP: LP: Co Cogni gniti tive e Fu Func nction tion • New cognitive measure: Cognitive Function Scale (CFS) • Combines Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and Cognitive Performance Score (CPS) into one scale Note: Impairment reduces PT/OT but increases SLP component. PT/OT rate reduction exceeds SLP enhancement (almost always). Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  20. Nu Nurs rsin ing g Ca Case se-Mix ix Cl Clas assif sificatio ication • 43 “nursing RUGs” • RUG-IV Reimbursement drivers, ADL scoring & splits and hierarchy remain intact • Minus Rehab RUGs • Reweighted indices • 19% HIV/AIDS rate enhancement only applies to this component • Triggered by ICD-10 code B20 on the UB-04 See handout for complete listing of case-mix groups and comparison of RUG-IV to RCS CMI weights Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  21. NTA Gr NT Grou oup p Cl Clas assif sification ication • Non-Therapy Ancillaries • Based on the number of services and conditions • Hospital look-back as allowed in RUG-IV • Greatest rate impact for days 1 - 3 See handout for complete listing of NTA service / condition drivers and related Points Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  22. Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

  23. RCS CS Ra Rate te Co Comp mpos osite ite Ca Calc lcul ulation ation • 5-day MDS (ARD 1 – 8) establishes Composite for the entire benefit period with limited exceptions • Significant Change / Readmissions • Each component has a “Base Rate” adjusted by CBSA • Multiply each Base Rate by respective CMI weight • “Variable Per Diem Adjustment Factors” • PT/OT and NTA components decrease as the benefit period progresses (see handout for detail on Base Rates & VPDA) Z IMMET H EALTHCARE 2018

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend