The N* programme at CLAS Dan Watts University of Edinburgh For the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the n programme at clas
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The N* programme at CLAS Dan Watts University of Edinburgh For the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The N* programme at CLAS Dan Watts University of Edinburgh For the CLAS collaboration at Jefferson Lab 1 Outline Outline Outline General motivations General motivations Observables in meson Observables in meson


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The N* programme at CLAS

1

Dan Watts University of Edinburgh For the CLAS collaboration at Jefferson Lab

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline Outline

  • General motivations

General motivations

  • Observables in meson

Observables in meson photoproduction photoproduction

  • Experimental details

Experimental details

Outline

2

  • Preliminary results for several

Preliminary results for several polarization observables polarization observables

  • Conclusions

Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation: Baryon resonances Motivation: Baryon resonances

  • Masses, widths, and coupling

Masses, widths, and coupling constants not well known for many constants not well known for many resonances resonances Many models: relativised quark model, Goldstone-boson exchange,

Motivation: nucleon excitation spectrum

model, Goldstone-boson exchange, diquark and collective models, instanton-induced interactions, flux- tube models, holographic dual, lattice QCD… Big Puzzle: Most models Big Puzzle: Most models predict more resonance states predict more resonance states than observed than observed

Lattice QCD predictions Hadron spectrum collab. Arxiv:1104.5152 (2011)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Outline Outline

  • General motivations

General motivations

  • Observables in meson

Observables in meson photoproduction photoproduction

  • Experimental details

Experimental details

Outline

4

  • Preliminary results for several polarization

Preliminary results for several polarization

  • bservables
  • bservables
  • Conclusions

Conclusions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Observables in pseudo scalar meson photoproduction

  • γ

γ γ γ

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Finding missing resonances and better establishing the properties of “known” resonances requires an extensive measurement programme Requires measurement of a complete or close to complete set of

  • bservables over a wide kinematic range & wide range of final states

The task ahead

6

Such goals are finally coming within reach ! Such goals are finally coming within reach !

  • The CLAS facility will contribute a large fraction of the required high

The CLAS facility will contribute a large fraction of the required high quality meson quality meson photoproduction photoproduction data data

slide-7
SLIDE 7

+ N*

Differing isospin overlaps of N* and ∆+ for the π0 p and π+ n final states The π0 p and π+ n final states can help distinguish between the ∆ and N*

Useful tools: Isospin decomposition

7

2 1 3 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 3 2 3

, 3 / 2 , 3 / 1 : , 3 / 1 , 3 / 2 : = = + = = + = = − = = +

+

I I I I n I I I I p π π + N*

slide-8
SLIDE 8

“Isospin filters” “Isospin filters”

Resonance spectrum has many broad overlapping states

The ηp, K+Λ and pω systems have I=½ and act as isospin isospin filters filters to the resonance spectrum.

γ p → π+ n γ p → η p

Useful tools: Isospin filtering

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

64 observables, 8 reaction amplitudes 28 independent relations related to magnitudes of reaction amplitudes 21 independent relations related to phases of amplitudes Results in 15 independent observables

Useful tools: Multipion final states

9

Good for discovering Good for discovering resonances that decay resonances that decay into other resonances! into other resonances!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

σ σ Σ Σ T T P P E E F F G G H H T Tx

x

T Tz

z

L Lx

x

L Lz

z

O O

x x

O O

z z

C C

x x

C C

z z

Proton target Proton target p pπ π0

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

n nπ π+

+

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

p pη η

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

p pη η’ ’

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

p pω ω

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K+

Λ

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

σ σ Σ Σ T T P P E E F F G G H H T Tx

x

T Tz

z

L Lx

x

L Lz

z

O O

x x

O O

z z

C C

x x

C C

z z

Proton target Proton target p pπ π0

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

n nπ π+

+

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

p pη η

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

p pη η’ ’

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

p pω ω

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K+

Λ

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Status of meson photoproduction at CLAS

✔ -

  • published

published, , ✔ -

  • acquired

acquired, , planned planned

K K Λ Λ K K+

Σ0

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

K K0*

0*Σ

Σ+

+

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Neutron target Neutron target p pπ π-

✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

p pρ ρ-

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K-

  • Σ

Σ+

+

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K0

Λ

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K0

Σ0

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K0*

0*Σ

Σ0

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K Λ Λ K K+

Σ0

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

K K0*

0*Σ

Σ+

+

✔ ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Neutron target Neutron target p pπ π-

✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

p pρ ρ-

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K-

  • Σ

Σ+

+

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K0

Λ

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K0

Σ0

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K K0*

0*Σ

Σ0

✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

K+Σ-

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Outline Outline

  • General motivations
  • Polarization observables to be

Polarization observables to be discussed discussed

  • Outline
  • Experimental details

Experimental details

  • Preliminary results for several

Preliminary results for several polarization observables polarization observables

  • Conclusions

Conclusions

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Multi-layer large acceptance detector with

tracking, calorimetry, time of flight Near complete coverage in azimuthal angle and from 8°to 140°in polar angle.

Jefferson Lab

CEBAF: 1.4 km racetrack electron beam

accelerator with two LinAc sections. Operating at up to 6 GeV.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Bremsstrahlung photon tagger

61

61 Backing counters (→ timing)

13

Eγ = 20-95% of E0 - up to ~5.5 GeV Unpolarised, circularly polarised or linearly polarised photons

(→ timing)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Circular polarization from 100% polarized electron beam Circular polarization from 100% polarized electron beam

Circular photon beam from longitudinally polarized electrons Electron beam polarization > ~85%

Counts

Circularly polarised photons

14 Circular polarization Circular polarization

2 2

3 4 4 4 k k k k P P

e

+ − − ⋅ =

γ

k = Eγ/Ee

  • H. Olsen and L.C. Maximon, Phys. Rev. 114, 887 (1959)
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Coherent bremsstrahlung from 50 oriented diamond Two linear polarization states (vertical & horizontal)

Linearly polarised photons

15

Analytical QED coherent bremsstrahlung calculation fit to actual spectrum

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Frozen spin target (FROST)

16

Longitudinal nucleon polarisation (g9a) more recently with transverse (g9b)

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Butanol

Butanol composition: C composition: C4H9OH OH

Frost target

Butanol Butanol (C (C4H9OH) OH)

17

  • Carbon target used to

Carbon target used to measure bound nucleon measure bound nucleon contribution of contribution of butanol butanol

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Frozen spin butanol (C4H9OH) Pz ≈ 80% Target depolarization: τ ≈100 days

FROST target polarisation

18

For g9a (longitudinal orientation) ~10% of time polarizing target For g9b (transverse orientation) ~ 5% of time polarizing target

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Frost – Stability of beam/target polarisation

19

  • S. Strauch
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Outline Outline

  • General motivations
  • Observables in meson

Observables in meson photoproduction photoproduction

  • Experimental details

Outline

  • Preliminary results for several

Preliminary results for several polarization observables polarization observables

  • Conclusions

Conclusions

slide-21
SLIDE 21

( )

2 / 3 2 / 1 2 / 3 2 / 1

σ σ σ σ + − =

C zP

P E       + − =

2 / 3 2 / 1 2 / 3 2 / 1

1 Y Y Y Y d P P E

C Z

( )

E P P d d d d

C z

− Ω = Ω 1 σ σ

Theoretically: Experimentally:

Helicity asymmetry E

21

  +

2 / 3 2 / 1

Y Y d P P

C Z

where Y represents yield and d is the dilution, which is the ratio of hydrogen events to total events:

H bound H

Y Y Y d + =

Note: Bound nucleons have no asymmetry → Ebound = 0

slide-22
SLIDE 22

γ p →p π+ π- X

Butanol

Butanol Bound nucleon events Bound nucleon events

m2

X(GeV2)

Counts

Accounting for unpolarised protons in the target

V/c) Scale factors = Butanol/Carbon Carbon z (cm) Counts Proton momentum (GeV Proton angle (deg)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

γ γ p p → p p η η

  • Arizona State University
  • Brian Morrison, Michael Dugger, and Barry Ritchie

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • S11(1535) dominates at threshold
  • Since the S11(1535) is an L=0, s =

½, resonance → only couple to helicity = ½ initial state.

E – η photoproduction at threshold

24

  • S11 dominance forces E ≈ 1.0 near

threshold for all scattering angles

  • Provides an analytic check

2 / 3 2 / 1 2 / 3 2 / 1

σ σ σ σ + − = E

slide-25
SLIDE 25

SAID MAID Bonn-Gatchina

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

γ+ p → p + X p0= 1.00 ± 0.04 γ + p → p + X (n.c.) p0= 1.02 ± 0.04

  • W = 1525 MeV

E at threshold for pη

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

γ + p → p + X (γ det.) p0= 0.99 ± 0.04 γ + p → p + X (γ det. n.c.) p0= 0.98 ± 0.04 *n.c. implies no charged particles other than the proton. cos(θc.m.)

  • W = 1525 MeV
  • All have E=1,

within statistical uncertainties

slide-26
SLIDE 26

SAID MAID Bonn-Gatchina

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

E

Helicity asymmetry at fixed energies

26

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

Preliminary data prefers SAID for W >1.75 GeV

cos(θc.m.)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

γ γ p p → π π+ n

  • University of South Carolina
  • Steffen Strauch

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

E: E: γ γ p→π →π+ n for W = for W = 1.25 25 to to 1.70 70 GeV GeV

28

Preliminary Preliminary Data Data Preliminary Preliminary Data Data

slide-29
SLIDE 29

E: E: γ γ p p → π π+ n for W = for W = 1 1.70 70 to to 2.25 25 GeV GeV

29

For W> 1.75 GeV none of the models represents the data well. For W< 1.75 GeV all of the models represent the data fairly well.

Preliminary Data Preliminary Data

slide-30
SLIDE 30

γ γ p p → p p π π0

  • The George Washington University
  • Hideko Iwamoto and Bill Briscoe

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

First data with FROST

W = 1.433 GeV W = 1.465 GeV W = 1.497 GeV W = 1.433 GeV W = 1.497 GeV W = 1.588 GeV W = 1.558 GeV W = 1.528 GeV

slide-32
SLIDE 32

First data with FROST

W = 1.617 GeV W = 1.646 GeV

32

W = 1.674 GeV W = 1.702 GeV W = 1.730 GeV W = 1.809 GeV W = 1.783 GeV W = 1.756 GeV

slide-33
SLIDE 33

First data with FROST

W = 1.835 GeV W = 1.860 GeV W = 1.885 GeV W = 1.910 GeV W = 1.934 GeV W = 2.041 GeV W = 1.994 GeV W = 1.959 GeV

  • Agreement with models breaks down for

Agreement with models breaks down for W > 1850 > 1850 MeV MeV

slide-34
SLIDE 34

γ γ p p → K+ Λ and and γ γ p→ K+ Σ Σ0

  • Catholic University of America
  • Liam Casey and Franz Klein

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Helicity asymmetry Helicity asymmetry E for for K+ Λ

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Helicity asymmetry for Helicity asymmetry for K+ Λ

36

  • None of the models represents the data well

None of the models represents the data well

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Helicity asymmetry for Helicity asymmetry for K+ Σ Σ0

37

  • Models represent the data better than for

Models represent the data better than for K K+

+ Λ

Λ

slide-38
SLIDE 38

G observable

  • bservable

( )

) 2 sin( ) 2 cos( 1 ϕ ϕ σ σ G P P P d d d d

z T T

+ Σ − Ω = Ω

  • Σ is a single polarization observable (beam asymmetry)

38

  • G is a double polarization observable
slide-39
SLIDE 39

γ γ p p → π π+ n

  • The University of Edinburgh
  • Jo McAndrew, Dan Watts, Derek Glazier

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Create an asymmetry and fit a function to obtain G:

G Observable Extraction

p3 = pTpzfG

Example of extraction for Example of extraction for G G for for π π+ n

Asymmetry +ve polarised target

PRELIMINARY! PRELIMINARY!

Asymmetry -ve polarised target

slide-41
SLIDE 41

“G” “G” observable for

  • bservable for π

π+ n

PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY

W = 1475-1500 MeV W=1640 – 1680 MeV

SAID MAID2007 Bonn-Gatch

PRELIMINARY

Early stage results -

  • nly approx. linear

beam polarization values

PRELIMINARY

W = 2032 – 2088 MeV W = 1840 - 1880 MeV

slide-42
SLIDE 42

γ γ p p → p p π π+ π π-

  • Florida State University
  • Sungkyun Park and Volker Crede

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

γ γ p p → p p π π+ π π-

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

γ γ p p → p p π π+ π π-

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

P○

z for

for p p π π+ π π-

45

φπ+

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Pz for for p p π π+ π π-

46

φπ+

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Pz for for p p π π+ π π-

47

φπ+

slide-48
SLIDE 48

IS for for p p π π+ π π-

48

φπ+

slide-49
SLIDE 49

FROzen FROzen Spin Target “FROST” (g9b) Spin Target “FROST” (g9b)

Beam: Circular polarization; Linear polarization; Un-polarized Data obtained for Σ, F, H, P and T T (for (for pseudoscalars pseudoscalars)

  • Data is in calibration phase right now

Data is in calibration phase right now

Beam Target Observable

σ σ d d

Transversely polarised FROST (g9b)

49

[ ]

) sin( ) cos( 1 ϕ β ϕ β σ σ − + − − Ω = Ω T P F P P d d d d

lab xy lab xy

  • [

) 2 sin( ) cos( ) 2 cos( 1 ϕ ϕ β ϕ σ σ − + Σ − Ω = Ω H P P P d d d d

T lab xy T

σ0 = unpolarized cross section, PT = transverse beam polarization P0= circular polarization, Pz= longitudinal target polarizaion CircularTransverse

]

) 2 cos( ) sin( ) sin( ϕ ϕ β ϕ β − − − + P P P T P

T lab xy lab xy

Linear Transverse

slide-50
SLIDE 50

A very early look at A very early look at T for for γ γ p p → π π+ n

  • Arizona State University
  • Michael Dugger and Barry Ritchie
  • M. Dugger, Jlab User Meeting, June 2012

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Used only 2 uncalibrated runs Eγ from 0.65 to 1.2 GeV cos(θπ

c.m.) = 0.95

T = -0.34 ± 0.09

First glimpse of T from CLAS

51

Target offset (in φ) is within one standard deviation of the set value (-60 degrees) The measured value of T is within 1.14 standard deviations of SAID TSAID

SAID =

= -0.440 440

slide-52
SLIDE 52

CLAS will provide a large fraction of the quality data needed to better constrain the reaction amplitudes in meson photoproduction → Improve determination of “known” resonance properties and a basis to search for predicted but unseen resonances Preliminary beam-target observables for pion, K+, η photoproduction differentiate between models and indicate various mass regions where no

Summary

52

differentiate between models and indicate various mass regions where no models currently describe the data → implications for resonance properties to be assessed when data finalised! More to come from CLAS: lots lots of data for π+ π- p, pω, transverse target

  • bservables, production from polarised neutron targets …

An exciting time for nucleon spectroscopy !

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

✦ NSF NSF ✦DOE DOE ✦ CLAS Collaboration CLAS Collaboration

  • M. Dugger, Jlab User Meeting, June 2012

53