RECURRENCE RATE POST RENAL TRANSPLANT OF CHILDHOOD NEPHROTIC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

recurrence rate post renal transplant of childhood
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RECURRENCE RATE POST RENAL TRANSPLANT OF CHILDHOOD NEPHROTIC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RECURRENCE RATE POST RENAL TRANSPLANT OF CHILDHOOD NEPHROTIC SYNDROME, AT RED CROSS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL Jonathan Buckley, Priya Gajjar, Peter Nourse Red Cross War Memorial Childrens Hopital Introduction Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

RECURRENCE RATE POST RENAL TRANSPLANT OF CHILDHOOD NEPHROTIC SYNDROME, AT RED CROSS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL

Jonathan Buckley, Priya Gajjar, Peter Nourse Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hopital

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is recognized cause of ESRD
  • The definitive treatment option in ESRD is renal

transplantation

  • But many types of NS reoccur in the graft kidney
  • FSGS especially has a recurrence of 20-40%1
  • Internationally, certain predisposing factors have been

identified2

  • Little has been published on the characteristics and

recurrence of NS in an African setting

(1Tejani et al, 1992)

(2Ponticelli et al, 2010)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aim

  • To describe the characteristics of the patients

with NS who were transplanted at Red Cross Children’s Hospital

  • To determine the recurrence rate of NS in the

graft kidney post renal transplant

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methods

  • This was a retrospective descriptive study
  • The medical records of all patients with

nephrotic syndrome, who received a renal transplant at Red Cross Children’s Hospital from 1996 to 2012, were reviewed

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Results

  • 148 renal transplants at RXH from 1996-2012
  • Average of 9.25 transplants per year
  • 28 (18.7%) had NS
  • Only 19 complete records could be found
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Characteristics

  • Mean age at presentation with NS: 5yrs

(Range 1-14yrs)

  • Mean age at transplant: 10yrs

(Range 3-15yrs)

  • Male to female ratio 11:8
  • 47% were Black African
  • 47% were Mixed Race
  • 6% were Caucasian
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Histiological subtypes

FSGS MCGN MPGN CN 7 (25%) 16 (57%) 2 (7%) 3 (11%)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Steroid responsiveness

  • 5 patients were initially responsive to steroids
  • 14 patients were steroid resistant at

presentation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Donor type

  • 4 patients received grafts from living related

donors

  • 14 patients received grafts from cadaver

donors

  • 1 patient received a graft from a living non

related donor

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Induction therapy

  • 9 patients received induction therapy
  • 4 patients did not
  • In 5 patients the records were not complete
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Time from presentation to ESRF

  • Progression to ESRF within 3yrs of

presentation has been shown to be a risk factor for recurrence

  • 8 patients developed ESRF within 3 yrs of

presentaion

  • 11 patients did not
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Outcomes

  • 8 patients lost their grafts
  • The 1 year graft survival rate was 89%
  • The 5 year graft survival rate was 50%
  • 5 patients died
  • 7 patients have been successfully transitioned
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recurrence rate

5 10 15 20 25 30

7 %

12,5%

Total recurrence rate FSGS recurrence rate

slide-14
SLIDE 14

FSGS patients characteristics

  • Both presented between 6-15yrs of age (9 and

14yrs respectively)

  • Both had induction therapy at transplant
  • Neither was Caucasian
  • Neither developed ESRD within 3yrs of

presentation

slide-15
SLIDE 15

cont.

  • In both cases the donors were young (18 and

32yrs)

  • The graft kidneys were from deceased donors
  • Only one patient had nephrectomies
  • One patient had a biopsy showing no

mesangial proliferation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Conclusion

  • FSGS was the most common histological type of

NS, leading to renal transplantation

  • Our recurrence rate of 12,5%, in our small group
  • f FSGS patients, is low
  • A possible explanation is that this is a single

center study, and that the spectrum of the NS, we see is different

  • Due to the small sample size no statistical

inference could be made with regards to possible predisposing factors

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Future suggestions

  • National paediatric transplant registry
  • Bigger sample size- better data
  • Able to calculate national recurrence rate
  • Determine what predisposing factors may lead

to reoccurrence

  • Therefore offer a better service to our patients

and ensure that valuable resources are use appropriately

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thanks

  • SCAH and UCT
  • Red Cross Children’s Hospital
  • Drs Peter Nourse and Priya Gajjar
  • Prof Mignon McColluch
  • OUR PATIENTS- WHO TEACH US NEW LESSONS

EVERDAY!

slide-19
SLIDE 19

QUESTIONS: