Realistic shell model and chiral three-body force Tokuro Fukui - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

realistic shell model and chiral three body force
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Realistic shell model and chiral three-body force Tokuro Fukui - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Realistic shell model and chiral three-body force Tokuro Fukui Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University 22/October/2020 Biography 1 Apr. 2012-Mar. 2015 Ph. D. Apr.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tokuro Fukui

22/October/2020

Realistic shell model 
 and 
 chiral three-body force

Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics,
 Kyoto University

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Apr. 2012-Mar. 2015

  • Ph. D.



 


  • Apr. 2015-Sep. 2016


Postdoctoral Fellow
 
 


  • Sep. 2016-Aug. 2018


Postdoctoral Fellow


  • Sep. 2018-Oct. 2019


JSPS Overseas Research Fellow
 
 


  • Nov. 2019-Present


Research Assistant professor

Biography 1

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Apr. 2012-Mar. 2015

  • Ph. D.



 


  • Apr. 2015-Sep. 2016


Postdoctoral Fellow
 
 


  • Sep. 2016-Aug. 2018


Postdoctoral Fellow


  • Sep. 2018-Oct. 2019


JSPS Overseas Research Fellow
 
 


  • Nov. 2019-Present


Research Assistant professor

Biography 1

March 2021


SPDR at Strangeness Nuclear Physics Lab.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Collaborators

INFN-Napoli

F . R. Xu F . R. Xu

  • Y. Z. Ma
  • Y. Z. Ma

Peking University

2

  • A. Gargano
  • A. Gargano
  • N. Itaco
  • N. Itaco
  • L. Coraggio
  • L. Coraggio
  • L. De Angelis
  • L. De Angelis
  • G. De Gregorio
  • G. De Gregorio

South China Normal Univ.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nuclear force | History 3

1950’s

Pion theories

1960’s

1-boson exchange

1970’s

Diverse 2-pion 
 exchange

1980’s

QCD

1990’s and beyond

EFT
 Chiral Symmetry Yukawa: 
 Meson theory

1935

Machleidt & Entem, PR 503, 1 (2011)

‟circle of history is closing”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Nuclear force | State-of-the-art theories 4

Chiral effective field theory

Weinberg, PA 96, 327 (1979) Machleidt & Entem, PR 503, 1 (2011)

Chiral symmetry (!N hierarchy)
 Many-body forces Realistic force ( )

χ2 ≲ 1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

100 200 300 400 500 600 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 VC(r) [MeV] r [fm]

  • 50

50 100 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

1S0 3S1

OPEP

Ishii +, PRL 99, 022001 (2007)

Nuclear force 
 from Lattice QCD

5

Future

Nuclear force | State-of-the-art theories

Chiral effective field theory

Weinberg, PA 96, 327 (1979) Machleidt & Entem, PR 503, 1 (2011)

Chiral symmetry (!N hierarchy)
 Many-body forces Realistic force ( )

χ2 ≲ 1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

6

Significance

Motivation | Why chiral-EFT interaction?

Microscopic origin (chiral symmetry and !N hierarchy) 
 Many-body forces on an equal footing Precise and hence realistic (

)

χ2 ≲ 1

I expect to deepen and shed new light on
 the understanding of nuclear force
 and properties of nuclei.

This work

Relation between single-particle properties and 
 chiral 3-nucleon force (3NF)
 elucidated by shell-model framework

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Nuclear structure models | Realistic force

Realistic shell model (RSM)

= Shell model with a realistic force

Shell-model framework and model-space truncation

ab initio Configurations Active nucleons Shell model Realistic force is applicable
 in a straightforward way Hartree-Fock method Difficult to find exact Kohn-Sham potential

7

slide-10
SLIDE 10

RSM and 3NF

Otsuka +, PRL 105, 032501 (2010)

The 3NF qualitatively accounts for the oxygen-drip line (24O).

3NF contribution to RSM

RSM Hamiltonian (in particular its monopole component)
 needs to be revised due to 3NF .

Zuker, PRL 90, 042502 (2003)

cf.) Oxygen-drip line and 3NF Fujita-Miyazawa 3NF

Repulsive contribution

Fujita & Miyazawa, PTP 17, 360 (1957)

8 20 4 1 6 1 Neutron Number (N)

s 1/2

(c) G-matrix NN + 3N (∆) forces

d3/2 d5/2

NN NN + 3N (∆)

Single-Particle Energy (MeV)

4

  • 4
  • 8

8

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Shell evolution on pf-shell and RSM

Holt +, PRC 90, 024312 (2014)

A crucial role played by 3NF (Chiral N2LO) for Ca isotopes.

Motivation | RSM and 3NF

3NF contributions need to be clarified in detail 


(monopole Hamiltonian)

40 44 48 52 56 60

Mass Number A

  • 150
  • 120
  • 90
  • 60
  • 30

Energy (MeV)

NN NN+3N

40 l l e h s f p

) a (

NN pf NN pfg9/2 NN+3N pf NN+3N pfg9/2

  • Expt. GX

1 2 3 4 5 6

Energy (MeV)

KB3G

9

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Theoretical framework | Shell-model Hamiltonian

Realistic Hamiltonian (starting point)

Chiral 3NF
 at N2LO Single-particle energy Chiral 2NF at N3LO
 + Coulomb

10

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Theoretical framework | Shell-model Hamiltonian

Realistic Hamiltonian (starting point)

Chiral 3NF
 at N2LO Single-particle energy Chiral 2NF at N3LO
 + Coulomb

10

Our new formalism Parallelized code for HPC 3-body matrix elements (3BMEs)

Fukui +, PRC 98, 044305 (2018)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Theoretical framework | Shell-model Hamiltonian

Realistic Hamiltonian (starting point)

Chiral 3NF
 at N2LO Single-particle energy Chiral 2NF at N3LO
 + Coulomb

Shell-model framework

Many-body 
 perturbation theory Diagonalization Effective Hamiltonian Eigenvalues
 Eigenvectors Diagonalization ab initio no-core shell model (NCSM) RSM Renormalization Normal-order approximation Optional Our new formalism Parallelized code for HPC 3-body matrix elements (3BMEs)

Fukui +, PRC 98, 044305 (2018) Navrátil +, PRL 84, 5728 (2000) Coraggio +, AP 327, 2125 (2012)

10

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Chiral 3BMEs | Harmonic-oscillator (HO) bases

How to compute 3BMEs

Talmi transformation Talmi, HPA 25, 185 (1952)

Nogga +, PRC 73 , 064002 (2006)

Center-of-mass separation Diagonalization of 
 antisymmetrizer

Navrátil +, PRC 61, 044001 (2000)

Antisymmetrization

Weinberg, PLB 295, 114 (1992) van Kolck, PRC 49, 2932 (1994)

Chiral N2LO 3NF 2π (

) c1, c3, c4

1π + contact (

) cD

Contact (

) cE

hV3Ni =

<latexit sha1_base64="jTfPAEDF9tB7bG2fbpOCma95Psg=">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</latexit>

3BMEs

=

A

Dh⇥ ⇤ i

JT

  • V3N
  • h⇥

⇤ i

JT

E

A

<latexit sha1_base64="VZlnsHg4iC4dgA5Gp41f2wib738=">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</latexit>

11

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pioneering work

Only for the 1"+contact and contact terms.


Present work

New formalism for 2" terms:
 Triple-fold multipole expansion

Chiral 3BMEs | Nonlocal regulator

High-momentum truncation by regulator with cutoff Λ

Navrátil, FBS 41, 117 (2007)

Nonlocal 3BMEs with HO bases Nonlocal regulator

Epelbaum +, PRC 66, 064001 (2002) Fukui +, PRC 98, 044305 (2018) 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Necessary to retain
 consistency


  • f the contact term!

12

slide-17
SLIDE 17

3BMEs of 2" terms

MARCONI (CINECA, Italy)

Fukui +, PRC 98, 044305 (2018)

Chiral 3BMEs | 2" terms

Computationally heavy!

MPI + OpenMP parallelization

23 sums 26 3nj symbols, etc. Triple-fold integration # of MEs Time Memory p-shell ~800 ~30 sec
 w/ 4 nodes, 48 threads ~500 MB sd-shell ~20,000 ~10 min w/ 60 nodes, 272 threads ~3 GB pf-shell ~200,000 ~5 h w/ 60 nodes, 272 threads ~30 GB

13

slide-18
SLIDE 18

RSM calculations | Numerical details

Low-energy constants

2NF: N3LO 3NF: N2LO

Entem & Machleidt, PRC 68, 041001(R) (2003) Navrátil +, PRL 99, 042501 (2007)

Model space

0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2 Particle Hole 1p1/2 0f5/2 0f7/2 Particle Hole 1p3/2 0s, 0p, 0d, 1s

Many-body perturbation theory

2NF: Up to 3rd-order folded-diagram expansion
 3NF: Up to 1st-order (normal-order approx.)

Coraggio + AP 327, 2125 (2012) Roth +, PRL 109 , 052501 (2012)

(1) Effective Hamiltonian involving 
 Q-space effect. (2) Theoretical single-particle energies
 and 2BMEs.

Heff

p-shell pf-shell No empirical inputs!

14

slide-19
SLIDE 19

RSM calculations | First-order approximation

Many-body Hamiltonian and 3-body operator First-order (normal-order) approximation

  • R. Roth +, PRL 109 , 052501 (2012)

Normal-ordered 1-body term Normal-ordered 2-body term

15

slide-20
SLIDE 20

RSM calculations | First-order approximation

Many-body Hamiltonian and 3-body operator First-order (normal-order) approximation

  • R. Roth +, PRL 109 , 052501 (2012)

Normal-ordered 1-body term Normal-ordered 2-body term Particle Hole Excluded Excluded

15

slide-21
SLIDE 21

p-shell nuclei:

Benchmark calculations

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Benchmark calculations | p-shell nuclei

Comparison with NCSM

Navrátil +, PRL 99, 042501 (2007).

NCSM RSM and NCSM agree
 with each other 
 for low-lying states.
 Significant 3NF effect
 can be seen. 2NF only 2NF + 3NF

Fukui +, PRC 98, 044305 (2018)

17

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Navrátil +, PRL 99, 042501 (2007).

NCSM RSM and NCSM agree
 with each other 
 for low-lying states.
 Significant 3NF effect
 can be seen.

Benchmark calculations | p-shell nuclei

Comparison with NCSM

2NF only 2NF + 3NF

4He 6Li 8Li 8Be 8B 10B 11B 12C 13C

Similar results for other p-shell nuclei → RSM: Simple and precise

Fukui +, PRC 98, 044305 (2018)

18

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Benchmark calculations | p-shell nuclei

Ground-state energies

At maximum 
 ~ 1 MeV discrepancy Higher-order 3NF contribution may be 
 necessary for single-particle energies. 2NF + 3NF

6 8 10 12

A

  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

N=Z isotopes Expt NCSM RSM

2NF only

6 8 10 12

A

  • 70
  • 60
  • 50
  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

g.s . energy (MeV) N=Z isotopes Expt NCSM RSM

We focus on the relative energies!

Fukui +, PRC 98, 044305 (2018)

19

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Individual contributions | 6Li ground-state energy

  • 12
  • 10
  • 8
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 4

2NF 2NF +3NF Exp

2! dominant ( in particular) Large coherent effects

c4

20

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Monopole interaction

Core Monopole interaction = J-averaged 2-body interaction Effective single-particle energy (ESPE) Monopole-Hamiltonian ME = Evolved single-particle energy Spherical mean field

Tool to study system in an effective way

21

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Monopole property | p-shell nuclei

Effective single-particle energies

0p1/2 0p3/2

2NF only decreases with A, and 
 the two orbits become inverted.

0p1/2 0p3/2

2NF + 3NF is almost constant. →

2NF+3NF 2NF only

4 8 12 A

  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 ESPE (MeV) Proton Neutro n

8 Better closure properties

Fukui +, PRC 98, 044305 (2018)

22

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Short summary 1

Benchmark test for p-shell Our RSM calculations with 3NF 
 are satisfactorily comparable to 
 the ab initio results (relative energies).

0p1/2 0p3/2

Spin-orbit splitting stabilized by 3NF

2NF+3NF 2NF only

4 8 12 A

  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 ESPE (MeV) Proton Neutro n

8 Probably due to the tensor force

(under investigation).

23

slide-29
SLIDE 29

pf-shell nuclei:

Shell evolution and drip line

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Shell evolution

http://griffincollaboration.github.io/griffin-website/physics.html

Shell structure is related to 
 the robustness of the energy gap.
 
 “Observed” from
 two-neutron separation energies
 and first excitation energies

25

slide-31
SLIDE 31

pf-shell nuclei | Monopole properties

Even 2NF reasonably accounts for experimental behavior of 
 2n-separation energies S2n 
 and closure properties.

Ca isotopes

22 24 26 28 30 N 1 2 3 4 2

+ excitation energy (MeV)

22 24 26 28 30 32 34 N 5 10 15 20 S2n (MeV)

Exp 2NF 2NF + 3NF

B(E2) 
 [e2fm4]

Ma +, PRC 100, 034324 (2019)

26

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Even 2NF reasonably accounts for experimental behavior of 
 2n-separation energies S2n 
 and closure properties. The 3NF monopole component 
 is small except for 48Ca.

pf-shell nuclei | Monopole properties

22 24 26 28 30 N 1 2 3 4 2

+ excitation energy (MeV)

Ca isotopes

22 24 26 28 30 32 34 N 5 10 15 20 S2n (MeV)

Exp 2NF 2NF + 3NF 2NF + 3NF monopole

B(E2) 
 [e2fm4]

Ma +, PRC 100, 034324 (2019)

26

slide-33
SLIDE 33

2NF fails and 3NF plays an important role to explain experimental data.

pf-shell nuclei | Monopole properties

Ni isotopes

22 24 26 28 30 N 20 25 30 35 S2n (MeV) 20 22 24 26 28 30 N 1 2 3 4 2

+ excitation energy (MeV)

Exp 2NF 2NF + 3NF

B(E2) 
 [e2fm4]

Ma +, PRC 100, 034324 (2019)

27

slide-34
SLIDE 34

pf-shell nuclei | Monopole properties

Ni isotopes

2NF fails and 3NF plays an important role to explain experimental data. The 3NF monopole component is essentially improves the calculations.

22 24 26 28 30 N 20 25 30 35 S2n (MeV) 20 22 24 26 28 30 N 1 2 3 4 2

+ excitation energy (MeV)

Exp 2NF 2NF + 3NF 2NF + 3NF monopole

B(E2) 
 [e2fm4]

Why opposite from Ca?

Ma +, PRC 100, 034324 (2019)

27

slide-35
SLIDE 35

20 22 24 26 28 N 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5

Neutron ESPE for Ca 2NF only 2NF + 3NF

f7/2 f5/2 p3/2 p1/2

ESPEs relevant for Ca isotopes

< 1 MeV Very small difference from 2NF to 2NF + 3NF .

pf-shell nuclei | Monopole properties 28

slide-36
SLIDE 36

ESPEs relevant for Ni isotopes

Drastic evolution of ESPEs 
 induced by the 3NF . 0f7/2-1p3/2 gap is enlarged. Proton 0f5/2 ESPE is enhanced.

pf-shell nuclei | Monopole properties

20 22 24 26 28 N

  • 5
  • 2,5

2,5 5 7,5

f7/2 f5/2 p3/2 p1/2

2,5 5 7,5 10 12,5

f7/2 p3/2

Neutron ESPE for Ni

f5/2 p1/2

Proton ESPE for Ni 2NF only 2NF + 3NF neutron-proton interaction 
 induced by the 2" term in Ni 
 is more relevant than that in Ca.

Naively…

The term has the operator

c4

which vanishes for identical particles.

29

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Experimental and theoretical efforts

pf-shell nuclei | Beyond 1-major shell

Extended model space

1p1/2 0f5/2 0f7/2 Particle Hole 1p3/2 0s, 0p, 0d, 1s 0g9/2

Where is the Ca-drip line?

Tarasov +, PRL 121, 022501 (2018) Neufcourt +, PRL 122, 062502 (2019)

30

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Towards drip line of Ca isotopes

pf-shell nuclei | Beyond 1-major shell

22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 N 4 8 12 16 20

2n Heff 4 orbitals Heff 5 orbitals Expt

12 S2n (MeV)

Exp fp + g9/2 fp only

H H Expt H

22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 N 1 2 3 4 21

+ excitation energy (MeV)

Expt Heff 5 orbitals Heff 4 orbitals

Exp fp + g9/2 fp only

H H Expt H

g9/2 g9/2

Bound 60Ca: 
 Consistent with experiment

Coraggio+, arXiv:2006.15196 (PRC accepted) Tarasov +, PRL 121, 022501 (2018)

Bound 70Ca:
 Consistent with other predictions

Density functional theories 
 
 Bayesian analysis

Kortelainen +, PRC 85, 024304 (2012) Goriely +, PRC 88, 024308 (2013) Wang +, PLB 734, 215 (2014) Neufcourt +, PRL 122, 062502 (2019)

31

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Short summary 2

Neutron-drip line of Ca isotopes Monopole properties & spin-orbit splitting stabilized by 3NF The 3NF-induced monopole 
 Hamiltonian is essential to explain 
 the measured shell evolution. Probably due to the tensor force


(under investigation).

20 22 24 26 28 30 N 1 2 3 4 2

+ excitation energy (MeV)

1p1/2 0f5/2 0f7/2 1p3/2

28

1p1/2 0f5/2 0f7/2 Particle Hole 1p3/2 0s, 0p, 0d, 1s 0g9/2

70Ca: Possibly bound state,


consistent with other predictions.

32

slide-40
SLIDE 40

sd-shell nuclei:

Neutron-drip line and beyond

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Beyond drip line | Oxygen isotopes

Interplay between continua and 3NF

1

Otsuka +, PRL, 105, 032501 (2010)

OK as to measured drip line 24O, but quantitatively insufficient Bound 28O, 
 conflicting with experiment

Fossez +, PRC 96, 024308 (2017)

Naive 
 model Continuum 3NF

?

Repulsive Attractive

Contradiction

Realistic Gamow shell model

= Shell model with continuum + chiral EFT

Neutron Number (N) 8 20 16 14

d3/2 d5/2 s 1/2

NN + 3N (N LO) NN NN + 3N (∆)

low k

(d) V NN + 3N (∆,N LO) forces

2 2

Single-Particle Energy (MeV)

  • 4
  • 8

Continuum states are missing. Present work

34

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Ma +, PLB 802, 135257 (2020)

Beyond drip line | Oxygen isotopes

Interplay between continua and 3NF

is repulsive. Quantitatively reasonable.

?

Realistic Gamow-shell model

1

Otsuka +, PRL, 105, 032501 (2010)

OK as to measured drip line 24O, but quantitatively insufficient Bound 28O, 
 conflicting with experiment

Fossez +, PRC 96, 024308 (2017)

Naive 
 model Continuum 3NF

?

Repulsive Attractive

Contradiction

35

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Perspectives

Extension of theoretical framework Study of neutrinoless double β decay

RSM calculations with chiral 3NF 
 for 76Ge, 82Se, 130Te, 136Xe, etc. Beyond 1st-order contribution … 13 diagrams for 2nd-order one-body term

36

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Current interest | Cluster physics with chiral EFT

→ Range of local Gaussian: 2 fm Nucleon-wave packets

Summary Phenomenological 
 from chiral N3LO 2NFs

̂ Veff

Relative strengths; unchanged

Brink model for 8Be

Central interactions only

Consistent with Volkov result

Energy minimum at ~3 fm 3 fm LO NLO + Short-range contacts + NLO Long-range 2"

5 10 15 20 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Eg.s (MeV) α α Full LOct LOct+NLO 3 4 5 6 7 α-α distance (fm) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 α-α distance (fm)

Energy from threshold

37