Readiness for capacity building
Ab ra ha m Wa nde rsma n, PhD Unive rsity o f So uth Ca ro lina
Readiness for capacity building Ab ra ha m Wa nde rsma n, PhD Unive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Readiness for capacity building Ab ra ha m Wa nde rsma n, PhD Unive rsity o f So uth Ca ro lina Great ideas dont always lead to outcomes Innovation with the best of intentions Why do innovations fail? L a c k o f mo tiva tio n L
Ab ra ha m Wa nde rsma n, PhD Unive rsity o f So uth Ca ro lina
L a c k o f mo tiva tio n L
L
Amb itio us initia tive s c a n b e ne fit b y b e ing
I nno va tio n: Any po lic y, pro g ra m, o r pro c e ss tha t is ne w to a se tting
General Capacity
Ready to Implement
Culture Climate Organizational Innovativeness Resource Utilization Leadership Structure Staff Capacity Process Capacity
Intervention-specific Knowledge & Skills Program Champion Supportive Climate Inter-organizational Relationships
Innovation-Specific Capacity General Capacity
Ready to Implement
Relative Advantage Complexity Ability to Pilot Observability Priority Compatibility
Motivation Innovation-Specific Capacity General Capacity
Ready to Implement
Public schools Community colleges Cancer centers Behavioral health centers Community coalitions Juvenile detention centers Fatherhood Programs Rural clinics in India Teen pregnancy prevention centers Federally-subsidized healthcare clinics
Wha t do the inha b ita nts o f so c ia l ho using ne e d? Write thre e po sitive c ha ng e s yo ur c o mmunity c o uld ma ke .
I ndividua l T e a m Org a niza tio n Co mmunity Sta te / Pro vinc e Na tio na l
L e a de rship Re so urc e s Pro g ra m Cha mpio n I n-te a m c o lla b o ra tio n
“[Our] organizational readiness has stayed constant from a resources perspective”
“I don’t feel as connected to the practice as I do my department” “the behavioral health team is more ready than others - more cognizant of who we need assistance from”
Me a sure Build Hig hs & lo ws Diffe re nc e s b e twe e n te a ms I de ntify Sta ff Re tre a t
A to o l to de sig n me a sure re fle c t
“Guide imple me nta tio n” “De sig n suppo rt” “De ve lo p c a pa c ity”
Readiness Innovation Configuration Map (RICM)
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 In our
We do not have a cohesive mission at this time that helps us unify our activities. We are in the process of developing our vision and mission to help unify our activities. While we have a vision about where we want to go, we do not always agree about what is important to us. We have a clear vision statement. We share the same values and goals for our work.
Re la tive Adva nta g e Mo tiva tio n
Readiness Monitoring Tool (RMT)
Re a dine ss va rie s b y c o nte xt
4,93 5,42 3,83 4,3 4,55 5,27 5,2 3,78 4,67 2,67 4,33 4,42 3,78 4,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 5,5 6 6,5 7
Relative Advantage Compatability Simplicity Ability to Pilot Observability Priority Joy
Motivation
AP2 AP3
Re a dine ss c ha ng e s o ve r time
Re a dine ss de pe nds o n po sitio n
Pla n Do Study Ac t
Asse ss Re a dine ss
Activity-specific Readiness Tool (ART)
Targeted Readiness Interview Guide (TRIG)
Readiness Monitoring Tool (RMT)
1. Motivation 2. Innovation-specific capacity 3. General capacity
Targeted Readiness Interview Guide (TRIG)
Activity Readiness Tools (ART)
1. Motivation 2. Innovation-specific capacity Readiness Innovation- Configuration Map (RICM) Innovation Components Innovation Components Innovation Components
These make up the innovation
Objective Indicators
(in development)
Wha t a re 3 thing s tha t fa c ilita te c ha ng e in yo ur c o mmunity? Wha t a re 3 thing s tha t slo w do wn c ha ng e ? Ho w c a n yo u b e mo re re a dy?
Do we func tio n we ll o ve ra ll? Wha t a re the e xpe c ta tio ns fo r ho w we do thing s? Ho w do we fe e l a b o ut b e ing he re ? Ho w do we fe e l a b o ut c ha ng e ? Ho w c le a r is it whe re we g e t a nd use o ur re so urc e s? Ho w e ffe c tive a re o ur le a de rs? Ho w we ll do we func tio n da y-to - da y? Ho w e xpe rie nc e d a nd skillful a re we ? Do we ha ve wha t we ne e d to ma ke this ha ppe n? Do we ha ve the rig ht kno wle dg e a nd skills to ma ke this ha ppe n? Are the re impo rta nt pe o ple tha t wo uld suppo rt this? Do we ha ve the o ve ra ll suppo rt a nd struc ture to e na b le this? Do we ha ve c o nne c tio ns to
do this? Do e s this se e m b e tte r tha n the a lte rna tive s? Ho w we ll wo uld this fit in o ur c o nte xt? Ho w c o mplic a te d wo uld this b e ? Ho w e a sy wo uld it b e to te st this
Wo uld we b e a b le to se e the e ffe c t
Ho w impo rta nt is this c o mpa re d to
Motivation General Capacity Innovation-Specific Capacity
“It’s made us aware of where we stand" “[Readiness is] a mental state of where we are…of each provider to stretch beyond their comfort zone”
Re a dine ss is ke y to suc c e ssful c ha ng e Re a dine ss va rie s o ve r time Re a dine ss is a to o l fo r pla nning impro ve me nts, c ho o sing inno va tio ns, me a sure me nt, a nd c o a c hing
Re le va nt pub lic a tio ns
Scott, V.C., Kenworthy, T., Godly-Reynolds, E., Bastien, G., Scaccia, J., Gadaire, A., …Wandersman, A. (2017). The Readiness for Integrated Care Questionnaire (RIC-Q): A new tool to assess readiness to integrate behavioral health and primary care. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ort0000270 Scaccia, J. P., Cook, B. S., Lamont, A., Wandersman, A., Castellow, J., Katz, J., & Beidas, R.
Co nta c t info rma tio n
Abraham Wandersman, PhD wandersman@sc.edu