re align dabigatran in patients with a mechanical heart
play

RE-ALIGN: Dabigatran in Patients With a Mechanical Heart Valve - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RE-ALIGN: Dabigatran in Patients With a Mechanical Heart Valve Randomized, phase II study to Evaluate the sAfety and pharmacokinetics of oraL dabIGatran etexilate in patients after heart valve replacemeNt 2 Background Vitamin K


  1. RE-ALIGN: Dabigatran in Patients With a Mechanical Heart Valve Randomized, phase II study to Evaluate the sAfety and pharmacokinetics of oraL dabIGatran etexilate in patients after heart valve replacemeNt

  2. 2

  3. Background • Vitamin K antagonists provide effective protection against thrombosis in patients with a mechanical valve but require food, alcohol and drug restrictions and coagulation monitoring • Dabigatran 150 mg bid is superior to warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (RELY) • Encouraging preclinical data with dabigatran in porcine mechanical valve models 3

  4. Study design of RE-ALIGN Study treatment Start warfarin up Warfarin to day 7 (INR according to guidelines) Population A 1 week follow-up or CrCl < 70 mL/min: transition to DE 150 mg bid RE-ALIGN extension CrCl 70 – < 110 mL/min: trial Population B DE 220 mg bid CrCl • 110 mL/min: DE 300 mg bid Start DE day 3–7 B: Surgery A: Surgery 12 weeks (> 3 months) Increase dose if dabigatran trough plasma level < 50 ng/mL (by Hemoclot  ) • • Discontinue dabigatran (switch to nonstudy VKA ) if < 50 ng/mL with 300 mg bid after 2 measurements 4

  5. Adjudicated efficacy outcomes Population A Population B All patients Dabigatran Warfarin Dabigatran Warfarin Dabigatran Warfarin (n = 133) (n = 66) (n = 35) (n = 18) (n = 168) (n = 84) Death, n (%) 1 (1) 2 (3) 0 0 1 (1) 2 (2) Stroke, n (%) 9 (7) 0 0 0 9 (5) 0 SE, n (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIA, n (%) 2 (2) 2 (3) 1 (3) 0 3 (2) 2 (2) MI, n (%) 1 (1) 0 2 (6) 0 3 (2) 0 Valve thrombosis 2 (2) 0 3 (9) 0 5 (3) 0 without symptoms Death/stroke/SE/ 11 (8) 2 (3) 2 (6) 0 13 (8) 2 (2) MI, n (%) Death/stroke/TIA/ 12 (9) 4 (6) 3 (9) 0 15 (9) 4 (5) SE/MI, n (%) 5 MI, myocardial infarction; SE, systemic embolism; TIA, transient ischaemic attack

  6. Adjudicated safety outcomes Population A Population B All patients Dabigatran Warfarin Dabigatran Warfarin Dabigatran Warfarin (n = 133) (n = 66) (n = 35) (n = 18) (n = 168) (n = 84) Major bleeding, 7 (5) 2 (3) 0 0 7 (4) 2 (2) n (%) Major bleeding 7 (5) 2 (3) 0 0 7 (4) 2 (2) with pericardial location, n (%) Any bleeding, 35 (26) 8 (12) 10 (29) 2 (11) 45 (27) 10 (12) n (%) 6

  7. Possible explanations for negative study results • Inadequate blood levels of dabigatran • Play of chance with relatively few events seen in the warfarin arm • Differences in the mechanism of action of dabigatran compared with warfarin • e.g., the inability of dabigatran to suppress activation of coagulation that occurs when blood is exposed to the artificial surface of prosthetic valves 7

  8. Prosthetic valves and contact activation Dabigatran vs. Warfarin Contact Injury Extrinsic Intrinsic IXa/VIIIa TF/VIIa Tenase Tenase X X Xa Prothrombinase Warfarin Thrombin Dabigatran Clot formation 8

  9. NEJM, September 1st, 2013 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend