pull off force off force jkr pull off off pull pull 2 0 6
play

= Pull- -Off Force Off Force JKR Pull- -Off Off Pull Pull - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

! van ! van der der Waals Waals/Pull /Pull- -off Force for off Force for Rough Surfaces Rough Surfaces ! Rolling and Sliding Removal of ! Rolling and Sliding Removal of Rough Particles Rough Particles ! Hydrodynamic Forces and Torque !


  1. ! van ! van der der Waals Waals/Pull /Pull- -off Force for off Force for Rough Surfaces Rough Surfaces ! Rolling and Sliding Removal of ! Rolling and Sliding Removal of Rough Particles Rough Particles ! Hydrodynamic Forces and Torque ! Hydrodynamic Forces and Torque ! Critical Shear Velocity for ! Critical Shear Velocity for Detachment Detachment ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi 3 − ∆ = π = π Pull- -Off Force Off Force JKR Pull- -Off Off Pull Pull 2 0 . 6 / F W d F a Nf e c po A Force M Po Force 4 Max Asperity Max Asperity Number of Number of Pull Pull- -Off Force Off Force δ 1 Extension Extension ⎛ π ⎞ Asperities per for each ∆ = Asperities per for each 2 3 3 W d c = ⎜ ⎟ Unit Area Unit Area Asperity Asperity A a σ Roughness Height ⎜ ⎟ c Roughness Height Contact Radius Contact Radius ⎝ ⎠ 8 K Standard deviation Standard deviation at Separation at Separation 1 1 ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ F d 3 F d 3 Contact Contact = ( ) ( ) = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ − Estimated M ⎡ − ν − ν ⎤ 1 Po a 2 2 a 4 1 1 = + 1 2 K ⎢ ⎥ ⎝ ⎠ Radius Radius ⎝ ⎠ 2 K ⎣ ⎦ 3 E E 2 K 1 2 ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi 1

  2. Equilibrium Separation Distance Equilibrium Separation Distance 1 / 3 ⎡ ⎤ 2 JKR f JKR δ = Po ⎢ ⎥ Model Model β c 2 ⎣ ⎦ 3 K Greenwood- - Greenwood σβ N ≈ 0.1 Williamson Williamson Average Roughness Height Average Roughness Height Displaced Origin of Velocity Profile Displaced Origin of Velocity Profile = 5.9 σ e = k r 0.53k r ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi π µ 3 f d + + = = u y F V Drag Force Drag Force t C c + = − β + + ≤ 2 v y , y 1 . 85 ( ) dV / dy = ρµ 1 / 2 2 o F 1 . 61 d V Lift Force Lift Force l 1 / 2 dV / dy + = β + + w 2 y z o πµ 2 2 f d V = Hydrodynamic Hydrodynamic m M β o = t 0 . 01085 Torque Torque C c ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi 2

  3. πρ * 2 5 . 8 du L + = Drag Force d Drag Force F + = + σ + + + − α + = + u 2 . 76 H L t C 0 2 ρ 2 * 3 1 . 95 d u L Λ + + = Lift Force d Lift Force F + = β + σ + + + − α + w ( 2 . 76 H ) ν L 0 2 2 πρ * 2 2 2 . 14 u d L Hydrodynamic Hydrodynamic d = = + σ + − α M L 2 . 76 H 0 Torque Torque t 2 C ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi F l F M l t M t F d / 2 t d F mg t mg L O a a F a F M ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi 3

  4. MOMENT DETACHMENT MOMENT DETACHMENT 1 / 2 ⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥ π − ∆ + 2 2 aC [ a Nf exp[ 0 . 6 /( ) ] mg ] = Rolling * ⎢ po c ⎥ Rolling u c d * ⎢ aCu ⎥ + − α + − ≥ ρ π + 2 c M F ( ) ( F mg ) a F a Ld ( 5 . 04 1 . 95 ) ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ν ⎦ t t 0 L M 2 1 / 2 ⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥ π − + 2 2 kC [ a Nf exp[ 0 . 6 /( D ) ] mg ] Sliding Sliding SLIDING DETACHMENT SLIDING DETACHMENT = ⎢ po c ⎥ * u . c * ⎢ kCdu ⎥ ρ π + c Ld ( 5 . 8 1 . 95 ) ⎢ ⎥ ν ≥ + − ⎣ ⎦ F k ( F mg F ) t M L ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi Rolling Rolling ⎡ ⎤ 1 / 2 ( ) ⎢ ⎥ π − ∆ + 2 2 aC a Nf exp[ 0 . 6 /( ) ] mg ⎢ ⎥ = * po c u ⎢ ⎛ ⎞ ⎥ c * * * u L aCu u L ρ + ⎜ π + + ⎟ 2 1 / 2 ⎢ c c c ⎥ Ld ( 1 . 72 0 . 1 ) ⎜ 5 . 04 1 . 95 ( 1 . 72 0 . 2 ) ⎟ ν ν ν ⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦ Sliding Sliding 1 / 2 ⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥ π − ∆ + 2 2 kC [ a Nf exp[ 0 . 6 /( ) ] mg ] ⎢ ⎥ = * po c u ⎢ ⎛ ⎞ ⎥ c * * * u L kCdu u L ρ + ⎜ π + + ⎟ 1 / 2 ⎢ c c c ⎥ dL ( 1 . 72 0 . 1 ) ⎜ 5 . 8 1 . 95 ( 1 . 72 0 . 2 ) ⎟ ν ν ν ⎣ ⎝ ⎠ ⎦ ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi 4

  5. 5 Ahmadi Ahmadi ME 437/537 ME 437/537 Ahmadi Ahmadi ME 437/537 ME 437/537

  6. � Rolling detachment is the dominant mechanism � Rolling detachment is the dominant mechanism for detachment of rough spherical particles. for detachment of rough spherical particles. � Roughness significantly reduces the adhesion � Roughness significantly reduces the adhesion pull- -off force. off force. pull � Turbulence near wall flow structure plays an � Turbulence near wall flow structure plays an important role in particle detachment process. important role in particle detachment process. � Accounting for surface roughness improves the � Accounting for surface roughness improves the agreement between the model prediction and agreement between the model prediction and experimental data experimental data ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi ME 437/537 Ahmadi 6

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend