Project ms Groenland Henk Grunstra / Richard de Vries Damen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Aug 04, 2023 168 likes •411 views

Project ms Groenland Henk Grunstra / Richard de Vries Damen Shipyards / Rederij Doeksen An Assessment of Sustainable RoPax Ferry Concepts This work is part of the iTransfer project, which is funded by the North Sea Region programme, part

SLIDE 1

Project “ms Groenland”

Henk Grunstra / Richard de Vries Damen Shipyards / Rederij Doeksen

SLIDE 2

This work is part of the iTransfer project, which is funded by the North Sea Region programme, part of the EU Inter-regional (Interreg) initiative and the European Regional Development Fund

An Assessment of Sustainable RoPax Ferry Concepts

SLIDE 3

Pre-design and specification of a sustainable ferry concept, to replace the existing ferry ms Midsland on ferry route Harlingen – Terschelling v.v. philosophy Objectives for Rederij Doeksen meet the Damen

 Environmentally friendly  Efficient in operation  Economically viable OBJECTIVESjectives:

SLIDE 4

Less Energy = CO2 reduction No SOX No PM Significant NOX reduction

ENVIRONMENTAL TARGETS

SLIDE 5

SLIDE 6

PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS

Promenade deck outside 120 seats Promenade deck inside 181 seats Bar with bar fixed stools Grouped passenger sanitary spaces 1 Passenger lift and 1 goods lift Evacuation systems Store space

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 7

PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS

Hospital treatment room on saloon deck Grouped passenger sanitary spaces Life jackets storage space on both sides Catering facilities Family lounge / playground Disabled person toilet 1 Passenger lift and 1 goods lift Evacuation system Passenger saloon 417 seats Central staircase Passenger entrance

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 8

PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS

A-Deck Level Top Deck B-Deck Level Wheelhouse Deck C-Deck Level Promenade Deck D-Deck Level Passenger Saloon Deck F-Deck Level Main / Car Deck E-Deck Level Mooring Deck G-Deck Level Tank Top / Floor Plate Level E-Deck Level Mooring Deck

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 9

PRINCIPAL CHARACTERISTICS

F-Deck Level Main / Car Deck Car Deck Height, free/clear: 3.25 m Passenger Cars Capacity: 60 in 6 lanes

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 10

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 11

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 12

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 [%]

MS BENCHMARK Energy consumption

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 13

0,10 0,15 0,20 0,25 0,30 0,35 0,40

Power

FnL [-]

Power vs. FnL

STEEL MH ALU MH ALU CAT

-15%
(-10%)
-40%
(-30%)
Desired speed

Source: Damen Shipyards

STEEL MONOHULL → ALUMINIUM MONOHULL → ALU CAT

SLIDE 14

PROPULSION CONCEPTS

Alt. 1 Diesel Direct + SCR + DPF + generator sets
Alt. 2 LNG – Electrical propulsion
Alt. 3 LNG direct propulsion

Base: Diesel Direct + generator sets

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 15

Energy Consumption Comparison

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140%

Relative Energy Consumption

Daily Energy Consumption

Diesel Direct Diesel Direct +SCR+DPF LNG Electric LNG Direct

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 16

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Efficiency Power

LNG Engine MHI GS 12R-PTK Miller

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Efficiency Power

Diesel Engine MTU 16 V2000 M61 LNG GENSET VS DIESEL ENGINE EFFICIENCY

SLIDE 17

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

NOX (x10 kg) SOX (x0.1 kg) PM (kg) CO2 (ton) CH4 (x10 kg) CO2, eq (ton)

Mass

Exhaust Gas Component

Diesel Direct Diesel Direct + SCR + DPF LNG Electric LNG Direct

EMISSIONS COMPARISON

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 18

FLEET CONCEPT FERRY SERVICE TERSCHELLING Current fleet Option 1: 1 new Ropax 900 pax, 92 PAE Option 2: 2 new Ropax 600 pax, 60 PAE, adjustment freight Roro Cat

SLIDE 19

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Fuel cons Opex Capex Current Option 1 Option 2

Percentage (%)

FLEET CONCEPT COMPARISON BASED ON DIESEL DIRECT CONFIGURATION

SLIDE 20

32% 21% 12% 10% 8% 4% 3% 3%

2% 2%

Operational Expenditures

Diesel gas oil Manning Technical assistance Insurance Planned maintenance Modifications Docking Classification and Port State Control Lubrication oil Food & beverages Inventory articles CMMS Tools Training

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP (INDICATIVE)

82 % 18 % CAPEX vs. OPEX Total OPEX Total CAPEX Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 21

MGO EN 590 = (USD 864/ton) = E 0,137/kWh HFO 380 = (USD 864/ton) = E 0,084/kWh LNG = (65% of EN 590) = E 0,089/kWh Natural gas (NL) = E 0,110/kWh E-shore supply = E 0,062/kWh

Notes Price level may 2013 Fuel prices vary +/-25% LNG is linked to cost of MGO in many cases E-shore supply based on Delta energy NL. Natural gas based on retail price and quality “Dutch gas”

FUEL COST TODAY

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 22

Time, i.e. fuel consumption Cost

CAPEX DD CAPEX LNG elec Three parameters influence the economical feasability: (1) Add. investment cost LNG system, (2) Price difference LNG and fuel oil, (3) Operational profile of the vessel. CAPEX DD + SCR+ DPF CAPEX LNG direct

LIFE CYCLE COST

Source: Damen Shipyards

SLIDE 23

CONCLUSIONS

Source: Damen Shipyards

 Preferred fleet configuration, with 2 new Ropax Alucats and adjusted existing Roro Freight cat  LNG Direct propulsion  Aluminium light constructed Cat hull form  Waste heat recovery system can be considered  Divide cargo and pax transport to reduce weight of Ropax Cats  Additional capex for LNG installation and future fuel price development is key

SLIDE 24

CONTACT DETAILS: Rederij Doeksen Waddenpromenade 5 8861 NT Harlingen The Netherlands Phone:+31 (0) 515-49 15 30 Fax: +31 (0) 515-41 33 03 E mail: info@rederij-doeksen.nl Website: www.rederij-doeksen.nll