Problem in Mid-South Cotton 2008 Crop Management Seminar Cotton - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

problem in mid south cotton
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Problem in Mid-South Cotton 2008 Crop Management Seminar Cotton - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spider Mites: A Persistent Problem in Mid-South Cotton 2008 Crop Management Seminar Cotton Incorporated November 12, 2008 Angus Catchot, J.F. Smith, J. Gore, F. Musser, S. Stewart, G. Lorenz, R. Bagwell, and R. Leonard (QUOTE FROM 2006)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Spider Mites: A Persistent Problem in Mid-South Cotton

2008 Crop Management Seminar Cotton Incorporated November 12, 2008

Angus Catchot, J.F. Smith, J. Gore, F. Musser, S. Stewart, G. Lorenz, R. Bagwell, and R. Leonard

slide-2
SLIDE 2

(QUOTE FROM 2006) Spider Mites “The Insecticide Budget Busters of Cotton Production in the Mid-South”

STILL TRUE IN 2008!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Trends in Spider Mite Treatments in Mississippi (Acres Treated)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Mid-South Spider Mite Control Costs - 2004

0.89 2.90 1.32 1.56 1.13

US average Cost/A- $1.66 Mid-South Cost/A-$1.56

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mid-South Spider Mite Control Costs - 2007

2.78 8.21 19.50 7.68 2.99

US average Cost/A- $2.96 Mid-South Cost/A-$8.23

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2007 Mississippi Cotton Insect Losses

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Twospotted Spider Mite Biology

  • Egg, larval (3 pair of legs), two

nymphal stages, adult

  • Generation time is highly

temperature dependent

  • Lay ~100 eggs in 2-4-week

lifespan

  • Multiple overlapping generations

per year

  • Adults overwinter in leaf litter or

debris

  • Become active in early-spring
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Spider mites feed on the underside of leaves puncturing epidermal cells, reducing photosynthesis

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Early-Season Damage

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Late Season Damage

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Possible Factors Contributing to Increased Frequency of Spider Mite Outbreaks in the South

  • Delayed burndown/Field Border

Management

  • Hot and Dry Conditions
  • Beneficial Insect Reduction (Flaring)
  • Increased use of Insecticide Seed

Treatments vs. Temik?

  • Resistance
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Impact of Spring Burndown Timing on Mite Outbreaks

4/3/08 – Date of First Burndown

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Impact of Spring Burndown Timing on Mite Outbreaks

5/8/08 – at-planting

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Impact of Spring Burndown Timing on Mite Outbreaks

Number Mites/Leaf in Cotton

5 10 15 20 25 30 5/19/2008 5/27/2008 6/3/2008 6/9/2008 6/17/2008

Untreated Check Tillage Roundup + Clarity (4/3/08) Roundup + Clarity (4/3/08) & Ignite (at-planting) Gramoxone (4/25 - 12 d before planting) Ignite (4/25 - 12 d before planting) Cotyledon 2-3 Leaf Stage 4-5 Leaf Stage Pin-Head Square Match-Head Square

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Avoid the “Green Bridge”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Yield Effects of Spring Burndown

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

whole plot center 12 rw ft

Lb Lint / Acre NS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Seed Treatments

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Materials and Methods

  • Cotton infested from 1st to 4th

true leaf

  • Bean leaves w/ mites stapled

to cotton cotyledons

  • Uppermost full-size leaf

examined with a microscope for mites/eggs at ~7 and 14 DAI

  • 4-6 reps, 5-10 plants/plot
  • 5 trials conducted in 2007

2 trials conducted in 2008

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Effect of Seed Treatments, Temik and Foliar Insecticides on Mites

Starkville, MS - June 2008. Number of Immature Mites/Leaf.

10 20 30 40 50 60

7 DAT 14 DAT

ab ab ab ab ab b a c bc bc d bcd a cd ab b 7 DAT - P=0.0473 14 DAT - P=0.0103

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Effect of Seed Treatments, Temik and Foliar Insecticides on Mites

Starkville, MS - June 2008 Visual Rating of Mite Injury (1-10, 10=best)

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

John Angus

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Number of Times That Each Treatment Had the Greatest Number of Mites or Eggs in Each Test

  • r Sampling Date

Treatment Mites Eggs

Untreated

2

Neonicotinoid

6 3

Temik

1 1

*Trends - Only 2 trials had significant differences

slide-22
SLIDE 22

YIELD IMPACT

Greenwood – Non Irrigated

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Yield of Damaged and Undamaged Cotton

Dryland Field – Greenwood

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Total Yield Bottom (N5-10) Middle (N11-15) Top (N16+)

lb lint / acre

Fruiting Zone

Undamaged Damaged

P=0.0003

  • 22%
  • 48%
  • 73%
  • 51.2%

P=0.001 P=0.29 P=0.0045

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Yield of Damaged and Undamaged Cotton

Irrigated Field - Tchula

  • 23%
  • 68%

22%

  • 9%

P=0.023 P=0.034 P=0.001 P=0.004

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Cotton yield loss from infesting mites beginning at first bloom then at 200 HU intervals thereafter

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Yield Effects from Spider Mite Infestation

946.7 976.2 1028.4 1066.01

880 900 920 940 960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080

First Bloom First Bloom + 200 HU First Bloom + 400 HU Uninfested

NS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summary

  • Winter Weed

Management

  • Seed Treatments
  • Yield Loss
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Questions? Special Thanks