Port Angeles Housing Needs Assessment Gantt Chart 7 September 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Port Angeles Housing Needs Assessment

Gantt Chart 7 September 2018

Our budget and schedule

Team Leader - Tom Beckwith FAICP | Economics - Eric Hovee | | Architect - Julie Blazek AIA LEED AP | | | GIS - Jennifer Hackett | | | | | | | | weeks 1 1 1 1 prof labor mtls & total 1 Initiate your process | | | | 2 4 6 8 2 6 8 hrs cost expenses cost a Conduct retreat with staff X X O 8 $1,200 $200 $1,400 2 Develop your baseline information a Develop community profile X X X 16 $2,400 $0 $2,400 b Analyze housing market X X 24 $3,600 $0 $3,600 c Develop needs assessment X X 16 $2,400 $0 $2,400 d Review w/staff/Housing Needs Task Force X X O 8 $1,200 $200 $1,400 3 Identify your resources/constraints/opportunities a Assess resources/constraints/opportunities X X X X 40 $6,000 $0 $6,000 b Survey resident households X 16 $2,400 $2,750 $5,150 c Review w/staff/Housing Needs Task Force X X X X O 8 $1,200 $200 $1,400 4 Develop your housing action plan a Develop housing action plan policies/strategies X X X X 28 $4,200 $0 $4,200 b Conduct open house/survey on action plan X X 8 $1,200 $750 $1,950 c Review w/staff/Housing Needs Task Force X X X O 8 $1,200 $200 $1,400 5 Adopt your housing action plan a Edit/publish final action plan X X X X 16 $2,400 $0 $2,400 b Adopt plan w/Plan Comm/City Council X X O O 4 $600 $200 $800 Subtotal 200 $30,000 $4,500 $34,500 O Workshops, open houses, and hearings Contingency 1% $500 Project budget $35,000

1

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM)

Clallam County population projection

5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Source: Port Angeles Comprehensive Plan

Port Angeles population projections

1

3,190 2,669 2,965 3,751 4,043 3,650 3,436 3,236 3,017 3,233 3,354 3,396 3,301 3,287 3,311 3,379

• 1,495
• 1,813
• 1,953
• 2,241
• 2,521
• 2,822
• 3,340
• 3,858
• 3,998
• 4,479
• 4,653
• 5,191
• 5,366
• 5,650
• 5,961
• 6,215

183 2,014 5,318 9,038

• 700

2,911 4,248 4,253 4,476 4,977 2,743 3,852 4,205 4,199 4,090 3,641

• 8,000
• 6,000
• 4,000
• 2,000

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000

1960-65 1965-70 1970-75 1975-80 1980-85 1985-90 1990-95 1995-00 2000-05 2005-10 2010-15 2015-20 2020-25 2025-30 2030-35 2035-40

Clallam County 1960-2040 Net Change

Migration Deaths Births

2

4.7% 4.8% 5.4% 5.6% 5.0% 5.0% 4.8% 4.7% 5.0% 6.3% 7.7% 8.5% 8.4% 7.4% 5.5% 4.2% 3.4% 3.5% 4.4% 4.6% 4.8% 5.4% 4.5% 4.8% 5.2% 5.2% 5.1% 5.0% 5.6% 6.2% 7.9% 6.9% 6.0% 5.2% 4.4% 8.7%

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+ Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM)

Clallam County age distribution 2010-2050

2050 2010

1,120 1,066 1,041 1,212 1,318 1,245 1,164 1,016 1,044 1,243 1,421 1,437 1,292 941 709 596 523 650 1,910 1,885 1,692 2,131 2,153 2,168 2,272 2,058 1,947 1,783 1,898 1,916 2,226 1,600 1,392 1,331 1,231 2,942

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500

0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+ WA OFM 2017, Port Angeles Population 2010 Factored by Location Quotient and Forecast Control

Port Angeles age-specific projections 2010-2050

Port Angeles 2050 Port Angeles 2010

1

2

5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10% 9% 12% 8% 9% 15% 8% 4% 5% 6% 3% 5% 8% 13% 8% 15% 11% 6% 12% 4% 3% 7% 5% 5% 7% 6% 14% 10% 12% 7% 7% 11% 6% 3% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 0- 4 5- 9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-59 60-64 65-74 75-84 85+

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Age distribution in Clallam County, Port Angeles, East Port Angeles 2016

Port Angeles East Port Angeles Clallam County

3

2.64 2.57 2.59 2.28 2.26 2.64 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 2.60 2.70 US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles Persons per household Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Average household size

66% 64% 63% 60% 53% 65% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles Percent of households

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent households in families

37.7 37.6 37.2 50.3 40.6 46.7 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Years

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Median age

14% 14% 12% 27% 20% 19% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent of population

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent 65+

4

20% 16% 15% 16% 22% 9% 11% 9% 8% 9% 15% 1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Female headed households

Female only headed household Female only headed household with related children

81% 77% 76% 82% 82% 88% 30% 28% 24% 44% 37% 46% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Non-family households living alone

Living alone Living alone over 65 85% 82% 82% 86% 80% 89% 76% 78% 80% 82% 84% 86% 88% 90% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent of population

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Resided in same house 1 year ago

5

58% 59% 62% 45% 48% 54% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent in labor force

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent civilian employed in labor force

19% 19% 18% 17% 14% 19% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent of employed

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent employed in base industries

81% 81% 82% 83% 86% 81% 78% 79% 80% 81% 82% 83% 84% 85% 86% 87% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent employed

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent employed in services

6

14% 16% 14% 23% 23% 18% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Port Angeles East Pt Angeles

Percent of all workers

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Workers - government

80% 78% 80% 69% 70% 74% 62% 64% 66% 68% 70% 72% 74% 76% 78% 80% 82% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Port Angeles East Pt Angeles

Percent of all workers

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Workers - private wage and salary

6% 6% 6% 8% 7% 8% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Port Angeles East Pt Angeles

Percent of all workers

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Workers - self-employed in own business

7

26.1 26.7 29.6 21.2 23.4 23.4 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Minutes

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Mean travel time to work in minutes

7% 8% 7% 11% 6% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% WA Puget Sound Clallam Port Angeles East Pt Angeles

Percent of households

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

No vehicles available to household

8

$67,871 $76,507 $90,479 $59,683 $56,645 $68,015

$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 $90,000 $100,000 US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Dollars

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Median family income

$29,829 $32,999 $38,095 $29,967 $24,147 $23,976

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Dollars

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Median per capita income

15.1% 12.7% 10.8% 15.7% 22.3% 10.9% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Port Angeles East Pt Angeles

Percent of population

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent of population in poverty

11.0% 8.4% 7.1% 10.0% 15.6% 7.4% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Port Angeles East Pt Angeles

Percent of families

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Total families in poverty

9

$184,700 $269,300 $342,891 $220,200 $188,300 $166,500

$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Dollars

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Median house value

$949 $1,056 $1,210 $854 804 735 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Dollars

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Median rent

62% 63% 60% 72% 70% 73% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent of housing units

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent in detached single family units

9% 10% 14% 4% 8% 0% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent of housing units

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent in multifamily of 20+ units

10

64% 62% 60% 70% 54% 77% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent of housing

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent owner occupied

36% 38% 40% 30% 46% 23% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent of housing

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Percent renter occupied housing units

23% 24% 24% 28% 26% 29% 42% 40% 39% 44% 45% 36% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

US WA Puget Sound Clallam Pt Angeles E Pt Angeles

Percent paying over 35% of income

Owners Renters

11

21% 19% 21% 5% 4% 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Port Angeles East Pt Angeles

Percent of population

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Language other than English

17% 12% 9% 6% 5% 7% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% US WA Puget Sound Clallam Port Angeles East Pt Angeles

Percent of population

Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Hispanic or Latino of any race

1

$757 $783 $838 $897 $930 $913 $952 $989 $1,052 $1,139 $1,236 $1,353 $1,412 $798 $831 $889 $960 $996 $964 $1,007 $1,050 $1,120 $1,213 $1,315 $1,437 $1,549 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 Washington Center Real Estate Research (WCRER)

Average apartment rents 2005-2013

Washington State Puget Sound

4.2% 4.3% 4.6% 5.2% 5.6% 5.9% 5.2% 4.3% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.5% 2.5% 3.2% 3.1% 3.3% 3.6% 4.3% 4.2% 4.3% 5.1% 5.4% 5.5% 4.9% 3.8% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.6% 3.1% 3.0% 3.2% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.4% 4.9% 4.9% 3.8% 3.2% 2.4% 2.7% 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.6% 2.2% 1.7% 2.8% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% Washington Center Real Estate Research (WCRER)

Percent of existing stock sold per year

Washington State Puget Sound Clallam County

2.8% 1.6% 1.7% 1.9% 2.0% 1.9% 1.7% 1.0% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 1.2% 1.5% 3.0% 1.6% 1.6% 1.8% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8% 1.1% 0.5% 0.7% 0.7% 1.2% 1.3% 1.4% 1.3% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 1.8% 2.5% 1.3% 2.1% 0.8% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% Washington Center Real Estate Research (WCRER)

Percent of housing stock added each year

Washington State Puget Sound Clallam County

$176,300 $179,900 $188,500 $203,800 $225,000 $260,900 $293,800 $309,600 $284,400 $244,000 $245,700 $223,900 $236,600 $256,300 $266,900 $292,900 $323,000 $352,200 $209,273 $219,344 $233,189 $246,888 $273,527 $318,427 $360,645 $388,682 $362,072 $312,705 $311,229 $266,449 $350,726 $340,614 $361,789 $393,302 $456,856 $492,838 $126,000 $131,400 $140,000 $164,300 $200,000 $231,500 $242,000 $222,600 $206,500 $206,400 $179,800 $191,500 $201,000 $196,700 $215,000 $242,500 $265,700 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Washington Center Real Estate Research (WCRER)

Median home prices

Washington State Puget Sound Clallam County

2

68.3 74.0 74.7 78.4 67.9 55.8 50.9 53.5 63.0 79.6 83.6 94.1 100.3 83.5 83.8 68.7 75.1 68.3 52.0 57.3 62.0 71.4 75.8 88.9 86.7 104.3 122.5 134.0 135.6 128.1

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Washington Center Real Estate Research (WCRER)

Housing Affordability Index - First Time Buyer

Washington State Clallam County

114.8 135.1 144.2 134.4 116.9 106.6 87.0 90.5 107.5 135.7 149.4 174.8 172.6 149.4 148.9 120.7 131.0 118.2 89.9 93.3 106.7 123.3 138.2 168.9 170.6 151.9 161.4 152.2 139.4 120.4

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0

Washington Center Real Estate Research (WCRER)

Housing Affordability Index

Washington State Clallam County

1

426 482 536 414 467 421 393 472 389 347 400 394 386 382 352 360 501 107 151 127 111 132 141 124 154 134 121 157 151 137 143 135 124 139 $100000 $200000 $300000 $400000 $500000 $600000 $700000 $800000 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

PERMIT FEE REVENUE NUMBER OF PERMITS YEAR BUILDING PERMITS FOR REPAIRS/ALTERATIONS & NEW HOUSING vs. PERMIT FEE REVENUE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL PUBLIC DEMOLITION / MOVE NEW DEVELOPMENT BUILDING PERMIT FEE REVENUE

CHART DEVELOPED 1/14/2015

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

NUMBER OF PERMITS YEAR SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY

$48,527,021 $47,246,387 $40,190,831 $17,311,981 $42,236,495 $12,249,351 $14,955,495 $15,823,969 $11,538,981 $15,599,816 $56,630,145

$- $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000 $70,000,000 $80,000,000 $90,000,000 $100,000,000

• 100

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

CONSTRUCTTION VALUE NUMBER OF PERMITS YEAR

CITY OF PORT ANGELES Number of Building Permits vs. Value of Construction 2005-2015

Building Permits Total Construction Value

1

$0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 $35.00 $40.00

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Average hourly wages 1990-2016

Washington State Clallam County

2

$41,334 $76,461 $64,834 $75,644 $49,046 $66,639 $43,958 $29,890 $34,174 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 $90,000 Washington State Employment Security Department

Average wage of critical occupations in 2017

$198,410 $367,024 $311,211 $363,103 $235,430 $319,877 $211,005 $143,475 $164,042 $188,300 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 Washington State Employment Security Department, American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Home purchasing capability by occupation in 2017

$1,033 $1,912 $1,621 $1,891 $1,226 $1,666 $1,099 $747 $854 $804 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 Washington State Employment Security Department, American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Monthly rental capability by occupation in 2017

3

$198,410 $48,002 $72,002 $96,003 $120,004 $144,005 $168,005 $192,006 $216,007 $240,008 $264,008 $288,009 $312,010 $336,011 $360,012 $384,012 $408,013 $432,014 $456,015 $480,015 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $41,334 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 $55,000 $60,000 $65,000 $70,000 $75,000 $80,000 $85,000 $90,000 $95,000 $100,000 Income level

Home purchasing capability in 2017

$1,033 $250 $375 $500 $625 $750 $875 $1,000 $1,125 $1,250 $1,375 $1,500 $1,625 $1,750 $1,875 $2,000 $2,125 $2,250 $2,375 $2,500 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $41,334 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 $55,000 $60,000 $65,000 $70,000 $75,000 $80,000 $85,000 $90,000 $95,000 $100,000 Income level

Monthly rental capability in 2017

1

$0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 $35.00 $40.00

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Average hourly wages 1990-2016

Washington State Clallam County

2

$41,334 $76,461 $64,834 $75,644 $49,046 $66,639 $43,958 $29,890 $34,174 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 $90,000 Washington State Employment Security Department

Average wage of critical occupations in 2017

$198,410 $367,024 $311,211 $363,103 $235,430 $319,877 $211,005 $143,475 $164,042 $188,300 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 Washington State Employment Security Department, American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Home purchasing capability by occupation in 2017

$1,033 $1,912 $1,621 $1,891 $1,226 $1,666 $1,099 $747 $854 $804 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 Washington State Employment Security Department, American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016

Monthly rental capability by occupation in 2017

3

$198,410 $48,002 $72,002 $96,003 $120,004 $144,005 $168,005 $192,006 $216,007 $240,008 $264,008 $288,009 $312,010 $336,011 $360,012 $384,012 $408,013 $432,014 $456,015 $480,015 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $41,334 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 $55,000 $60,000 $65,000 $70,000 $75,000 $80,000 $85,000 $90,000 $95,000 $100,000 Income level

Home purchasing capability in 2017

$1,033 $250 $375 $500 $625 $750 $875 $1,000 $1,125 $1,250 $1,375 $1,500 $1,625 $1,750 $1,875 $2,000 $2,125 $2,250 $2,375 $2,500 $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $41,334 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 $55,000 $60,000 $65,000 $70,000 $75,000 $80,000 $85,000 $90,000 $95,000 $100,000 Income level

Monthly rental capability in 2017

1

172 156 165 106 123 78 141 124 89 179 191 149 160 120 96 152 157 144 1 1 1 2 1 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Clallam County Homeless Household Composition

HH w/children HH w/o children HH w/only children 278 282 235 229 185 135 188 193 126 74 65 79 38 59 41 105 88 108

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Clallam County Point in Time (PIT) Homeless Count

Sheltered Unsheltered

11,390 10,465 10,993 10,468 11,583 12,346 13,796 6,331 5,927 10,817 9,617 9,101 7,142 7,062 6,893 6,944 14,460 16,170 412 264 242 145 194 179 104 321 319 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Washington State Homeless Household Composition

HH w/children HH w/o children HH w/only children

16,230 14,905 14,852 12,712 12,550 12,297 12,370 12,521 11,743 6,389 5,441 5,484 5,043 6,289 7,121 8,474 8,591 10,673 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Washington State Point in Time (PIT) Homeless Count

Sheltered households Unsheltered households

1

2.9% 3.0% 3.3% 3.8% 4.8% 5.6% 6.1% 6.1% 6.9% 7.3% 6.5% 7.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% 2.2% 2.6% 3.0% 3.4% 4.0% 4.4% 4.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.5% 0.8% 1.0% 1.3% 1.5% 1.7% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Source: US Bureau of the Census, Demographic trends in the 20th Century

Percent of the US population over age 65

Age 65-74 75-84 85+

53.3% 54.1% 54.4% 52.2% 56.4% 45.0% 38.1% 37.1% 35.6% 35.8% 33.8% 34.9% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Source: US Bureau of the Census, Demographic trends in the 20th Century

Percent of US households renter occupied

7.7% 9.3% 13.3% 17.6% 22.7% 24.6% 25.8% 26.7% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Source: US Bureau of the Census, Demographic trends in the 20th Century

Percent of US households 1-person household

78.1% 74.8% 69.4% 60.2% 55.1% 51.7% 48.4% 11.3% 10.1% 10.9% 13.1% 15.0% 16.4% 18.1% 9.5% 13.3% 17.6% 22.7% 24.6% 25.8% 26.7% 1.1% 1.7% 2.1% 4.1% 5.3% 6.1% 6.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Source: US Bureau of the Census, Demographic trends in the 20th Century

Percent of US households by type household

Married couples Other family types One-person household Other non-family

10.5% 12.4% 9.9% 4.7% 37.5%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Permits + fees waiver Smaller units + density Manufactured units Land trust Total Housing cost reduction analysis

50 Katrina Cottage - was designed to be an alternative to the FEMA trailer following Hurricane Katrina. It is a small permanent house that can be assembled quickly as a self-help project or with the assistance of a builder. The units are engineered to withstand hurricane force winds and can be constructed with wood or steel framing finished with fiber cement siding and a metal roof. The original Katrina Cottage I was a 308 square foot cottage designed by Marianne Cusato that debuted at the 2006 International Builders. The demand for the unit, however, surpassed the emergency housing market, and is currently being marketed by Lowe’s as an affordable stand-alone or grow-house for the elderly, as accessory dwelling units for in-laws and guest houses, and vacation homes. The first 4 floor plans in the Lowe’s Katrina Series were available in select Lowe’s stores in Mississippi and Louisiana in 2007 though Lowe’s discontinued selling the complete packages in

• 2011. Lowe’s currently sells the cottage blueprints and materials
• packages. The material packages cost approximately $55/square

foot including all materials necessary to build the cottage from the foundation plat up including studs, insulation, fixtures, electrical, plumbing, and appliances. The homeowner needs to supply the foundation, HVAC system, and furniture. Materials packages require a contractor to assemble.

52 § Micro-housing - is the umbrella term for a housing

• ption that is smaller than average. These homes

are the modern-day equivalents of rooming houses, boarding houses, dormitories, and single-room

• ccupancy (SRO) hotels, and they come in two main

flavors: Congregate housing - is like a dormitory. The rooms are “sleeping rooms,” rather than complete dwelling units, and renters enjoy private bathrooms and kitchenettes in their units, along with shared kitchens and other common amenities for the whole

• building. A typical project looks like an apartment
• building. “Apodments,” the brand that started the

micro-housing revolution in Seattle in 2009, are functionally the same thing as congregate housing, though technically they are classified as boarding

• houses. The size of the sleeping rooms in

congregate micro-housing is typically in the range

• f 140 to 200 square feet.

Small Efficiency Dwelling Unit (SEDU) - is a slightly undersized conventional studio apartment. It has a complete kitchen and bathroom and closet

• space. By code, SEDUs must have at least 220

square feet of total floor space, as compared to 300 square feet for the smallest typical conventional studio apartments. All types of micro-housing unlock more affordable and small but independent homes for people who want them. They are one more option to serve the broad spectrum of housing needs.

54 Modular construction - is the off-site construction of prefabricated, steel frame building modules in an integrated delivery method collaborating with designers, builders, and

• developers. The modular process provides higher quality

construction, increased cost efficiency, and faster delivery than traditional site-built, small scale construction resulting in development costs 15-20% less than conventional on-site stick built construction methods. One Build’s N’Habitat project is a mixed-use structure with ground level retail, 6-stories of affordable housing apartments, and a one level basement for bicycle/workshop and utility/storage spaces located in Seattle’s Belltown neighborhood. The project is composed of 49 residential units and 3,100 SF of ground-level retail with almost 2,000 square feet of outdoor rooftop amenity space for

• residents. The location has it within walking distance to

restaurants, pubs, cultural centers, and public transit hubs.

1 Implementation – 2019 Port Angeles Housing Action Plan

25 January 2019 - 656 completed surveys

Port Angeles Housing Action Plan for 2019

Housing trend statements – in order of agreement Priority Young adults - are increasingly unable to rent or buy an affordable living unit that is manageable with local entry-level job incomes. 4.29 Single-headed families, especially female - are unable to rent or buy and affordable living unit and pay for daycare, health costs, and other family expenses. 4.25 Service workers - in manufacturing, retail, health, and other services cannot afford rising housing costs and are not accepting jobs affecting Port Angeles's economic development. 3.88 Elderly adults, including single individuals - are increasingly unable to find affordable housing that fits their changing lifestyle needs and as a consequence continue to live in and keep older lower priced housing units out of the market. 3.84 Special populations including the mentally ill, victims of domestic abuse, and the temporary homeless – are unable to be economically housed to the extent current sponsors are unable to develop and

• perate necessary housing.

3.84 Public workers - teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other critical public service workers cannot pay rising housing costs and are not accepting local job

• ffers affecting Port Angeles's economic development.

3.75 In-migrant households - move to Port Angeles from higher priced housing markets and with more cash from higher market housing sales buy available houses at high prices driving up the price of houses that remain for local residents. 3.52 Investors - buy available houses to rent for short term, seasonal, or airbnb income keeping available and affordable housing off the market that remains for local residents on a permanent or interim basis. 3.44 Older or retired adults - move to Port Angeles to live full-time and buy available houses at higher prices driving up the price of houses that remain for local residents. 3.38 My available housing choice - as a result of the above as well as other market factors, is not what I really need or want. 3.20 High agreement = 3.61-5.00 Moderate agreement = 2.31-3.60 Low agreement = 1.0-2.30

2 Implementation – 2019 Port Angeles Housing Action Plan

Action tasks – in order of priority Priority Encourage innovative housing products – possibly including single room occupancy (SRO) units, small efficiency dwelling units (SEDU - micro-apartments), accessory dwelling units (ADU), cottage housing, cluster housing, live/work, and mixed-use structures in appropriate areas of the city all with universal design (US) features. 3.54 Adopt low impact, smart, and green development guidelines - for solar energy, passive heating, increased insulation, energy efficient appliances, stormwater treatment, pervious pavement, recycled materials, and other innovations that may increase initial construction costs but reduce long-term

• perating and utility costs.

3.54 Initiate a housing renovation loan program – where the eligible house is rehabilitated and the loan is deferred for payment until the house is sold. 3.51 Establish an affordable housing coalition – of public, nonprofit, and for-profit representatives to monitor housing conditions in Port Angeles and advise public officials on actions that can be taken

• ver time to resolve quality and affordability

concerns. 3.49 Allow innovative land ownership options - including land trusts where a nonprofit organization owns and leases the land at a low lease rate to a qualified affordable household who buys the house and agrees that when they eventually sell the house it will be at a reduced cost increase to allow purchase by another qualified affordable household. 3.41 Adopt cash-offset housing incentives – possibly including reduced building permit fees, utility connection charges, parks and traffic impact fees for housing projects that provide a minimum number of affordable housing units. 3.38 Increase housing density allowances – possibly including townhouse, condominiums, and mixed-use 3.30 structures up to 5-stories in appropriate areas of the city. Encourage innovative housing construction methods - possibly including pre-manufactured, modular, and container methods. 3.28 Exempt property taxes - for multifamily projects that include affordable housing components within designated areas of the city for up to 12 years in accordance with Washington State affordable housing policies and legislation. 3.06 Adopt non-cash housing incentives – possibly allowing additional height, reduced parking ratios, or increased site coverage for housing projects that provide a minimum number of affordable housing units. 2.94 Voter-approve a 7-year special property tax levy – to provide funds to finance the development of a mixed- use, mixed-income demonstration project for innovative affordable housing products and methods in the city. 2.69 High priority = 3.61-5.00 Moderate priority = 2.31-3.60 Low priority = 1.0-2.30