Point in Time 2005 - What We Did Using a snowball technique, SSRC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

point in time 2005 what we did
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Point in Time 2005 - What We Did Using a snowball technique, SSRC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

January 25 th Point in Time 2005 - What We Did Using a snowball technique, SSRC interviewers surveyed key informants throughout Orange County to collect detailed descriptions of outdoor locations where homeless persons could


slide-1
SLIDE 1

January 25th

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Point in Time 2005 - What We Did…

  • Using a “snowball” technique, SSRC

interviewers surveyed key informants throughout Orange County to collect detailed descriptions of

  • utdoor locations

where homeless persons could be found.

C
  • a
s t P a c i f i c C
  • a
s t I
  • 5
D a n a S e l v a L a C r e s t a P r i v a t e M a l a g a A l i p a z G
  • l
d e n L a n t e r n V i c t
  • r
i a D e l O b i s p
  • P
a r k L a n t e r n A l c a z a r P e q u i t
  • D
  • h
e n y P a r k D a n a P
  • i
n t H a r b
  • r
L a P a z D e l P r a d o D
  • m
i n g
  • L
a D i a n a S a n M a r i n
  • V
i a V e r d e M a z
  • M
a n z a n i t a M a r i a n a P u e r t
  • C
  • p
p e r L a n t e r n S e p u l v e d a C a l l e l a P r i m a v e r a I s l a n d L a P l a y a V i l l a g e S i l v e r L a n t e r n B e d f
  • r d
Vi s t a S a n t a F e C a m i n
  • C
a p i s t r a n
  • Z a r
z i t
  • O
l d b r i d g e F
  • r
m
  • s
a C
  • l
e g i
  • C r
y s t a l L a n t e r n V i a C a n
  • n
C a m b r i d g e C a p i s t r a n
  • b y
t h e S e a P e r c h S e a B l u f s T e r r a c e L a n t e r n L a s V e g a s L a s F l
  • r
e s O l d G o l d e n L a n t e r n V i a S e r r a V i a E l e v a d o B r i d g e h a m p t
  • n
C
  • r
d
  • v
a F i s h e r m a n s W i n d h a m S a n J u a n D a n a B l u f f H
  • l
t z H i l l Q u a i l
  • R
u n D a r t m o u t h L a n t e r n B a y V i a C a l i f
  • r
n i a P o r t L a n t e r n S h
  • r
e L a n t e r n C
  • v
e L a n t e r n C a s i t a s V i a S a n t a R
  • s
a V i a C o r
  • n
a V i e w P
  • i
n t B i g S u r E m b a r c a d e r
  • V
i a P l a y a S t a r R i d g e Z a r z i t
  • C
  • l
e g i
  • Each key informant

was then asked to identify other knowledgeable individuals in the County who could provide information about additional locations.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The data were compiled, culled for duplicates, and a final list of 289 unique

  • utdoor locations

throughout the county was produced.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

These locations were mapped and proximate locations grouped into “Clusters” for sampling purposes.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Survey teams used detailed neighborhood maps to reach locations, enumerate the homeless persons

  • bserved there, and

conduct the survey.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Three Important Changes in 2007

  • From a Census to a Sampling Technique
  • Broad Community Participation to Rate

Block Groups – All interested community members can participate through the internet.

  • Data Collection Goals

– Point in Time Volunteers will enumerate only

  • n the day of the count; in-depth surveys will

be conducted one week later.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

On the night of the 2005 Point in Time survey, teams across the county completed an Enumeration Form at each map location. A sample of individuals also completed in- depth surveys which provided valuable information about homelessness in Orange County, but required a significant investment of volunteer time. In 2007, in-depth interviews will be conducted after the Point in Time survey leaving volunteers free to search and count.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The New York Model

  • Sampling for the 2003 count of Manhattan

899 ‘surface study areas’ assigned a density of High (6 or more homeless individuals), Medium (2 to 6), or Low (1 or none); 54 areas were classified as High, 139 as Medium, and 706 as Low. Assignment based on information from outreach workers, the Parks Department, New York City Police, the Transportation Authority, Community Boards, and other “density experts” familiar with the location of unsheltered homeless individuals. A complete count of all high-density areas was attempted. A sample of medium-density areas was drawn to achieve 95% confidence that the weighted count was within 10% of the actual number in these areas. Fewer Low-density areas were sampled.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why Sample in Orange County?

  • The resources needed to scour the entire

798 square miles in our county are not available

  • A scientific sampling strategy is the only

HUD-approved basis for extrapolating to compute the total number of homeless

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Orange County is divided into 1,993 Census Block-Groups

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mainplace/Santa Ana St Jopseph Hospital Hart Park Santiago Park Chapman University Childrens Hospital of Orange C Killefer Park West Coast University k ge Park Plaza Square Park

Palm Maple Main Almond Tustin Walnut la Veta I ‐ 5 Garden Grove Lemon Shaffer Center C a m b r i d g e P i n e Batavia Chapman Fairhaven O l i v e P a r k e r G r a n d Cypress O r a n g e Eckhoff G l a s s e l l H a r w

  • d

Sycamore Mayfair Fairway P a l m y r a Culver Lincoln Memory Everett C r e s t W a v e r l y Oak D e v

  • n

Albion Citrus Lake Washington O r a n g e w

  • d

R

  • s

e B e d f

  • r

d River Feldner Jewell Park Pixley Willow P

  • p

l a r Tularosa V i r g i n i a Dana Kemper Robin Cleveland M a r d e l l S e d

  • n

a Angus Cherry Clark Beverly M a i n p l a c e Madison Lael Spruce Jonquil B u s h B i r c h T

  • w

n a n d C

  • u

n t r y Magnolia P

  • n

d e r

  • s

a Lime Van Bibber Century Elm Kelly A s h Fir Stewart Shattuck C a l i f

  • r

n i a P e p p e r Acacia Rosewood G r e e n v i e w Lyon Grovemont Water Orange Grove P r i m r

  • s

e G r e e n g r

  • v

e Seba Holly L i n w

  • d

Chalynn Marks E m e r a l d Alpine Knoll Lake C l e m e n s e n Hariton Jacaranda C a n f i e l d Braden M a p l e w

  • d

W a y f i e l d O l d G r a n d Columbia J a m e s

  • n

Atchison Dayna Arbor Alvarez F

  • l

e y Jefferson Monterey la Veta Park Cedar L a r c h m

  • n

t M c C

  • y

Orchard M

  • r

e l a n d P

  • i

n s e t t i a Stearns O a k m

  • n

t Little Main L a w s

  • n

Valencia Glenview F a s h i

  • n

P a r k P a u l Penn R

  • c

k C r e e k Y

  • r

k s h i r e Heritage E a s t w

  • d

Eastside Fairmont W

  • d

b u r y Nubian R u s s e l l Brynwood l a L i n d a J e s s e e University Providence Silktree Hickory Roswell S u n f l

  • w

e r V i c t

  • r

i a F r e n c h R i g h t e r C r e s c e n t Marietta C a r m e n Citrus Fairway P

  • p

l a r Rose Mayfair Lawson Washington California W a v e r l y C l a r k W a v e r l y Palmyra Culver S h a t t u c k O l i v e P i x l e y C l a r k Everett Orange Grove L i m e W a y f i e l d Pixley Fairway Arbor O a k Fairway Grand L i m e Chapman C u l v e r Palmyra G r a n d Van Bibber P i n e Shattuck P i n e L i n w

  • d

Orange A l p i n e P i n e Rose Palmyra Sycamore Sycamore Sycamore Memory Virginia Culver Lincoln Rose S h a t t u c k G l a s s e l l

Block-groups are typically comprised of 10 to 15 city blocks. Though suburban and rural block-groups may be much

  • larger. The highlighted block-group in this map includes the
  • ffices of the OC Partnership in the City of Orange.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

An internet based application, developed by the SSRC and CSU Fullerton Geography Department will allow interested community members to provide information about the homeless in each block-

  • group. This application will:
  • Provide information about

the Point in Time Survey

  • Collect limited information

about each user and the source of his/her knowledge of homelessness in Orange County

  • Provide more complete

information to researchers preparing the sample for the count on January 27th.