persistent occiput posterior op is manual rotation the
play

Persistent Occiput Posterior (OP): Is Manual Rotation the Answer? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

6/10/2016 Disclosures I have nothing to disclose Persistent Occiput Posterior (OP): Is Manual Rotation the Answer? Brian L. Shaffer, MD Maternal Fetal Medicine Doernbecher Fetal Therapy June 10, 2016 Clinical scenario you get a


  1. 6/10/2016 Disclosures • I have nothing to disclose Persistent Occiput Posterior (OP): Is Manual Rotation the Answer? Brian L. Shaffer, MD Maternal Fetal Medicine Doernbecher Fetal Therapy June 10, 2016 Clinical scenario – you get a page…. Objectives: Persistent OP: Manual Rotation? • Background 39 yo G1 at 40 3/7 weeks – Incidence & Etiology - Pushing for 3 ½ hours, fatigued – Associated Maternal & Neonatal morbidity - Category II tracing • Diagnosis of Persistent OP - Minimal-moderate variability, intermittent late • Management decelerations – Pre-labor & Stage I - EFW 3800g….. – Stage II • Prophylactic, After a pre-defined time period, “Late” • Manual Rotation: Technique • Clinical scenarios 1

  2. 6/10/2016 Clinical scenario – you get a page…. Background: Persistent OP • Fetal occiput in the posterior quadrants until delivery 39 yo G1 at 40 3/7 weeks – SVD or Indicated (AOD, etc.) - Pushing for 3 ½ hours, fatigued – Most common fetal malposition - Category II tracing - Minimal-moderate variability, intermittent late decelerations - EFW 3800g - …and “I think she is OP” Can you come and assess her? Background: Persistent OP Background: Etiology • Parity – nulliparous; Age >35; BMI >30; >41 weeks • Onset of Labor – 25% of fetuses in OP (~1/2 OT) • Anterior placenta; Fetal macrosomia (>4000g) – 80-90% rotate to OA prior to delivery • Labor augmentation • OP and Stage II • Prior OP birth – If OP at onset of stage 2 – rotation to OA? - 50-80% – If OA at onset of stage 2 - rotation to OP? ~5% • Shape of pelvis - occiput attracted to area of most room – At birth: 5-12% OP • Right OP (60%), Left (30%), Direct (10%) 2

  3. 6/10/2016 Background: Etiology Background: Etiology - Epidural • Parity – nulliparous; Age >35; BMI >30; >41 weeks • Epidural � More relaxed levator complex • Anterior placenta; Fetal macrosomia (>4000g) – Inhibits rotation of OP to OA – more persistent OP • Labor augmentation – Retrospective cohort studies* (OR: 2.2-3.25) • Prior OP birth – But Nulliparous women have more OP! – “Back labor” – no difference in rate of epidural @ • Shape of pelvis - occiput attracted to area of most room – Anthropoid • Randomized controlled trials^ • More common - African American – Epidural vs. No analgesia/other methods – RR 1.4 (0.98-1.99) • Epidural *Sizer AR Obstet Gynecol 2000; Cheng YW J Mat Fet Neo Med 2006. @ Lieberman E Obstet Gynecol 2005, ^Anim-Somuah M Cochrane 2011 Persistent OP – Maternal Outcomes/Morbidity Persistent OP – Maternal Outcomes/Morbidity Subocciptobregmatic: 9.5cm Occiptofrontal: 11.5cm Subocciptobregmatic: 9.5cm Occiptomental: 13.5cm Occiptofrontal: 11.5cm Occiptomental: 13.5cm Barth WH, Obstet Gynecol 2015 Barth WH, Obstet Gynecol 2015 3

  4. 6/10/2016 Persistent OP – Maternal Outcomes Persistent OP – Neonatal Outcomes* • Labor dystocia Outcome OR (95% CI) – Longer stage I, more likely – prolonged stage I Apgar <7 @ 5min 1.5 (1.2-1.9) • Augmentation – oxytocin, amniotomy CUA acidemia 2.0 (1.5-2.7) – Longer stage 2 – PEOPLE* – Add 45 minutes Meconium 1.3 (1.2-1.4) • Operative vaginal birth - ~2 fold increase Birth Trauma 1.8 (1.2-2.6) – Failed operative vaginal delivery NICU admission 1.6 (1.3-1.9) – 3 rd & 4 th degree lacerations Neonatal morbidity 1.4 (1.2-1.6) • VAVD and persistent OP: ~33% • FAVD and persistent OP: 50-70% Shoulder dystocia 0.5 (0.3-0.97) • Cesarean – strongest association in late stage II Brachial Plexus Injury 10.4 (3.0-35.9) � Bleeding, extension, injury *Cheng YW Obstet Gynecol 2006; Cheng YW Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006 *Senecal J Obstet Gynecol 2005 Diagnosis - OP Diagnosis - OP • Ultrasound • Digital examination – Axial view – orbits, post fossa, falx – May be challenging – caput, molding – Axial/Sagittal view – Location of fetal spine – Differ by >45°? -- 30-80%* – All vs. selective/uncertain examination *Barth WH Obstet Gynecol 2015 *Barth WH Obstet Gynecol 2015 4

  5. 6/10/2016 Diagnosis - OP Diagnosis - OP • Ultrasound • Ultrasound – Axial view – orbits, post fossa, falx – Axial view – orbits, post fossa, falx – Axial/Sagittal view – Location of fetal spine – Axial/Sagittal view – Location of fetal spine – All vs. selective/uncertain examination – All versus selective/uncertain examination *Barth WH Obstet Gynecol 2015 *Barth WH Obstet Gynecol 2015 Management – Persistent OP Management - Pre-labor/Antepartum period • Can we prevent Persistent OP? What to do…? • Can exercises facilitate anterior rotation of the occiput? Dictated by when you are aware of OP – Hands/Knees thought to promote rotation to OA^ • Pre-labor/Antepartum – Multicenter, randomized, n= >2500* – 36-37 weeks • Active Labor – Stage I – Daily Walk vs. Hands/Knees/Pelvic rocking 10 min 2/day • Stage II • Await spontaneous labor – Onset of stage II – “Prophylactic” – Persistent OP: ~8% in both groups – After some Pre-defined period of time ~ 1h – No difference in CD – Lack of Progress/Arrest • No evidence of benefit – No large RCTs to guide management ^Kariminia A BMJ 2004 5

  6. 6/10/2016 Management - Active labor, Stage I Management – Stage 2 • Most OP fetuses spontaneously rotate to OA OPTIONS: • RCTs* - Maternal repositioning did not: 1) Prophylactic manual rotation – Increase OA at time of delivery – Decrease operative vaginal delivery rates 2) Rotation after some defined period of time - 1h nullip • Late stage I – manual rotation 3) Rotation for Arrest of Descent – Less success^ 4) Expectant management – Increased risk for cord prolapse & cervical laceration • No intervention has proven successful *Stremler R. Birth 2005; Desbriere R. Am J Ob Gyn 2013; ^Le Ray C. Obstet Gynecol 2007 Management – Stage 2: Examination Persistent OP and fetal station • Station - May be difficult to assess • Leopold – Abdominal palpation of BPD – BPD above spines? – High station despite visible scalp • Leopold for BPD • Pelvis: Is the pelvis adequate – Arch, Spines, AP? – Treat Android, Anthropoid and Gynecoid differently – Do the fetus and pelvis match?, EFW? • Progress? – Onset of stage II – Manual rotation success indirectly related to time in OP *Barth WH Obstet Gynecol 2015 – Limit unnecessary procedures – Frequent assessments of descent 6

  7. 6/10/2016 Management – Stage 2: Examination Management – Stage 2: Examination • Station - May be difficult to assess • Other clinical factors – BPD above spines? – Urge to push • Leopold for BPD – Anesthesia • Pelvis: Is the pelvis adequate – Arch, Spines, AP? – Chorioamnionitis – Treat Android, Anthropoid and Gynecoid differently – Do the fetus and pelvis match?, EFW? • What is the timeline for this birth? • Progress? – Onset of stage II – Rotation success indirectly related to time in OP – Limit unnecessary procedures Management – Stage 2 Management – Expectant management OPTIONS: • Labor progressing, FHR category I 1) Prophylactic rotation (manual or forceps) – Occiput posterior at onset of stage II • 50-80% spontaneously rotate to OA 2) Rotation after some defined period of time - 1h nullip – Manual rotation is not risk free 3) Rotation for Arrest of Descent • Uncommon but important related morbidity 4) Expectant management • Cervical laceration (~2%), NRFHT (1%), discomfort – Frequent assessment of descent/progress – May continue to progress and undergo SVD • What is the pelvis type? 7

  8. 6/10/2016 Management - Onset of stage 2 Management – Prophylactic rotation OPTIONS: • RCT: Term, Nulliparous, Epidural, OP, n=64* – Onset of stage II: 1) Prophylactic rotation (manual) • Manual rotation vs. Expectant management 2) Rotation after some defined period of time - 1h nullip – Early manual rotation 3) Rotation for Arrest of Descent • Successful rotation: 83% vs. 20% (p=0.001) 4) Expectant management • Shorter stage II: 65 vs. 82 minutes (p=0.04) • No difference: – 3 rd /4 th degree lacerations, – Cesarean – Operative vaginal birth – No evidence of harm *Broberg Am J Ob Gyn 2016 S63. Management – Stage 2 Management – Stage 2 Rotation after some period of time OPTIONS: 1) Prophylactic rotation (manual or forceps) • Prospective, n=61 – 2 nd stage, sono confirmed persistent OP 2) Rotation after some defined period of time - 1h nullip – Randomized by time period 3) Rotation for Arrest of Descent/NRFHT – Expectant vs. Manual rotation 4) Expectant management – Nulliparas – at 60 minutes (90 min if epidural) – Multiparas – at 30 minutes (60 min if epidural) * Reichman Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2006 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend