Performance Review July 2018 Safety Overview As of July 31, 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Performance Review July 2018

2

Safety Overview

11 First Aid cases in July:

• Employee snagged thumb on a uni-

strut while working by farm causing a minor laceration

• While performing laundry duties,

employee felt pain in shoulder.

• Employee fell down and hit hand on

the fence causing abrasion.

• While transporting equipment by

handcart on uneven surfaces employee twisted knee causing strain.

• Employee lifted laundry bag causing

strain to lower back.

• Employee reported bite/sting on neck

causing irritation.

• Employee lifted boxes off of handcart

causing strain to abdomen.

• While walking employee felt an insect

bite on the neck causing irritation.

• Employee was adjusting chair and fell

to the floor causing pain to elbow, hip, knee and shoulder.

• Employee was wearing SCBA walking

down a hill on uneven terrain causing strain to knee.

• While walking employee felt an insect

bite on the neck causing irritation.

As of July 31, 2018 WRPS Tank Operations Contract has worked 7,630,194 hours (539 days) without a Lost Time Workday Injury and 197,133 hours (14 days) since the last Recordable case.

Total Recordable FY 2018 Cumulative Summary

October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018

Days Away, Restricted Workdays

• r Transferred (DART)

FY 2018 Cumulative Summary

October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018

0.09

12-month rolling rate: 0.11

DOE/EM Goal – 1.10

0.00

12-month rolling rate: 0.00

DOE/EM Goal – 0.60

One Recordable case in July:

• While loading equipment in the back
• f the van employee hit head on edge
• f hatchback causing laceration.

July 2018

Effective Corrective Action Tracking FY18 Status SV Improvement Focus

• Comprehensive schedule opportunity scope

list being monitored and tracked

• Overtime for High Priority Work

Non-labor effectiveness evaluations

• Critical Procurement Focus
• Implementation & Acceleration of FY19 Award

Resource availability

• Reprioritization of Critical Resources
• Posting of Critical Field Craft

Vapor REA for $20M

• Contract Mod Rec’d – PMB Target Aug-18

Management Topics

3

• Evolution and Transition of Waste Feed Delivery
• Capital disposition and alignment
• FY19 Plan Implemented this period
• PEMP renegotiation modification received this period

July 2018

Key Milestones

Complete To Go Will Miss Total MS % Complete % To Go

93 68 1 162 57.40% 42.60%

Current Month Change Control

4 July 2018

Performance Overview Current Month / Fiscal Year

5 July 2018 *OBS focus areas – detailed in subsequent slides

Performance Overview Cumulative / At Complete

6 July 2018 *OBS focus areas – detailed in subsequent slides

Management Forecast of Cost Performance

Schedule and Cost Performance Forecast

7 July 2018

CV declines by -$1,609k by FY End (from CTD)

2L Production Ops -$2,102k 2T Chief Technology Office -$1,345k 2M Tank Farm Projects $1,562k

Forecast July BCWP vs. Actual July BCWP Missed by -$5,982k

2M Tank Farm Projects -$2,841k 2L Production Ops -$1,125k 2T CTO/Closure -$899k

CM Schedule Accuracy

72%

Discrete work only

Management Forecast of Schedule Performance

Carryover Funds Support 20 Operational Days

$50-$60M $43,625k

July 2018

Opportunities for Schedule Recovery

8

Expected Recovery $6-$16 M Opportunity $18 M

1 - most likely to recover 5 - least likely to recover

WBS L5 Title 5.01.04.01.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements OP 2-3 2,249 1 5.01.02.06.08 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Operations & Maintenance - OP 2-3 946 1 5.01.02.06.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 804 1 5.01.04.01.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 787 1 5.01.01.15.29 - AY-102 Rinse & Transfer - Phase III 654 1 5.01.04.01.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades 594 1 5.03.02.06.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 581 1 Total 6,615 5.02.06.02.01 - A-Farm Infrastructure - Ventilation 1,247 2 Total 1,247 5.01.05.11.56 - Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades 2,839 3 5.02.08.04.04 - A/AX Infrastructure Installation 2,363 3 5.02.01.04.13 - Interim SX Barrier - South Construction 2,340 3 5.01.05.11.57 - Industrial Hygiene Trailer 799 3 Total 8,341 5.02.01.04.12 - Interim SX Barrier - North Construction 1,894 5 Total 1,894

Grand Total 18,097

Grand Total in $k 1-5 Ranking Top SV Recovery scopes in the remainder of FY18

Risk Program Health (July)

• Risk Management is averaging under 28 days for all 34+

register updates (time between register updates) (Figure 1)

• WRPS has maintained less than 21% total high risks

throughout FY18. Risk Management monitors the overall TOC risk profile to determine if risk mitigation strategies are effectively being developed for the highest level risks as a key component of improving the probability of mission success (figure 2) Current new registers being developed;

• TSCR (Tank Side Cesium Removal)
• Test Bed Initiative
• APO2A Jumper Repair
• Tank Farm Upgrades
• 2704 Fire Alarm Systems upgrades
• Maintenance Program Register

Current Risk Management program priorities;

• During the month of July, Risk Management assisted in

questions of DOE independent auditor team (CohnReznick) regarding the FY19 proposal.

• TBI register is being developed and going through a deep dive.
• Schedule Risk Analysis has started for Waste Feed Delivery
• Risk Management continues to hold smaller group training

classes for the EROMS database to assist and train risk

• wners, project managers, subject matter experts and project

controls members on the use and application of the system. Risks of Near Term Concern:

• P-B-1 might require replacement instead of repair (if repair

doesn’t work, possible 14 months to manufacture replacement)

• DST Transfers - Four DST transfers which were previously

scheduled in FY19 to support EC-11 and EC-12, will be rescheduled pending resolution of schedule dates for TBI and P-B-1 pump repair (or replacement).

• 222-S – Contract Transition Delays Upgrades
• 222-S – Lab Rad analysis resource availability

WRPS Risk Management

9 July 2018

Figure 2 Figure 1

Objective Measure

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

Performance Thresholds

45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 25 15 15 45 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Goal 29 28 36 29 32 37 28 29 28 29 28 28 Declining Meets Exceeds To demonstrate the health of the risk program, the average age of project and program level risk registers are monitored as a guage of overall risk program activity and effectiveness. This metric helps ensure that the Risk Registers for TOC managed projects and programs are up-to-date. The Enterprise Risk and Opportunity Management procedure, TFC-PRJ-PC-C-13, requires that Program and Project Risk and Opportunity Registers be updated at least every 90 days. The average age in days of risk register from last update to the current date (end of calendar month) >90 Adverse ≤45

Performance Data

• Avg. Age in Days of Risk Register

>45 and ≤60 >60 and ≤90 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Average Age in Days

• Avg. Age in Days of Risk Register

Objective Measure

0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

Performance Thresholds

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.45 0.1 0.05 0.3 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Goal 130 124 126 133 138 130 139 146 148 152 150 148 703 680 688 689 726 734 743 756 745 778 729 721 18% 18% 18% 19% 19% 18% 19% 19% 20% 20% 21% 21% Declining Meets Exceeds Percentage of High Risks (Month) Number of Open Risks To monitor the overall TOC risk profile to determine if risk mitigation strategies are effectively being developed for the highest level risks as a key component of improving the probability of mission success. The percentage of currently characterized High Risks

• Vs. the Total number of Risks as a percentage.

>45% Adverse ≤30%

Performance Data

Number of High Risks >30 and ≤35% >35 and ≤45% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percentage of High Risks Percentage of High Risks (Month)

Plant Status –PMs & CMs

10 July 2018

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Field Work Complete - CMs 40 43 32 46 39 60 48 39 31 31 Field Work Complete - PMs 589 628 473 554 653 645 566 511 426 516

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

FY18 Monthly Completed CMs & PMs

Indirect Pools

July 2018 11

(Over)/Under Summary: $6.9M Under July / $6.5M Under June

Fringe Rate (ABS & COS) ($1.7M) Over ABS (applied to Labor) $0.1M Under COS (applied to Labor) ($1.8M) Over COP Rate (applied to Labor) $2.3M Under G&A Rate (applied to Labor/Non-Labor) $6.3M Under

Total Net Debit to PMB $6.9M Under

FY18 (Over)/Under Forecast

(Over) = Credit to the Direct Field Work / Under = Cost Charge/Allocation to the Direct Field Work

Current Month Impacts:

• Reduction in labor base due to an increase in time taken off by employees.
• Reduction in base scope ~$12.1m offset by reduction in Indirect Pool.

Critical Needs List

12 July 2018

Waste Feed Delivery Summary

13 July 2018

Waste Feed Delivery Focus

Incorporating TSCR and Tank Farm Upgrade scope into the LAWPS Line Item project

• LAWPS Project scope will include
• Ramp down of the permanent cesium removal capability
• TSCR and associated infrastructure
• Waste feed transfer system to deliver feed to WTP
• Developing an integrated schedule to include 413.3B CD strategy
• Developing erratas to prior proposals, due in November align scope and finalize new baseline
• Revising the TSCR SDS to reflect incorporation into the LAWPS Line Item project

Accomplishments

 LAWPS SDS endorsement by ORP  TSCR SDS endorsement by ORP  TBI – Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) evaluation completed for ORP review

Challenges

• Resolution to Ecology’s position to regulate TSCR and LAWPS ventilation under RCRA
• Ecology’s willingness to grant temporary authorization to enable early start

• $393
• $7,815
• $118
• $1,736

0.94 0.95 1.02 0.99 1.11 0.80

July 2018

LA LAWPS Performance Revie iew

(WBS 5. 5.5)

Schedule Cost

14 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$1,618 P - LAWPS-S - Design Project Support

• $915

P - LAWPS-S South - Design

• $556

P - LAWPS-S - Technology Maturation

• $96

Cost Variance FYTD: $646 CTD: -$7,422 P - LAWPS - Design

• $992
• $6,728

P - LAWPS - Design Project Support $362

• $2,337

P - LAWPS-S South - Design $1,183 $1,183

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

Biggest Threats/Risks Keys to Success

WDOE Desire to include HVAC System in RCRA Permit. Continue to support ORP in discussions/negotiations. Spent IX Column interim storage package requirements. Continue evaluation of requirements and alternatives. Permitting strategy for interim storage pad. Continue evaluation of requirements and alternatives.

• Completed 5th and final 45% Over-the-shoulder design reviews
• Continued progress towards conducting Formal 45% Design Review September 5th

& 6th

• Received approval of SDS from ORP
• Commenced proposal errata / addendum preparation to align LAWPS scope with

ORP Letter of Direction

• BCR-18-157 for LAWPS Expense to Capital Transition to be implemented for

August 2018 reporting

Biggest Threats/Risks Keys to Success

GFE doesn’t meet functional requirements CEES to perform simulant testing utilizing Laboratory validated simulant APT/WRPS/DOE integrated QA process and oversight during fabrication and FAT WIR Authorization is delayed HQ to remove public comment period from WIR reviews – or early public comment based on calculated DF values RCRA permit modification delay Temporary Authorization for early work

Test Bed Initiative

15 July 2018

Key Points: Schedule Recovery:

• GFE will include the waste processing equipment, i.e. filtration and IX.
• DOE is the DA for the GFE with WRPS support to the DA (Kris Thomas)
• WRPS has taken the lead in coordinating and organizing the multi-

performer / multi-contract project team through external IPT meetings and War Room efforts

• WRPS has completed numerous tasks including the following:
• Developed Tank Selection Report and received
• Completed Functions and Requirements and revision to F&R
• Drafted 1st WIR evaluation
• Developed schedule and optimized schedule
• Progressing on drafting necessary permits
• 30% Design Review
• Initial PrHA
• Proposal submitted to ORP 7/31/2018
• Project critical path is typical through design, fabrication, installation,
• perations with permitting and NEPA actions on critical path as well.
• Aggressive but realistic schedule in place, which does not meet

12/31/2018 desired date.

• Working opportunities to gain schedule acceleration.

2,000 Gallon Test Bed Initiative Gatepost Milestone Chart

2,000 Gallon Test Bed Initiative Milestones Responsible Party Forecast Finish WIR Evaluation Updated Based on AW-102 Sample Analytical Results WRPS 8/30/2018 Final Design Complete APT 10/25/2018 Temporary Authorization Approved DOE 11/13/2018 WIR Evaluation Approved DOE 12/4/2018 WIR Determination Approved DOE 12/20/2019 Fabrication and Factory Acceptance Testing Complete APT 12/27/2018 Equipment Delivered to Evaporator APT 1/2/2019 Equipment Installation Complete WRPS 2/7/2019 NEPA Documentation Approved DOE 2/11/2019 Testing Complete WRPS 2/11/2019 Declaration of Readiness to Operate WRPS 2/19/2019 Start of Waste Processing WRPS 2/20/2019 End of Waste Processing WRPS 2/26/2019 Totes Shipped to PFNW WRPS 3/15/2019 Complete Treatment of Mixed Low Level Waste APT 3/28/2019 WCS Provides Waste Profile Approval APT 4/29/2019 Treated MLLW Arrives at WSC APT 5/6/2019 Waste Disposed at WSC APT 5/9/2019

Extracted from TBI Working Schedule (8/13/2018)

$1,370

July 2018

$14,389

• $3,781

CT CTO/Closure an and In Interim Meas asures Performance Revie iew

Schedule Cost

16 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$5,151 Direct Push Characterization & Sampling

• $1,577

Waste Mgt Area C Performance Assessments

• $692

RCRA Closure Plan Updates

• $615

Cost Variance FYTD: $2,057 CTD: $15,448 Technology Development $0 $3,177 Technology Maturation & Analysis $1,313 $2,837 IDF Glass Testing $259 $2,254

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today -$1,059

Key Points Schedule Recovery

• Complete WRPS and ORP legal reviews and incorporated comments; begin preparations to finalize

Technology & Innovation Roadmap; PBI 42.0.4 to be submitted in August upon finalizing roadmap.

• Issued TSCR technology maturation/testing plan ahead of schedule and submitted completion paperwork

for PBI 47.0.3.

• Completed Phase II testing associated with Mechanical Waste Gathering System alternate retrieval

technology and drafted, reviewed, and incorporated comments into the test report; PBI 42.0.9 to be submitted in August upon finalizing report.

• Complete review of the 100% design on the new sampling technique and incorporated comment on the

final design; PBI 42.0.5 to be submitted in August upon finalizing design.

• Design of the first of three panels for the TX Farm interim surface barrier is proceeding.
• Work is proceeding on Grout Testing and other WMA C closure activities.
• Developing responses to Ecology comments on the RCRA Tiers 2 and 3 Closure Plans.
• DOE O 435.1 WMA C WIR and PA public/NRC reviews are in progress.
• Regulatory Documentation schedule variance is due to Ecology comments that are

past due. Have started receiving and dispositioning the comments. Due to the significant number of comments, recovery is not expected this FY.

• ILAW Glass Testing is expected to recover a portion of lost schedule in the current

fiscal year, the remaining scope (Lysimeter studies) is expected to carryover to Q1

• f FY 2019.

Note: CTO related schedule is recovering as anticipated for the month and is expected to continue to recover most of the SV by the end of the FY18 Q4.

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Path forward for Ecology review and finalization of WMA C closure documents is

• needed. A mutually acceptable regulatory

approach must be developed among Ecology, DOE, and WRPS to move forward with incremental closure of WMA C. Working with DOE and Ecology to develop acceptable path forward.

0.95 1.12 1.08 0.84 1.07 0.98

$512

• $13,006

$9,730

• $7,958

0.90 0.96 0.77 0.97 0.93 0.95

July 2018

Tan ank Far arms Projects Performance Revie iew

Schedule Cost

17 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$17,688 Tank Chemistry & Integrity

• $4,158

Tank Farm Upgrade Projects

• $7,177

Vadose Zone/ Interim Measures – SX Barrier

• $4,251

Cost Variance FYTD: -$9,051 CTD: -$13,518 Tank Chemistry & Integrity

• $623

$4,003 Tank Farm Upgrade Projects

• $2,378
• $7,414

Vadose Zone/Interim Measures – SX Barrier

• $6,740
• $6,609

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

ISSUES

• Critical resources support to projects
• ARPA for execution of SX Barrier placement

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

• Completed AW-102 grab sampling to support Test Bed Initiative
• Received final shipment of removal equipment for AW-103 pump replacement
• Completed AZ-101 UT.
• Completed AZ-102 UT floor and vertical strip scans – Riser 89
• Completed In-Pit heater installation AN01A and AN06A
• Completed SS flow instruments electrical installations AY/AZ Farm
• Continued LERF Basin cover removal

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Construction and plant forces resource availability Weekly critical resource allocation reviews and prioritization. Impact of change in mission to include Tank Side Cesium Removal and Test Bed Initiative Integration and prioritization for allocation of key resources.

CVAP Performance Revie iew

(WBS BS 5.1.5.2.11 & 5.1.5.11)

Schedule Cost

18 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$5,375 Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades

• $3,983

Industrial Hygiene Trailer

• $799

Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades

• $598

Cost Variance FYTD: -$319 CTD: $70 New Vapor Detection Technologies

• $756
• $1,912

Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades

• $630
• $1,578

Strobic Air Upgrade $1,068 $1,118

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

• PA System Field Work – U complex completed & kicked off B

complex

• Completed first Strobic Air equipment mockup test
• Received short-lead calibration gases for AP stack monitor
• 10-wide IH Trailer site prep completed
• Released AX-farm Stack Monitor Final Design
• Completed 222-S 4S Renovation

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Critical Resource Availability (Plant & Construction Forces) Integration & prioritization for allocation of key resources Consistent vendor support for vapor monitoring procurements Timely delivery of stack monitors & calibration gases AW Stack Permitting Ecology Approval for Authorization Results of QRA may change boundaries Vapor Monitoring & Detection System equipment turnover to

• perations

July 2018

$1,051

$1,121

$3,089

• $2,286

0.99 1.11 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.19

CVAP Da Dashboard

19

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Schedule impacts due to several factors have resulted in retrieval legal milestones being in jeopardy: CD D-16B-2 (Complete 9 tanks by 31 March 2024) and TPA M-045-15 (Complete A-103 by 30 Sept. 2022)

• DOE notified the State of Washington that CD-D-16B-2 is in jeopardy due to

vapor impacts

• Funding priority placed on A/AX construction
• Retaining core operations team proficiency for AX retrieval readiness
• Implementation of APR use in AX farm will significantly improve

efficiency/schedule performance Washington Department of Ecology’s recent interpretation on tank ventilation air permitting requirements cannot be met with the current generation of tank exhauster systems

• Request to revise the AX Farm air permit needed to support retrieval was

submitted to ECY February 23, 2016

• ECY’s position is closely associated with the tank vapor litigation
• Work closely with WRPS and DOE legal to negotiate solution

Costs of A/AX retrieval system construction have increased due to several factors

• Implementation of APR use in AX farm will significantly improve efficiency/cost

performance

• Redesign of waste retrieval systems to simplify construction and reduce costs
• Complete a cost growth drivers analysis

There is a shortage of key field labor (NCOs, HPTs, IHTs, construction crafts) due to attrition, site-wide bump-and-roll, regional competition for skilled labor

• Coordination with CHPRC to pick up labor from any future RIF
• Early forecasting of construction labor needs to support contractor recruiting

efforts

• Expedited worker training for field deployment

Deployment of new retrieval technologies to improve efficiency and strengthen DOE support for retrieval

• Coordination with CTO
• Tech transfer from SRR (crawlers, sampling systems, mixer pumps)
• Tech transfer from heavy construction/mining industry (dome coring,

mechanical waste gathering)

$529

• $31,088

$3,599

• $2,153

0.97 1.02 0.99 0.99 0.90 1.06

July 2018

SST Retrie ievals ls Performance Review

Schedule Cost

20 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$5,752 C-Farm Retrievals $225 A/AX Retrievals

• $5,323

AY-102 Retrievals

• $654

Cost Variance FYTD: -$903 CTD: -$31,617 C-Farm Retrievals $6,103

• $5,052

A/AX Retrievals

• $8,405
• $33,900

AY-102 Retrievals $1,375 $7,311

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

• Completed AX-101 & AX-103 equipment removal pit cleanout – AX03A
• Completed riser investigations for A-103 & A-104
• Completed install of water/chemical piping – all sections complete
• Completed isolation & layup of POR107 exhauster and POR357 raw

water skid

• Completed 1st half of shielding install along HIHTL route between POR

497 & POR412

• Completed removal and disposition of 12 interim stabilization

HIHTLs

• Completed disconnects HIHTL/cap HIHTL ends for C-105 to

POR104

• $2,102

$6,230

$1,841

• $1,660

0.81 1.01 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.42

July 2018

Production Operations Performance Review

Schedule Cost

21 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$3,501 ETF/LERF/TEDF Operations & Maintenance - OP 2-3

• $2,022

222-S HVAC - Vent Supply & Exhaust Fan Rplmnt

• $429

UX-302A Catch Tank Pumping FY18

• $259

Cost Variance FYTD: -$6,797 CTD: $8,332 Production Operations Support Services $0

• $11,807

Production Operations Farms AN/AP/B/BX/BY/C

$0 $6,852 Production Operations Central Shift Office $0

• $6,206

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

• PB-1 Pump Failure – Realized Risk “242AE-0034-R” impacted achieving the full

WVR of 130,000 required to meet PBI 37.0.1.2 “242-A Evaporator Campaign WVR 130,000”.

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Aging Equipment: ETF Systems, 242-A Systems, Transfer Pumps Adequate Spares, PMs, and Planned Upgrades PM/CM Backlog Reduction Adequate resource availability Adequate PMs, Spare Parts Inventory Critical Resource Review FY19/20 Planning Integration & prioritization for allocation of key resources Assess Skill Mix to FY19/FY20 Scope HAMTC MOA - Downgrade Respiratory Equip Requirement Field implementation of cartridges following 3rd Party Review PFP D&D boundary controls impact TOC execution Close coordination with CHPRC/DOE on response actions at PFP to minimize impacts 222-S and ETF Readiness to support DFLAW FY19/FY20 Proposal

• July Significant Accomplishments:

 Completed the second Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) Campaign of FY18 reducing the LERF inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons in support of PBI-37.0.3.2.  Completed the disposition of the remaining 6 RCE items for a total of 10 in support

• f PBI-40.0.3.

 Completed installation of the Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer in support of PBI-38.0.2.3.