SES Performance targets and achievements Xavier FRON Head - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
ses performance targets and achievements
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SES Performance targets and achievements Xavier FRON Head - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 26, 2023 385 likes •546 views

SES Performance targets and achievements Xavier FRON Head Performance Review Unit 12 February 2013 Topics SES Performance Scheme Targets for RP1 (2012-14) Performance achieved in 2012 Looking ahead SES Performance targets and

slide-1
SLIDE 1

SES Performance targets and achievements

Xavier FRON

Head Performance Review Unit 12 February 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SES Performance targets and achievements 2

Topics

  • SES Performance Scheme
  • Targets for RP1 (2012-14)
  • Performance achieved in 2012
  • Looking ahead
slide-3
SLIDE 3

SES Performance targets and achievements 3

Regulation (EU) N°691/2010 (being updated) Performance targets

  • set for Reference periods
  • RP1: 2012-2014, RP2: 2015-2019, etc
  • n specified Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
  • For safety, environment, capacity & cost-efficiency
  • EU-wide targets adopted by EC
  • Binding National/FAB Performance Plans adopted by States
  • Including targets and incentives
  • Process to ensure consistency between EU and local targets

Ensuring targets are met

  • Monitoring of performance
  • Corrective actions at national/FAB and EC initiative

Independent Performance Review Body (PRB) assists the EC

SES Performance Scheme

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SES Performance targets and achievements 4

SES Performance scheme schedule

1st Reference period (RP1) Targets set European targets RP1 (EC/PRB)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

RP2

National/FAB performance plans RP1 (States) Consistency with European targets (EC/PRB) European targets RP2

(EC/PRB) Nat./FAB performance plans RP2 (States) Consistency with European targets (EC/PRB)

1st Reference period (RP1) Targets set European targets RP1 (EC/PRB)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

RP2

National/FAB performance plans RP1 (States) Consistency with European targets (EC/PRB) European targets RP2

(EC/PRB) Nat./FAB performance plans RP2 (States) Consistency with European targets (EC/PRB)

Monitoring

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SES Performance targets and achievements 5

Performance monitoring

  • Safety reporting through EASA
  • Data compiled from several sources
  • Network manager, States, ANSPs, airlines and airports (CODA), etc
  • On-line SES Performance dashboard
  • European view
  • Performance plan views (FAB/national)
  • Airport views
  • Annual reports
  • From States
  • From PRB
  • All available on PRB web site at www.eurocontrol.int
slide-6
SLIDE 6

SES Performance targets and achievements 6

Traffic

Currently, high economic and air traffic volatility

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SES Performance targets and achievements 7

Environmental target for RP1

  • KPI: Horizontal route extension (Flight plan vs. great circle in %)
  • SES environmental target: -0.75% in 5 years
  • Environmental benefits
  • 1.2 million tons CO2 saved over RP1 vs. 2009 baseline
  • Carbon-neutral growth of aviation as far as ANS is concerned
  • Economic benefits
  • € 500M saved over RP1 vs. 2009 baseline (Flight time and fuel burn)
  • Network Manager has accountability for reaching the EU target

Performance indices (100 in 2009)

80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SU index Emissions index

SU: Service units 3,0% 3,5% 4,0% 4,5% 5,0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  • 0.75%

points vs. 2009

Actual baseline Current enhancement plans (-0.6% points vs. 2009) EU-wide target

%

  • f horizontal en route extension
slide-8
SLIDE 8

SES Performance targets and achievements 8

Environment – Actual performance 2012 vs. target

  • Airspace design progressing broadly in line with target
  • Issues in airspace use (e.g. shortest available route not selected)

being identified and addressed by Network manager

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SES Performance targets and achievements 9

  • KPI: En-route ATFM delay per flight (lack of capacity)
  • Targets more challenging than ever achieved
  • Indicative target for 2012 met (in context of lower traffic)

Capacity – Actual performance 2012 vs. target

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SES Performance targets and achievements 10

Cost-Efficiency target for RP1

Performance indices (100 in 2009) 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SU index DUR index Cost index

  • EU target for RP1
  • 53.92 €/SU in 2014 (15% below 2009 baseline)
  • Caps costs at nearly constant level for planned traffic
  • Performance plans slightly above EU target
  • €2.4 B savings over RP1 vs. 2009 baseline
  • Charging regime caps the revenue
  • No more cost recovery!
slide-11
SLIDE 11

SES Performance targets and achievements 11

Risk sharing mechanism

  • Cost risk borne by the State
  • Target sets a revenue cap
  • Incentive to reduce costs
  • Margin retained by State/ANSP
  • Traffic risk shared 30/70

beyond dead band (± 2%), within alert threshold (± 10%)

  • Maximum exposure: ± 4.4%
  • Not necessarily a loss
  • Lower traffic than planned in 2012
  • RP1 starts with a stress test!

Revenue vs traffic

  • 6%
  • 4%
  • 2%

0% 2% 4% 6%

  • 10%
  • 8%
  • 6%
  • 4%
  • 2%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Traffic vs plan Revenue vs plan

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SES Performance targets and achievements 12

Savings over RP1 (vs. 2009 baseline)

  • Environment
  • 1.2 million tons of CO2
  • 400.000 tons of fuel
  • € 500 M in flight time & fuel savings
  • Capacity
  • € 600 M in delay cost
  • Cost-efficiency
  • €2.4B in route charges

Total savings over RP1 ~ 3.5 billion euro

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SES Performance targets and achievements 13

Looking ahead

  • Revision of Performance regulation
  • Safety targets
  • Extension to gate-to-gate (Local targets)
  • Adoption of revised regulation in progress
  • Target setting for RP2 (2015-19) has started
  • PRB proposals due by Sept. 2013
  • High ambitions from EC
  • RP2 coincides with start of SESAR deployment
  • Very challenging work
  • Impact on some €70 B
slide-14
SLIDE 14

SES Performance targets and achievements 14

Interdependencies and trade-offs

  • Safety standards prescribed by EASA
  • Military requirements
  • Total economic cost borne by airspace users: some € 14B p.a.
  • Trade-offs, e.g. delay vs. charges, delay vs. flight efficiency

6.8 6.9 6.7 6.9 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 3.9 3.5 3.7 3.7 1.9 1.2 2.2 1.5 10.1 9.8 9.5 9.4

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

2008 2009 2010 2011 (P) Billion [€2010] En-route & airport ATFM delays (Capacity) ANS-related inefficiencies gate-to-gate (Environment) Terminal ANS provision costs* En-route ANS provision costs

Source: PRC analysis

Estimated ANS-related economic costs to airspace users (gate-to-gate)

ANS-provision costs ANS quality of service related costs

Flight inefficiencies (taxi-out, en-route, terminal) ATFM delays Terminal charges

IFR flights (M) * Note that terminal ANS provision costs only refer to 21 States

En-route charges Community perspective Airspace User perspective Air Navigation Service provider Perspective User charges Service Quality (time, fuel) ANS Cost - efficiency

ECONOMY ENVIRONMENT

ANS-related

  • perational

performance

Capacity SAFETY Safety

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SES Performance targets and achievements 15

Conclusions

  • Performance is the SES success criterion
  • Major change under SES II
  • Enforceable performance targets, incentives
  • Significant performance improvements in first step (RP1)
  • Much remains to be done towards outstanding

performance