Achieving the SRF targets? Frank Rijsberman, Consortium CEO - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

achieving the srf targets
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Achieving the SRF targets? Frank Rijsberman, Consortium CEO - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Achieving the SRF targets? Frank Rijsberman, Consortium CEO Intermedia iary ry 2022 targets ali lign with ith th this is se second call. ll. CRPs claim contribution to 2022 targets in pre -proposals ls. 100 million more farm


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Achieving the SRF targets?

Frank Rijsberman, Consortium CEO

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Intermedia iary ry 2022 targets ali lign with ith th this is se second call. ll. CRP’s claim contribution to 2022 targets in pre-proposals ls.

REDUCED POVERTY

100 million more farm households have adopted improved varieties, breeds or trees, and / or improved management practices 30 million people, of which 50% are women, assisted to exit poverty

IMPROVED FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY FOR HEALTH

Improve the rate of yield increase for major food staples from current <1% to 1.2-1.5% per year 30 million more people, of which 50% are women, meeting minimum dietary energy requirements 150 million more people, of which 50% are women, without deficiencies in one or more of the following essential micronutrients: iron, zinc, iodine, vitamin A, folate and vitamin B12 10% reduction in women of reproductive age who are consuming less than the adequate number of food groups

IMPROVED NATURAL RESOURCES SYSTEMS AND ECOSYSTEMS SERVICES

5% increase in water and nutrient (inorganic, biological) use efficiency in agro-ecosystems, including through recycling and reuse Reduce agriculturally-related greenhouse gas emissions by 0.2 Gt CO2-e yr-1 (5%) compared with business-as-usual scenario in 2022 55 million hectares (ha) degraded land area restored 2.5 million ha of forest saved from deforestation

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Investment results are analyzed against the SRF’s: (a (a) ) Resu sult lts Framework rk; and (b (b) ) CGIA IAR Targets.

Investments: Pre-proposals 12 excl. Genebanks

  • Flagships (69)
  • Outcomes (320)

TWO ANALYTICAL LENSES

Qualitative outcomes through the Results Framework (RF)

Heatmaps analyses

Quantitative outcomes through CGIAR Targets

Contribution to targets analyses 1 2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Heatmap of f in investments against ID IDOs

SLO IDO

Poverty

Markets Income Resilience to CC

Productivity Productivity Food & Nutrition

Improved diets Improved food safety Improved health

NRM & ES

Ecosystem Services Agro-ES Management Natural Capital

DCLAS Fish FAL Lstock Maize Rice RTB Wheat CCAFS A4NH PIM WLE

Agrifood Systems Global Integrating

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2022 CGIAR Targets` Reduced Poverty Improved Food & Nutrition Security for Health Improved Natural Resource Systems & Ecosystem Services VALUE MONEY VALUE MONEY VALUE MONEY 100M HH adopt varieties / practice s 30M people exit poverty % weight in this SLO

($ M)

Yield inc. From <1% to 1.2% to 1.5%/yr 30M people w/ min diet energy 150M people w/o micronut rdefcienc y 10% less women w insufficie nt food groups % weight in this SLO

($ M)

5% inc. in water &nutrient use efficiency Reduce Ag GHG by 0.2 Gt CO2/yr 55M ha restored 2.5M ha

  • f forest

saved % weight in this SLO

($ M)

LivStck 5 2.5 47%(426) 3.0% 15 39%(348) 10% 14%(127) Dryld 20 40 60% (515) 1.5% 3 110 30% (265) 27 10% (89) RTB 8 20 50% (336) x 5M 40% (317) 2.5 10% (85) Maize1 15 6 1.5% 10 3M 3M Ha 0.7 Rice 22 17 50% (473) 1.5% 30 40% (333) 5% 5% 10% (116) AgroFrst 100 25 35% (257) x 25 50 20% (170) 0.2 – 0.6 30 3 -9.6 45% (319) Wheat 17.5 5.7 56% (301) 1.5% 10 3M 40% (212) 5M Ha 0.2 4% (22) Fish 5 2.5 40% (158) 5 1M 40% (172) 15% 20% (89) A4N 35 10% (66) 100 10% 90% (532) PIM 29.9 8.9 60% (271) 35% (154) 22.7 5% (25) Ccafs 12.5 3.75 50% (129) 25% (75) 0.2 (8%) 2 25% (68) WLE 8.5-17.5 14% (68) 13%(63) 5-20% 14% 18 73% (355)

Co Conclu lusio ion: : if if clai laims are reali lized, , CR CRPs as s proposed could ld achie ieve all ll but t tw two targets (t (two need clar larif ific icatio ion)

AGRI-FOOD GLBL INTEGRATING

Feasible if achieved Needs clarification

Color legend Green = good coherence between the overall and PIM claims Orange= some coherence between the overall and PIM claims Purple = poor coherence between the overall and PIM claims Black = Outcomes were not directly expressed in terms of CGIAR targets

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Port rtfoli lio le level l V4M Co Conclu lusio ions and Recommendatio ion

1.

  • 1. Tar

argets provide a a pri riority se settin ing ap approach:

  • a. Set targets linked to SDGs
  • b. Allocate funding to CRPs & platforms to achieve the targets

2.

  • 2. V4M

4M an analysis is sh shows th that pre-proposal outcome claims would deliver CGIAR Targets for 2022 assuming they are delivered, and more clarity is obtained for two of them 3.

  • 3. Fu

Full ll Proposals ls need to

  • be use

sed to

  • str

trengthen cr credib ibil ilit ity an and consistency of

  • f bot
  • th outcomes, budgets, baselines, indicators

Recommendation: clearly separate qualitative and quantitative

  • utcomes from each other and from monitoring milestones